the state. that person from mars who is literal, which i usually am not, but a literalist i think would have to read it that way. but if you're not a literalist, well, i guess you could read it that way. now you want to go into the context, you want to go into the context, at that point it seems to me your argument really is weaker. mr. carvin: do the exchanges fall apart, nobody can buy on them there are no customers employers don't have to pay penalties as long as they use just people from verge but one maryland person comes in you know those arguments. how is does the context spoth you? mr. carvin rment: under a literalist or nonliteralist interpretation saying the secretary can establish such exchange. look at a parallel provision where they use the same language and they said and shall be treated as a state. that language which is notably omitted from 1321 and the basic statutory construction, interpret the same phrases the same way and it showed congress knew how to create equivalents betw

in the states? is it we talked about entitlements and away that suggest it is about -- in a way that suggests it is about them? the programs that lifted the americans up after the 1960's? why is it we don't talk about the fact that our schools are re-segregating faster now than they were in the 1970's? we have to talk about wage disparity, generally for all americans, but then he despaired impact upon black people and brown people. we have to get black people, brought people in poor why people to understand, in many ways we are being played by an oligarchy it knows how to use these racialized codewords to create wage issues rather than to create the kind of moral transformative fusion a black, white, and browns that need to happen in this country particularly, in the south, to move us forward. amy: reverend barber you mentioned philadelphia mississippi. this past sunday marked the 51st anniversary of another hateful act tied to another historic black church. it was june 21, 1964 when three young civ

-- to state options. that is my view and the civil war of the '30's we went to the camp david summit did not achieve peace but because of that had the ability. so we need to the to state vision, option to keep an open probe --. because it kills the possibility. i am not naive. i want security securities security. i hope to weaken as israel and does not strengthen there. we are not endangering ourselves in any way but keeping the two-stage options. >> fate you. either with their extra time >> that tuesday dynamic with some of plans for a cause or the west bank with those structure to the neighbors while controlling the destiny and maintaining the spirit. >> thank you. [applause] >> you have seven minutes 52 seconds to respond. [laughter] >> antoine interruption. [laughter] >> thank-you so much for hosting this debate. and also to ari shavit to be a very esteemed carter or opponent is an interesting challenge to debate you. he is an example of the best of the left. from a policy prescription he represents t

it refers to exchanges established at the state level by the state as well as exchanges at the statelevel by hhs standing in the shoes of the state. the act expressly represents income level by which an individual is determined to be eligible or not for these tax credits. not the bureaucratic entity which runs the exchange in that state. what about these phrase that they rule found in calculating the tax exchange. while you could pluck a forward phrase out of moby dick and say it was about a sunday will watching cruise but that's not how you read a book and that's not how the supreme court tells us you read a statute either. this allows the provisions of the aca to work harmoniously which is something the supreme court has told us had should be a guidepost when reading statute. this is something the supreme court should told us we should avoid when reading the law. making tax credits law. making tax credits available to all americans who need them regardless of the state in which they live is the plain text of the law and allows the lot to what work in the way congress intended it. i

the body of reverend and state senator clementa pinkney arriving at the state house today where he became the first african-american to lie in state there at least since the reconstruction era just after the civil war. passing right by the confederate flag, that flag embraced by the white supremacist who murdered him a week ago tonight where he was pastor. while governor nicky haley and other lawmakers have called for the flag to be taken down and the state legislature took its first procedural steps yesterday, it is illegal under south carolina law to remove the flag without two-thirds approval from both legislative houses. so workers covered the windows with black drape so the mourners would not have to see it. a different story in alabama where bentley could order the flag and three others to be removed. according to a report, two workers came out and with no fanfare took the flag down. they said this is the right thing to do. we're facing some major issues in the state regarding the budget and other issues. this had a potential to be a major distraction. i have taxes to raise, we have

we've elected more african-americans in my state than any state in the union."er, chief justice john roberts made almost an identical argument when he struck down the heart of the voting rights act. so in two decades, arguments that the south was being unfairly singled out went from a neoconfederate magazine that refers to the civil war as the "late unpleasantness" to the official traditional of the highest court in the land. joining me now ari berman author of the forthcoming back" give us the ballot, the modern struggle, voting rights in america." this is big news. basically the court said basically we don't think you have any co-hereabout rationale for what does and doesn't get subjected to this extra scrutiny so we throw it out, come up with something better. so what are democrats going to introduce? >> congress has done that. they've come up with something better. number one, they forced the states with a recent history of voting discrimination to approve voting changes with the federal government, so that includes 13 states, states we know of when it comes

there is a lot of variation from state to state. certainly, the area agency leadership on the plan -- i think there is. what i would say is surprising is the level of coordination across the three agencies at the state level. and in many states where most of you would probably be surprised that is occurring. i don't -- i think you can point to particular examples where a governor may have charged a particular agency to take the lead, but generally, it is much more collaborative. carol werner: and that is really, really good news. terrific news. go ahead. >> thank you. -- with the natural resources defense council. my question is concerning -- so, we have been hearing a lot of messages and we can argue about the reliability of the data or the messages. but we have been hearing a lot of arguments about the threats to the clean power plan on low income ratepayers, in terms of -- in terms of rising rates. but at the same time, we hear about the compliance options particularly for energy efficiency, there is always an emphasis on the ind

allow one state literally one state, a minority of states to legislate fundamental state concern about every other state quite literally. that's an enormous imposition and an intrusion upon the states ability to decide for itself important public policy questions. particularly when you're talking about recognition. there is an impact that occurs when one state is asked to recognize another state same-sex marriage because of the fact that its entire domestic relations policy has been built around the expectation and the presumption that there is a man, woman relationship. .. >> there is a child of that marriage in a same-sex situation would fundamentally alter the state's tiff in addition of plant -- definition of parentage -- >> i understand your argument that it's a fundamental policy question about whether you're going to recognize same-sex marriage or not, but i don't see the difficulty in following the consequences of that under domestic relations law as treating a couple as married. the first question's a big step but after that it seems to me the question of how you apply the dom

to exchanges established at the state level by the state as well as exchanges established at the stateredits allowing individuals to afford to purchase insurance on these exchanges, the act expressly presents income level as the method by which an individual is determined to be eligible or not for tax credits not the entity which runs the health insurance exchange in that state. what about the phrase seized upon by critics of the treasury department's rule found in the provision for calculating the amount of the tax credit from -- who purchased a policy on an exchange established by the state? well, you could pluck a forward phrase out of moby dick and say it was a story about a sunday whale watching cruise. that's not how you read a book and not how the supreme court tells us you read a statute, either. reading the law to provide tax credits nationwide on both state-run and federally facilitated exchanges allows the provisions of the aca to work harmoniously which is something the supreme court has told us clearly is something that should be a guidepost when we're reading statutes. in

so if we go state-by-state, even if they are litigating in state court so long as they are only bring this under the state constitution because they are the ultimate arbiters of state law. so any good or harm that kind of thing it would be contained within the boundaries of the state. and so what these movement lawyers are doing is to adopt this strategy and they are saying that what they wanted was you know, 10 states with same-sex marriage 10 states where the civil unions were part of this 10 states with some form of relationship recognition. so that was a kind of guideline, definitely more than a guideline, but that was a guideline for what they were going to be prepared to go to the supreme court for her, knowing full well that it was totally endorsed that it was too far ahead of public opinion. and so what we see in many of these things. >> is at the same time it is just watching the outlines. so by the time that was decided in 1967, 34 states had talked about it in the supreme court was just watching it and they did not have it yet. and there are 13 states -- what the scenario o

so south carolina is a proud state. we have a number of newly elect ed federal who understand the significant impact across the world. people are willing to do the people's business and bring this state united. there's been too much division but let me be clear. after we remove the flag we still have to have a serious dialogue about race relations in the state, including an economic empowerment agenda because many citizens feel disenfranchised from economic opportunities and procurement. that is the solution for the future. we have to come away after honoring these victims of this horrific tragedy, and major sure we do more than just remove symbols. we need a substantive agenta so that all citizens can participate in economic empowerment and have the retirement security be able to send their kids to college, to be able to get a good education. that's what we're going to focus on in the aftermath of this tragedy. >>> senator, thanks for joining us. we'll check back with you tomorrow. senator marlon kimpson joining us fro

that is the nature of this state .e have to talk about why supremacy just more broadly than that flag. now, if we want to talk specifically about that plan the flag that flies on the state house grounds, a bad compromise the naacp agreed to with the state legislature back in the 1990's -- that was a bad compromise -- but the flag represents why supremacy. the original flag of the confederacy, the stainless white banner was a banner that was designed to represent a white man's country. you know, for those of us who are opposed to the flag being on the state house grounds and almost monuments, people can fly the flag at their homes, they can wear a put a flag bumper sticker on their car, they can wear it on a hat brother for heads, but my tax dollar, people's tax dollars ought not go into supporting the idea of the confederate states of america. when i was president of the aclu backed the flag fight, we tried to make the legal arguments, and we wanted to pursue it in court that the flag flying on the statehouse dome was

of every other state. why doesn't that apply? >> court's cases made clear court draws a distinction between judgments between states and the laws of each day and the reason in part the court's decisions have said that is otherwise each state would be able to legislate for every other state. it would include the act of marrying people. my understanding of the court's decisions is reference in the constitution to public acts that each state's laws so there is nothing in the constitution that should require a state to acknowledge even those marriages in other states that are the same. >> essentials redirect that this court's decision is essentially right. with jurisprudence with regard to allstate insurance in alaska, there's minimal due process requirement to decline to apply another state. >> we can say the only marriages we acknowledge in new york our marriages concluded in new york. is it possible? >> i am sorry? >> the only marriages we acknowledge in new york are those marriages that have been made unde

need a two state vision, two state option, and two state dynamic. vision, this is throughout our history. we were stronger when we were moderate and generous. we accepted the partition plan in 37. that when we won the terrible war of the '30s. we went to bill clinton's camp david summit. we did not achieve peace better come up with because of that we had the credibility and legitimacy of the unity it went against the terrible suicide bombing of the second -- we need the three, that vision, the two state vision a two-state solution to keep it open, and we need the two state dynamic. want to talk about when i talk about the two state option? that's why settlement building beyond the barrier is so dangerous. because it kills the possibility of doing anything in the past. i am not naÏve. i understand the danger. i want security, security, security. i think that but building beyond the block weakens israel doesn't strengthen issue. so if we tried a settlement freeze be on the barrier, he on the blog come in my mind we are not endangering ourselves in any

but clearly there is a playbook that we are seeing play out in state after state after state. you left off your list ohio, which, despite the fact that we had in 2004 and 2008 and 2012 an epidemic of long lines. you remember those images. >> sure. >> of the kerry campaign in 2004. you remember those students waiting in line for hours and hours amount. you saw that in 2008 and 2012. well, what did ohio do? again, they said that during early vote period, there can only be one location in a county. noble county has 8,000 citizens or voters, and franklin county has 800,000. there is only going to be one place in the county. why would you do that other than to make it harder to vote? >> marc elias, i got a tough question for you. was that vote counted in ohio in 2004 an honest call? was that an honest count? >> look, i think that attend of the day, the gap between president bush and john kerry was wider than the ballots that were left to be uncounted. ohio has a history of a large volume of provisional ballots that don't get counted. and that gap was too large. but i want to say th

we are not funded through the state budget, no state monies involved. the bay area counsel provides the infrastructure and we represent the state of california. we are a governed by a advisory board made up of about 15 companies. some well known recognized name jz little companies not as well known but just as important. that is our life blood and our board. one of the challenges i have is build the advisory board. i am lookic for additional numbers for experience as well as additional resources. our mission is to promote the state of california and to facilitate chinese direct investment into california as well as help cael companies doing business in china. california has a big wonderful diverse economy. we are the 7th largest economy in the world so i'm looking at things in technology, agriculture, maritime industry, moving making that is a hot topic between china and california right now, manufacturer, biotechnology. there are a variety of things we do to promote the state of california. we are promoting the states investments into california by hav

, the state needed to do something symbolic. john: funerals and memorial services coming up on friday. president obama will give a eulogy for one of the following. -- fallen. it would have been awkward to not make that switch by then. the other thing is money. this is a state that economically is tied into the business community. bmw, boeing, and other companies. the corporate sector is a force for progressivism. the corporate world would want this changed. mark: there are politics, the 2016 candidates would be pressed on this. the chair of the national committee was on the stage. the republican party did not want to spend another day defending the confederate flag. john: it tells you there was a lot of machinery grinding pretty quickly. mark: a lot of instant statements. john: in an interview releassed today, president obama addressed the persistence of racism in america in a blunt way. he has referred to a word that has been banned from respectful conversation. it has created a bit of a media conniption. let's take a listen to

one state and now a minority of states to legislate fundamental state concern about marriage for every other state, quite literally. that's an enormous imposition and intrusion upon the state's ability to decide for says it, important public policy questions. >> and to maintain -- particularly when you're talking about recognition, there's an impact that occurs when one state is asked to recognize another state's same-sex marriage because of the fact that its entire domestic relations policy has been built around the expectation and the presumption that there's a man-woman relationship. in windsor, this court recognized and observed that marriage is the foundation of the state's ability to regulate domestic relations. and to give you one concrete example, that comes up in this case itself, one of the incidents of marriage is the child -- the presumption for parentage that comes with a marriage. and for the state to be required to recognize another state's marriage where there's a child of that marriage in a same-sex situation, would fundamentally alter the state's definition of parenta

we went from one of the worst states to one of the best states in the country. [applause] we privatized our outdated government-run hospital system. we reformed education with nearly 100% charter schools in new orleans and now we have statewide school choice, because every child deserves an equal opportunity for a great education. [applause] instead of a child following the dollars, we made the dollars follow the child because we trust the parents not the bureaucrats, to make the best decisions for their kids. [applause] we did what they said could not be done. we shrank our government. we cut our budget by 26%. we cut the number of government bureaucrats by more than 30,000. that wasn't easy. the big government crowd fought us every step of the way. they protested. they filibustered. they even took us to court but in the end we won. [applause] today, we have more people moving into louisiana than out of it. our highest population in history, our kids are coming home. [applause] and now, we have more people working than at any time in our state's history, with t

one state doesn't. the constitutional past is the one that they have set forth to have a sufficiently interest that in the case of incest it does have a sufficiently important. >> they are not biologically tied. >> rules against college marriage that simply define incest in a broadway that encompasses cousins to marry him whether it is to extenuated i don't think the state would have. >> the assumption the way it is presented that the state does have a sufficient interest but there is a sufficient interest with the assumption that it is not a fundamental right. >> to analyze different name to allow couples to enter a marriage for one who was already married. kentucky has asserted its interest of opposite sex couples to marry will be to increase the birth rate. apply that theory to same-sex couples were already married or in half of the states of the country. to be a sufficiently important interest to have those existing marriage vows and obligations to marry someone else to appropriate biologically even

we've turned the state around.u look at what was going on post-katrina, many were wondering if they could come back here decades of out-migration. eight different credit upgratsdz. our last credit rating in texas and fewest state employees in decades. we measure success by how people are doing in the reeld world not the government sector. a lot of politicians, republicans and democrats, don't like that but that's how we measure success. >> we'll see ign train. governor jindal, thanks for coming on "meet the press." stay safe on the trail, sir. >> thank chuck. >>> coming up -- how ten days in june have cemented president obama's legacy. >>> following the big progressive victories of the '60s they used we all enter this world with a shout and we see no reason to stop. so cvs health is creating industry-leading programs and tools that help people stay on medicines as their doctors prescribed. it could help save tens of thousands of lives every year. and that would be something worth shouting about. cvs health, because

the central ministry and the state. this is a state subject where the state food commissioners are entrusted with the safety of the consumers and food articles. they are supposed to basically be responsible for the states for the operation in the states and for this each state has to file a separate complaint send a notice to nestle and take them to the court. it's a cumbersome process, where each state has to take nestle to court and file a complate for what has taken place. obviously there are some states which have found no traces of led or msg. they will not file the cases. at the central level, we have consumer affairs military filing a suit for the first time under the consumer protection act. that is a national forum. and the hearing will begin, and the notice has been served through nestle on this. there are two types of actions happening here - at the state level and at the central level. >> operating officer, voice society, thank you for your time and information >>> an explosion and fire at a petrol station i

the united states is not -- the united states government is not committed to this fight. and it's very interesting, i was just in the pentagon yesterday to hear military people say that we don't need american advisors on the ground with iraqi forces to call in air strikes to provide combat advising support. that's not what my friends in uniform are telling me. instead the white house has made it very clear that they don't want that to happen and the military is hearing what they're supposed to say. but everyone, everyone knows that if we want to defeat i.s.i.s. as the president has stated he wants to do, we have to put american advisors on the ground with the iraqi units. the president is going to have to pony up and pay the price to fight his war in iraq which happened only because he withdrew american troops from iraq at the end of 2011 against the advice of his entire security team. >> in your book knife fight, if we forget the lessons we have learned about counterinsurgency over the past decade of war, what are those lessons? >> those lessons are many. they include th

state? in the united states, it's where the patient is located. so you can see how this impacts telemedicine, if you've got a duly licensed physician in pennsylvania, for example, who's providing online care for telecare to somebody in north dakota. they need to be licensed in north dakota unless they meet a number of exceptions. we're going to talk about some of the solutions that have been developed recently. this has been a long-standing barrier. one of the reasons i think is if you really think about healthcare in the united states, although there are some local differences, i think for the most part, a lot of the core requirements are the same across the board. the doctor is practicing in california. the doctor is practicing in florida, especially if you're practicing in urban areas. is there really a difference between the practice of medicine in miami, los angeles, new york, chicago? that's the question that needs to be address.ed. there are some exceptions to obtaining a full regular

it includes four states and has cases before the court. an issue for the justice is whether the bans on same-sex marriage, whether they were constitutional. if the court rules they are unconstitutional. it would mark a legal transformation that began two years ago. in 2013, a key section of the marriage act was rejected. ruling that benefits could not be denied to legally married gays or lesbians. 35 states passed laws banning same-sex marriage, and the ruling prompted dozens of those bans to be struck down in lower court. the transformation that has been under way mirrors a shift in american's attitudes towards gays and lesbians. a poll shows that 50% of americans support same sex memories, and it is up from the 35% support in 2001. and the percentage of americans who are opposed to day marriage - it was at 57% 14 years ago, and opposition has dropped to 39% today. look at this. a gallop poll found two-thirds of americans found homosexual relations acceptable. 40 years ago only 14% said it was morally acceptable. the percentage of people

in this incredible cascade of state-by-state news, place-by-place news. the decision came down on the wires at 10:02 a.m. by 10:19, look same-sex couples in texas may soon obtain marriage licenses. by 10:28, gay couples in nebraska will now have their marriages legally recognized in the state that has had one of the most restrictive same-sex union bans in the country. by 10:45, the county clerk in the largest county in arkansas tells the "ap," while choking up "it's a special day. i'm honored to be part of it." and he says his office in pulaski county arkansas, is prepared to issue marriage licenses. that was 10:45. by 10:46, it's montana -- gay couples can now marry in montana. by 10:49, it's michigan, one of the states that fought this to the supreme court. look. michigan governor rick snyder says state agencies will insure that the state fully complies with the supreme court ruling. by 10:53, it's north dakota. the supreme court ruling nullifies north dakota's constitutional ban on smaerge marriage. same-sex marriage. five minutes later, ohio cuyahoga

the new york state police and the vermont state police are working hand in hand to secure our state'srs. one of the things that we developed during our investigation was information that there was a possibility of them fleeing towards vermont. we've mentioned early on we've reached out, we've been hand in hand with the vermont state police working to secure the borders, and today we're just formalizing our arrangement, our agreement. we'll be able to employ state troopers on the new york state line should it be required for searches. that's if leads take us there. in addition we've conducted interviews with inmates, corrections officers contract employees and anyone else working here at the correctional facility. we continue to ask the public for their assistance in our investigation, looking for any suspicious activity they might see in their communities, anything they might see that's out of the ordinary and we urge them to contact law enforcement. we ask the public to remain vigilant. these men are considered very dangerous. please call 911 if you see these inmates. if you notice a

some say it's just for the state.olls in new hampshire that are going to be motivating discussion in politics. let's discuss it. alisyn is in south carolina. jeff it's good to have you there. alisyn you are part of the panel. i'm going to put a lot of questions to you you don't want to answer. >> go for it. >> this turn around. let me play this sound of lindsey graham. i think he's provided a good metaphor for the turn around. look at lindsey graham when he said what he's saying now. >> the problems we have in south carolina and throughout the world are not because of the symbol, it's because of what's in people's heart. i can't fix every problem in the world, in the state, in the nation but we can start with the flag. it needs to come down and go to a museum. south carolina needs to get this right. i'll do whatever i can, along with my colleagues to get the number of votes necessary. >> one was friday one was yesterday. what happened? >> what happened chris, was all the republicans in south carolina beginning in sout

united states supreme court. what a day it is for the president. he's now getting ready to fly to charleston south carolina to participate in the funeral of the reverend clementa pinckney who was murdered last week. looking at live pictures coming in from the procession. this funeral just beginning to get under way. gloria borger john king you think about the emotional ride that the president and so many other millions of americans are going through now on this issue of same-sex marriage gay marriage now going to be legal in all 50 states and now the president's going to be preparing to eulogize the reverend pinckney who was so brutally along with eight other people massacred in a church a historically african-american church in charleston. >> i think it just sort of opens a public window into what the president of the united states deals with on a seesaw every day. i mean we had this morning we had terror attacks, right, in tunisia. you have to deal with that. you have a ruling from the supreme court that he was

>> i think it varies by state. but in most programs we probably could double the number of students that are being served by the programs that are currently funded. >> so some of the witnesses who testifying over the watt days of hearings, either they feel there is insufficient data to show the trio in the other programs have been suggestly successful so that we should eliminate funding for that or some of them have been successful perhaps it would be better to roll it all into one big general grant program that was more flexible. i'm wondering what your take on in terms of the data, how could we improve the data collected? dr. minor you noted that the department has been doing more rigorous data based research. i'm wondering what you've learned. and i'm wondering whether you -- any of you have a response to the issue how could these programs be improved? >> well, thank you. i appreciate you highlighting the point. there's no doubt about it that we need to have better ee val yags and data attached to this kind of i

joining me outside the state house and columbia, south carolina, is state representative mea mccleod.s because it seems like there were a lot of obstacles baked in 15 years ago to get the flag off the capitol dome and in the position we see over your shoulder now. >> right. there was. and the so-called compromise of course wasn't really a compromise at all. but today we do have a meaningful opportunity to bring about change and make history in this state. >> so when you talk about a meaningful opportunity, walk us through exactly what needs to happen, the hurdles from your colleagues in state legislature to make sure that this happens. >> well, at this point i'm not exactly sure about my colleagues who may not be supportive of the effort. i do know that there is of course, a ground swell of support after the shooting of our colleague our eight other precious lives in charleston last week. so today, we can amend the resolution or we can take some other measures to actually bring about the change that the governor referenced yesterday. and not have to come back into session. i'm hoping

of the state.he choice the state has establish your own exchange or let the federal government establish it for you. that is the choice. if we read it the way you are saying, we're going to read the statute as intruding on the federal state relationship because then the states are going to become worst into establishing their own exchanges. then you say, oh no, they cannot be coerced. going back to what justice breyer was talking about, in those states that citizens do not receive subsidies, we are to have a death spiral that this system was created to avoid. states are obligated -- insurers are obligated to make sure that in their state, whether they are part of this program or not, that they have guarantee coverage -- guaranteed coverage. that children are covered until 26. and that they base their costs on community ratings. if we have to that, costs are going to arise on every insurance plan offered in the country in those 34 states. nine of your states will have tightened their medicaid eligib

the reverend's body is back there now, he laid in state in the state capitol of columbia.w, don. >> reporter: it is a very emotional day. i'm sure you can hear the christian jubilee. they are playing in the background in front of this church. but there is important news that we need to give you regarding the family of the suspect, dylann roof. basically, what they are saying is that at this time it's not appropriate for them to make a comment. the thoughts and prayers and the minds should be with the victims. that being said we'd like to take this time to reflect on the victims and give their families time to grieve. we feel it would be inappropriate to say anything at this time other than we are truly sorry for their loss. and again, they say after some time they may feel it's appropriate to make a statement. that is coming from the family of 21-year-old dylann roof the shooter, the alleged shooter in this case who has confessed to the shootings and the killings here at the emanuel ame church. but really right now there is -- i said that the christian jubilee was playing

state -- theslamic saudi's what the islamic state destroyed.many chairs on the finance piece that i talked about. they are deep in this and they have made their investment in terms of money and the military piece against the islamic state as well. pimm: i want to thank you very much. ahead, it is a spiritual competition between scots, whiskey, and bourbon. details about americans drinking habits and the money that is to be made. ♪ back to "bloomberg market day." i'm pimm fox. u.s. stocks seen the best gains in a month. julie hyman is watching the markets in the news. tell us what is going on. julie: we brought you headlines a moment ago saying that people familiar with the situation says that germany will be willing to be flexible with greece. but may be demands, willing to parse them out a bit. adopteases wanted to a measure like higher taxes, they will phase the others in later to get access to bailout funds. when the headlines crossed and all this familiar to people of the talks, we saw stocks spike in the u.s.. in europe, they stayed steady

hands, yet some states remain defiant. have announced efforts to go around the ruling and they say it is their responsibility to guard state's rights and religious freedoms. robert ray reports. >> reporter: a racous pride celebration more special this year after a supreme court ruling made same-sex marriage legal across the country. but some state officials are saying not so fast. even as same-sex couples in texas rushed to tie the knot over the weekend, the governor issued a scathing rebuke of the supreme court decision, and directed state southeast that civil servants cannot be forced to conduct same-sex wedding ceremonies over their religious objections. the state's attorney general also promised legal assistance to clerks who are fined or even sued. numerous lawyers stand ready to assist, he said in many cases on a pro bono basis, and i will do everything i can to be a public voice for those standing for their rights. at an austinaldy monday day rights activists responded. >> this ruling could not be more clear, and pu

some states ended up doing both. in 2000 vermonts paed civil unions in 2003 massachusetts state supreme court ruled in favor of marriage rights but the resulting backlash to vermont and massachusetts, went so high as the sitting president of the united states saying not just that he'd sign a law but the u.s. constitution should be changed to block gay people from ever actually enjoying that right. change the constitution of the united states to stop gay people from getting equal rights. inspired by that clarion call to stop the progress of social justice, hoping that a chance to cast an anti-gay vote might really bring conservative voters out of the wood work and into the polling places in the presidential election year of 2004 11 states passed state constitutional bans on same-sex marriage, two years later in 2006, eight more states passed eight more bans. the history of marginal advances on this issue, here and there and different kinds of venues the history of the advances on this issue around the country, that hi

we are not fighting a state but non-state actors is the strategist to not take on the global force for good that is the u.s. effort -- navy is the smart strategy but since they don't open identify themselves to wear uniforms they do not take and hold territory this is a war in the shadows and inevitably we will use the extraordinarily technology -- technological abilities to intercept communications to wiretap the american people and i do not complete the discount the damage done and i certainly share eisenhower is concern that the resources spent in one way are not spent in another but united states is spending of very low per - - portion of gdp on national-security issues that could easily increase that percentage of italy raised taxes we would have plenty of resources for the federal government to provide guns and butter. said ronald reagan in the liberal that he was. i think of the damage done and the trade-off taken to give up privacy to increase security, and i do agree we have given up some privacy rights to the homeland security industry and bureaucracy but i would argue almost

by the state.hose four words clearly mean you don't get the insurance if you're the majority of people who bought insurance on healthcare.gov on the federal exchange. what the 6-3 majority said in this case is you have to look at the health care law as an interlocking set of parts. insurance companies can't deny coverage for preexisting conditions. everybody has to buy insurance to put more money in the pool and spread the risk. and you have subsidies to make it affordable. take the subsidies away, the thing collapses and that clearly isn't what congress meant. >> this was antonin scalia's dissent. he wrote, words no longer have meaning, an exchange that is not established by a state is established by the state. it is hard to come up with a clear way to limit tax credits to state exchanges than to use the words "established by the state." that's where he landed on this. >> he did and he just scoffed at the idea that the majority was going to try to interpret that provision in a broader context. and

the state. justice scalia continued, "we should start calling this law scotus-care. i agree. if this were a bankruptcy case or any other case of ordinary statutory interpretation, ther results would have been 9-0 with the court unanimously reversing the obama administration's illegal actions. but, instead politics intervened. for nakedly political reasons the supreme court willfully ignored the words that congress wrote and instead read into the law their preferred policy outcome. these judges have joined with president obama in harming millions of americans. unelected judges have once again become legislators and bad ones at that. they are lawless and they hide their prevarication in legalese. our government was designed to be one of laws, not of men. and this transparent distortion is disgraceful. these justices are not behaving as umpires calling balls and strikes. they have joined a team, and it is a team that is hurting americans across this country. obamacare is the biggest 0 job killer in

state bans on same sex marriage treat gay couples unequally and the states have offered no petition justor that unequal treatment. finally the constitution fundamental right to marry includes gay couples. >> sreenivasan: there's a section from the majority opinion. it says it would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. their hope is not to be condemned, to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization's oldest institutions. they asked for equal dignity in the eyes of the law, the constitution grants them that right. he also part of this he actually quoted sort of the decision from 12 years ago. >> yes, he did. in fact with justice kennedy in particular, dignity and liberty are sort of essential to thinks jurorsjurorsi don'tjurisprudence. threw prior decisions he wrote and that's what he was relying on here, the dignity that marriage confers. >> sreenivasan: there's also four that didn't vote for this individually wrote. i want to read something from scalia. this practice from constitutional division from an unelected committee of nine alwa

of the state.e rolled up our sleeves and went to work. we have refused to raise taxes on the people of the state for six years. [applause] governor christie: we made the hard decisions that had to be made to improve our education system. we made the difficult decision to reform pensions and health benefits and continue that fight today. we have stood together against each and every person -- every cynic who said, why are you wasting your time? the last six years, we proved, not only can you govern the state, you can leave it to a better day. that is what we have done together. now, we face a country that is angry. when i hear the media say that our country is angry, i know they are wrong. last year, i want to 37 states. i met people in every corner of america, and they are not angry. americans are filled with anxiety. they look to washington, d.c. and see a government that does not even work anymore, it does not talk to one another anymore. does that even pretend to work anymore. we have a presiden

the reality is in the united states they've done this. japan has done this 400 times manipulating the currency. we don't have enforcement mechanisms built in, we have a problem. until we deal with it, until the government starts to call out that behaviour, we are not playing on a level playing field. >> let me ask you this, i know you come at this dishonestly. as a financial journalist, when interest rates goes down and a country does something to keep the currency liquid, you say japan did it 400 times, you thick they are doing is to be a currency manipulator as opposed to lowering interest rates to boost economy. >> you want to know. toyota made more on currency manipulation than ford did in the worldwide operation. it's a tool for them to make profits. that's a reality. this free trade agreement is not just the union. all the auto companies have been saying we have to address currency manipulation. it's causing an unfair disadvantage in a global marketplace. our government - we can compete with everyone, i know the product we built, yo

so, i walked across the state, 1000 miles. spent the night every night was -- with someone in their homes. went home on weekends, saturday and sunday, and go right back to the same place. people would give me walking sticks as a symbol of my walk. the first day was january 26 1978, and it was so cold and it there was so much snow and ice as i stood there on my parents 's front porch that the trombone player's slide froze in the band i had with me. and so i just took off walking. i think my parents were probably pretty embarrassed. they raised me to be a respectable young man. i was standing on their front porch announcing i was going to walk 1000 miles across tennessee. so, i would shake hands. i try to shake 1000 hands a day. usually we would plan ahead and maybe i would stop and have lunch with certain people. by late afternoon, if the weather got better, i would get to a town and i would have a family to stay with. it might be the local farm bureau head or just someone from the community. i might go to their kids' softball

in member states. they are not a single member state. often member states ask us to be more coherent, coordinate better among ourselves. member states themselves don't necessarily coordinate in the system and in their presence in the system. so i think the purpose that i mentioned as we move forward is exactly trying to see how we tackle that. one of the biggest problems i see we have these days internally is the need for coordination to get things done. sometimes coordination becomes an end of its own and you stay so much in coordination that you lose sight of why is it that you are there and who are you there to serve? so we need to find ways to simplify and to define or mandates in the manner that is more clear and at the same time, is more geared towards working together. it's a very strong competition for resources these days. and that goinges against the notion of coming together. because it's so difficult to fund the programs that we have. it is so much that we rely on extra budget taer funding

the word were exchanges by the state.he court held that the zpanchs held by the state or the state where they refused to establish an exchange and established by the secretary of health and human services. so word were changed. you could only do it not by the imagination of the judgment of what 535 people meant when they voted for or voted against a law. >> well the argument is that there wasn't a conflict there because chief justice roberts spoup isly was deferring to the legislature and that in deferring in this case and some could say it's an odd form of deferral. he was looking at not just the words but the legislation and that's something courts traditionally do and he was in a sense deferring in this case in the same-sex marriage case saying hey f the legislatures want to decide this they can decide it but it isn't for nine robed justices to argue. >> in the first instance in obama care in which justice scalia said it should be called scotuscare there was legislation and the language went beyond saying it wasn't wha

in every state. so there's no anomaly there, and if your honor wants to ask me about any of the other ones, you can, but i there are no anomalies frankly. >> as i understand your answer to be that there are federal regulations telling the states what they have to do here, and they've all done it. but the fact remains that the state has some obligation under the regulations to make sure that there is a proper interface with the federal exchange. >> on the state's side of the interface, yes. but that's the chip and medicaid agencies. those are state government agencies, and it's their side of the interface that the statute governs. and, you know, as i said, i don't think there are anomalies of our reading, but if they are, they pale in comparison to the anomalies on the other side. i mean, i really do want to focus on this point about the qualified health plan and the qualified individual, because the statute is quite clear in section 1311 that an exchange, not an exchange established by the state, but

states. n.a.t.o. condemned the russian announcement. >> this nuclear sabre rattling of russia is unjustified. dangerous. >> what happens next is anyone's guess. vladimir putin is playing down the forwards of a rush an attack on forces in eastern countries, to many it's a warmed over cold war, no one can say for sure where the back and forth volleys may lead. >>> joining me for a look at russia, the u.s. and a retro tone in the international politics is seven piper, director of the arms control and nonproliferation, toby, the senior director for russia at the national security council, and she's now an international advisor, and will pommerance, deputy director of the cannon institute for advanced russian studies at the wilson center. the cold war was just over when you were in government. are there mornings when you peck up the papers and it feels fresh in your mind? >> it feels fresh, the time when we made the gold water history, and the steps taken to bring the two countries together. that time was