appeal numbers -- it has -- 18-060 and 18-061, the union square business improvement district and stanley roth versus san francisco public works bureau of street use and mapping, two separate apaelz. subject property is 281 geary street protesting the issuance on april 21, 2018 to san francisco's hometown creamery of a mobile food facility permit, to operate at a location 80 linear feet east of the friday and geary street intersection. this is permit number 17 mff-0001 for further consideration. on june 20, 2018, the board voted 3-1-1, president fong dissented and commissioner swig was absent. the restriction would address concerns about congestion in the area. lacking the four votes needed to pass, the motion failed. upon a motion by commissioner honda, the board voted by 3-1-1 to continue this matter to allow vice president swig to participate in the vote, so the matter has been submitted and vice president swig, did you have an opportunity to review the video and materials for these appeals? >> commissioner swig: yes, i actually watched the proceedings from home on the night of the event, s

. >> my name is stanley roth. i've been in this business 44 years. in 1974, this board actually overruled the police department and gave me a peddler permit, which was actually the first peddler permit in the city. i am the owner of the stanley steamer hot dog cart. i have to agree with karen, this is the wrong location for a food truck. and my job tonight is going to be to try and go into the -- the legislation. i think the most important line in this is line 23, where it says consequently, the location restrictions included in this legislation are intended to -- i'm sorry, the locational restrictions are intended to address these public concerns, and those are the concerns about -- and so the locations that are put together, these restrictions are the foundation of the ordinance, and there's three mandatory location requirements that are violated in this approval, and that's what i'd like to review. so if you'll bear with me, they are -- the location is -- violates the 6 feet from sidewalk furniture rule. it doesn't provide the clear path of 6 feet