standard.tting british standards, it now has 80 offices in 30 countries and employs over 3,800 staff. joining me is howard kerr, global chief executive of the british standards institution. i'm not sure if we were quite accurate, does britain make up the most amount of your standards? only 596 most amount of your standards? only 5% of our standards are purely british, the international standards environment is made up of local, national and regional standards. you go around the world setting standards in different countries? we shape the standards with industry and with regulators and academics and with regulators and academics and consumer groups to make sure that best practices are available to use. we collaborate with other countries and bodies to elevate those standards, leading to an —— to a universal standard. that is the holy grail. national standards which address and national issues are still relevant, but increasingly wea k still relevant, but increasingly weak or international. one o

if we're gonna set the standard, it's gonna be my standard.e upped the quality of our ingredients, simplified the menu, and overhauled the space. [ laughter and applause ] we needed somebody to run the day-to-day operations, so joseph stepped up to be the general manager. but i wasn't just fixing up one restaurant in staten island, i saw standard burger as a national opportunity. and this place would be the model we'd use to sell franchisees on the concept. to the burger boys. -all: burger boys. lemonis: six months and about a half a million dollars later, we're just about ready. ♪ today we're at "time out" magazine's battle of the burger, and there's about 50 restaurants here competing for one prize -- best burger in new york city. joe t.: so let's rock this out. let's show everybody who we are. [ cheering ] [ whistling ] lemonis: the business plan is to launch standard burger into other markets through a franchise model. and so, when you can get recognition as the best burger in new york, that bodes very well for getting potential franchisee

is on this list of people list of banks standard chartered was non standard chartered was not a guy bag for a big fine well standard chartered the distinction between standard charter and one hand and h.s.b.c. on the other is that in the department of justice wow you best a geisha is going on and while the prosecutors are planning to go after each s.b.c. members of british financial services people are inside the internal d.o.j. meetings what are they doing inside internal d.o.j. meetings those meetings should be closed to foreigners sorry and in fact they were closed in the in the standard chartered case and the only reason that one would be that the british people were allowed in the h.s.b.c. meetings on the one hand but not as just another charter means on the other hand is it standard chartered bank wasn't a g syfy it's not part of the f.s.b. cartel at least it wasn't in late two thousand the right of there was it at the time they got tagged h.s.b.c. was and as you point out they are it's a protection racket essentially run by the financial stability board and the bank of internatio

standards on the united states. president obama, the president of the united states at the time is the one who set the standards. but moving that aside for one second. i want to be clear, you're not willing to ak nobcknowledge tha calling climate change is a hoax. >> president trump believes that the climate is changing and pollutants is part of the equation. that is the fact. that's where it stands. he knows that it's changing. he knows the u.s. has to be responsible with it. that's we're going to do. because we got out of a club doesn't mean we don't care about the environment. >> let's talk about another club that we're in. nato. one of the biggest concerns in europe now is the president trump visited nato headquarters but not publicly reiterating the u.s. commitment to article v. vladimir putin suggested this weekend that these squabbles of nato are helpful to russia. i understand that the president wants every country to pay the fair share. why was the president not willing to underscore the united states' comm

ist the truck administration proposing -- from administration is there be no standard, the minimum standard for -- voluntary, half of apprenticeships do not register with the government but if you register, you are supposed to do 2000 hours of on-the-job training and another 150 hours in classroom training. all paid for pretty much by the employer. a lot less than they do in europe. in europe, two years, five days a week and employer-based training and you get another year of formal schooling. if you take away the standard, and internship can become an apprenticeship. we have them in our offices, young people who do great work but are not really getting trained eight hours a day, five days a week. host: one of the ideas from the obama administration was this idea of lessening the regulatory burden when it comes to these programs, is that what you're talking about? guest: the regulatory burden is minimal to begin with, in america apprenticeship is voluntary and half of them, 500,000 are registered and 500,000, maybe a little more, are not registered as unions and employers see no reason to r

but not by later standards of permissive parenting. there are also a lot of things he advised that american women did not follow. he counseled on demand breast-feeding. that has made a big comeback, though. when i was a child, breast-feeding was out of fashion and formula and bottles were the way babies were raised. assumed boys are boys and girls are girls. he did counsel raising children according to traditional gender roles. by today's standard, spock was something of a reactionary when it came to his assumption there are girls and boys. what really made spock a controversial figure was his opposition to the vietnam war. he became very active in the antiwar movement. people projected his antiwar liberalism onto his child-rearing books. that is something of a distortion. american families are expanding a great deal in the 1950's. in thell taking place american suburbs. 1955 was an important landmark year because more americans lived in suburbs and cities for the first time in american history. whenand in the landmark america became a

and it shouldn't they be more standardized? mr. linsky: the legislation is a response to a divergence in the way that ftc cases, the merger cases and department of justice murder cases have been handled. the department of justice has no authority whatsoever to determine any party has violated the law. the only thing the antitrust division can do, when it believes a merger is illegal, is present a case to a federal district court by way of complaint. the court makes the decision. the federal trade commission has the same options, but they also have the authority to conduct their own administrative procedure where an administrative law judge hears the case from the ftc and parties respond, and that makes an initial decision reviewed by the federal trade commission itself. then there is an appellate process. so it has given rise to a tremendous difference, a potentially tremendous difference in the way that the procedures are handled, the length of the preceding and so forth. in more recent years, we have had more problems, a diss

of life safety —— that reasonable standard of life safety — — that school reasonable standard of life. do not meet that. why? if you have children there, you would want to put things in place. these housing blocks, there were no spin the systems. in place. these housing blocks, there were no spin the systemsm is astonishing. some of it is down to cost, the retrofitting of old buildings. changes are made in good faith, and people discover that they are not ok with tragic consequences. it isa are not ok with tragic consequences. it is a coming together of lots of different things. it seems to be motivated by cost—cutting, especially if he's like the cladding. that seems to be becoming a bigger and —— especially issues like the cladding. that seems to be becoming a bigger and bigger issue. sa blocks in 17 authorities. i have

and if it does have a legal standard that can evaluate these vertical foreclosures, and standards has been developed over time that recognizes some vertical foreclosure i anti-consumer and some can be proconsumer. the earlier panel discussed the fact we have a consensusbuilding around a no blocking any no throttling rule and no unreasonable discoloration will. but where the rubber hits the road was on the question about paid prioritization, which can be good, can also have anticompetitive effects. the ftc is well-equipped to evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether a particular agreement is one that might harm consumers. consumers. using robust law that's been developed from a number of different cases elsewhere in the economy, and so they have a broader scope informed by a lot more history than the federal communications commission can. i agree the expos for you and the flexibly that the ftc brings that's a lot better in a dynamic, regulated dynamic marketplace that more rigid fcc ex ante rulemaking. on the consumer protection side, one thing that really opened my eyes recently was t

first they applied the wrong legal standard. constitution challenges of twons abroad -- section tempora repository six countries to shelter or sponsor terrorism readily satisfies that test. what is the difference, practically? think it is just this no court has ever applied it, not the supreme court or this court. you have to have an affirmative showing of that faith. if that is what you require for a discretionary decision, you really ought to require the strongest showing when you are talking about the president of the united states and multiple members of his cabinet, whose motives have not been impugned. say that the commander-in-chief, head of the executive branch and multiple members of the cabinet acted just dofor early -- i not think plaintiffs have put together the kind of record. court -- there is an exception. they obviously did not find. under this case law, the exception is there. >> i understand your position is that the exception only applies to individual? >> i do not think so. it applies to the full scope of man

our message is, anything that threatens jobs or living standards asa threatens jobs or living standardss a result of brexit negotiations, we will be fighting very hard. we wa nt to we will be fighting very hard. we want to be constructive and we recognise the difficult position we are rolling democratically, but we also want to get across some of our ideas about people's standards of living, because people also voted to stop the austerity agenda and to look again at the nhs on its knees, to look again at schools funding. we cannot lose teachers in our schools. and once again to look at social care, older people and people with disabilities. catherine west, re—elected labour mp for hornsey and wood green, thanks forjoining us. some of the biggest upsets were in

it's easier to get to high standard on currency and set the standard, so there are a lot of things thating those kinds of agreements does push back against china, does change the standard and it does have people realizing the us is engaged and it has a ripple effect throughout the region, so i completely endorse them. >> thank you, mr. thompson you're recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. and vaster, thank you for being here. priorities for our trade policies must be to support and create good american jobs, croak-- grow the economy, set basic standards for our partners to live up to, improve market access and protect labor rights in the environment and i think that congress has an important role in this. i value the opportunity to work with you to ensure this happens. increasing exports and elevating trade barriers could be a win for our economy, provided the playing field is leveled and everyone operates under a fair and basic set of rules and that those rules are enforced, so i went to-- in that regard and went to associate myself with that tag comments made by a couple of my colle

area where you can get a good standard. a good example would be currency, if your negotiating with someone who's a currency manipulator, and intercept the standard so there are a lot of things that can be done like that but i think having those kinds agreements does push back against china, it does change the standards and does have people realizing the united states and engage and it has ripple effects through the region so i completely endorse that point thank you mister thompson, you are recognized. >> thank you mister chairman, mister ambassador thank you very much for being here. the priorities for our trade policy must support and help create good american jobs, grow the economy, set basic standards for our partners to live up to, improve market access and protect the labor rights and the environment. and i think that congress has an important role in this and i value the opportunity to work with you to make sure that this happens area and increasing export and eliminating trade barriers can really be a win for our ec

set the standard. there are a lot of things that can be done like that, but i think having those kinds of agreements does push back against china, does change the standards and does have people realizing the united states is engaged and it hasn't. it has a ripple effect throughout the region. i completely endorse him. >> thank you, mr. thompson, you're recognized. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. ambassador, thank you very much for being here. the priorities for trade policy would be to support and help create good american jobs and grow the economy and set basic standards for our partners to live up to and improve market access and protect the labor rights and the environment, and i think that congress has an important role in this, and i value the opportunity to work with you to make sure that this happens. in increasing exports and eliminating barriers could really be a win for our economy provided that the playing field is level and everyone operating under a fair and basic set of rules and that tho

i want to know what your standards are. thank you. >> we expect to negotiate an agreement that has enforceable labor standards. we expect them to be consistent with the agreement that the committee had with the bush administration on may 10, 2007. we expect them to be enforceable and i look forward to working with members of the committee to make sure that happens in spite of the disagreements that you articulated i think my guess is that we are not that far apart. >> our time is expire. >> mr. chairman i will submit the other question to the investor with the approval. >> without objection. >> the movement of data around the world is essential for businesses of all types in the 21st century, from automobiles to airplanes, to agriculture different apps access to data around the globe is paramount. in order to compete in the global economy. data flows have gone by 45 times since 2005 and are expected to go nine times by 2020. as you know, there are no enforceable trade rules specifically with data flows leaving american comp

we have an agreement with high standards. on a bilateral basis, you can have higher standards. a good example of that would be currency. there are a lot of things that can be done like that. having those types of agreements does push back against china and does change the standards. and it also has people realize the u.s. is engaged. it has a ripple effect drop the region. mr. thompson, you are recognized. >> mr. investor, thank you for being here. for our trade policy must be to support and help create good american jobs, grow the economy, set basic accessds, improve market , and protect the labor rights and empowerment. -- and congress environment. i think congress has an important role in this. increasing exports and eliminating trade barriers can be a win for our economy provided the playing field is level and everyone operates under a fair and basic set of rules. and the rules are enforced. in that regard, i want to associate myself with the agricultural comments made by my colleagues. myselfwant to associate with something mr. doggett said when he asked if you thought wag

detention standards are well beyond the standards that even the federal bureau of prisons has in terms of prisoner or detainee in this case, housing and care. as we seek to enter into, if you will, rental agreements with local law enforcement or counties to have access to their beds for generally short periods of time, in order to do that we have -- we're looking at lowering our standards so that we can enter into agreements, but still, those -- the agreements, the detention conditions of detention will be much higher than what is accepted -- what is acceptable in either the federal system or the state system. so yes, lowering it so we can have some access but it's not lowering it to the point by no means lowering it to the point where there's mistreatment or conditions that would not be appropriate from a humanitarian point of view. >> i guess the point is that it seems to me that all detainees deserve the same level of protections for whatever amount of time that they are in -- that they spend in detention. and so, that's what brings my concern about having different standards in dif

that would be a sort of a standard procedure for him. he's certainly throwing out suggestions here he's not going to get a fair shake. i don't think there's any conflict of interest. this man is above reproach in his dealing with the law and his whole background shows he's very careful about these things. i'm sure he cleared it with his firm before he departed and took the assignment. >> matt, do you think he's hinting that mueller may find himself out of a job? >> i don't, but i think it's very interesting, you know, i've been on your show several nights and i have usually been the only one that says there is no evidence of obstruction of justice or collusion, and i am -- so i'm surprised when he says it's almost unanimous that folks believe that's the case. but nonetheless, i mean, i do still believe that, you know, there is not enough evidence here to substantiate obstruction of justice claim. certainly criminal, anyway. then, you know, there is no evidence, we would know by now as much leaking as there has been that there was collusi

that was an analog standard. in 1988, that commission made an astounding decision and said, you know what? we will not make the right decision if we choose the digital standard. basically we are going to leave it up to the companies to do that. and, you know, they were right. to quote a former fcc official, in fact he may even be sitting here but i doubt it. there are other conclusive disk on my finger with a chief scientist to said, if we had chosen a standard we would have chosen the wrong one so what happened in the u.s. as a result, some people look at it as being a mistake. we had two standards, one that was promulgated through the rest of the world and the other was a little standard called the cma which by the way became the standard for most of the others in the 3g world after that. it is interesting that also what that did was it led to our ability as carriers to say, you know what? we see a need to move to the next generation of technology. we see a demand in the market, we want to do things differently

you can't have a double standard. >> where is the double standard?are saying this and you slam it from this stuff and he fights back and everybody says you can't do that. >> we can be accused of holding the president to a high standard. that is true. >> we are also just covering -- if you want to do what she was doing earlier we are also covering it and criticized by the white house for covering it and asking questions about it. he says this. we are going to ask questions. >> more to talk about as we have been talking about the details on past ie tacks on women. after a quick break. so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it, with great summer deals up to 40% off. visit booking.com. booking.yeah! ♪ if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis,... isn't it time to let the real you shine through? maybe it's time for otezla (apremilast). otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just

this is a double standard. it's not a partisan double standard, but a double standard coming out of bill maher's mouth. white americans do not have an unsettled history with the term --. while white men were raping and beating and calling us -- that's why it's such a painful word. my friend don lemon doesn't want it used at all, that's why for so many people it's unsettled. >> you talked about the reaction by ben sass. he has been tweeting up a storm. he can't apologize enough for not reacting more strongly. does this just expose a political weak spot for him? >> it's an odd apology, because basically, first, he's defending the right of free speech for comedians, then he's condemning the speech that bill maher made. he's in a difficult spot. i wouldn't be surprised if we haven't heard the last of him in terms of getting an apology. but in terms of ben, part of his reputation as being around an independent-minded republican, so personally, within that republican party, i don't know if there will be as many reper

under that standard, i am glad courti'll think the should over read it. under that standard, i am glad that counsel says that we do not go by the campaign statements. people say things on the campaign trail. they consult on policies they develop and we should not stared down the road of psychoanalyzing -- start down the road of psychoanalyzing what people meant on the campaign trail. he is down to a handful of statements and the only one that directly concerns this order is what the president said when he signed the first one. we all know what that means. said in the president the presence of the newly sworn in secretary of defense was, i am signing this order because i want to increase the vetting radical islam and terrorists. he makes a six word offhand comment. it is clear in context and within the presumption of regularity we ought to afford to the head of a branch, terrorist groups, not all muslims. there is not enough to get you to bad faith under didn't and i think council wants to discount power markable it would be for the courts on a handful of

i think that was the issue we had with the general conduct standard. we saw it in action shortly after the rules came out. we had cool -- we had calls to use the standard to go after usage allowances. we never knew where it was going to go. you never knew what services it was going to attack. if you think about the free data services, these are commercial services, there is no billing arrangement, they are commercial that are offered to ared to a third-party to pay the usage on somebody's bill. then you have the calls to eliminate the services. i think there is a relationship between what happened to unlimited data and zero rated services. i was not in the rooms that made the decision to say, we are going to go all out with this unlimited data, but there is an to be made that some of these moves were made as a result of the fact that free data was in the marketplace. i think david has laid out the argument really strongly against why the general conduct standard was a problem. i think he gets a 100% right on paid prioritization. i think in an age when

and employer training materials on pesticide safety and implementation of the worker protection standard and the certified pesticide applicator role. so education and training for medical providers to diagnose and treat pesticide poisonings and support for state public health agencies to maintain pesticide injury surveillance programs. farmworkers and especially those who mix and apply pesticides face substantial risk of becoming poisoned by pesticides because they work with them at their greatest concentrations and strengths. farmworkers and their families come into contact with pesticides on a daily basis. pesticide residues that remain on their work clothes and skin when they return home from work can ex please members of their family. it causes farmworkers to suffer more chemical related injuries and illnesses than any other workforce in the region. it is estimated up to 3,000 farmworkers suffer acute pesticide poisoning every year with symptoms that include irritated eyes, rashes, nausea, dizziness, headaches and shortness of breath. these estimates don't include those who suffer lo

you would never hold yourself to that standard, but maybe between -- maybe between the five of us in 15 minutes we can hope to cover some of the breadth of communications policy issues that i think are on the top of the pile, if you will. >> you've got about two minutes and thirty seconds left now. >> i got it. so i'm going to focus on two higher-level policies. i think i look at our current internet ecosystem. i think it's the envy of the world. i don't think there is any country, any continent anywhere else in the plan net that has been able to develop the internet ecosystem we have in the united states and i think it is pretty easy to understand why. it is because of a consistent, light regulatory touch that has been developed by democratic and republican administrations up until the last five years or so. and so the number one priority, i think, for our company, for our industry and i think for everyone on this panel and meredith already eluded to it is to figure out how we keep the united states on the leading edge of innovation and investment for the internet ecosystem. the pri

to deliver ever increasing living standards for its creativity and enterprise. that is one we shouldus embrace. to recognize that peace and prosperity you have to drive the past 70 years or joined by all och and increasingly with in reach of all. [applause]us sees legacy is a great pportunity to help the people to join the global middle-class. with the second challenges the exhausted event that the global system can better help them. ed has that potential if we let it. in those around of the road have a pervasive sense that is the true the system is flawed with international trade but the real culprit is domestic policy that was continued growth with domestic measures that share the wealth. this is a complicated problem but let's be clear on this point it's wrong to view the middle-class with the behavior the foreigners the truth is it has changedt tha because of the nine global economic innovation the transformation from rarely read the digital revolution.dly >> managed -- [speaking french] translator: now supporting families and pensions and retraining astr th

there's a double standard here.there's a double standard the way donald trump is being treated. >> that makes no sense. >> the "times" actually wrote during the campaign about those allegations. i don't think that's -- i also think that bill clinton was not running for president in -- >> i think this is a rare day where there's a single standard where every media voice, every liberal and conservative voice has said this is beyond the pale. and the only people that are defending it are either paid, or paid white house spokesman, and they'll have to deal with their own conscience on that. frankly, so far that i've seen, you, jeffrey. >> i'm not defending it. i'm simply -- >> you're kind of defending it actually. you said he shouldn't have done it, but -- your reason for him not doing it is you think it was politically stupid it sounds like to me. >> no, i think it's the wrong thing to -- >> you think it's morally wrong? >> i think it's wrong to get -- no matter who they are, no matter who they are. but you can't have

it is not a minimal standard, all of our hospitals are accredited. thank you very much, everybody. >> iyo

obstruction of justice is a high standard and there is a high standard to be met from a legal point of view. you listen to there was a briefing done some time ago in the house by the deputy ag discussing with us why he wrote the memorandum that comey should be fired, he repeatedly, to the members of the house used the ard that this would be criminal investigation, a criminal investigation. a much higher standard than the senate would have in its own investigation, or independent commission would have. the standard would be a really high one. whether it appears to be obstruction or skirted the edges of it, it is something that is different than if it actually happened. i think we need to be clear about that. is that enough to be concerned about the administration? uncommon to put together a memo particularly of this action? guest: most really good attorneys try to write contemporaneous memorandums after having significant interactions with someone related to a matter that they are working on. this is not an unusual thing. james comey is a very buy the book kind of person if nothing else

the smell of double standards in the morning.ar's commeher's comment l was completely inexcusable. and we reached oi out to bill maher and have not heard back. and cnn and hbo share the same parent company, time warner. >>> this week we saw disturbing amount of racist incidents and hate crimes. although it occurred in different cities, christian holmes explored if there is any correlation in the alarming uptick. >> he told us to go back to saudi arabia. >> reporter: two oregon men stabbed to death while trying to defend black and muslim teens from a racist tirade. >> they lost their lives because of me and my friend. the way we look. so i want to say thank you. >> reporter: a noose hanging inside the frirn hafrican-ameri histo histo history museum. >> being black in america is tough. >> reporter: but these are not isolated events. there were more than 1800 bias incidents from election day through the end of march. and the director of the institute for the studies of race indifference say the uptick is partially a reflection of th

that is what we should continue to hold as her standard. to make sure that people are able to fight, that we don't waste precious dollars or type on individuals who are not ready to fight. i yield back. >> thank you. to expand on the point those made earlier, every time we have added a new group of americans beyond white males who originally served, the sky was feared to be falling. in each case we learned that everybody in this country when treated with dignity and respect and given the chance to serve does us all proud. we know the facts from those transgender service members there serving with distinction, their widely praised by their commanders. we know from other militaries were transgender have served that they have had no problems with readiness or costs. we know because dod has studied this, we know the numbers with all due respect that they are using are a great divergence and overblown from what we have studied and what has already been determined. i would ask us to stick to the facts and stick to water military commanders have r

hi entry standards are required because failure on the job costs lives. last year was costly in dollars and short on common sense. it is imperative the nation reverses its ill-advised policy and ensure that tax dollars are spent wisely. fairness is restored and we ensure our military personnel can succeed on the battlefield. i plan to withdraw my amendment after some discussion tonight in hopes of getting the dod the opportunity to address this problem internally by reversing this policy. however if they fail to act on this policy, future action must be taken by us the guardians of national defense it is imperative that the original policy that stood the test of time be reinstated to prioritize our readiness and save precious defense dollars and ensure our men and women serving the nation can fight and win the nation's more so mr. chairman i yield back with the intent to withdraw this amendment after this discussion. >> further discussion. >> thank you mr. chairman. mr. chairman, no clear definition of this exists for a military to develop the current pol

[applause] the double standard exists today with them. bds condemns israel, they impose boycotts, they seek to impose boycotts solely on the jewish state but willfully turn a blind eye to nations that violate human rights. went around sponsors terror and executes dissenters, bds is quiet. when arab nations jail journalists, punish homosexuality with prison sentences and physical abuse , dds is nowhere to be found. and that's because the state of israel is all too frequently measured by a different double standard than the rest of the world. it's up to us to fight these efforts to the nail and not only unjust and immoral, their counterproductive in achieving a truly lasting peace between israel and the palestinians so again, you deserve a huge round of applause or what you did with the governors. [applause] are state of new york has passed a law that says if you're visiting the university that boycott israel, new york will boycott you. just last week. just last week, nevada did the same. we should call on every governor of every state to p

editorial standards and has been retracted links to the story have been disabled c.n.n. apologizes to mr karr mucci. the story was concerning this man and the scary mucci and american finance heir who served as an advisor to the trump presidential campaign and sat on the trump transition team it alleged the senate intelligence committee was investigating scar mucci for a meeting he held with kiro dimitry of the c.e.o. of the russian jew wrecked investment fund four days before trump's inauguration all based on an anonymous gresham will source the report written by a twenty twelve q a surprise finalist said the russian direct investment fund is overseen by this day state run the e.b. bank currently sanctioned by the us government and that the meeting could have included a conversation about the lifting of sanctions on the fund there's just one problem the fund is not in fact operated by the state run bank as a spokesperson for the r a d i have told sputnik the russian direct investment fund our d.i.'s became an independent sovereign fund in two thousand and sixteen conseq

new standards are in place for the six primarily muslim countries.fect for those from six primarily muslim countries. family includes parents, children, siblings and sons and daughters-in-law. refugees scheduled to be resettled by july 6th will still be allowed in. >>> senate majority leader mitch mcconnell is hoping to hammer out a new version of the gop health care bill by this friday. the plan is to send it to the congressional budget office before senators leave town for the fourth of july recess and hoping to push for a vote this summer. nine senators say they'll vote against the bill without significant changes. those were all republican senators. and the others could face increased pressure from constituents as they return home. but president trump appears to be undeterred. >> health care is working along very well. we could have a big surprise with a great health care package. >> about 40 people protesting the bill were arrested on capitol hill. chuck schumer is calling for president trump to meet with both democrats and republicans, but the

the pm 2.5 standard is better than any in europe. we are making i believe tremendous progress toward achieving good health outcomes for our citizens but congresswoman, i believe we can do more. when i say celebrate progress, i think we have to recognize we have prioritized as a country, that we should recognize the success we've achieved but it doesn't mean we stop. it means we work with the states to get better data. not model data but monitored data. realtime data. and then focus on compliance and assistance with those states to achieve better outcomes in the program. with respect to co2, i want to say to you, the president when he announced withdrawal from the paris accord said something else, as well. he said that he wanted to continue engagement on this issue. i just left the g-7. i spent four days with my counterparts. we started bilateral discussions. i started discussions with them with respect to our continued leadership with respect to co2 production. and that's another area we need to recognize the progress we've made. you

oil companies, texaco, gulf, standard oil of california, chevron, exxon, and standard new york, mobile. they all turned their attention, increasingly so -- this is a process of global exploration that started in the late 19th century but takes on a new urgency, whether it is asia, south america, and especially the middle east and saudi arabia. there were many in his -- many in business and government, s of powerbrokers, those that were in publishing, those that were in washington, those that were ceos and leading executives of these companies. those that were lobbyists of major oil, some of the most influential share luce's vision for expanding american influence abroad. you have encountered harold ickes before. can someone tell me who he was? student: he was the secretary of the interior under fdr. prof. dochuk: what was he like? what were his politics? student: he was concerned over the teapot dome scandal and wanted to have police over the oil industry. prof. dochuk: so interest in regulating. he was appointed secretary of the interior, but also the oil czar of the roosevelt adminis