the fate of stalingrad hung in the balance, the founders of the operation were considered to be stalin zhukovilevsky, the level of secrecy was so high that it was forbidden at the meeting. while staying in place to broadcast on the air in plain text, the whole thing is in order to to lead opponents under the delusion that this part does not move anywhere, the counteroffensive involved three soviet fronts, the stalingrad donskoy and the southwestern last were supposed to deliver the main blow from two serafimovichi bridgeheads and stanitsa kletsskaya is located in a lowland, relatively speaking, at the bottom of such a bowl surrounded by steppe hills, freeing it and having occupied the adjacent heights, the red army receives the most important springboard for a decisive counteroffensive; the defense of the invaders collapsed under the heroic onslaught of the red army in the long-awaited offensive from the kalmyk steppes began and the 28th army, which covered the astrakhan direction, submachine gunner yevgeny rogov remembered this day well . on the second, 330,000 people were surrounded by a ka

the fate of stalingrad hung in the balance, the founders of the operation are considered to be stalin zhukovnd vasilevsky. was so high that it was forbidden for them to meet. even to write down plans only to remember. so in every aspect of the radio station, the divisions that went to stalingrad had to stay in place for some time to broadcast on the air in clear text, the whole thing in order to lead opponents astray that this part did not move anywhere, the counteroffensive involved three soviet fronts, the stalingrad donskoy and the southwestern, the latter was supposed to deliver the main blow from two bridgeheads and a cage. stanitsa kletska located in a lowland, relatively speaking, at the bottom of such a bowl, surrounded by steppe hills, having liberated it and occupied the adjacent heights, the red army receives the most important springboard for a decisive counteroffensive; the defense of the invaders collapsed under the heroic onslaught of the red army, and the 28th army, covering the astrakhan the direction of the submachine gunner yevgeny rogov well, he remembered that day it was

strike under stalingrad posted stalin's correspondence with zhukov stalin's and zhukov's correspondence of the counter -offensive at stalingrad stalin, also known as vasiliev , writes, whose zhukov is usually called konstantinov's day of resettlement in secret correspondence. that is, you can designate a counteroffensive at your own discretion. other rare exhibits can be seen at the exhibition, for example, a handwritten document of his ground appeal to the people on june 22, 1941, the project was written by the hand of the people's commissar. however, references that allow historians to assume that the speech was originally written for stalin's right the enemy will be defeated, victory will be ours in this exhibition. the most important thing is the approach to organizing the presentation of the material. i would see two things here. the first is a very clearly defined chronology. well, the second. this is a lot of sources for obtaining archival documentation of information. they are brought together, perhaps for the first time at the exhibition, more than 400 documents. including decl

is posted stalin's and zhukov's correspondence on the eve of the counter-offensive at stalingradn as vasiliev, writes to zhukov whom in secret correspondence it is customary to call konstantinov the day of resettlement, that is, the counter-offensive. you can assign as you wish. at the exhibition, you can see other rare exhibits, for example, a handwritten document of his appeal to the people on june 22. 1941 draft written by the hand of the people's commissar however, references that allow historians to assume that the speech was originally written for stalin by the right the enemy will be defeated, victory will be ours in this exhibition. the most important thing is the approach to organizing the presentation of the material. i would see two things here. the first is a very clearly defined chronology. well, the second. this is a lot of sources for obtaining archival documentation of information. they are brought together, perhaps for the first time at the exhibition, more than 400 documents. including declassified from the report from the fronts of the intercepted ciphers of th

the fate of stalingrad hung in the balance the founders of the operation are considered to be stalin zhukovsky, the level of secrecy was so high that it was forbidden at the meeting. account in order to lead the opponents under the delusion that this part does not move anywhere, these villages and farms keep the memory. fierce battles and heavy bremen occupation by november forty-second almost everything about the coast. don was captured by the enemy. here the nazis and their allies, romanians, italians, hungarians and croats, antonina, malakhov , were in charge, and then there were 14 guys, here they are. was supposed to strike the main blow from two bridgeheads, serafimovichsky and kletsky, the village of kletskaya is located in a lowland, relatively speaking, at the bottom of such a bowl, surrounded by steppe hills, freeing it and having occupied the adjacent heights, the red army receives the most important springboard for a decisive counteroffensive; the defense of the invaders collapsed under the heroic onslaught of the red armies; there were also amazing cases, for example, the fearl

preparation for a counteroffensive, among the exhibited underlings are the correspondence of stalin by the zhukovsach other under pseudonyms for the purpose of secrecy, dmitry was one of the first to familiarize himself with the exposition . the most difficult and tragic period of the great patriotic war from the invasion of the wehrmacht to the counteroffensive near stalingrad on november 19 forty second unprecedented unity of the country. e, showed not for the first time, by the way, speaking in our history the ability of our people in a critical situation to unite and defend their country, the documents presented at this exhibition are clearly evidenced by 400 documents from all the leading state archives of the country. here, in fact, stalin's handwritten note to timoshenko khrushchev and bagromen, the troops are slipping near kharkov, the generalissimo demands to improve the quality of army management. you asking. give me a weapon. so you are asking for help with reinforcements, but you can't organize properly. uh, it means the combat activity of the entrusted front, if you do not learn. the

zhukov. he has two of them, like marshal alexander vasilevsky and joseph stalin in the ussr, there were 17 holders of the order, he was also awarded to the commanders of the allied forces, including general and senhower feldmar, mangomeri and marshal brostal, they also awarded the romanian king mechanizing the first for breaking fascists and trans. on the side of the anti-hitler coalition, after the death of the owner, the order of victory was supposed to be handed over to the state, but the orders that ended up abroad on five orders did not return to their homeland are stored in the central museum of the armed forces november 8, 1960 john f. kennedy was elected 35th president of the united states such a president in america was neither before nor after the youngest only 43 years old soldier during the war commanded a torpedo boat had awards. and the favorite is also good-looking, his wife considered women to be a trendsetter. kennedy wanted to breathe new life into the american dream. and all in general, the good of freedom and democracy raised the minimum wage supported the struggle of african a

so stalin didn’t believe, you know, some didn’t have faith in the red army when zhukov voronov and vasilevskya plan of operation. uranus stalin says, and you will definitely be able to carry it out, because there were several attempts before this encirclement of the germans and far from everything, to put it mildly , it turned out they pulled out there, then launched a counterattack. well, it's near kharkov a classic example, but they got together and really it was a mobilization, really. the same, stalingrad was supplied, having no bridges across the volga , only through having the necessary crossings, the crossings were under constant fire, and there are many of these examples when we talk about examples. by the time of the patriotic war, the question arises here, we simply retell them, as examples from a plutarch, and great heroes, or is it still a role model when we constantly refer to. eh, there, as soon as we mention stalin. that was the mechanism. this is how it was recipe. we say this simply for some beautiful quote or in order to put it into practice now. but after all, this is our c

the supreme headquarters were summoned by zhukov and vasilevsky stalin turned to us.new on the fronts? alexander mikhailovich reported the latest news received from the caucasian front. tsia to oil summed up stalin this conversation took place in september, it was decided to collect reserves. moreover, the secret is the main goal to block the sixth army through the streets. that the main blow should be delivered on the flanks. go contour, offensive was. in fact, a strike to a great depth is quite simple, by independently mechanized formations of tank corps by mechanized corps, and each of which had about two hundred mechanized tanks buildings. uh, there were a lot of motorized infantry. that is, she traveled by car. and this made it possible to quickly pass long distances, and which were favored by open ones. steppes. near stalingrad, respectively, strikes were made against two romanian armies. this is the third romanian army to the north of stalingrad, a bridgehead on the don a in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bkletskaya serafimovich and the fourth romanian army. this is

clenched fists, they were forced to listen to professionals so that they would not repeat stalin's mistake with the zhukovching, i would say so, because when we turned off the offensive on the southern flank, it was not necessary to stop naked. steppes among irrigation and military spoke. what are you doing there? in any irrigation steppe it was not necessary to play such the concrete gave out that you were actually anti-tank and you set up defenses there, but it was a political border. again, as we are incomprehensible. why, what kind of gesture, goodwill did the troops take from kiev? why did they deceive us later? all the same voluntarily, they deceived in istanbul they first signed or there they agreed to sign. we, with good will, once again deceived us. no we were deceived everywhere and grain deals and everywhere. i hope from this there is. she will call for grain terms. well they're sly now they're now now they're trying with us to bargain. yes, they released our fertilizer, the americans removed the father partially. well , partly there, a number of sans are being filmed, that is, they swam and re

political leadership interfered in management. military process was in 1941, when stalin despite strong recommendations. zhukov refused him a military decision to withdraw troops from kiev and not to defend kiev, another commander was appointed to the post. it led to the encirclement, in which there were up to 800,000 soviet soldiers. nearly 600,000 were captured. equipment was lost. and a colossal blow was dealt to the defense capability of our country. then there was a political decision, not a military one. mikhail ivanovich kutuzov made a political decision when he left moscow, then denunciations began to rush. they demanded to present his head on a silver tray to the emperor, who did not understand why this was being done? but kutuzov is a student of the suvorov school and it would seem not, the concept of retreat is only to go forward and the science of winning. then he said that it is important not to win the battle, but to take the company's fortress easily; it is difficult to win the company. we did not expect that nato would fight with us on such a scale and that the military would make a decision, w

so stalin didn’t believe, you know, some didn’t have faith in the red army, when zhukov voronov and the speaking, it turned out they broke out there, then delivered a counterattack. well, near kharkov is such a classic example, but they got together and really it was mobilization, really. the same, stalingrad was supplied, having no bridges across the volga , only through having the necessary crossings, the crossings were under constant fire, and there are many of these examples. so, when we talk about examples of the great patriotic war, the question arises here, we simply retell them, as examples from a plutarch, but are great heroes or is it a role model when we constantly we refer. eh, there, as soon as we mention stalin. that was the mechanism. here was the recipe. we say this simply for some beautiful quote or in order to put it into practice now. but after all, this is our country, our ancestors used those mechanisms, those methods, those methods of warfare, which led to victory in victory in conditions incomparably more difficult than now in conditions. yes, we had allies. but a

uh, so to speak, that stalin at one time ordered not to leave. from kiev although zhukov left.. in fact, of course, as always they exaggerate, but several hundred thousand was a big defeat for our army, but i think it was stalin's mistake at that time. was, that is, if there was an army that fought in stalingrad a year later and where there was absolutely no military decision to stay on the right bank, it was not military expedient, it was possible to go to the left bank of the volga it was a firebox where they threw and threw , well held on, because the red army was completely different. if in the forty-first year stalin apparently counted on this that the red army would hold out there to the last, then i think that it would be a serious defeat for the wehrmacht before moscow, because a huge group would say this, it would have fettered a huge , but the red army was not yet in that state, therefore, in this sense, zhukov's decision was more correct than the steel decision . i believe that in this sense, this decision is more correct. because yes. and of course political they ha

zhukov was awarded. he has two of them, like marshal alexander vasilevsky and joseph stalin in the ussr, there were 17 cavaliers of the order, he was also awarded to the commanders of the allied forces, including the general from eisenhower, feldshem mongomery and marshal threw, they also awarded the romanian king mecha the first for being torn by the nazis and went over to the side of the anti-hitler coalition. after the death of the owner of the order. victories were supposed to be given to the state, but orders that ended up abroad did not return to their homeland five orders are stored. correct museum of the armed forces november 8 , 1960 john f. kennedy was elected the thirty-fifth president of the united states america had no such president before or after the youngest only 43 years old soldier during the war commanded a torpedo boat had awards. and also a good-looking favorite, the women of his wife. considered a trendsetter, kennedy wanted to breathe new life into the american dream. that all, in general, the good of freedom and democracy raised the minimum wage supported the struggle of african america