still haveted, you to go way beyond the standards in order to -- >> beyond the standards, one of thebiggest threats to the security infrastructure is the human element, the insider threat. the errors of commission or omission. employee training is one of the most important things. you can have the best standards, the best technology, the best procedures, but if your people are not trained, your customers are not trained -- the financial industry sees its customers as part of the broader ecosystem. not only are we trying to protect them but we are trying to educate our customers on how they can protect themselves. that is really a key part of it. yes, there are insiders were malicious but a lot of cyber attacks can be prevented if only your employees have as a matter of habit the knowledge that you do not click on that e- mail that you do not recognize, that you do not open the attachment you do not recognize. if it looks suspicious pass it on to your security team. some of the most elemental ways of preventing cyber attacks. it is one of the biggest hurdles we have to get over. >> th

standards. five years ago we set up a system with our self-regulating system we have called mark which would respond to the blackouts. they are standards with our regulators commission and they have been update to five times now so we have standards. i think we all agreed that the standards are the minimum. they don't do the job. what you need to do is to go beyond that on information sharing. you need the information that the government has. the information has an army of intelligence people out there that need to partner with and we also have information sharing group that is being expanded right now with ceos and cios and others to work with the department of homeland security and the department of energy to make sure that we get real-time information, actionable intelligence that we need and we have the best technology in the system and prevention technologies and also detection technology. detection technology is the key so the industry can inform the government and vice verse on that infor

there is a low standard. there are exemptions for state and local governments, for the c.i.a., for the scc, so the law has very little content to it. so i want to ask questions of give different people. for jason, if congress was seriously considering changing the third-party doctrine, what other kinds of exemptions do you think the law enforcement community would ask for? to greg, i would ask, how can you argue to overturn the third-party doctrine when third parties are able to take information they have about individuals and sell it out the back door to anyone who wants it? >> third-party doctrine is a constitutional doctrine, and i think it is here for now. part of congress' rule is to fill the gaps that the third-party doctrine has created . and we see ecpa as one of those gap killers -- fillers. it needs to be strengthened and it needs to be updated. as for the ability of companies to disclose your information without your permission, that is not part ft third-party doctrine. the third-party doctrine is

standard oil and other monopolies like u.s.el, general electric, at&t, and international harvester, became price makers. but their methods left some bruises. georgetown university law professor thomas l. krattenmaker. the standard oil trust was formed in 1882, and that led to widespread public concern. and it was that public reaction to the trusts that led to the passage of the sherman act in 1890. the sherman act made it illegal for any one firm to obtain a monopoly. that is, to get complete control over the production of all the goods in one market. and secondly, the sherman act made it illegal for firms to get together and agree on the way in which they would compete. for example, by setting prices or dividing markets or determining which customers they would deal with. the sherman act was one of only several choices that could have been made in 1890. congress could have chosen to nationalize the trusts. it could have chosen to set up a large government department to oversee the behavior of the trusts or even to run the trus

so we have standards, but i think we all degree the standards are kind of a -- agree the standards are kind of a minimum. they don't do the job. what you need to do nd n iormati in y ne the informa t government has. the information has an army of intelligence and people out there that we immediate to partner with. and -- we need to partner with. and we also have an information sharing group that is being expanded right now with ceos and cios and others to work with the department of homeland security and department of energy to make sure that we get realtime information that greg emphasized, actionable intelligence that we need, that we have the best technologies on the system with respect to prevention technologies and also detection technologies. detection technologies are key so that the industry can inform the government and vice versa, and that information sharing scenario so that we can actually move forward to address threats that may come from terrorist groups or from national groups overseas that may want to harm us. we probably aren't worried as much about a denial of service

the significant breach of standards and opinion is not only consistent with those standards and cause impact on the environmental structure and second floor over the garage, not only destroys the design relationship and cleanse the forms including the garage but also the houses primary access from lights to the south. i know this is not the forum to challenge the categorical exemption. we are not asking to you do that here where your only -- has a conflict. what am i asking to you do because we have to do another form to over turn this to get another eir which is needed. it only gets involved in the other side when i think something isn't done appropriately. i would ask to you either prove the compromise being suggested or find someway to delay this so people can work so there won't be a drawn out fight and there can be a compromise that they are trying to achieve and which may eliminate the ability to have anything on the second floor. >> thank you. excuse me commissioners. if i may interrupt for just a moment. those of you who are gathering around the entrance, it's causing a fire h

how can a parent compare state by state unless their is a standardized test, standard as director of?dy have a lot of ways for parents to compare. states produce criteria references, let the parents know how well their child has mastered the curriculum. we have all this affirmation. a lack of transparency is another issue that does not merit nationalizing the content that is taught in every local school across the country. >> what's wrong. commodore. centralization on a grand scale. utterly failing to improve outcomes. no reason to believe it will improve outcomes. it was actually a surprise to a lot of people, ourselves included. john: let's go to what they signed onto. the suggested reading list and @ common core standards you find it epa manuals. executive order 1343, strengthening federal environmentaenergy transportation management. you know, this is exciting reading in school. the head of each agency shall improve energy efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions. it sounds like marching. >> you know what the good news, some have opted to do a different reading list. they have

instructing the bureau that's responsible for the standard to change the standard. so we can have increased fire safety without the chemicals. the new standard, if everything goes well, should take effect in october. and that means people will be able to buy furniture that has increase fire safety without flame retardants. >> so renee sharp of the environmental working group nice to have you on the panel. you live in california. do you expect this change in the standards to go through, and how will that affect americans generally? >> we're certainly hoping it goes through. we have our work cut out for us honestly. the chemical industry has spent a total of $23.2 million lobbying against the change. so that's been the quite a force to overcome. but, if we do see this change, what we expect to see is we expect to see the levels of fire retardants in our body drop. it has tested, expressed milk, tested umbilical chord flood so babies with born born with these chemicals already in their body before they have been in the world and exposed. we have also found that childre

standard. i think it was previously, i'm sure this wasn't the intent but to clarify for the sake of the public of an implication that geography is not a factor in threat assessment. i don't think that's consistent with the current and best thinking in terms of rva's and risk

the standard, in my experience, is a rigorously applied standard. back when the standard was raised in 1994, the privacy community embraced that change from basically a subpoena standard for reasonable suspicion as protected of privacy providing a high degree of protection. .. >> actually, i'm going to turn first on this to lisa and david, although i'll give you all a chance to talk about this. so for those of you who are not fessly in the weeds on -- necessarily in the weeds on these doctrines, the supreme court came up with a case in the context of banking. but the basic notion, and i'm summarizing here, but the basic notion is if you as an individual turn over your private data -- in that case, financial stuff to a bank -- then you're basically losing your fourth amendment privacy interests in that information. you've consented to give it to the bank, you've shared it, it's no longer your private, protected information. so the government then go and seek it from that third party without you having the same traditional fourth amendment safeguards

the standard of care is they have to be treated equally, fairly, or with respect. a lot of clients will come -- clearly a majority of them will come saying that they in some way may have felt disrespected or the staff is less than expected. another one, like not having the proper supplies, not having enough soap in the bathroom, enough toilet paper, enough towels, enough sheets for them, sufficient enough sheets for them to stay warm, stuff like that. >> thank you. >> so, moving on to recommendations. what is a very big recommendation i think we can get from this report is that the staffing capacity needs to be increased or at least filled in. currently there is one staff bernice here. there's spots for two. the other one has been vacant for i believe five months? for five months. so, in that -- the result of that is that we had an average response time of 29 days of responding to client's complaints which is almost three times the amount allotted. and, so, in order to meet the legislative time period and complete all investigations, the staffing capacity really ne

they can agree to unifm standards. >> we all agr they have the right to set their own standard. a group of governors. john: not being crammed down. >> not. there were enticed into adopting college and you're ady standards. >> one competitive grant program, but over 4 billion job to cut $4 billion. >> now we have waiversrom notes out left behind which are conditioned in large part upon adoption of komondor standards. >> is a difference. you can't get it if you don't apply. john: maybe they knew they would not get it. >> is not a requirement. john: let me push back to you. we support choice and charter schools. how can a parent compare state by state unless their is a standardized test, standard as director of? >> we already have a lot of ways for parents to compare. states produce criteria references, let the parents know how well their child has mast the curriculum. we have all this affirmation. a lack of transparency is another issuehat does not merit nationalizing the content th is taught in every local school across

how can a parent compare state by state unless their is a standardized test, standard as director of?dy have a lot of ways for parents to compare. states produce criteria references, let the parents know how well their child has mastered the curriculum. we have all this affirmation. a lack of transparency is another issue that does not merit nationalizing theontent that is taught in every local scho across the country. >> what's wrong. commodore. centralization on a grand scale. utterly failing to improve outcomes. no rson to believe it will improve outcomes. it was actually a surprise to a lot of people, ourselves included. john: let's go to what they signed onto. the suggested reading list and @ common core standards you find it epa manuals. executive order 1343, strengthening federal environmental energy transportation management. you know, this is exciting reading in school. the head of each agency shall improve energy efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions. it sounds like marching. >> you know what the good news, some have opted to do a different reading list. they have a fa

how can a parent compare state by state unless their is a standardized test, standard as director of?dy have a lot of ways for parents to compare. states produce criteria references, let the parents know how well their child has mastered the curriculum. we have all this affirmation. a lack of transparency is another issue that does not merit nationalizing the content that is taught in every local school across the country. >> what's wrong. commodore. centralization on a grand scale. utterly failing to improve outcomes. no reason to believe it will improve outcomes. it was actually a surprise to a lot of people, ourselves included. john: let's go to what they signed onto. the suggested reading list and @ common core standards you find it epa manuals. executive order 1343, strengthening federal environmental energy transportation management. you know, this is exciting reading in school. the head of each agency shall improve energy efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions. it sounds like marching. >> you know what the good news, some have opted to do a different reading list. they hav

i retrofitted it to a very high standard.an you retrofit brick buildings to a high standard, if you choose to, since i was going to occupy it. it would be embarrassing for an engineer to be in a building that is damaged. >> there is an issue of what standard. is it collapse prevention or immediate occupancy or immediate use. often i have found that the marginal cost difference is quite low to go to that next level. maybe a little more when you go up to the -- when you want to keep using immediate occupancy. but people need to understand that and make a conscious decision. do not leave the decisions to the engineer. these are not engineering decisions. they're your personal decisions as an owner. >> since i was the owner i made the decision to go up. >> very informed owner. we will walk up to the rialto building on the corner up here. keep walking. (♪ music playing ) >> we are here just a little further down mission street past annie alley toward new montgomery. it was badly damaged. this was also burned? >> it also experience

how can a parent compare state by state unless their is a standardized test, standard as director of?a lot of ways for parents to compare. states produce criteria references, let the parents know how well their child has mastered the curriculum. we have all this affirmation. a lack of transparency is another issue that does not merit nationalizing the content that is taught in every local school across the country. >> what's wrong. commodore. centralization on a grand scale. utterly failing to improve outcomes. no reason to believe it will improve outcomes. it was actually a surprise to a lot of people, ourselves included. john: let's go to what they signed onto. the suggested reading list and @ common core standards you find it epa manuals. executive order 1343, strengthening federal environmental energy transportation management. you know, this is exciting reading in school. the head of each agency shall improve energy efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions. it sounds like marching. >> you know what the good news, some have opted to do a different reading list. they have a fant

how can a parent compare state by state unless their is a standardized test, standard as director of?ave a lot of ways for parents to compare. states produce criteria references, let the parents know how well their child has mastered the curriculum. we have all this affirmation. a lack of transparency is another issue that does not merit nationalizing the content that is taught in every local school across the country. >> what's wrong. commodore. centralization on a grand scale. utterly failing to improve outcomes. no reason to believe it will improve outcomes. it was actually a surprise to a lot of people, ourselves included. john: let's go to what they signed onto. the suggested reading list and @ common core standards you find it epa manuals. executive order 1343, strengthening federal environmental energy transportation management. you know, this is exciting reading in school. the head of each agency shall improve energy efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions. it sounds like marching. >> you know what the good news, some have opted to do a different reading list. they have a

standard. i think it was previously, i'm sure this wasn't the intent but to clarify for the sake of the public of an implication that geography is not a factor in threat assessment. i don't think that's consistent with the current and best thinking in terms of rva's and risk assessment. i'm assuming it was a risk assessment. we don't want to build buildings that are going to create a disproportional impact or collapse. i'm sure it's now and at the end of the process. it's almost a suggestion that up to this point we have been moving on path of designing that is going to move to progressively collapse. i want to state that for the sake of the public. >> that is not the case. we have prevented a collapse methodology from day one. >> we are all harping on this a little bit. i think the director or chairperson kim has mentioned, we are looking at cost, additional cost which added to whatever the current cost were might be approaching something like 10 percent of the cost of the building. it's a sig

taking care of 10 patients is going to meet that standards.it's just not going to happen. it's humanly impossible to meet the standards that are going to be placed upon us, once this gets implemented and full -- so i give credit to the head of the hospital. she's been working really hard, sue, barbara garcÍa, even people like me, everybody, we're all in this to make sure that this works. because we want public health to remain strong like it is. we want to still provide the best service that we can, like we do. but, you know, all these little things, you can't -- you can't undercut us. so this is not the time to be cutting public health. this is the time when public health really needs to be built up. you know, i'm almost to the point now where i feel like there needs to be some sort of bond measure or something so that public health isn't constantly short every time. the bottom line it's not getting enough funding to perform at the level that's required of it. i mean that's the structural problem we have. is that it's not getting enough money

the standards apply for light and air everywhere else have been exceeded. in the long history leading to our current proposal there have been many revisions and changes that we have made reducing the size of the proposed project. the original project application include a 3rd party addition. it's not a historical resource. it was in fact an a historical resource. to limit modification became the basis for that evaluation from that point forward. despite our disagreement with the facts we accepted the department's findings and moved forward with the development of a new design that has met the secretary and interior standards. further reduction was accepted as we worked with staff to work with roughly for 12 months. in essence all the reduction of square footage is a reduction from an opposition historical report. we are a 2 story home in a neighborhood zone consistently throughout the neighborhood. the foot print of the 2 stories that remain is unreasonable. in sum tree modest addition proposed compromised with planning staff. there is nothing exceptionally

i want to ensure that you the standard for the performance is a standard by every structural engineered. we don't want it to be disproportionate. it's an industry best practical. we have a partnership as a security consulting and engineering firm with firms like thomas setey who is with blast design and the premiere of blast designs and they have worked with the pentagon and worked with the coals, and what we did was asked the executive director to allow to us bring in best of class people to say, you know, we have this explosive event threat that's been identified by urs, we have thomas seteyb one of the premier engineers in the world. let's look at possible damage. we like to compete with each other and bring different viewpoints to the subjects because that's our responsibility. >> bob, can i, just top to be helpful with time can you go over the budgetary recommendations. we can go through all the dooms day scenarios. but we are more interested in the fs fiscal lens of this. >> we've had a series of threats, from a budget perspective. there are relatively and were relatively minor st

so just as important as the standards we write is the way those standards are applied. now, the standard, the specific facts in my experience is a rigorously-applied standard. and back when that standard was raised to specific facts in 1994, the privacy community embraced that change. from, basically, a subpoena standard to reasonable suspicion as protected of privacy providing a high degree of protection. and provided that standard is faithfully executed by prosecutors and applied by judges, it's anything but a rubber stamp. so the question is not do you have a privacy interest in your his to haval or prospective location, the question is that something that is such that the fourth amendment protects it and the warrant requirement or some exception to the warrant requirement would apply, or is it something that is still significant but is less significant than the fourth amendment territory such that congress can protect it with a lower standard? >> okay. so now i'm going to bring us back to the third party doctrine, and actually i'm going to turn first to lisa and dav

also on the standards, we're very excited about open data standards and taking the data and the standards that san francisco produces and bringing that to our network of other large cities that we work with. so, thank you very much and we're very supportive. >> all right. thank you. next speaker, please. >>> hello, i'm peter hirschberg, co-founder of gray area foundation for arts and [speaker not understood]. we've had the privilege to lead incubation efforts and hack athon and building in this greater space. i want to say if you think about the history of american government, data has really moved forward the business of government and reform. 100 years ago the reform movement it was data about child labor data about health that enabled this company to move forward. so, data has always been part and parcel of progressive cities. today we live in this unique moment where we're pouring out more than ever before and most importantly there were these enormous communities that want to jump in and help. by building that ecosystem that's really part of building our leadership as a city, as an e

you shouldn't, according to older standards. coing tood's standards, you've got to be. you're not dealing with a press problem, i think. we've be blami the press r it a lot of things have been going on and changing our standards-- more media politics, watergate, which chand our notions of the standards of blic rectitude applied to people. women's movement, which changed attitudes towards what was cute when it came to fooling around. and the press starts reflecting those in its pursuit of people. if we want a change back, we have to start talking differently about public figures and wh we have a right to know. ms. ferraro, do i have to get out? your problem is that you had terrific advisers, and you didn't ask advice before you ran off to the cozy condos. had you come to your kitchen cabinet, they would have said, "behave yourself." if you want it enough, you'll have to play by the rules. you're fair game. be cool, at least until you get elected. scinating. fascinating. s. graham, have the rules changed? i think they have changed for the better. i would say that alan sim

we have to have one standard. we have to be fair. >> i also want it talk about ak speps when we talk about access and access to healthcare and medicine we have to talk about who is most vulnerable if we increase restrictions. in this context, it is not just young women 11 and 12. but not having access to over the county emergency contraception affects low income women, women of color of and i want to live in a world where everyone who needs healthcare, and it is safe for them, can get it. >> you don't need an abortion pill. >> it is not aabortion pill. >> i'm sorry. i threw that out there. >> you're trolling, karen. >> yeah. >> this is not like you are getting an -- >> this is a right wing talking -- >> it is not an abortion pill. >> all right. my point is still that this is not a need. this is something that he -- >> this is a need. here is the point i would say. i guess this goes back around to the original point about the politics of this. i understand why they are touchy. i do understand, if i were david axelr

angelus. >> in terms of standards, similar to pg&e we have established our own internal standards on how resilient our network is. it's two hour quality of service how to design our capacity and also in how we perform, we do these failure tests to make sure the network can withstand the additional traffic being transferred from one portion to another. we have an earthquake strategy binder which is available aupb lane for our employees that can be accessed. it's available in all of our switches. these are step by step directions what happens when this big one occurs. we also practice this on drills, we have very little drills within the company or within the region to make sure everybody is on the same page when this situation does occur. now, as far as our support with other agencies, you know, our first priority of course when this thing happens is to make sure our network is running. but we also have a number of hotline numbers available for the police department rtion for the local agencies to contact us if they need some adistance from us in case some of their own systems do go d

taking care of 10 patients is going to meet that standards.it's just not going to happen. it's humanly impossible to meet the standards that are going to be placed upon us, once this gets implemented and full -- so i give credit to the head of the hospital. she's been working really hard, sue, barbara garcÍa, even people like me, everybody, we're all in this to make sure that this works. because we want public health to remain strong like it is. we want to still provide the t

by news not doing badly standards. it was that we came to the standards that news was judged by in terms of profitability and and then got into a fear and panic cycle, which has meant overtime that the demographics of network news has become older and narrower. now there's a gap that either can or cannot be still depending on different management decisions to reach down demographically and out diversity wise. part of the issue was that a lot of different news entities were part of larger companies not just entertainment companies but the other holding companies that did not really know how the news was and did not know the profit margins. one person said to me that a 7% return is about right for healthy news company. that is not necessarily good enough for some of the larger entities. that creates a huge problem. let's go to the next question. we've got a whole bunch. give us your name please. >> [indiscernible] [inaudible] from baltimore. >> baltimore, hometown! 1 second period how about we get him the other microphon

why california's own safety standards may not be the best guidelines for parents. >> at the top of the newscast we were talking about fire danger. there is no rainfall in the forecast for the weekend but things are changing dramatically as high pressure builds back in. we'll keep the sunshine but wait until you see where the temperatures are heading. think 90s. the forecast next. >> and you can't say you have nothing to do on this friday night. big-time basketball about to unfold in oakland. we're live at oracle arena ahead of game 3. ,,,,,, struck a deal with the cityn pension reform >>> they don't like it but the san jose police officers union has struck a deal with the city on pension reform. the deal applies only to new hires at san jose pd. officers would retire at age 60 instead of 50. they would collect 65% of their salary instead of the current 95%. the union says the deal will make it harder to keep good cops. the city says it will be able to hire more officers. >>> people in one bay area city are being warned to keep their doors locked and their windows shut. thieves hit more

instead of having a set standard of care, even if it's an altered or austere standard of care, what we want to have is good decision framework. until you are in the situation you can't determine what you would actually be doing and what resources are still available. >> do we have other questions from our audience? one final question and this is for our civilians. you got to see all kinds of cool stuff yesterday down at moffat's field. i want to see if there's one or two that stuck out. >> i think the c130 definitely blew me away, the fact it can transport 92 people, patients, was incredible. the other 1 that stands out is the mobile decon patient, that it can decontaminate a patient that was not able to stand. >> the team from the hospital that i was with and the other hospitals really looked at what were their hands on capabilities and some of the things that stood out the most is a portable oxygen generator that sits in the corner of the shock trauma platoon unit and doesn't have to be hooked up to our large liquid oxygen tanks and all that piping that might get disrupted during a m