you knew- stanley kubrick? i knew him for five years _ stanley kubrick?e — stanley kubrick? i knew him for five years. he suggested - five years. he suggested working with him for a year, i moved to england and rented a house with my wife and son. my first experience was clockwork orange. i observed it, and i learned how to do it and how to do financial things and planning things, getting things. planning things, getting thins. ., ., i. things. you mentioned you are less of a creative _ things. you mentioned you are less of a creative input - things. you mentioned you are less of a creative input and - less of a creative input and more of the organiser, but can you sum up what a film producer role is in that way?— role is in that way? well, my role, a role is in that way? well, my role. a film _ role is in that way? well, my role, a film producer- role is in that way? well, my role, a film producer doesn't| role, a film producer doesn't mean anything... there is the producer, that was stanley. my role was to make deals, to get things. they have to be ther

you knew stanley kubrick? i knew him - there. you knew stanley kubrick? i knew him for| there. years, he suggested - kubrick? i knew him for 12 years, he suggested i- kubrick? i knew him for 12 i years, he suggested i moved to england, i rented a house with my wife and my little son, my first experience and practice was the clockwork orange, i observed this and i learned how to do it, and how to do financial things and planning things, and getting things. you mention you — things, and getting things. you mention you are _ things, and getting things. you mention you are less of a creative input and more of the organiser of people can use sum up organiser of people can use sum up what a film producer role is in that way? mr; up what a film producer role is in that way?— in that way? my role, a film producer— in that way? my role, a film producer doesn't _ in that way? my role, a film producer doesn't mean i in that way? my role, a film i producer doesn't mean anything. there is the producer that was stanley, my role was to make deals, to get things, and to have to be there on time

stanley kubrick is already stanley kubrick when he's making that film.audition he sent me -- i was at a diner in los angeles, a very famous restaurant called the source, and it was made famous because woody allen, when he went out to find annie hall -- diane keaton, in "annie hall" -- he was a new yorker and didn't know how to drive that big cadillac and he thinks he's put the car in reverse and drives into the restaurant so i was sitting with somebody i know you know, david alan grier - >> seth: yeah. >> wonderful comedic actor and dramatic actor and we had just won this prize at the venice film festival for best actor and we were hoping that woody allen was in new york and not in los angeles driving around looking for annie hall, because in movies it's funny when somebody drives a car into a restaurant in real life, people get crushed and killed >> seth: yeah. [ light laughter ] >> so we were eating our pancakes, and there was a guy sitting over there and i didn't know who it was it was val kilmer. and he was looking at me, saying obscene things to me

i also love such space paintings, but stanley kubrick's space odyssey is still the most romantic for me, the most looking ahead. e scientific, rather fantastic space odyssey, but nevertheless later, there are already 20-30 years. you look at the picture, but how did he look ahead of all these tvs and phones special uh chat video on the internet, then we watched thought, that's it now i think that lord everything happened. so the whole future of space depends on this fantasy , which today we allow ourselves to be filmed or, uh, write in this or that high literature, but i have not yet heard any new literary space novels appear, and films are being made, everything will appear novels films hopefully. so i wish you good luck. everything depends on you. are you the closest you see an art connection or cinema and space. and even more so , tv is already here, so thank you. unfortunately , the approach time and everything was in one breath, but we have to return back to the ground. today , honored artist of russia , theater and film actor andrey merzlikin was visiting me on board the space

, and then an even more fantastic story pops up, it turns out that the great english director stanley kubricko made the first science fiction film in the history of cinema called space odyssey 2011, was released on the screen in 1968 in a year. before landing on the moon, ours filmed footage of the landing on the moon, the module and the astronauts' walk on the satellite by order, and ours does not deny this. listen to how many lunar episodes came to light. indeed, they filmed on the ground and there are enough shots in the nasa archive that illustrate this. however, the aerospace agency for a long time, for some reason they are not published, and then published. why because they admit that yes, we are talking about specially shot frames that we ordered in case, if for some reason it is not possible to get images from the moon. that is, you understand the subtlety of this story. and i launch a man to the moon, and just in case, if it doesn’t work out, i shoot how he lands on the moon in the event that it opens up to him to say, well, yes, we do this in order to show, just in case, if this wil

and the english stanley kubrick, who made the first science fiction film in the history of cinema calleddyssey 2011, which was released on screens in 1968, a year before the landing on the moon , he filmed by order our footage of the landing on the moon, the module and astronauts walking on the satellite, and ours does not deny it. this listen, as it turned out many lunar episodes. indeed, they filmed on the ground and there are enough shots in the nasa archive that illustrate this. however, the aerospace agency for some reason did not make them public for a long time, and then made it public. because they admit that yes, we are talking about specially filmed shots that they ordered for us in that case there is and will not succeed in for some reason to get images from the moon. that is, you understand the subtlety of this story. and i launch a man to the moon, and just in case, if it doesn’t work out, i shoot how he lands on the moon in case it opens, i can say, well, yes, we do this in order to show, just in case, if this does not happen , and it is impossible to verify, because there

a fantastic story , it turns out, the great english director stanley kubrick, who made the first scienceilm in the history titled space odyssey 2001, released on screen in 1968 for a year. before landing on the moon, ours shot footage of the landing on the moon of the module and the walk of the astronauts on the satellite, and ours.

an new him for five years already -- you knew| five years already —— you knew stanley kubrick. little son, my first experience in practice, they observed anai learns how to do it, and how to do financial things and planning things and getting things. you things and planning things and getting things-— getting things. you have mentioned _ getting things. you have mentioned that - getting things. you have mentioned that you - getting things. you have mentioned that you are l getting things. you have . mentioned that you are less getting things. you have - mentioned that you are less of a creative input and more of an organiser, can you sum up was a born producer's role is in that way? born producer's role is in that wa ? y born producer's role is in that wa ? g ., ., born producer's role is in that wa? , ., way? my role, a film producer doesnt way? my role, a film producer doesn't mean _ way? my role, a film producer doesn't mean anything. - way? my role, a film producer doesn't mean anything. there j way? my role, a film producer. doesn't mean anything. there is the producer, th

i also love such space paintings, but stanley kubrick's space odyssey is still the most romantic for the most looking ahead. e scientific, rather fantastic space odyssey, but nevertheless later, there are already 20-30 years. you look at the picture, but how he looked ahead all these tvs, special phones, these uh video communications on the internet, then we watched here's what he came up with. that's it. now i think that god everything happened. so that the whole future of the cosmos depends on their fantasy , which today we allow ourselves to film or, uh, write in this or that high literature, i have not yet heard any appearance of new literary space novels, and films are not understood as films. all right, let's wait. so i wish you good luck. everything depends on you. you are the closest. how art connected cinema and space, and even more so tv already, so thanks. unfortunately time is coming to an end was in one breath, but you have to go back to the ground. today , on board the space station, i was visiting the honored artist of russia , theater and film actor andrei merzlikin,

i also love such space paintings, but stanley kubrick's space odyssey is still the most romantic forost looking ahead. uh, scientific ah sci-fi space odyssey, but still later, there are already 20-30 years. you look at the picture, but as he looked ahead, all these tvs, phones, special uh video communications on the internet, then we looked, so he came up with. that's it. now i think that god everything will happen. so that the whole future of space depends on this fantasy, which today we allowed ourselves to film or , uh, to write in this or that high literature, but so far i have not heard any appearance of new literary cosmic novels, and films are not being made . everything will be waiting. so i wish you good luck. everything depends on you. you are the closest art has connected cinema and space. and even more so, tv is already here, so thank you. everything is now. unfortunately, time is coming to an end, everything was in one breath, but we have to return back to the ground. today i have aboard the space station in honored artist of russia , theater and film actor andrey merzli

one of the most famous films by the late, great director stanley kubrick. what you see here, this title image is one of the major characters in the film named major kong, actually riding a nuclear warhead being launched to start world war three, which more or less was understood to equate with nuclear annihilation. and thinking in terms of nuclear catastrophe, what cold war political scientists on the u.s. side refer as mutually assured destruction, where there's one side in a comfort two has the power to completely annihilate the other side. but then again, the other side can respond by annihilating the first side. so the idea fundamentally, when we talk about mutually assured destruction and the history of nuclear technology in the cold war, is that rationally neither side should launch those weapons first. what's called the first strike, because both know that would be game over for everybody. this movie, dr. strangelove posits instead that rationality dropped out and the consequences were predictable and completely catastrophic. now, this is an assumpti

i'd like stanley kubrick's dangerous. how? this mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize the current li are very different sentiments as taking hold. it's not so much that the machines have become so intelligent that they as i'm a nation, humans. but rather than we are gradually submitting to the standardized logic of the machine in call centers like this one, employees have to adapt to an algorithm and are increasing the being monitored by all sufficient intelligence. software identifies keywords and the conversation to ensure instructions are being followed emotions of the customer and the employee you're analyzing real time. anger is detecting the system directly prompts the employee to be more empathetic at the end of the conversation, employee performance is race it. and if it falls below a certain school, they are immediate defiant. is everyone i know the we are witnessing the tone of an age in which multitudes of people are forced to adopt the light to the dynamics of interpretive system so that you do

film to myself these cosmos everything that we called, too, i love such space pictures, but stanley kubrick'scientific and fantastic space odyssey, but nevertheless later, there already 20-30 years old and you look at the picture, but how he looked ahead all these tvs, special phones, e-e video communication on the internet, then we watched, he thought up all this, now i think that, lord, it all happened. so that the whole future of space depends on this fantasy, which today we allow ourselves to be filmed or, uh, write in this or that high literature, i have not yet heard any appearance of new space literary novels and films.

a fantastic story, it turns out, the great english director stanley kubrick, who made the first sciencein the history of cinema called space odyssey 2011 released on the screen in 1968 for a year. before landing on the moon , ours filmed footage of the moon landing, the module and the astronauts' walks on the satellite by order, and ours does not deny it. this listen. this is how it turned out. many of the lunar episodes were indeed filmed on earth, and there are enough shots in the nasa archive that illustrate this. however, the aerospace agency for a long time, for some reason, did not discover them, and then made them public. why because they admit that yes, we are talking about specially filmed shots that she ordered us in case, if it doesn’t work out for some reason to get images from the moon. that is, you understand the subtlety of this story. and i launch a man to the moon, and just in case, if it doesn’t work out, i shoot how he lands on the moon in the event that it opens up to him to say, well, yes, we do this in order to show, just in case, if this will not happen, and it is

an international stanley kubrick spotted— an international stanley kubrick spotted this years ago, rernernertwe get, ve— but look, the reality is that if we got, we could— but look, the reality is that if we got, we could actually have a raratise— we got, we could actually have a raratise .— we got, we could actually have a raratise . it— we got, we could actually have a paradise . if the— we got, we could actually have a paradise . if the world was we paradise. if the world was we titn-t— paradise. if the world was we titn-t nave— paradise. if the world was we didn't have to. _ paradise. if the world was we didn't have to. c didn't have to. it's not possible . steve, don't be such possible. steve, don't be such a socialist . the world is utopia socialist. the world is utopia doesn't have never, ever you end up place presenters, would you could you imagine too much orwell? a couple of robots in tne— orwell? a couple of robots in tne nittie— orwell? a couple of robots in the middle here.— 7 a couple of robots in the middle here. yeah. ii/tis «ttis the middle here. yeah. yes, yes, evastiy. — th

a ten-meter wheel on which astronaut stanley kubrick's space odyssey runs it was made in full size ands a challenge, everything on the land of weightlessness was only removed by kubrick according to the soviet system with the help of cables. soviet cinematographers came up with a different way in the film through hardships to the stars by richard viktorov, the actors were immersed in the pool. this time everything is really clear, how to shoot? weightlessness how to build scenes and position actors in a space odyssey of the future and while you're watching the challenge know yulia overpowered the first actress in space. meanwhile , may 20, that is today as part of the program. night at the museum at the museum of cinema will be a presentation of a book about one of the most talented directors who worked in the genre of science fiction, the discoverer of richardi quizzes attention on the ship. we've reached our design speed. listen, are we flying at the speed of light. yes, almost even i myself am moscow kosyaopiya youths in the universe through thorns to the stars. this is all directed