cling to how sackler family members transferred 10400000000 dollars from the privately held stanford, connecticut based company over the decade before the bankruptcy, or to holding sac with family members accountable for the opiate crisis. instead, us district judge colleen mcmann focused on whether the bankruptcy law even allows for the kind of deal during the new york based lawsuit. mcmann said the great unsettled question in this case is whether the bankruptcy court or any court is statutory lead, authorized to grant such releases. this issue has put the federal circuits for decades. purdue pharma says it will appeal the ruling either way. the deal which was rejected would not have help protect sackler family members from criminal charges, which some activists are calling for. for boom bust, i'm alex moore. hi love it. it's out for a quick break, but when we come back, the string of hacks that infected 2021 could flare up again with the holidays upon it. on the other side, we'll discuss what kind of threats we could see in the coming weeks is gonna break here. the numbers at the close. ah mm.