do you have any argument on federalism you think that the communities are making a mistake -- stanek. >> guest: i'm behind constitutionalism particularly the public and i believe even the federal law to conflict. they won't be accused of taking the question, but let's remind people there is federal law that has been passed and it is against federal law. the obama administration has decided that may be they could argue that we would never pass as it is just like the states decided that as it stands this is another case of this administration going up against was established law is. >> host: can you explain what they have done in colorado? >> guest: they say essentially we won't enforce federal law. it's a class one substance against the law to sell it or use it and it's been told to lay off. i don't think that is a wise way to execute the law which they are sworn to do. if people don't like the federal law let would do more to change the federal law then let the states do whatever they want. i don't know how it would come out by the way. i think that it would come out against the law b

stanek a lot of what is driving this is racial anxiety being stoked by the right purposefully. you know this politics. this is sb 1070. [applause] >> that's ludicrous but it does create fear so one last point it has to be in code because most people would reject any politician that said the stand with me because i'm going to protect the good folks of the world. we as a country afraid to country every pda data that's what we have to work harder to see that the rhetoric has morphed into a language of culture and behavior that says this isn't about brown people it is about those that bring disease and are sneaking across the border to bring in isis with them. but the actual feeling in a lot of ways we've allowed ourselves and empowered ourselves to feel more comfortable with that to cover and it now has this new dog whistle language where you can feel those things that you don't have to acknowledge the stuff that you're feeling. the other point i will make just in terms of conservatives, i find it interesting when george will started using the phrase to refer to people like himsel

stanek there are lessons to draw from the attacks.as somewhat depressed listening to the soviet presentation to the question seemed to be between censorship and self-censorship. that seems to me precisely the wrong debate to be having. i am somewhat shocked to learn that you would have reservations about publishing images of christ and our guests to -- and analogous to the ones the danish paper published. that is just precisely the wrong approach. >> you would refrain from publishing things that you thought were either not interesting to the readers -- >> i wrote the editorial making the case why we didn't do print on the cartoons -- >> speak into the microphone. >> in 2005 or 2006 now i can safely say i was the author of the editorial why we didn't publish the cartoons. making the case that what you have the right to do isn't necessarily what the paper with a reputation off to. there is a distinction between what you have the right constitutionally speaking to print and what is tasteful and the appropriate wall street journal. i thin

stanek thank you for the question. we were just getting into that for jeremy back there. i think britain is at its best when we are out there treating them like cooperating and working with others in the world. we are in open country trading nation, part of the importunate works whether it is nato or the european union to the problem at the moment have too many things that drive people mad. people see that it's trying to become too much of the state rather than the organization. trying to take too much power. and i think what we need is a new deal with europe where we say we want to be in europe for the cooperation. we want common market but we want to be part of an ever closer union. maybe the countries in their own currency need to do that. we don't and we will keep it as the currency at least if i'm premaster. so if i can get a new deal, and i believe i can. i sat around the table the last five years. if i can get that deal i think that there is a prospect to say to the british people you choose you can stay in on this reform faces which would be good for britain but t