and his folks are stating stata little time in the hearing they think probably it is duplicate if. i think it is incumbent on the administration to make this a priority to push the congress because the congress has to embrace it and unless they recognize publicly that this is an important issue and it isn't going to happen because they are going to have people pushing back hard so it has to be a public effort and they will be armed and turned with the push from the president and the white house to say this is important. so making this top priority in the conversations to congress. you mentioned in pushing this ahead what should they be doing. one, it is a national security issue. it is a national security issue. i don't think anyone would argue that the restructuring of congress after world war ii and the subsequent stretching from the department of the war to the department of defense has provided more aggressive and effective oversight of the dod. but that isn't an organizational much of this is a national security issue, number one. no one is arguing about the need for the overs

and his folks are stating stata little time in the hearing they think probably it is duplicate if. i think it is incumbent on the administration to make this a priority to push the congress because the congress has to embrace it and unless they recognize publicly that this is an important issue and it isn't going to happen because they are going to have people pushing back hard so it has to be a public effort and they will be armed and turned with the push from the president and the white house to say this is important. so making this top priority in the conversations to congress. you mentioned in pushing this ahead what should they be doing. one, it is a national security issue. it is a national security issue. i don't think anyone would argue that the restructuring of congress after world war ii and the subsequent stretching from the department of the war to the department of defense has provided more aggressive and effective oversight of the dod. but that isn't an organizational much of this is a national security issue, number one. no one is arguing about the need for the overs

stata center that case very narrowly. this case accepted that invitation. paragraphsand has about all the problems he sees with the case that the court heard in 1970's. alito can't resist taking potshots at the ruling and the idea of these fees in general. i would expect to see another case sooner rather than later. host: is there one up bubbling up? seenr: not that i have that has been petitioned or accepted. roots of scholar enough that was interesting. the roberts court has a tendency do narrow rulings on things a couple of times until he get to an overall issue and people think this is one of those cases. host: amanda becker is our guest. if you want to ask her questions, here are the questions -- numbers to call. if you want to send us a tweet or an e-mail. what was the reaction from labor unions? caller: they were disappointed. they were a little bit relieved. expected to be bigger which would've been bad for them. toy said they are just going put more effort into organizing. they will still exist. they can still represent people. they won't be able t