that stanislav kravchenko now looks the most incredible head of the new, well, new supreme court, but most dubious because, as correctly noted by my colleague, there are already doubts about him in advance, because the public council of integrity in 2017 adopted a conclusion about non-compliance with the criteria of integrity, and as you correctly said, the reason was that the judge was a member of the panel of judges that made the decision, which was later reviewed by the european court of human rights. the human rights court stated that the panel of judges, where stanislav kravchenko was present, referred to the recognition of the testimony of a person who was given without a defense attorney and that there was a violation of human rights, the right to defense and the judge this is not taken into account, and it looked like stanislav kravchenko tried to hide it during the competition to the supreme court in the declaration of integrity for 2015, perhaps because he did not mention the fact that such a decision had been reviewed in the supreme court, and it was not the only problemati

by the eh judge larisa larisa rogach and judge vitaliy zuyev, i.e., one of the judges, and stanislav kravchenkomended a meeting of judges of the criminal cassation court. that is, if they go there as a whole group to support this judge and in the context of journalists it is reported that kravchenko promised the judge to solve the issue of official apartments when he will be in the position of the chairman of the supreme court , er, actually, about some kind of conspiracy or something else , we can also talk about the question of where he will get it , where in the budget to write this money and it is already for sure only now judges don't have free apartments there, they don't need them. now , because of injuries to many other people , many people have lost many children. families, families of those who died in the war, they don't need apartments. ok and one more scandalous story, it is tragically scandalous . unfortunately, i will briefly voice it. maybe someone did not follow the news today, so he did not miss the head of one of the district courts of the kyiv region, namely the makariv cour

news after a high-profile corruption scandal was the supreme court elected a new chairman, stanislav kravchenkom, in total, four candidates applied for this position candidates, the voting took place in secret , the majority voted for stanislav kravchenko. and that is 108 judges out of 148 present , after which he immediately took the oath and sat down in the chair of the head of the supreme court stanislav kravchenko has many years of experience in the system, he was the head of the criminal court of cassation since 2017, and it was then that the public integrity council found inconsistencies in his declaration, in particular, kravchenko did not specify a plot of land in the city of kozelets in the chernihiv region and made decisions in violation of what he recognized the european court of human rights , i will remind you, the new head of the court was elected after the scandalous dismissal of vsevolod knyazev , his nabu, and he himself is accused of receiving a bribe of 2 million 700 thousand dollars decision-making in favor of the oligarch konstantin zhivago, the higher anti-corruption court

didn't cooperate with the investigation maybe remark yes, let's go before the elections of stanislav kravchenkocame the head of the supreme court well, yes, we mentioned about georgy berkadze, who was apparently present at the scene, was the first to write about this, our colleague marina danylyuk yermolayeva, our colleague in the past, yes, the americans denied this information. so i just let it pass by . it came to my ears. the white man said that it was not him and that he was at the scene of the accident for with the participation of the judge of the makarov court, tandyra was not present . this is just a person who looks like him, and now he is even threatening to sue danyliuk yermolaeva . let's meet in court. he wrote this post . it is a pity that some journalists who are so they say he said there, they give out misinformation for the information, i'm sorry, it's really not him, he's a very similar person let's put it this way, but you can check, yes, the supreme court , the elections, the elections of stanislav kravchenko , they voted for him yesterday, he was elected and it's interestin

, the majority voted for stanislav kravchenko, it was 108 judges out of 148 present .2011, he was a judge of the higher specialized court of ukraine, which was created under the fugitive president viktor yanukovych, in 2017, he became the head of the criminal court of cassation, just then the civic council of integrity found inconsistencies in his declaration, in particular, he made a decision in violation of what the european court of human rights recognized and did not yet specify a plot of land in the city of kozelets in the chernihiv region to declare, for 10 years i wrote out a house and land of 9 acres in the village of kozelets, chernihiv region well, again, for years i wrote only the house considering that he cannot be in the air, the head of the supreme court has a strong influence, he is a member of the high council of justice, this is a kind of court over judges , he does not have immunity or can remove a judge from his duties, he decides who will be a member of the higher qualification commission that selects candidates and fills empty seats in courts throu

only news after the high-profile corruption scandal the supreme court elected a new chairman stanislav kravchenkoame him in general for this four candidates applied for the position, the voting took place in secret for stanislav kravchenko, the majority voted. and this is 108 judges out of 148 present, after which he immediately took the oath and sat down in the chair of the chairman of the supreme court . then the public integrity council found inconsistencies in his declaration , in particular, kravchenko did not specify a plot of land in the city of kozelets in the chernihiv region and made a decision in violation of what was recognized by the european the court of human rights, let me remind you, the new head of the court was elected after the scandalous dismissal of vsevolod knyazev, he is accused of receiving a bribe of 2 million 700 thousand dollars, allegedly for making decisions in favor of the oligarch kostyantyn zhivago, the higher anti-corruption court sent knyazev behind bars for two months of arrest with the possibility of bail of more than 107 million uah , the judges called these

the supreme court elected a new leader stanislav kravchenko became the head of the criminal court ofassation , 108 judges and 148 attendees voted for him . earlier, anti-corruption authorities caught the former head of the supreme court, vsevolod knyazev, for a bribe of almost 3 million dollars, and finally, in our video review about someone whom the russian media have been trying to bury for a long time, valery zaluzhny denied the moscow fake about his so-called disappearance, the officer of the zsu, anatoly shtefan , released a joint video with the commander-in-chief of the ukrainian army. i sincerely thank all ukrainians, together we will definitely win, and not only today, but always thank you all, because it is for bakhmut that led to the closure of the largest salt production plant in ukraine after the defeat of artem salt, the only producer of white gold in the country remained the drohobytsk saltworks is the oldest enterprise in the country, it has been operating since 1390. can salt from drohobych cover the demand of ukrainians? our kateryna oliynyk, a technologist, oksana b

court a new chairman was elected , he became the head of the criminal court of cassation, stanislav kravchenko until now the chairman of the criminal court of cassation as part of the new supreme court, 108 voted for him of the 148 judges present during the meeting, a dispute began between the judges about whether the head of the ukrainian armed forces should be elected now. two of these are already fighting in different units , for example , they made a cabriolet-type bohun specially for paratroopers and stormtroopers, where they equipped places for personnel by making from it, an amphibious vehicle is currently being tested by other units, various types of weapons are installed for use in military operations, there is even a version of a medical evacuation vehicle , and there are already applications from separate commanders , added varschikov. and this is the option when, in modern conditions, every boy who today has a little more adrenaline in his life than a normal civilian, such a cabriolet. i think this is a very necessary thing, starting with the evacuation of the wounded and continuin

the ex-head of the supreme court has already been dismissed, we have a new head appointed, stanislav kravchenkowas elected, although the majority of experts and activists were against him, talking about certain nuances, but kravchenko denied that he allegedly offered apartments to judges of the supreme court for voting in his favor, what kind of story is this, that is, a court that would have to pass the final verdict, which should be clear and transparent and so that everyone understands the court's decision, but here there is some confusion and some such things that simply do not fit in the head and have been going on for several weeks yes, you are right, in fact, there was a story about the offer of an apartment, because in the context of what happens in the media, there is information that he offered free apartments to the judges at lunchtime for the votes there. in fact , he cannot confirm or deny such information, because publicly he expressed me like this your program before that, but the queen, this could be in the context of the fact that judges really have the right to use service tea

ammunition depot one radar station and two artillery units at the firing positions of the court stanislav kravchenko voted for by 100 eight judges out of 148 present during session, a dispute began between the judges regarding whether the head of the ukrainian armed forces should be elected now, i will remind you that the previous head, vsevolod knyazev, was removed from office due to accusations of receiving a bribe in 2,700,000 dollars, a judge killed a national guardsman in the capital, it happened at a roadblock on beresteysky prospect with a lexus car, the driver ran into servicemen from injuries received , the soldier died on the spot, said the spokeswoman of the state bureau of investigation olga chekanova , the head of the district court was detained by law enforcement officers from conducting an examination of the state of the he refused treatment in a health care facility, according to ukrainian pravda, we are talking about the head of the makariv district court of the kyiv region oleksiy tandyra are used procedural measures regarding the forced collection of biological samples in court, a

shouted no, here the briber should be shot well , we waited well, we elected another judge from stanislav kravchenkond 148 judges voted here again the question arises because this mr. kravchenko, whom we are talking about, turned out to have released at one time, well, he didn't pass at all, for the sake of integrity, he can't explain his fortune, well, he forgot, he spent it in his memory. well, at one time, in 2003 , he released the well-known colonel fart, who was involved in the murder well, he was not involved in strangling him, he killed the journalist georgy gonka, like he is already convicted for the murder of gongadze, please explain the metamorphosis, the convicted and the general are so convicted, in my opinion, for life, but the point is different, the point is that the judge of the princes was already the compromise of the bank and with the supreme court judge the prince was also a compromise of the judge of the princes who, in principle, well, when we say that he allegedly organized these acts of justice with regard to georgy ros well, not quite, first of all i want to remind you throu

of the supreme court was elected , he became the head of the criminal court of cassation, stanislav kravchenko was voted for by 108 judges out of 148 present . during the meeting, a dispute began between the judges about whether the head of the supreme administrative court should be elected now. i will remind you of the previous vsevolod knyazev removed from office due to accusations of receiving a bribe of 2 million 700 thousand dollars at night in the center of russian krasnodar , loud explosions were heard, telegram channels reported that anti-air defense forces had worked after the city was allegedly attacked by a drone , a video of a possible strike on a target appeared on social networks to be a communication tower, local sources write later the governor of the krasnodar region, viniamin kondratiev, said that the cause of the explosion was the fall of two drones, according to him, there was destruction, but the infrastructure was not damaged 12 years in prison such a sentence was handed down here by a collaborator of kharkiv region, the traitor took part in the repression of the resident

oleksandr utchenko for radio freedom the supreme court of ukraine got a new head he became stanislav kravchenko for by 108 judges out of 148. kravchenko replaced vsevolod knyazev, who is suspected of receiving a bribe of $3 million . the judge of the supreme court of ukraine is elected for a term of four years, and the supreme court is the highest body in the ukrainian justice system, it is interesting that a day before the election of the head of the supreme court, specialized experts wrote about the fact that there is already an agreement in the court to elect kravchenko, as noted by mykhailo zhirnakov, co-founders, chairman of the board of the dure foundation, this is an analytical center that monitors work in the field of justice in ukraine, judge kravchenko has a negative opinion of the public integrity council because he made a decision in violation of human rights, which was recognized by the european court of human rights person, but he did not indicate this in the declaration of integrity and did not declare property. in addition, zhernakov claims that the judges voted for kravchenko b