cd's of strong country currencies and conditions of reinstatement in accordance with international standard for code compliance by signatories the i asked yes which to fake in april 28th to. the consequences include the binding of russia from the olympics paralympics and world championships run by all code signatories for 4 years and a binding the russian host of russia hosting any of these major events within that time frame. this is a ban against russia that protects the rights of russia not seats by allowing the re entry for major events to those that are able to demonstrate that they are not implicated in any way. by the noncompliance. the decision is designed to punish the guilty parties and send a message that it will not be tolerated it stands strong against those who cheated this system well protecting those who did not. to dish out communist sanction to the agency's robust investigative lee kept a privileged thief the vision of the compliance review committee and why this recently acquired ability to recommend meaningful sanctions via the young plus the compliance standard which wa

a but for cause standard. i go back to what i said to justice gorsuch, if you look at constitutional cases, with the village of arlington heights, and all that's required at the pleading stage is the motivating factor. >> that's true to title 7 and it's the motivating standard at the pleading stage. i think to acquire but for causation at the pleading stage we have an insurmountable burden and that was o'connell's point of pricewaterhouse. >> these case e as you know, are not usually thrown out at the motion to dismiss stage and usually, you have the ultimate legal test in mind and you just look at the facts alleged in the complaint to see as justice sotomayor rightly said whether there is a way you can infer from those facts that you would ultimately need to test for 1981 or for discrimination and this is a helpful question for you. isn't that just how it usually works? >> yes. >> yeah. yeah. in other words, we shouldn't get in or why -- i guess i'm picking up on justice kagan now. here's the legal test for 1

consumer -- consumer will for standards.there's been a lot of talk in america the past two or three years about what is now popularly called hipster antitrust. wonder if you could give us some thought to hipster antitrust? >> welcome hipster antitrust, for folks who may not have heard it, refers to kind of twisting the antitrust laws away from the common understanding of industrial organization, economics, and it is a way to begin looking at other societal goals outside of competition. and competition, for example, should we take a look at sustainability as part of competition? should we look at labor as part of competition analysis? the way to address perhaps shortcomings of other policy goals. and that is, at one level, it might be a misconception that the general antitrust standards only deal with price points which is just not true. over and over with the courts have said that the general antitrust laws as applied, apply to not only price but quantity, quality, innovation. and so those are all factors that we need to be

if we're gonna set the standard, it's gonna be my standard, and my standard is way higher than you guys. when i'm done, there will be something special about our food. there will be something unique and different that nobody else on staten island will have. and we're gonna start over. is that clear? tranchina: i like that very much. sammy: i'm ready. i'm ready. lemonis: but we got a lot of damn work to do. let's get to work. come on. so, fuji, one of the things that we're gonna do -- we're gonna start over on the menu. now that we've got the chef back, the thing i'm most excited about is getting him into that kitchen to come up with new ideas. i'm looking to kind of see the gold inside of here -come out in here. -fuji: all righty. tranchina: what do you think about doing a mixture, like doing a little pork with a little beef or something? meatballs -- sometimes that meat is so juicy 'cause it's got that fat from the pork in there. maybe, like, some jalapeÑos with some brown sugar -- like, they balance each other out. you got to play around, try different stuff. lemonis: it's important f

standard the global economy did great under a gold standard once you left the gold standard you had a club talk or see an socialism actually during the gold center we're going to look at that before in 1007 when there was a global gold standard it does not matter you still can have thugs you can still have thugs who come in and take your gold you can still have thugs to control in the united states we have the robber baron era was under the gold standard and how do you get that thuggery and that's important to this economy because when and i think the wikipedia on argentina economy is very simple as just lays out all the progress essentially from 880 when they had mass migration tens over 10000000 europeans fled all the conflicts in in europe between you know world where one world war 2 they all flee fled here mostly italian but you know these are dedicated people with capital they brought a lot of capital in the country here was only 2000000 people 10000000 came in from europe and it was a boom times that's when you hear about that fabled time of it being the 3rd wealthiest country

if we're gonna set the standard, it's gonna be my standard.e upped the quality of our ingredients, simplified the menu, and overhauled the space. [ laughter and applause ] we needed somebody to run the day-to-day operations, so joseph stepped up to be the general manager. but i wasn't just fixing up one restaurant in staten island, i saw standard burger as a national opportunity. and this place would be the model we'd use to sell franchisees on the concept. to the burger boys. -all: burger boys. lemonis: six months and about a half a million dollars later, we're just about ready. ♪ today we're at "time out" magazine's battle of the burger, and there's about 50 restaurants here competing for one prize -- best burger in new york city. joe t.: so let's rock this out. let's show everybody who we are. [ cheering ] [ whistling ] lemonis: the business plan is to launch standard burger into other markets through a franchise model. and so, when you can get recognition as the best burger in new york, that bodes very well for getting potential franchisee

the absence ofn having any standard, other players are becoming the defective standard. europe is becoming at the fact is becoming at the factors standard on privacy. impactsns our values the way we see issues as a country. even the impact we might have on the economy might not be considered when people are looking at legislation. we are innovators and leaders in this area. we should be leading in setting the standards and making sure consumers are protected. >> mark zuckerberg earlier this year and an op-ed talking about the framework, he called for something called a global framework. he said it would do better than legislation from the state. ensure that the internet is knocked it fractured. what do you think of that argument? rep. delbene: we need to make sure we have strong protections. if we do not have a domestic standard, we are not at the international table setting that standard. there has to be a high quality standard for protections. that is why it is so important that we are at the table and leaders at this issue. right now we are not because we do not have

little bit lower standard than what we have to face.o little bit of a different legal regime between the two agencies, but as far as her wish to of been more aggressive, i'm not fully familiar. i would say they've been pretty aggressive in some of the matters. but also these markets evolve. market shares remain and there some changes that you might not have done six years ago, and sometimes as a monday morning quarterback you might think had we bought that transaction or otherwise, this company wouldn't be where the our, and some of raised the facebook concerns. had they not merge with instagram or whatsapp, maybe we would have different marketplace. i will leave to the agency who is looking at those issues, but it's difficult to kind of look back in every instance. >> here's a question that says attorney general barr said tech platforms should be quote-unquote good samaritans in the context of section 230. section 230 is provision of the communications act that creates sort of a safe harbor on uploaded content that is supposedly not ed

and what is the goal of the standard? it is to prevent the implementation of esims and the innovation that could have been fantastic as far as consumer mobility, and make it a lot easier for folks to be able to be on the vireceiving end of aggressive pricing practices. well, that business review letter which said that in your future conduct you cannot do certain things that you have done in the past is a great resolution, and i understand that just last week, i believe, thursday, the gsm, a eda adopte whole new standard to allow these pro technologies to go forward in the new handsets which is going to have real impact. but it also showed that some of the folks who were implementing the standard, and you can take a look at the quoted e-mails and documents in that review letter about what some went through to try to prevent the consumer from getting the benefit of esims, and this is the type of the standard setting that is nefarious and anti-competitive. >> this past summer, you and chairman simons at the ftc announced pos

standards that operate in the united states. is this company is set on pursuing a trade deal with the united states with precious few bargaining chips to hand, the brute dell -- the brutal reality is that britain will have to lower its standards. that is the brutal reality of it. the european union has made it clear that a future trade deal with the european union will depend on maintaining a level playing field on standards and protections. the choice we now face is between keeping the highest environmental and food standards in order to get a future trade deal with the european union, dorsal -- or slashing food standards to the united states where there are acceptable paprikaf rat hair and or maggots and arms juice. it is true. a members think that this is piece of imagination on my part, when i was first told this, i also thought this cannot be the case. i checked out, and it absolutely is. we are about to strike a new race to the bottom in a deal with the united states, and i think everyone should be aware and warned. mr. sp

defect of standards. that means our values and the impact of the way we view issues as a country and impact it might have on our economy when folks look for legislation. we are innovators and leaders. >> it was mark zuckerberg that called for a global framework. he said it would do better then the regulation of the state. he went onto say the super net won't get fractured and build products. what do you think of that argument? >> we need to make sure we have strong arguments. we are not at the table with that standard. >> there must be a high quality standard. that's why it's important we are at the table and leaders on the issue. we are not because we don't have it here at home. >> with information and technology putting out a report saying there are certain types of regulation coming occupy and cost the companies to hire people to watch over this at the tune of $22 billion per year. as a former tech person what do you think about that argument. >> i think once again we put the consumers first and realiz

fcc standard. at the window you are looking at which is 33 feet away from the pole, it's less than half a percent. 2,000 times below the window. in this case the antennas are directional, 80° and 260 looking up and down the street so there's no antenna that's facing that building. i guess i should add also in response to some of the comments that i mentioned raj of the hemet and edson company was on the subcommittee for the ieee which just concluded their review, they review the standards every seven years and concluded earlier this year and confirmed that the standard should remain at the level that it's at with respect to emissions. the fcc has had since 2013 a review process regarding the standards and they announced earlier this summer they were going to reaffirm the standards. that's because the physics has not changed. the frequencies have not changed. they've been around for a long time. and the standards are adequate and are what they should be and they are constantly reviewed. there was th

we know it will hit jobs and living standards. it will leave scottish businesses facing competitive disadvantages with businesses in northern ireland. the prime minister can talk about trade deals all he wants, but the harsh reality is that a basic trade agreement of the type he wants to negotiate will lead to gdp being lower by the equivalent of 1600 pounds per person compared with e.u. membership. in all, people are going to be worse off and people can watch and listen to this debate, and what they hear are honorable members and right honorable members opposite laughing. that's the seriousness they show to these crucial issues. mr. speaker, is it any wonder that the people of scotland, armed with the facts, aware of the deceit from the vote leave campaign and the brexit tears in number 10, came out in huge numbers last week and backed the scottish national party to escape this government's disastrous brexit, and escaping is now the only option to save our economy. we have tried time and time again to compromise, but the tories s

and protections so that the choice we is between keeping the highest environmental and food standards in order to get a future trade deal with the european union or slashing food standards to match those of the united states where there are so-called acceptable levels of rat hairs and paprika, maggots in orange juice. it's true. if members this is a piece of imagination on my part, what i was first told this i also thought that cannot be the case. i checked out and it absolutelyis . we are about to strike a new race to the bottom with the unitedstates and everyone should be aware and warned of that mister speaker , turning to the arrangements with northern ireland, the prime minister has emphatically claimed on a quote his own words, there will be no check between northern ireland and gp and that again i quote, we had a deal that keeps the whole of the uk together as we come out of the eu. these claims are simply not true. we know from the analogies carried out by his own treasury , under his deal there will be in fact an abundance of checks and customs declarations in the rhc. not on

we've already done that in our own portfolio is establishing a hunt standard for standard consistency and so our residents should start seeing that shortly. you know, in terms of our environmental concerns, environment concerns are on the rise in the last couple years, we've seen mold to an extent we haven't seen in a long, long time. caused by some extreme climatic conditions that haven't historically been seen but i don't think that's going to change in the future. so we're beefing up our environmental expertise on site and at the corporate level, beefing up our environmental training for our maintenance teches, adding qaqc professionals. and we've made a great deal of progress in filling all those positions. and then, of course, the increased training across all of our people. >> thank you. thank you. i'd like to turn to the issue of mold. and thank you for raising that yourself. it continues to be a major challenge and we've heard that from our -- my colleagues. many families want to have licensed and certified third party experts conduct testing in their homes. some have been tol

things like variances and completion standards. we've already done it in our own portfolio for the consistency in terms of our environmental concerns they are on the rise in the last couple of years we have seen the conditions that have historically been seen but i don't think that is going to change in the future so we are beefing up our environmental expertise at the corporate level and the training for the bemaintenance tech and we made a great deal of progress in filling those positionsng and tn of course increased training among all of our people. >> i would like to turn to the issue of mold and thank you for raising that your self. it continues to be a major challenge and we've heard that from my colleagues many families wants to have license testing in their homes. some have been told other housing companies won't accept these result results with thirdy experts wouldn't be permitted to enter the home. what is this by the experts. >> they find it to be inconclusive from elsewhere in the portfolio. on the other hand we have be

the chief harbor engineer to grant waivers from these stan standards. second, the port will follow the guidelines of the 2019 california existing building code and no longer requires a full-seismic upgrades of buildings based on an increase in occupant load. and you can imagine what the impact of this will be for development of the port. the previous port code followed the more restrictive standard that was part of the san francisco building code created by the department of building inspections. under that standard, an occupant load increase of 10% for the entire structure that also resulted in an increase of more than 100 occupants for that structure would have triggered a seismic upgrade. to follow state standards, this occupant load increase would no longer require seismic upgrades. a second part to this that remains in the state code, requires a seismic upgrade if an occupancy is introduced in the structure that would trigger an increase to a higher risk categories. and the risk categories are on the screen right now. there are four of them startin

we are getting back to that standard. i don't want to accept the fact that we got there because -- >> you mentioned in your testimony townhall and greater communication with service members is a big part of it and one servicemember has been denied access where those communications, are you familiar with that? >> i'm not really with that. >> please know your eyes yourself with that so we say when servicemembers are formal and informal communications with you that that means all service members. i ask unanimous consent to enter into the record a letter i have sent to the inflation commander at fort mead asking the garrison commander to step up his oversight at fort mead because i really believe you are not making forward progress as you committed earlier this year. can we enter this into the record? >> without objection. >> several service members, they experienced direct retaliation from your company to resolve issues with their homes. these behaviors included seen gestures, drive-by harassment, deny access to the resident

labor standard in a trade agreement. i want to thank everyone who worked on this and make sure we're working in the right direction. with that, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from massachusetts reserves. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. brady: yes, madam speaker. i'm proud to yield one minute to the gentlelady from the show-me state, mrs. wagner. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady is recognized. mrs. wagner: i thank my friend from texas. madam speaker, i rise today to urge my colleagues to vote yes on usmca trade agreement. for months partisan politics and the democrats' impeachment charade have prevented from us finalizing this agreement. but it is clear to members on both sides of the aisle that the president has negotiated a deal that will strengthen our economy and benefit all missourians and americans. one of every three rose of crops is grown for exports in the great state of missouri, and this deal expands market access in canada and mexico for our farmers. it's the first time

by reforming bank capital standards.inuing our mortgage mothers in order to provide assurance -- insurance against the approach meant of irresponsible lending standards. we are supporting efforts to replace libor, to reform open-ended funds and oversee new payment systems to ensure that more sustainable and resilient productive finance is widely available. through all of these actions to reduce risk to financial stability and to improve the financial system we are doing our part to promote the goodness of people of the united kingdom. with that we would be pleased to answer your questions. >> wait for the mics. give your name and organization. simon, bbc news. governor, have you reviewed or changed your view of the risks posed by a disorderly brexit? given the events of the last week? >> as i said in my opening comments, our job is to look at the worst-case scenario. the worst-case scenario is a no deal, disorderly brexit. the probability of that scenario has gone down. because of the intention of the new government. the

we want to live up to the gold standard. yet today you're saying that it's quote it's going to take some time to get back to the gold standard quote of communication and service that they enjoyed at the early stages of our partnership. but why haven't you, this is a question. so why haven't you been able to return to this gold standard that you promise to congress and service members. >> our position is not change, we endeavor to return to the gold standard. as i mentioned in my testimony, the gold standard will really be when a deployed soldier is able to call back, which what weights put our business on. we want them to call back to talk to their families and talk about what's happening in their lives without having to deal with home issues. we are getting closer and closer back to that standard, were not there yet. i also known of effective except the fact that were get there because it's an ever-growing process. >> and let me ask this question at fort meade maryland you talked about town halls and greater communications

nap of the leather upholstered features and sport whether steering wheel become a standard. if you wanted to really swish you can opt for a start stop button and gear shift lever made of crystal. neck warmers integrated into the front headdress which blow out warm air on colder days are only available as an optional extra despite the high starting price which we think is pretty poor for the kind of get my hands measures one meter 75 which is not particularly top if he can sit comfortably in the front but he wants to try out the back of that i've got a front seat moves were done of course but the roof getting it is easy so i. like this he's quite comfortable but now when he puts the driver seat set to his height back into position it's pushing against is neat. no one's going to want to sit here for longer journeys that the. intercoastal active steering enhanced is the overall sporty feel of the car up to a speed of 72 kilometers per hour the rear wheels are steered in the opposite direction to the front this makes the steering a lot more precise and significantly reduces the

a hearing was designed to estaish a standard for whether mr. trump's conduct should mean he should be removed from office. house democrats say the president abused his office to pressure ukraine to investigate the bidensli while repns say he did nothing wrong. we report from capitol hill. reporter:nother historic step in the impeament inquiry as it moves to the judiciary coittee. a new room, a new set of members and witnesses, and the ultimate question -- did president trump commit an impeachable offense? for caskey constituternal scholars calle in to give their analysis. three of the professors were emphatic that the president had to be held accountable for putting his persona interest above the nation and its security. >> professor feldman, did president trump commit the impeachable high crime and misdemeanor of abuse of power based on that evidence and thosi fo's? >> based on that evidence, the president did commit an impeachable abe of office. >> professor carlin, same question. >> same answer. >> and professor gerhard? >> we are unanimous.

they say that they've got rigorous standards but they really don't know what those standards are real terms they say that they kick people out we don't really have a comprehensive record of when they're doing that or what the consequences are even if they're ticked they'll be can still keep breathing and they can still keep operating so what's the value of their inspections program there in force and efforts for all we know are completely meaningless we don't know what they even inspect for when they go into these facilities because they don't make their inspection records public quite frankly if they were meaningful inspections there would be no reason not to make them public. while the a k c boasts of a rigorous inspection program in 2011 only $1500000.00 of their $59000000.00 in revenue was spent to employ just 9 inspectors across the entire united states. big. is a group that says it's the dogs champion but in practical terms is consistently leading the fight against efforts to establish humane dog breeding standards in the states at the federal level. over $5000.00 kennel inspect

it was a very sensible standard. she says, impeachment is so divisive that the evidence must be overwhelming, compelling and bipartisan. not one of those criterias have been met today. based on the facts, based on the evidence, based on the truth, this impeachment even fails that pelosi test. those now who say removing president trump would protect the integrity of our democracy have it backwards. by removing a duly elected president on empty articles of impeachment, congress will erode the public trust in our system of government. i understand you dislike the president. his beliefs, the way he governs, and even the people who voted for him. how do i know this? because you say so day in and day out. in 2016 they even dismissed his supporters. remember calling us deplorables? now they are trying to disqualify our voice before the 2020 election. they want to undo the results of the last election, to influence the next one. as i've said, president trump will still be president when this is all over. but congress will ha

so there is no real standardization. and then proximity and health.ns, i want to concur with the chair. i think we don't do harm by slowing down the conversation to get all the facts on the table. and in particular, if we were to proceed, then there needs to be a standardization. there needs to be understanding of why some of these are implemented and why the scale is different in size and the esthetic is different depending on where they're implemented. >> supervisor peskin: could you read item number 2? >> item 2 is ordinance amending the planning code during the project approval, by authorizing the planning department to authorize certain interim activities at project sites as temporary uses up to 36 months and adopting appropriate find its. >> supervisor peskin: mr. star, the floor is yours -- >> audrey, planning department staff. before i talk about the planning department recommendations, i've been asked to share a map to show where the legislation would be applied. if i could get the overhead? so any of the colored areas on the map is where thi

these changes seattle new standard for u.s. trade agreements and demonstrate trade agreements can achieve broad bipartisan support if they empower workers, protect patients, provide access to affordable health care, and improve our shared environment. i'm proud of what we did here. 14 months of negotiating on every conceivable front we have improved the old nafta. i want to remind our colleagues today, if they decide that they are not going to vote for this piece of legislation in front of us, that's up to them. but one thing they cannot say is this is not much better than what we have had in the past. the options here are clear. you can vote for what we have negotiated, or you can embrace the status question. -- status quo. if this fails today that's precisely what you are doing, embracing the status quo. this agreement based upon the painstaking efforts of members of the committee and ambassador ghthizer, was done with full transparency, no surprises are in this legislation. i hope that today we can say at the end of the time

labor standard in a trade agreement. i want to thank everyone who worked on this and make sure we're working in the right direction. with that, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from massachusetts reserves. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. brady: yes, madam speaker. i'm proud to yield one minute to the gentlelady from the show-me state, mrs. wagner. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady is recognized. mrs. wagner: i thank my friend from texas. madam speaker, i rise today to urge my colleagues to vote yes on usmca trade agreement. for months partisan politics and the democrats' impeachment charade have prevented from us finalizing this agreement. but it is clear to members on both sides of the aisle that the president has negotiated a deal that will strengthen our economy and benefit all missourians and americans. one of every three rose of crops is grown for exports in the great state of missouri, and this deal expands market access in canada and mexico for our farmers. it's the first time

this should be the standard now i kavanaugh every standard was well-qualified for the job. but most of the democrats not going to confirm and if yes then, they would see i will is the problem and he wasn't upset but it was you if you think i should be the old standard or is it or sort of depends on the political makeup of the set. >> actually been gone for very long time. many realistic standards, they were absolutely, unquestionably qualify for the job and will talking the 80s. so that standard has been abandoned for a long time. ms. amanda first by the democrats and then kind went back to this and he tells the story of the justice on trial. the means, there many times when republicans will hoping we can return to that what you saw. clayton somebody's all of us unanimous kind of confirmation. and i think what you've seen, has taken a while for public to realize that standard hasn't been followed in you actually saw little frustration coming from lindsay graham was on the people absolutely hillside. his outburst at the final confirmation at the reset i voted for them and yo

. >> in the media, you should hold the democrats to the standards they set for themselves, not the standard they set back in 1998 when jerry nadler said impeachment would have to be apported by substantially bipartisan group to be legitimate. look at the standards they set for themselves a few months ago. democrats said the evidence would have to be overwhelming, yet been hearing after hearing the evidence they presented was hearsay, speculation and conjecture or the result of a policy disagreement about how to treat the ukraine. democrats promised at the public hearings there would be newfound animated public support for impeachment. the reality is, they failed to meet their burden. now, with no bipartisanship, matter of fact the only bipartisan vote will be against impeachment with no direct evidence, no enhanced public support for impeachment, democrats will continue to visit the opportunity costs for this division on our country. as republicans we would like to policy infrastructure, changes that will actually impact the quality of life for our constituents, but for democrats, impeachme

look at the standards they set for themselves a few months ago . the democrats said the evidence have to be overwhelming, yet the -- in hearing after hearing the evidence they presented was either hearsay, speculation and conjecture, or the result of a policy disagreement about how to treat the ukraine. democrats promised that after public hearings there would be some newfound, animated public support for impeachment. the reality is that they have failed to meet their burden. so now with no bipartisanship, matter of fact the only bipartisan vote would be against impeachment with no direct evidence, no enhanced public support for impeachment. democrats will continue to visit the opportunity costs for this division on our country. we would like to work on infrastructure, on a solemn reform, on policy changes that will also impact the quality of life for our constituents. for democrats impeachment is there obsession and total focus and it is deeply disappointing that they failed to meet the standards set for themselves. questions? >> [indiscernible] n

we have heard from emmanuel macron saying that a uk trade deal must remain loyal to eu standard.disconnect, because there are very different standards that eu demands, certainly in agriculture, to that of the us that does wash it can, some of it, with chlorine which is very different. the important thing to understand here is that we have been through this before, chlorinated chicken in the nhs is enough to think any deal. what is absolute priority for the government right now is to get in place proper trade government structure, that doesn't exist at the moment. but thatis doesn't exist at the moment. but that is going to be really critical to make sure that trust into a system, there is proper consultation, those issues are headed off before you get into negotiations, there is no accusations of things going on behind closed doors, we need clear para meters behind closed doors, we need clear parameters whether the nhs is in the deal or not in the deal, those straightforward issues need to be put into place quite quickly and then all those deals will go through faster. a lot of w