have voted against 3 sir keir starmer�*s have voted against a sir keir starmer�*s position. presumably, they would then be sacked from the front bench?— front bench? labour forces are makin: front bench? labour forces are making that — front bench? labour forces are making that pretty _ front bench? labour forces are making that pretty clear. - front bench? labour forces are making that pretty clear. it - front bench? labour forces are making that pretty clear. it is i front bench? labour forces are | making that pretty clear. it is a whipped — making that pretty clear. it is a whipped vote. they are saying you have to _ whipped vote. they are saying you have to turn up and you have to do what _ have to turn up and you have to do what the _ have to turn up and you have to do what the party tells you to do. if not, _ what the party tells you to do. if not. in _ what the party tells you to do. if not, in terms of collective responsibility, then got a choice either_ responsibility, then got a choice either to— responsibility, then got a choice either to resign or be sacked. so

starmer: thank you. thank you. [laughter] -- [applause] [applause] mr. starmer: thank you.nk you. thank you, conference. thank you, conference. democracy is citizen led, politics needs an upset. we need to take back the people's hous we are in crisis. [inaudible] mr. starmer: thank you, thank you conference. thank you. thank you, conference. thank you. thank you, conference. [applause] test or power, that is why we changed our party conference. [indiscernible] [applause] mr. starmer: thank you. and it was just as well was made because my wife is really beautiful. thank you, marie, for those words. my father would have loved to have been here and heard you saying those words. thank you so much for doing that honor. and thank you conference. [applause] thank you for that perception, this is fantastic to be here with you in liverpool again. and now, before i get going, i know what you're thinking. please, please, please, no more [indiscernible] and i think you are righ but conference, i want to offer my sympathies to manchester. not for that reason. but because i really do fee

starmer says?n. and actually, tom, a lot of conservative voters out there are saying that suella braverman is one of the very few conservative of the real conservatives left. and the deep irony here is that seven teen members shadow members of keir starmer's shadow ministerial team have directly defied ministerial team have directly defied him on the issue of a ceasefire in gaza. >> now , that would suggest that >> now, that would suggest that if the labour party were to hold themselves to the same standard as article eight of the ministerial code, keir starmer should be sacking 17 of his shadow ministers, but he's chosen so. so chosen to not do so. so sometimes there's greater politics comes into play politics that comes into play with regard to how the ministerial code is interpreted. ultimately, the ultimate arbiter of that code is the prime minister himself. so it could be the case that the prime minister says this is a sacking says this is not a sacking offence, but ultimately only this to the

wants be prime starmer?ing be clamp down on is it going to be international students, it international students, is it going occupations going to be shortage occupations or to be those or is it going to be those refugee routes? or is it going to be those releea routes? or is it going to be those releea route to or is it going to be those releea routeto suggest what he's >> he needs to suggest what he's going do, if he has any hope. going to do, if he has any hope. >> and i can't imagine it >> and i can't imagine when it comes it, when it comes comes down to it, when it comes down detail matthew, down to the detail of matthew, that willing to. that he will be willing to. well, take a tough stance on this when it actually comes to the practical terms of migration policy , because let's remember, policy, because let's remember, it's pretty obvious that a huge number of his backbenchers want to have their illiberal immigration policy, whether it comes asylum policy, whether comes to asylum policy, whether it to

, to starmer's credit he has _ know, starmer, to starmer's credit he has rid — know, starmer, to starmer'spoisoned then. those who argue he hasn't won then. those who argue he hasn't won the hearts— then. those who argue he hasn't won the hearts of— then. those who argue he hasn't won the hearts of electorate are correct _ the hearts of electorate are correct. we have a visionless offer from _ correct. we have a visionless offer from both— correct. we have a visionless offer from both parties, and a vision can tip the _ from both parties, and a vision can tip the balance. i do from both parties, and a vision can tip the balance.— tip the balance. i do think that the idea that the _ tip the balance. i do think that the idea that the conservatives - tip the balance. i do think that the idea that the conservatives might | tip the balance. i do think that the i idea that the conservatives might be able idea that the conservatives might be abte to— idea that the conservatives might be abte to turn— idea that the conservatives might be able to turn round _ idea that the conservatives might be ab

— resignation mean for sir keir starmer? , ., , , starmer? it means is that today. — starmer? the first thing it means is that today. this _ starmer? the first thing it means is that today, this issue _ starmer? the first thing it means is that today, this issue has _ starmer? the first thing it means is that today, this issue has sort - starmer? the first thing it means is that today, this issue has sort of. that today, this issue has sort of had all of us talking rather than what the labour leadership wanted to be on the agenda today, which is their position on the king's speech yesterday and particularly a focus on education and the number of children who are missing days in school. that is what they wanted and will highlight today in parliament but that is not what we're talking about now. that i think is a frustration for them. more importantly, i think the bigger issueis importantly, i think the bigger issue is the way that this puts a spotlight on the sort of depth of feeling in some parts of the labour party about the leadership's pos

mine, and this is in keir starmer's mine, and this is 12_ is in keir starmer's mine, and this is 12fter a general election— is 12 months ahead, after a general election when he was with the government as prime minister in the same _ government as prime minister in the same things said as of the labour prime _ same things said as of the labour prime ministers in norway and australia — prime ministers in norway and australia assist the parties in spain — australia assist the parties in spain or— australia assist the parties in spain or in germany, they're not going _ spain or in germany, they're not going for— spain or in germany, they're not going for a — spain or in germany, they're not going for a cease—fire, they're gone for extended humanitarian calls and you do— for extended humanitarian calls and you do not— for extended humanitarian calls and you do not have to be stuck i may have _ you do not have to be stuck i may have to _ you do not have to be stuck i may have to bring in all the necessary supplies— have to bring in all the necessary supplies but you have to remember at th

keir starmer argues that it was actually _ expected? was actually a _ expected? keir starmer argues that it was actually a little _ expected? keir starmer argues that it was actually a little smaller, - it was actually a little smaller, certainly amongst his frontbenchers thanit certainly amongst his frontbenchers than it might have been but what is the evidence? he says there were more than those who ended up resigning who had expressed sympathy with the idea of a ceasefire and he has spent the last couple of days meeting people one—on—one or in pairs to try and persuade people round. de curiosity with all of this really is it was not about changing uk government policy or even about changing labour policy in the context of what we're seeing in the east, it was seen trivial, procedural, irrelevant, but it mattered and certainly matters as far as keir starmer sees it because he wants to present himself as a prime minister in waiting and saw this as a dress rehearsal for what he would do when he was in government point the difficulty for

just as sir keir starmer was t in to to go. just as sir keir starmer was trying to get _ to go.o get his — to go. just as sir keir starmer was trying to get his party _ to go. just as sir keir starmer was trying to get his party together- to go. just as sir keir starmer was trying to get his party together to | trying to get his party together to face an election, in what could be a general election year next year, this is quite a setback to those plans. where does that leave his labour party right now? this plans. where does that leave his labour party right now?- labour party right now? this is a articular labour party right now? this is a particular issue _ labour party right now? this is a particular issue where _ labour party right now? this is a particular issue where clear- particular issue where clear divisions within the party are exacerbated by events out of their control in the middle east. obviously people have come back into the labour party since the corbin era, someone supported israel, not all, others from different political traditions with the labour party, so

starmer: how has it come to this?eople paying for their own health care in a cost-of-living crisis? waiting for weeks, months and years just before what they need, that is the whole point of our nhs, being the solution for all of us. [indiscernible] [applause] we have got to get it back on its feet. thank you conference. thank you, thank you. this is a legal loophole that allows some the richest people in the world to avoid playing cash paying taxes in return. that is something we could invest in our nhs, that has always been our priority. right now, the biggest challenge is cutting waiting lists. we will invest that money in boosting capacity and get our nhs working around-the-clock to paytaff -- and pay staff to do it. appointments. you will be seen, a we will be clearing the backlog seven days a week. [applause] conference, if all we do is place the nhs on a pedestal, then it will remain on life support. i know some people don't like the word reform, but i tell you now there is no other option. we must be the gover

brutal attack ad on starmer , brutal attack ad on starmer, saying starmer wants open borders.l be asking the question after a series of brutal murders with people wearing full face coverings as people dressed as hamas terrorists at pro—palestinian protests and also a rise in hate crimes, is it time to repeal british laws and change it so we ban full face coverings and balaclavas on british streets? all of that coming up in the next action packed hour . it's next action packed hour. it's fair to say it's completely kicking off down under about the nigel farage allegations. first of all, they're trying to completely destroy nigel's political career. they're trying to destroy his reputation on the show. and now allegations he hasn't even seen the video . and hasn't even seen the video. and itv, if they publish , they'll be itv, if they publish, they'll be damned by an ofcom sting. this one is reaching fever pitch all that coming in the next hour. but first, here's the latest news headlines with polly middlehurst . martin thank you middlehurst. martin thank you and good evening to

is there 'eo ard voting for keir starmer. is there jeepardy in _ voting for keir starmer.there jeopardy in anything _ voting for keir starmer. is there jeopardy in anything tomorrow l voting for keir starmer. is there i jeopardy in anything tomorrow for the labour party? nick was talking about the bear traps that are being set by the conservatives. yes. about the bear traps that are being set by the conservatives.— set by the conservatives. yes, so the king's _ set by the conservatives. yes, so the king's speech _ set by the conservatives. yes, so the king's speech tomorrow is i set by the conservatives. yes, so l the king's speech tomorrow is one set by the conservatives. yes, so - the king's speech tomorrow is one of rishi sunak�*s final opportunities, one of those final roles of the —— rolls of the dice to put clear blue water between his tory party and the labour party. we have seen on issues such as the war in israel and in gaza, that government and labour are united but ahead of a general election, on the domestic front which is so important, rishi sunak is really go

nicholas and more strife starmer. we're strife for keir starmer.acyeah it's well, we were just >> yeah it's well, we were just talking about this labour councillor who quit over backlash against party's gaza stance wins back seat wins back seat as independent. so this was sophia naqvi from the ward of plaistow north. it's an east london ward in the council, newham council. she was furious when keir starmer said she he wouldn't ask for a ceasefire or pressure israel for ceasefire. she also say and yeah, yeah , she also say and yeah, yeah, apparently i didn't listen to this interview on lbc myself, but apparently keir starmer has also said allegedly that israel has a right to cut off electricity and to water gaza. well, i presume to northern gaza , because israel was was encouraging or was demanding, advising all inhabitants of northern gaza to move south because operations started from the north. and i don't recall all any other conflict in the world when one of the two belligerent parts is supposed to provide the other side with electricity and wat

that was sir keir starmer speaking. rishi sunak— growth. that was sir keir starmer speaking. starmer speaking. rishi sunak the prime i speaking. rishi sunak the prime minister had his response. he thanked the king for making that speech, but also criticise labour's economic plans. he speech, but also criticise labour's economic plans.— economic plans. he called them dangemus- _ economic plans. he called them dangerous. let _ economic plans. he called them dangerous. let me _ economic plans. he called them dangerous. let me also - economic plans. he called them dangerous. let me also thank. economic plans. he called them i dangerous. let me also thank the leader_ dangerous. let me also thank the leader of— dangerous. let me also thank the leader of the opposition for his contribution to this debate and, indeed, — contribution to this debate and, indeed, his first u—turn of it. as a former_ indeed, his first u—turn of it. as a former republican, he used to think this country— former republican, he used to think this country shouldn't even have a king's— this country shouldn't e

were to see _ their games, is so kier starmer were to see it _ their games, is so kier starmer weret the _ either themselves constituents felt that the calls for a ceasefire was so overwhelming that they needed to back an _ so overwhelming that they needed to back an snp motion as well as presumably backing the labour motion calling _ presumably backing the labour motion calling for— presumably backing the labour motion calling for a _ presumably backing the labour motion calling for a huge range of other things— calling for a huge range of other things including a humanitarian pause — things including a humanitarian pause but some are gone further than the official— pause but some are gone further than the official line and sided with the snp in _ the official line and sided with the snp in calling for an immediate ceasefire — snp in calling for an immediate ceasefire. ~ ., snp in calling for an immediate ceasefire. . . , snp in calling for an immediate ceasefire. . , , ., ceasefire. what i can see is that three resignations _ ceasefire. what i can see is that three resignations of

i'll be asking one of starmer? i'll be asking one of the party's most high profile supporters, ann widdecombe . tice supporters, ann widdecombe. tice versus anderson . whose side are versus anderson. whose side are you on? two hours of big opinion, big debate and big entertainment. my big opinion is on the way. it's not for the faint hearted. first, the news headunes faint hearted. first, the news headlines and our in armstrong . headlines and our in armstrong. >> yeah, very good evening to you, aaron armstrong here in the newsroom . i'm thousands of newsroom. i'm thousands of people lining the streets of cheered as a convoy carrying the third group of hostages released by arrived in israel. the by hamas arrived in israel. the international red cross says 17 captives made the journey from gaza. meanwhile, israel's prison service has confirmed the release of 39 palestinian prisoners in exchange , it's the prisoners in exchange, it's the third of a four day pause in fighting . in total. the two fighting. in total. th

for keir starmer is has more. for keir starmer is standing firm on his line on israel, but he's already lost one frontbencher. >> can he really afford to lose any more .7 any more.7 >> prince of prince sc a judge is expected to give decision on whether prince harry and others privacy case against the daily mail publisher will go any further . mail publisher will go any further. we'll have mail publisher will go any further . we'll have the mail publisher will go any further. we'll have the very latest . and protest poppy latest. and protest poppy sellers. that's the message from defence secretary grant shapps, who has told pro—palestinian protesters to put politics aside this weekend . this weekend. and of course, we want to know your thoughts on all of the issues that we're covering today, particularly on this issue of poppy sellers . this issue of poppy sellers. would you feel safe.7 would you feel not intimidated to go and sell some poppies at a train station or in your local high street? have you done we want

keir starmer lost ten of his — ceasefire. keir starmer lost ten of his front _ ceasefire.ent for a ceasefire. the scale perhaps explained by pressure from their constituency. waheed has previously been a labour voter but now says he would seek an independent candidate instead. we are not actually seeing anything in terms of our voice being heard, ora real recognition of the fact that actually there is a lot of people who are taking this position that they want to ceasefire.— ceasefire. but in the constituency - ceasefire. but in the constituency of - ceasefire. but in the - constituency of hendon, which has a significantjewish population, daniel says the party stance is a welcome change from the past. keir starmer has shown good solidarity with the jewish people, some good solidarity with israel, and i hope he can maintain that and i'm sure he will. keir starmer had hoped that his motion calling for a longer humanitarian pause could keep mps on side. in a letter to night he said he regrets that some colleagues felt unable to support his position, but wrote that leadership

we've just chip away at starmer. disciplined and got to be disciplined and determined do john says. determined to do it, john says. >> done, suella. we are all >> well done, suella. we are all behind you all of this. you behind you on all of this. you would get my vote. suzanne says. suella is brave. a woman , and suella is brave. a woman, and she is right. in every single way. angela says the suella letter just shows that the tory voters have been used and conned by rishi paul. i'm so proud of suella. she stood her ground and she's still battling for the people of this country. more power to her downing street have responded to suella braverman saying the pm believes in actions , not words. that is the actions, not words. that is the short version of this. he goes is proud that this government has brought forward the toughest legislation to tackle illegal migration this country has seen and subsequently reduced the number crossings by a number of boat crossings by a third this year. and whatever the outcome of the s

what do you think, starmer think, then? is sir keir starmer in? actually a dicey spot? in?on. >> on. >> and i'd like to split that question into two parts because you've got 60s. >> , you know. >> so, you know. >> so, you know. >> right. okay. well, he starts can be positioned and he can't flip flop from it for a particular reason. but i think the reason the labour party may lose the next general election is because their long term policy is always been to have open borders and mass immigration. >> new immigrants always vote, tend to vote. labour and it's also been a natural home for the muslim community. >> but this week there's a new player on the block and the party of islam registered with the electoral commission to try and start a new party. >> it was refused, but for technical reasons, so they'll redo that and so soon we will have that party there. and that is a bit of rug pull for the is a bit of a rug pull for the labour party because there's a huge block vote which will go to another party, but also red wall. >> you know, they they lent their vote to the tories, b

>> taxi for keir starmer taxis for starmer by way, the for keir starmer by the way, the people adoreivers take veterans to and drivers who take veterans to and from this weekend. drivers who take veterans to and frorwonderful,end. drivers who take veterans to and frorwonderful, etcetera . um, i've >> wonderful, etcetera. um, i've forgotten what i going. forgotten what i was going. >> listening, boys and >> if you're listening, boys and girls, salute you. we girls, we salute you. and we thank you for 100. thank you for your 100. >> i mean, that is amazing. that is the spirit this is five is the spirit of this is five years of labour chaos. is the spirit of this is five yealabourbour chaos. is the spirit of this is five yealabour split. haos. is the spirit of this is five yealabour split. do»s. is the spirit of this is five yealabour split. do they deserve >> labour split. do they deserve government? i mean? government? what does i mean? >> call him sir >> people jokingly call him sir flip flop . let's see how firm he stands. >> absolutely. this is a test. >> absolutely. this is a test

., ~ , ., ~ leader of the opposition keir starmer! ., ~ ~ .,~ starmer! thank you, mr speaker. mr speaker. before i turn to _ starmer! thank you, mr speaker. before i turn to the _ starmer! thank you, mr speaker. before i turn to the address, - starmer! thank you, mr speaker. before i turn to the address, i'm | before i turn to the address, i'm sure the whole house would like to join me in paying tribute to his majesty the king on the occasion of his first gracious address is our sovereign. of course, he did give the address last year and he has for some time enjoyed the best view in the house on how it should be done, but nonetheless, this is a new chapter for him and but nonetheless, this is a new chapterfor him and our country, so we pay tribute to him on that. let me also congratulate both the mover and the second for their fantastic speech is just a and the second for their fantastic speech isjust a moment and the second for their fantastic speech is just a moment ago. and the second for their fantastic speech isjust a moment ago. the right honourable member for scarboroug

i still have the foggiest what keir starmer stands for. ilirui’e’iiii what keir starmer stands for.t, but the problem is you may not have very long, you may if you can�*t deliver any of these, what�*s the point? if you can't deliver any of these, what's the point?— if you can't deliver any of these, what's the point? you're saying we can't do anything _ what's the point? you're saying we can't do anything because - what's the point? you're saying we can't do anything because there's i what's the point? you're saying we. can't do anything because there's an can�*t do anything because there�*s an election coming up? we know there�*s election coming up? we know there�*s election coming up? we know there�*s election coming up. it could even be january 2025 technically, so we can�*t not govern, and i think it is important. 0ne can�*t not govern, and i think it is important. one of the things that rishi sunak has said is that we have to make long—term you�*re watching bbc news. benjamin netanyahu benjamin neta nyahu says benjamin netanyahu says his country will assume responsibility for s

that unity which keir starmer has fought so , so hard starmer has fought so, so hard to win after thes of jeremy corbyn seems to be really quite surface deep , deep. quite surface deep, deep. >> jess phillips olivia. i see she is now taken to x after resigning. she's spoken of her belief in wanting to take practical action now concerning the war in gaza, but she does say that she will continue to fight for the labour government at that. the country desperately needs at the next general election , which may be election, which may be emphasises that this was very much a specific issue that they were voting on last night. it >> well, absolutely. and all of those shadow ministers who've resigned , all eight of them have resigned, all eight of them have said that they will continue to support keir starmer from the backbenches. and interestingly, john healey, the shadow defence secretary, said on the morning round this morning that it's a long way down the road. but he implied that there is a possibility that at least some of those shadow ministers who've been end up being been sacked could

i took the lead of the opposition, keir starmer . thank opposition, keir starmer. thank you, mr speaker . you, mr speaker. >> the prime minister obviously thinks so little of his own mps that he's had to peel david cameron away from his seven year exile in a shepherd's hut and make him foreign secretary. >> but a few months ago , the >> but a few months ago, the intelligence and security committee said that the now foreign secretary his role in a chinese investment fund may have been and this is their words, engineered by the chinese state. i hardly need to remind the prime minister of the threat posed by the chinese communist party or the intimidation against members of this house. so when will he instruct the foreign secretary to give full pubuc foreign secretary to give full public disclosure of his work for chinese interests? prime minister >> mr speaker, as i said, i'm delighted that the former prime minister has rejoined government as foreign secretary . we as a as as foreign secretary. we as a as an individual with unrivalled experience, he will help britain

>> taxi for keir starmer taxis for starmer by way, the for keir starmer by the way, the people adoreivers take veterans to and drivers who take veterans to and from this weekend. drivers who take veterans to and frorwonderful,end. drivers who take veterans to and frorwonderful, etcetera . um, i've >> wonderful, etcetera. um, i've forgotten what i going. forgotten what i was going. >> listening, boys and >> if you're listening, boys and girls, salute you. we girls, we salute you. and we thank you for 100. thank you for your 100. >> i mean, that is amazing. that is the spirit this is five is the spirit of this is five years of labour chaos. is the spirit of this is five yealabourbour chaos. is the spirit of this is five yealabour split. haos. is the spirit of this is five yealabour split. do»s. is the spirit of this is five yealabour split. do they deserve >> labour split. do they deserve government? i mean? government? what does i mean? >> call him sir >> people jokingly call him sir flip flop . let's see how firm he stands. >> absolutely. this is a test. >> absolutely. this is a test

keir starmere and. paul >> he's saying we are the govthat. keir starmer hasi. we are the govthat. keir starmer has to ’aul >> he's saying we are the govthat. keir starmer has to dol all that. keir starmer has to do really is just sort of play with a straight bat, really, isn't it? >> well, do you remember ted heath going the country with heath going to the country with that who governs back in that slogan who governs back in the danger with the 70s and the danger with asking kind of rhetorical asking that kind of rhetorical question might not get question is you might not get the you want. so rishi the answer you want. so rishi sunak election sunak going into an election saying, you want change? saying, do you want change? i think people do change, but think people do want change, but they it's him. it's they don't think it's him. it's quite asking quite risky. he's asking the wrong question. and wrong question. i think. and that's the danger. he had that's the real danger. he had one with king's speech one job with this king's speech and to reboot the and that

recognises, but keir starmer recognises, but keir starmer recognises, but keir starmer is not a protestng the arguments of a national politician concerned to see the best way of achieving what is a common concern about the palestinian suffering and loss of innocent lives. more steps need to be taken to protect those , and it's a leader protect those, and it's a leader who wants to take people with him. but in the end, a collective responsibility, a degree of discipline is required i >> -- >> cd ah, okay. so if a degree of discipline is required because you're obviously looking fonnard, perhaps to leading the country after the next general election, you're to going have lots of matters of foreign affairs to deal with and you're going to have a number of contrarians within own contrarians within your own party. should they be party. so how should they be disciplined likes of disciplined if the likes of claudia webb this claudia webb keep up this campaign , which goes against campaign, which goes against what the leader is what the labour leader is saying, should she and others lose whip ?

suggests to keep keir starmer suggests to keep keir starmer suggests to keep keir starmer out of number are both sides of the same socialist coin. high tax, high regulation , nanny state, pro net regulation, nanny state, pro net zero. that all equals low growth. no rishi sunak rishi sunakis growth. no rishi sunak rishi sunak is just diluted net zero. he's wiggled and wobbled around because he knows the pressure that i'm putting on him. the country does not want net zero. it wants growth. it wants action. it wants to stop the boats. it wants net zero immigration. that's what we stand for. and i promise you, no deals. i'm on the record. mark yeah. even if they offered me £5 million and a peerage, the answer is still no. yeah, well, that's because you don't need the you're absolutely. >> you're absolutely. >> you're absolutely. >> because i'm man of >> no, it's because i'm a man of principle and conviction that once and you are. once change and you are. >> i've actually always >> and i've actually always said, even going back to my old talk radio that are talk radio show, that you are a si

nicholas and more strife starmer. we're strife for keir starmer.acyeah it's well, we were just >> yeah it's well, we were just talking about this labour councillor who quit over backlash against party's gaza stance wins back seat wins back seat as independent. so this was sophia naqvi from the ward of plaistow north. it's an east london ward in the council, newham council. she was furious when keir starmer said she he wouldn't ask for a ceasefire or pressure israel for ceasefire. she also say and yeah, yeah , she also say and yeah, yeah, apparently i didn't listen to this interview on lbc myself, but apparently keir starmer has also said allegedly that israel has a right to cut off electricity and to water gaza. well, i presume to northern gaza , because israel was was encouraging or was demanding, advising all inhabitants of northern gaza to move south because operations started from the north. and i don't recall all any other conflict in the world when one of the two belligerent parts is supposed to provide the other side with electricity and wat

suggests to keep keir starmer suggests to keep keir starmer suggests to keep keir starmer out of number are both sides of the same socialist coin. high tax, high regulation , nanny state, pro net regulation, nanny state, pro net zero. that all equals low growth. no rishi sunak rishi sunakis growth. no rishi sunak rishi sunak is just diluted net zero. he's wiggled and wobbled around because he knows the pressure that i'm putting on him. the country does not want net zero. it wants growth. it wants action. it wants to stop the boats. it wants net zero immigration. that's what we stand for. and i promise you, no deals. i'm on the record. mark yeah. even if they offered me £5 million and a peerage, the answer is still no. yeah, well, that's because you don't need the you're absolutely. >> you're absolutely. >> you're absolutely. >> because i'm man of >> no, it's because i'm a man of principle and conviction that once and you are. once change and you are. >> i've actually always >> and i've actually always said, even going back to my old talk radio that are talk radio show, that you are a si

we're seeing keir seeing the opposite with keir starmer. he's the rest starmer.wing the rest of public. i will take the of the public. i will take the hard choices despite my party, to be strong for this country. me many of those who me and indeed many of those who quit the front bench are probably left wingers. we wanted to anyway bring his to move on anyway and bring his kind centrist group to kind of more centrist group to run the labour party. so i think although looked difficult for although it looked difficult for him, and him, it won't damage him. and of course talking about course all we're talking about right we're not right now is rwanda. we're not even talking about labour civil war. has. he's a lucky war. so it has. he's a lucky general. andrew and bev. >> all right. that's chris hope, our editor. well, our political editor. well, let's now to let's talk straight away now to steve the labour steve mccabe, who's the labour mp for selly oak, who who voted with last night. with his own side last night. steve you. 56 labour steve morning to you. 56 labour

sir keir starmer. he suffered biggest rebellion night. sir keir starmer.releadershipest rebellion night. sir keir starmer. he suffereleadershipest rnighton night. sir keir starmer. he suffereleadershipest rnight as of his leadership last night as ten labour front benches, eight of roles, of of them very key roles, of course defined him. of revert for immediate ceasefire in for an immediate ceasefire in gaza.56 for an immediate ceasefire in gaza. 56 labour mps, of course voted in favour of that. pretty much a quarter of the mps that he has now. you've written a variety of books actually, but one in particular as well about labour being in opposition and all the rest of it, never mind being in opposition, but actually going forward potentially to being in government perhaps by a slim majority, which is what a lot of people are predicting . what do people are predicting. what do you think, if anything, the result last night shows? do you think that keir starmer has got a on his mps? do you a good handle on his mps? do you think could potentially see think we

what does keir starmer do about this? he is between a rock and a — starmer do about this?ck and a hard place. _ starmer do about this? he is between a rock and a hard place. it _ starmer do about this? he is between a rock and a hard place. it is - a rock and a hard place. it is extremely— a rock and a hard place. it is extremely difficult, and this has happened at a time where he wasjust starting _ happened at a time where he wasjust starting to— happened at a time where he wasjust starting to establish himself quite clearly— starting to establish himself quite clearly as— starting to establish himself quite clearly as being in control of his party _ clearly as being in control of his party. he — clearly as being in control of his party. he has been ahead in the polls— party. he has been ahead in the polls for— party. he has been ahead in the polls for a — party. he has been ahead in the polls for a long time, but he had .ot polls for a long time, but he had got a _ polls for a long time, but he had got a grip— polls for a long time, but he had got a grip on his party, he

keir starmere and. paul >> he's saying we are the govthat. keir starmer hasi. we are the govthat. keir starmer has to ’aul >> he's saying we are the govthat. keir starmer has to dol all that. keir starmer has to do really is just sort of play with a straight bat, really, isn't it? >> well, do you remember ted heath going the country with heath going to the country with that who governs back in that slogan who governs back in the danger with the 70s and the danger with asking kind of rhetorical asking that kind of rhetorical question might not get question is you might not get the you want. so rishi the answer you want. so rishi sunak election sunak going into an election saying, you want change? saying, do you want change? i think people do change, but think people do want change, but they it's him. it's they don't think it's him. it's quite asking quite risky. he's asking the wrong question. and wrong question. i think. and that's the danger. he had that's the real danger. he had one with king's speech one job with this king's speech and to reboot the and that

labour party has had tensions around keir starmer's position. it. around keir starmer's position.ficulty in managing discipline within this group and the significant — discipline within this group and the significant rebellion going on in the front— significant rebellion going on in the front bench week or so ago with the front bench week or so ago with the view— the front bench week or so ago with the view relatively low level but still significant resignations and it felt— still significant resignations and it felt a — still significant resignations and it felt a little bit problematic in the sense that alyssa comes down to semantics _ the sense that alyssa comes down to semantics between what's the humanitarian cease—fire and these are just _ humanitarian cease—fire and these are just words but the reality that we are _ are just words but the reality that we are talking about is is a break in the _ we are talking about is is a break in the violence so that food, water, energy— in the violence so that food, water, energy can — in the violence so that food, water, energy can get

said. what keir starmer said. >> nothing. what keir starmer said. >> think nothing. what keir starmerd lammy said? >> so what's david lammy said? >> lammy has said intellectual powerhouse course, the powerhouse who of course, the shadow last gasp act of it's the last gasp act of desperation from a government devoid ideas amid devoid of talent and ideas amid international crisis, sunak has chosen unelected failure from the past. >> for him to speak >> it's right for him to speak out because, of course, at the dispatch not able out because, of course, at the disdebate not able out because, of course, at the disdebate with not able out because, of course, at the disdebate with icameron,.e to debate with david cameron, the foreign secretary, that the foreign secretary, and that is a democratic deficit is part of a democratic deficit which will be heavily criticised and rightly rightly so. >> and the question is who will take questions in the commons? >> secretary >> the shadow foreign secretary over that is. >> moment it looks >> well, at the moment it looks like talk that andrew like the

keir starmer was showing leadership. _ past? keir starmer was showing leadership, and _ past?nows- past? keir starmer was showing leadership, and he knows the i past? keir starmer was showing l leadership, and he knows the fear that that phrase evokes, among the jewish community. and among the country general, who i think do want to see a two—state solution and it is wrong to have fear on our streets, and to have people rallying together and evoking fear and making the jewish together and evoking fear and making thejewish community together and evoking fear and making the jewish community feel extremely insecure in this country, after the horrors of those corbyn years, and the sooner that hamas can lose their capacity to inflict more damage, to conduct more massacres and the rules to find a negotiating two state solution, the better it will be for everyone, but in the meantime people should not try to stir up hatred. andrew fisher, regardless of andy mcdonald's intention, arejewish people wrongs to be hurt? mcdonald's intention, are jewish people wrongs to be hurt? jewish eo -

starmer palestine.our be prime our candidate to be prime minister, it's understandable minister, so it's understandable that want to challenge that people want to challenge him. he's done the right him. i think he's done the right thing by tough by thing by however tough by setting what believes in, setting out what he believes in, explaining i explaining very clearly why i think be think there shouldn't be a ceasefire. example, hamas ceasefire. for example, hamas still hostages, which is still holding hostages, which is incredibly gave incredibly cruel. but he gave the chatham house speech two weeks ago, some labour, one labour amendment, but that hasn't satisfied those within his within his party. >> my question is, is this just just the beginning or will essentially this be it? well i think we'll know very soon. >> it's a defined moment. and i think we saw even in opposition, which seems strange because you can't pass any laws. but for ed miliband , the syria vote several miliband, the syria vote sev

starmer once again, labour that. starmer once again, labour has gaza war breaks out as eight ministers resign . what's driving ministers resign. what's driving this? and we've got some analysis on the suspicion that it's about getting muslim votes. and finally, the crown is back. but is it too much information ? but is it too much information? is it too soon after the death of diana or is it just fiction? we've got all that coming up on today's action packed show . so today's action packed show. so get in touch all the usual ways. vaiews@gbnews.com, especially on that top story, those pictures of protesters on the war memorials in london have made you go mad today. but we're going to say is it time to beef up legislation? do you think we're just doing too we're too soft on these kind of protesters, but we're too harsh on people. for example, on saturday at armistice day, all that in this next hour. but first, your news headlines with sophia wenzler. good afternoon. >> it's 3:01. i'm sophia wenzler in the newsroom . i

there keir starmer things off. rishi starmer kick things off. rishi sunak replied.atherine forster to studio by katherine forster to go over the points . well, go over the main points. well, dramatic stuff as you'd imagine. starmer saying that this is the government that's dying , it's government that's dying, it's dying out and they are sticking plaster politics, gimmicks, rishi talking about more strikes , more immigration, more crime under labour. what your takeaway points from the speeches is they both painted a very gloomy picture of life under the opposition, didn't they ? opposition, didn't they? >> so we had keir starmer saying that under the conservatives you had low growth , high tax, had low growth, high tax, crumbling public services and sure , our growth has been pretty sure, our growth has been pretty anaemic . we've had hardly any of anaemic. we've had hardly any of it over the last 13 years. we have got the highest taxes since the second world war. public services are not in a good state. and then we have rishi sunak saying that under labour you'd ha

but it is clear it is a significant challenge to keir starmer, because the labor leader said he wantedm to abstain, not to vote on this motion by the scottish nationalists. saw it as playing politics, but also there is extensive efforts over the last 24 hours to negotiate labour's own motion on this to try to minimize the scale of the rebellion. doesn't look as though that is entirely succeeded. labor -- reiterating -- labor reiterating that israel has the right to defend itself and take on terrorists, also critical of the conduct of the campaign by israel, calling for the lifting of the siege conditions in gaza, getting food as well as fuel into gaza, talking about israel having a duty to protect hospitals. we've seen those pictures from gaza today, the israeli raion the hospital in gaza city. labour to some extent would be more critical to take on more the concerns of some of the mp's, some the grassroots, some of the constituents. it wasn't enough to prevent a significant rebellion in one of the most significant challenges keir starmer has faced since he became labor leader and took

starmer palestine.our be prime our candidate to be prime minister, it's understandable minister, so it's understandable that want to challenge that people want to challenge him. he's done the right him. i think he's done the right thing by tough by thing by however tough by setting what believes in, setting out what he believes in, explaining i explaining very clearly why i think be think there shouldn't be a ceasefire. example, hamas ceasefire. for example, hamas still hostages, which is still holding hostages, which is incredibly gave incredibly cruel. but he gave the chatham house speech two weeks ago, some labour, one labour amendment, but that hasn't satisfied those within his within his party. >> my question is, is this just just the beginning or will essentially this be it? well i think we'll know very soon. >> it's a defined moment. and i think we saw even in opposition, which seems strange because you can't pass any laws. but for ed miliband , the syria vote several miliband, the syria vote sev

it doesn't mention anyone's name who are forcing starmer. obviously starmer. obviously unhappy think it does? don't unhappy think it does? i don't think says think it does. well, it says that hussain quit. but. that imran hussain quit. but. but it said that. it said that there many at least there are many others, at least 15 ministers . 15 other ministers. >> so it's being quite vague about it. >> but the point, the story is. >> but the point, the story is. >> yeah, but point is >> yeah, but the point is sometimes these political sometimes with these political stories, you can the stories, you can only get the sort outline of what's sort of vague outline of what's going from westminster. sort of vague outline of what's goinpoint from westminster. sort of vague outline of what's goinpoint is from westminster. sort of vague outline of what's goinpoint is thatom westminster. sort of vague outline of what's goinpoint is that there astminster. sort of vague outline of what's goinpoint is that there are1inster. sort of vague outline of what's goinpoint is that there

, show their own distaste in parliament and it puts keir starmer in a in and it puts keir starmer inosition against rishi sunak at the despatch box than he has been for the last couple of years. >> you know, olivia, one thing that puzzles me is, you know, apart from offending the muslim vote within the labour party, might starmer kind of tugging his fall back to these kind of people affect labour votes within the red for wall example, at the weekend, we're seeing people all from labour seats such as batley, batley, where the grammar school teacher is still in hiding, are being bused into london to take part in the pro—palestine march . aren't pro—palestine march. aren't these the sort of people that starmer should be standing up to in that way , or is he completely in that way, or is he completely toothless now when it comes to trying control muslim trying trying to control muslim voters, muslim councillors or muslim mps and muslim ministers as well? >> i mean , there are those >> i mean, there are those within the labour party allies of keir starmer and british jews who say that act