rogue states are very small and medium weight states. but, because of nuclear, chemical or biological factors they attract a lot of attention. at a consequence, recently spend more time. the same with north korea, it comes and goes. for example, there has been heightened tensions over the last 3 - 4 weeks. and then it may rmerge later on. so, there are times when the united states is focusing a hundred% are other times may be ten or 20%. or we may have an internal crisis or internal political event that captures our attention. it could be a piece of legislation, and economic problem or challenge. nonetheless, the foreign-policy, the rogue states, for size they are they take a great deal of our attention. >> host: do you think of cuba as a rogue state? >> guest: cuba was at one time the spear points. they were the most aggressive in spreading communism. for example, nicaragua, bolivia, they sent 16000 troops to angola, they were at the forefront. they were committed , and they provided oil and all sorts of resources to them. when the sovi

states. jersey,ld vote in new pennsylvania, new hampshire, and north carolina. this always comes as a shock that free blacks could vote in north carolina, but people in north carolina took the revolution seriously. if you're not a slave, you're a citizen. in later you could vote tennessee because tennessee is really a spinoff of north carolina and the tennessee constitution replicated the north carolina constitution. period between the adoption of the constitution and the 1830's, a number of states backtracked on voting rights. , they would gain the right to vote in the new state of maine and the new state of vermont and eventually the state --rhode island, and edition and in addition to that, blacks would be able to vote in .ichigan and ohio there's no definition of citizenship under the u.s. constitution. the word citizen is scattered across the constitution but nowhere does it tell us what a citizen is. we have to figure it out by looking at what the right are that people have, and if you

of the united states and of the states wherein they reside. descendents was meant to overrule dred scott with respect to african-americans but to stop by to others. it does not to say, chinese who were present in the united states at the time. congress debated the question and remain controversial. it doesin pennsylvania argued te language was too broad. is the child of the chinese immigrant, a citizen? if so, what rights have been? -- they? to me, reminiscent of contemporary debates, he asked, are californians to remain complicit will they are overrun by immigrants. are they to be outrun by their home by the chinese? in our millions, are the states to lose control? is a united states determined that they will become citizens? it will connect california argued that the language of the amendment was too broad because they were making citizens of the chinese port in the united states. the chinese are in and it meant to me although, i have lived among them. economic good citizens of them. he asked, what is the difference in chinese and africans?

been disbursed to the states. finally the 2016 elections have spurred many calls for additional laws. i remain open to learning more about where those gaps are and how we approach those gaps in a way that continues to let local officials do their job but be sure that there is maximum confidence in what happens on election day. glad all of you are here and certainly it is a pleasure to get to work together on this and particularly for me to get to work with her and we have had a long history of working together but just this year starting to be the top two individuals on this committee and senator recognize you for your opening statements. >> thank you. this committee jurisdiction is clearly a jurisdiction of federal elections and there has been a lot of committees looking into this issue as part of the vestigation. in the end if we want to get something done and make some changes i think it is important that this committee way in and be going through this committee. according to the department of homeland security

>> they travel from state to state. >> we do some. we also do ncaa sports and we do in the nfl, we do in major league baseball and the nba. not in the usc, but we will with mma. >> but ultimately each commission of the 34 paramutual governed jurisdictions which oklahoma obviously you have will rogers downs, thorough bread -- >> the horse racing industry is not for this and i understand it. i am not for overregulating i'm just asking the question does congress have a role to play in it or not? >> i do not think so, each state is 100% uniform that has racing. >> but the horses travel outside the state. >> you have to abide by -- you have to abide by the rules that are in that state. >> and the horses travel from track to track and the owners travel from track to track, right? >> yes. >> my first cousin who is a very good friend of mine, very close, we traveled all over the place, rodeoing together because my background is rodeoing, i think quarter horses are better than thoroughbreds. that's my jab there, guys, go with me, make light of

it is the duty of federal and state partners to ensure that taxpayer dollars a federally funded state administered programs are usedorheir intended purposes. none of the payments identified by sigtarp report advance the main purpose of the program to prevent foreclosures and provide assistance homeowners most affected by the housing crisis. although many states have voluntarily refunded over $450,000 to the program since sigtarp's report it's apparent the questions over appropriate expenses and efficiencies remain. acrding to sigtarp's 2017 s annual report to congress, it apedal of all homeowners who sought assistance were admitted to the program and nearly 30% of homeowners with good applications. with nearly 2 billion in remaining funds left to be dispersed by the treasury of the states, it is necessary to ensure proper safeguards are in place. i think the witnesses from the treasury department, sigtarp and representatives from three states including my state of alabama for being here today. i now recognize the ranking member of the inter-governmental affairs subcommittee mr. raskin

the united states has never been interested in that. by talking about kennedy 1963 talks about the nuclear arsenal for clinton when she was secretary of state to say we will be stronger than ever with more nuclear weapons many times over 12 last year said the nuclear arsenal was top of the pack. . . . . for that matter passive defenses that can contribute to our security and of others in this ring seamanship theory. >> your argument in the book is that it the united states willingness and resolve to send allies to defend her and just depends on her vulnerability to nuclear war so the more we can limit the vulnerability the more we can limit our adversaries vulnerability the better we can understand conflicts of interest with other aaron state. the answer is its offense and defense so having the nuclear capabilities to conduct counter for strikes and the capability which is something the united states has for decades been interested in. it's a part of the defense of whatever survives to be able to protect yourself and to protect your all

every state will get $3 million. my low state of delaware will get million. we have some of the oldest election machinery in the country. we've got dozens of states that i ink arnot fully prepared for an election that as senator durbin pointed out is less than six months away. i'm concerned about the sense of a lack of urgency. give us insight into how you think the eac grants are being distributed and whetr you think there is more resources needed, and where you would put those if made available federally. >> thank you. this was the focus of the work that we did with the government coordinating council, in looking at the funding. we were asked by councilmembers, state and local officials primarily, to help provide insight, as far as where the money could be used, both short and long-term, to address riskto the process. we focused first on addressing those common i.t. vulnerabilities that exist across i.t. systems, regardless of elections. things like patching, and training for fishing campaigns, as well as just manpower. several states, illinois, florida, as

it was done on states lock around. which means that the states laws -- states laws grant. the supreme court had no authority to intervene because there was no issued a result. host: is part of the difficulty that the constitution has to address all these and is there not a's that of the -- guest: if you are a plaintiff filing a lawsuit, what do you sue under? equal protection, first amendment, the courts have not figured out a test they can use to say, i have been hurt by this, how do i get a remedy that results is claims? host: racial gerrymandering would take a different track i imagine? guest: there is a long tradition of the court getting involved in that. that theory does not really apply in the same way too partisan gerrymandering. host: here is anne in the tampa, florida. caller: i want to thank you for taking my call. i wanted to -- i never really understood much of the detail about gerrymandering. there was -- here is my two-part question. the supreme court and partisan gerrymandering, when it comes to issues, he just mentioned -- california just had something on

elections are run by states and loes ross the 50 states and five territories. there are over 10,000 jurisdiction -- jurisdictions in the united states. what works for the voters of florida may not work for the voters of california. the local administration of elections empowers voters to engage directly with the process, and those who run it. my final point, for those voters who have questions or concerns regarding the integrity of the process i implore you toget involved. become a poll worker. watch pre-election testing. check your registration information before elections. engage with your local election officials. most importantly, go vote. the best response for those who wish to undermine fah in our democracy is to participate and vote. before i conclude i want to thank congress for the legislative progress thus far and strengthening dhs's cyber security and critical infrastructure authorities. we strongly support final passage of legislation to create the cyber security and infrastructure security agency. which would rename and reorganize mpd. i look forwa

the state and others provided. adoption centers, fathers had to pay things. now, i think your distinction -- nd you keep repeating it is -- these centers, i'm assuming both the licensed and unlicensed ones are not doing procedures. but i don't know what an ultrasound is if not a procedure. i don't know what a pregnancy test is if not a proceeds -- procedure. i don't know how counseling on the pregnancy state is not part of medical advice in the same way a doctor gives it when he's considering ap abortion procedure -- an abortion procedure. i don't understand the difference. both of them are doing medical-related procedures, and both are being asked, the chief said there's a distinction in not advertising someone else's services. but in casey we permitted it. so please explain to me again why there's a difference ere. >> so, justice sotomayor, i agree with everything you said in the back half there. and if california were coming in and saying before you, licensed clinic, perform an ultrasound you've got to provide c

of any of the states. the 740,000 people in alaska, how many work in the industry industry? our fishing and tourism industries are very high , but it is a significant generator of jobs, certainly in the top three or four employment in alaska in the energy sector. timeter: you are four zones away from washington, d.c. in much time do you spend washington, and how much attention to you pay to what goes on here? gov. walker: a lot. in fact, i will be there next week for most of the week. land is owned or controlled by the federal government, so we have an ongoing relationship with the federal government since statehood. it is an important part that we have engagement with all administrations, and we have, certainly throughout my term. we've had significant engagement with the prior and current administration. reporter: trade is a big issue here in washington. you just returned from china recently on a trade mission. what are your thoughts when it comes to the current state of affairs between the u.s. and chin

there is a lot of states that are in dire straits. they cannot fulfill this, and now they are going to find a way. i have a reasonable belief that is what the supreme court did. i think they were already contacted. host: let me give jessica a chance to respond to the monetary issue. we are talking potentially billions of dollars that can be collected from consumers going into the coffers of states. guest: that is absolutely right. the money is driving this, no daddy. -- no doubt. perhaps you feel like states have a revenue problem. or perhaps you feel that states have a spending problem. it is certainly much, much easier for them to tax other businesses than to make tough political choices. they would rather tax people who cannot vote them out of office, and they would rather sell those tax coffers been cut programs that are popular with their constituents. no politician like doing that. i think that is exactly right. as far as the supreme court's motives, i think this issue has been on the minds of justices. in a few public comments,

they are going to become states on equal standing as existing states. you have the 13 colonies turn into 13 states, and now you're saying we're going to create new states an equal basis. oh really, did they go to the -- go through the revolution? why do they get to the equal to us? this is this understanding of people moving west and as they move west, where they are, that will be incorporated into the united states. it is this notion of the people being at the center of the legal order here. although state governments, they will be similar to other states, so they have to follow certain rules, and citizens in them are going to be like citizens in other states. just because you move around the country, does not mean you will go to a lesser place. not some colonial appendage where you would not be able to do the things you would in other states. this is really different from the situation with other imperial powers. these new lands are not going to be colonial appendages. these lands belong to the monarch even if it is owned by individual, but that is no

this is the one state -- one-jew these are all very large states about 5 million people.d the rest of them are sort of moderate states with about 2 million voters. what does this mean? this means that the pri is losing is voter base. this is a very difficult and dangerous position for the one hegemonic party, the party taking back in 2012 out of nowhere and just beat everyone. and now it is out of contention in these governorships were at once held sway. that pan could still win two more states, terry crews, pueblo, very large. it is locked in a battle with morena candidates. in fact, the morena party it also when two more states 50p on have the chips fall. this is interesting because a former pri and look, that name again. because it's his son running for office. against a morena candidate. so we will see how that comes out. puebla, martha is the wife of the former pan sort of government who was, in fact, himself a former -- these parties have start to lose the ability to attract new talent. and that there is something that is sort of very corrupt in the state of denmark

congress sents the members to the states for ratification. many states refused to ratify. these states -- political change might have been delayed. james garfield of ohio, future president for a brief time in 1881 before being assassinated, declared military authority was needed to plant liberty on the ruins of slavery. congress felt bound to a higher purpose. as a result of southern states' refusal to ratify the 14th amendment, congress enacted the reconstruction act of putting the rebel states under federal military control. the reconstruction act authorized new state constitutions and united states military commanders took charge of registering all voters to elect delegates to state conventions. charles sumner, ardent supporter of black rights, believed the ballot ensured protection against white supremacy. he naively thought the rights of southerners once given can never be taken away. across the south, whites thought newly freed slaves would not bother voting. they were proved dramatically wrong. african americans responded overwhelmingly, offering -- often marching t

under state law, because of the severability clause, there would be state law contract issues. there might even be a duty to bargain that kicks in under state law where we would have to renegotiate not only this provision but surrounding provisions. that's a serious reliance interest in our view. thank you. justice roberts: thank you, counsel. mr. frederick. mr. frederick: thank you, mr. chief justice, and may it please the court, i would note at the beginning that all of these arguments were before the court 40 years ago in abood. and when the court unanimously upheld the idea of agency fees, it considered whether or not these issues would constrain the constitutional prerogatives of government to act under democratic impulses to come up with a system that would fit the local culture, history, private sector background of what state governments were having to do to recruit and attract the most willing and able people to discharge the public services that public employees are required to perform. so, when this court addressed in lehnert the question of how do you draw the line

department of state. she is also a member of the andcil of foreign relations the inter-american dialogue. mr. farnsworth, you are now recognized. mr. farnsworth: good afternoon you -- to you and the ranking member. on yourngratulate you opening statements. those were powerful and we look forward to responding to the questions you have put out there already. it is a privilege to appear before you again at the subcommittee. the news that the trump administration has moved forward with aluminum and steel tariffs on canada, mexico, and europe ofh the possibility additional tariffs and the cancellation of u.s. participation in the transpacific partnership and to recast nafta, have roiled economic relations. have introduced a significant element of uncertainty into the trade and investment calculus along with the normal and anticipated emerging-market risks in latin america and the caribbean basin and increasing uncertainty is, to be blunt, bad for business. as the united states retrench is, others are quick to

that will be monday evening here in the united states. the president said it's not about being prepared. everybody is prepared for this. the united states has been prepared for a long time, north korea is prepare add long time. what is important is attitude, the willingness to get things done. the president in the oval office awhile ago saying denuclearization, he said they have to denuke. denuclearization is at the heart of making a deal with north korea. if they play their old game of well, we'll give up a little bit in exchange for concessions and, you know, money and other goods from the united states, that won't be good enough. the president has talked about it in the past that he would like to see an all-in one denuclearization, giving up the nuclear program in north korea but may have to be a more phased-in approach. think logistically the phased-in approach is more realistic. we'll get a couple chances to ask questions of the president in terms of however is he willing to go in terms of normalizing a relationship. what about the p

what i believe i am a strong believer that the two state solution is essential because a one state solution would mean what would mean that everybody would have. been in existence. for i don't think it's possible to be maintained never an easy time though nothing is eternal in the world and i believe our role is not to maintain states of small in which people suffer and in which the risks for peace and security are there at any every moment i think our role is to overcome these states of squaw and to create a stable peaceful solution where two peoples are able to live together in respect for their homes and goods the secretary general of we have to leave india i really appreciate your time today and i'm curious to keep this conversation going in our social media pages and talk to syria the same place same time here on the walls apart. i played for many flips over the years so i know the game and so i got. the ball isn't only about what happens on the pitch for the final school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the shaper money killing their own to spend spend to get to th

this is about the united states and the posture the united states has chosen to assume against the rest of the world, particularly against its closest friends and allies in these are measures applied -- allies. these are measures apply not only to canada, but toward the eu and mexico. we believe it is a highly regrettable one. we said that directly to our american counterparts. >> we've got two minutes left. there are six people on the list. we have time for one more question. french]king this will affect the schedule you had chosen for the g7. >> we always expected there to be some differences of opinion amongst various g-7 members, especially when it comes to climate change and international trade. >> we have many elements upon which we agree. we knew we would be having some frank and honest discussions on those topics and others. we will certainly see that the incontinues to be useful allowing frank and honest discussions and rigorous discussions. >> is it possible that your government will offer financial help to the aluminum and steel industries if this trade dispute continues over

does 19 states will make a determined on a state-by-state basis on what races are important. once those 19 states are done, we will make a determination on a state-by-state basis on what races are important. >> i going to have a jr smith moment in your best about card? mr. holder: i don't think so. if you are a pro, you have to remember what the score is. at a minimum, he put the rebound right back up, or thought. when he dribbled the ball, , or . when he dribbled the ball, that's was painful to watch. is a good player and we all make mistakes. announcer: you can see prime minister's question wednesday at on c-span2 or sunday night at 9:00 p.m. eastern here on c-span. use can also go to c-span.org and find video of past prime minister's questions. corpsorrow, u.s. marine officials discuss maritime security. that is live at 10:00 a.m. eastern on c-span. night on the communicators, american cable association presidt and ceo and telecom senior vice president of corporate affairs talk about issues facing rural and urban broadband providers. >> 35% of our customers do not have acc

is are far smaller states.the only state left in this lots of big powerful, numbers, lots of money, is the state of mexico with about 17 million voters. electionst lost that and the question will be, what's going to happen in that state's midterm elections, which will happen, i think, in a year and a two years. how can the p.r.i. survive if it governors? in 2000, the p.r.i. didn't fall apart, as many expected it to. why? because it held between 19 and governorships, 19 and 21 states out of 32, including all the largest states. that meant was that when the p.r.i. governors saw local and federal elections come up, they helped their candidates. this will no longer happen in at of those 21 states it held. now, is the -- dead? this is so mean. let me show you what i put up in 2012 when i came to the wilson center to give a talk right after the elections. this is what i said. is a badhis, this thing -- this doesn't work. it sort of doesn't work. was at the p.r.i., this 2012. so look at the p.r.i. circumscriptions, th

like a lot of states right now, funding is really tight in our state. >> voices from the states, part of c-span's 50 capitals tour and our stops in pierre, south dakota, and bismarck, north dakota. >>> the center for strategic and international studies and the u.s. naval institute co-hosted a discussion on maritime security yesterday. we'll hear about how the military coordinates for potential maritime threats. this is 90 minutes. >> i'd like to welcome you all to today's event. i'm a senior adviser here at csis.

states. but if you look to the states, these are all very large states above 5 million people and the rest of them are moderate with 2 million voters. what does this mean? that means they are losing their voter base. this is a very difficult and dangerous position for the one hegemonic party that came back in 2012 out of nowhere and beat everyone. and now it is out of contention in the governorships. so now it still could wind to more states and it is locked in a battle with the candidates so in fact the morena party could win two more states depending on how the chips fall and this is interesting because as a forme former -- look it is his son running for office a morena candidate we will see how that comes out so now this is the wife of the former sort of governor who calls himself a former priest so now his party is starting to lose the ability to attract new talent and that there is something that is very corrupt ine the state of denmark or mexico which is where you are not pulling in new

secretary of state mike pompeo just took a question.quite a short answer to that, saying we have been clear on the sequencing. it was answering that question in relation to someone saying that donald trump had said that people can sleep well tonight, but, of course, north korea still has their nuclear weapons. he really did not address that point. but he did say we are going to get denuclearisation. that is the aim of the countries there. we bring in our corresponded in washington, chris buckler, who has been listening to this press conference as well. it is interesting, i was talking a few minutes ago about how secretary of state mike pompeo was slightly irritable on wednesday when being questioned by reporters about the details. and i think we saw a slight flush of that again just a few minutes ago when he was asked about the sequencing, is this a problem for the white house, that there are so for the white house, that there are so few details about what they are asking north korea and in what order before north korea gets what it wa

the countermeasures will only apply to the originating from the united states. they will take effect july 1 and will remain in place until the united states eliminates its trade restrictive measures against canada. where possible we have thought the products on the list that can be easily sourced from either canadian or non-us suppliers. i like to take the opportunity to thank the canadians who have been actively engaged in the consultations. i'm grateful for your input that have helped us build the best possible retaliatory lists. as we take these steps we are asking and acting in close collaboration with our like-minded partners. i was in fact in brussels on tuesday to discuss this issue. it's important to point out that there are also subject to the 232 terra from post on june 1. their allies and neighbors of the united states. canada's approach is and will be this. we will not escalate and not act on. judging by the feedback, countless canadians in many diverse political points of view agree with this approach. i can't emphasize enough the regret with which

my hope is by june 12 the president of the red states -- the united states knows his facts. host: the president saying this is just the beginning of it and it will require more than just one meeting. we will go to keep in fargo, north dakota. you are on the air with the cognition. congressman. caller: it's a little off from what you guys are talking about, but with our president wanting yet weup that wall and told gorbachev over in russia to when ronald wall , if you canresident put up a wall, you can dig under a wall. it's not going to do any good. host: congressman? guest: thank you for that question. you are absolutely correct. republican members of congress along the border of the united states have come out and opposed the wall. one of them in texas actually said the wall was one of the most inefficient systems you can put in because it's so easy to overcome any wall. in addition, it's extremely expensive. that is why the president of united states keeps making this misleading statement that mexico is going to pay for it. i've got a newsflash for you. mexico is not payi

by its differing member states levels of state-owned enterprises for decades. there's lots of institutional materials and experiences that we can draw on. this is just if you don't remember the tpp agreement, this is the soe chapter. it's there. we can go back and read it and learn from it. what are the critical features of these chapters in these agreements that we could build from? obviously, transparency. and this is one of the big concerns with the chinese approach of having government officials, communist party officials potentially sitting on the board of companies, right? potentially directly/indirectly promoting certain nonmarket-oriented behavior. we need to understand if there is going to be an soe, if it has nonmarket motivations, you need to know what those are. it may be -- they may be perfectly legitimate. it may be that they're worried about employment concerns. it may be that they're worried about servicing underserved populations, poorer populations. that they might have nonmarket, nonprofit-oriented motives. but you have to understand what tho

force, blacklist, state of the union plus 14 more thrillers. interact by phone, twitter or facebook. our special series in depth --thor.with brad sower on c-span2. mexico's presidential election is tomorrow, july 1. three presidential debates were held in various parts of the country. the second debate was from may 20 into you want in front of a live studio audience. this 40 minute portion includes onponses on the candidates mexico's relationship with the u.s., trade relations and immigration policy. here's that now. [music] [music] music [music] [music] >> good evening and welcome to the second presidential debate in the city of tijuana, baja, california. i'm leon contract it's a pleasure and good evening, candidates. of court, all of our public in mexico and our audience. the main objective of this debate has to do with mexico's role in the world. going to take a look at the relevance of mexico in the world and it an emblem matic city in mexico, tijuana. the first time we had debate with a studio audiences. all of them are from tijuana and th

the first irish ambassador to the united states. he was the one who initiated this wonderfully brilliant practice of handing over a bowl of shamrocks to the american president in the early 1950's. that tradition has developed and it is now a mainstay of our diplomatic effort throughout the year. as a final point, i unveiled a monument to john last week, which is in my garden at the embassy residence in washington. the reason i did it is because he was the architect of the irish constitution, and also from my home city. [laughter] >> thank you very much. [applause] >> good morning to you all. i am dr. curtis sandberg, i direct the national center for white house history here. all of us, we are delighted to welcome you to the white house symposium. as we move through the day, a quick map before we start. you will hear from distinguished speakers, each of whom will share thoughts respectively on 200 years of the united kingdom and ireland and the white house, the central role of james hoban on white house design. you have seen the impa

citizenship of the united states and of the states. constitution does not define their relationship so for a long time, people are puzzled over exactly what citizenship is supposed to be. the 14th amendment is going to settle that. 14th amendment to says that citizenship is based on where you are born, on what is called the sus solas. roger tawney and dred scott tried to determine citizenship based on born and blood. he was appealing. they go out the window with the 14th amendment. 14th amendment categorically says that there is a itizenship of the united states based on those who are orn in the united states. this means that those 3.9 million slaves who were born and the united states are by the 14th amendment and by virtue, they are citizens of the united states and therefore enjoy all of the privileges and immunities. you might think that would settle the matter, states and therefore enjoy all not with crookshank, and was those two cases, the supreme court revives this idea of dual track citizenship. this is what the citizenship of

about what i believe i am a strong believer that the two state solution is essential because a one state solution would mean what would mean that everybody would have to send their this therefore been in existence for seventy years this total score i don't think is possible to be maintained never easy to know nothing is eternal in the world and i believe our all is not to maintain said too small in which people suffered and in which the risks for peace and security are there to tell you every moment i think our role is to overcome this little school and to create a stable peaceful. two peoples are able to leave together in respects for the atoms to get secretary general and we have to leave india i really appreciate your time today and i'm glad our viewers to keep this conversation going in our social media pages and hope to see you again same place same time here when i was a part of. our. position would you go to one of them to be in luck because. that's me one more time in our well me and i. see. that. moment was a. jumble but he moves a. little. ole in the spirit john in the prison i

[applause] to her untiring support for the united states military when she was a senator from the state of new york, to her forward challenging, consequential, and as thexhausting years 67th secretary of state, she has given with every ounce of persistence, and hope, and determination, she has showed us how america can be great on the world stage. i think she may exemplify better than jusabout ybody that i know, theodore roosel's belief that it is not the cr that counts. the credit belongs, in this case, to the woman who is in the knowarena. who is in the public square, who is in the middle of the action. roosevelt words, who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends herself in a worthy cause, so as he said so memorably, her place shown never be with those cold and timid souls ow neither victory nor defeat. she has been in the arena for all of us, for the united states, for her entire adult life. as secretary of state she steered america's response to the arab revolution. she stood up to the chinese in 2010 the south china sea. she stood up to it truculent vladimir pu

state of war.ermeates throughout society. >> at school, children are taught, i have killed an american, i kill an american, i will kill an american to illustrate the tenses. >> it was that fear of american domination which fuelled north korea's desire for a nuclear bomb. a successful nuclear program also played into the legend of power kim jong-un's grandfather established about the kim dynasty. >> he was able to convince people that he was god. that he could turn pinecones into grades. when he died, people couldn't believe it. they didn't think that god could actually die. >> after kim's death from a heart attack in 1994, his eldest son kbecame the leader. he paid homage to his deceased father by naming him the eternal president of north korea. >> what they were trying to do is to confer legitimacy on the family itself. he is under glass. you can see him. it shows that the regime is based on the kim family. >> he proved to be a more ruthless leader than his father. at the beginning of his 17 years

it hosted them for the first state visit. obviously, china is playing a big role throughout the continent. but talk about this very big play they have made historically and seek to continue in zimbabwe. >> thank you, senator. and that's obviously an excellent question and a crucial issue for us. china has invested heavily in the extract tive resources sector around the world. and zimbabwe, with its extensive mineral wealth, is certainly no exception to that. i believe that private sector led growth for zimbabwe is important. but i also think it's important that the people and government of zimbabwe receive fair and equitable treatment for their resources. and i hope they are entering into a trade relationship with china with their eyes open, and certainly insisting that all countries that invest in zimbabwe respect the worker rights, respect environmental regulations, and do not allow the resources that they have to be taken without proper compensation. and i believe that it's incumbent upon the united states and our represen

in the hearing, i think you have stated that should be up to each individual state or school district. and then you release a follow- up statement in which you said that our nation has a legal and moral obligation to educate every child is a well established under the spring court's ruling. it has been consistent in my position since day one. i am worried that that statement is still not clear. on this very important question of whether or not a teacher or principal is allowed to call ice to report and undocumented students under federal law. can a teacher or principal call ice to report and undocumented student under current federal law? >> i will refer back again to the settled case in 1982, which says students that are not documented have the right to an education. and i think it is incumbent on us to ensure that those students have a safe and secure environment to attend school and learn, and i maintain that. >> so let me ask the question again, is it okay as the secretary of education, there are a lot of schools that want guidance and want to understand what the law is. is it oka

to the united states. because, i said, i couldn't have decided such a thing before this new president. because i said, now i see the passion, i see the opportunity, i'm more energized. so i made a voluntary promise and now i'm very happy. we're making great success and i said, i have one more thing to promise, which is foxconn. so those three things i promised. and i did not have official, official permission from terry, but i promised. [laughter] president trump: you brought him along, right? you brought him along. [applause] >> but i'm so happy today that my promise came true. so this is a great historical moment, because i think the united states does not have the ecosystem for new technology the last 20 years, and now this is the beginning of new ecosystem, of high-tech manufacturing back in the united states. cheers and applause] president trump: thank you, masa. -- massa. one of the great businessmen of the world also. those two. that is some combination standing back stage. i said, whoa. but they li

, 80% of our exports are going to the united states. people say that you don't make many mistakes you make one mistake and then you have to deal with the consequences. one historic error was to receive donald trump in -- who was insulting, who was attacking the mexican people. it didn't even take -- bother to read this book. says you have to provoke the opponent and if he is weak, we smash him. and if he is strong, we negotiate. so when my opponent is weak, we crush him. so, if you want to be respected, you have to respect yourself first. a president needs to behave with dignity, and i will defend the national interests. >> candidate -- i'd like to know what are the specific actions to redirect mexican exports in order to reduce the economic impacts resulting from our overreliance on the nafta agreement? thank you. >> we have opportunities throughout the world and we're going to take advantage of them before we talk about trade and investment. we need to talk but mutual respect, president trump four days ago, on again, insulted us, and

it provides states with flexibility to meet these needs at the various states. programs include requirements for states to monitor providers that receive federal funds. now, unfortunately there has been a situation in my home state of minnesota where we've got a number of day-care providers that are openly violating federal and state laws and regulations, taking money for personal use, using the money to set up a fraudulent childcare client and providing a kickback has been reported. this is a major issue. there are allegations that not just several, you've got 23 childcare or day-care centers either closed or under investigation. the fraud may go as high as $100 million. think about that in fiscal year 2018, minnesota received $120 million in federal funding. the state contributed about $50 million in matching and maintenance funds. and we may have a fraud case of nearly $100 million in this state with money then being transferred out of the country via msp airport. this is a big issue in my home state of hadfof minnesota. can you share with me what your agency

state of missouri.e're so proud of your leadership. for us today it is infrastructure and jobs in missouri. like many of the other governors, that is what is important to me. i appreciate having an opportunity to being with the president of the united states to discuss those issues. >> thank you very much. i hear josh is doing pretty well? >> josh is doing well. we'll work hard for for him. >> i hear he is doing well. he is great. matt, you set records in your great state, i love very much, kentucky, a special place. you have really done the job. >> i will simply say this i'm grateful. what has brought many of us down is select usa, the u.s. chamber of commerce has recognized in a world of geopolitical instability there is really nowhere as likely to have upside potential for investors as is the united states, period. so we as states, we compete with one another, we're all on the same team at the end of the day, to bring investors to the united states, all of us benefit to some degree givent integrated

these countermeasures will only apply to goods originating from the united states. they will take effect on july 1st and will remain in place until the united states eliminates its trade restriction measures against canada. where possible we have sought to put products on the list that can be easily sourced from either canadian or non-us suppliers was i want to take this opportunity to thank all the canadians who were actively engaged in consultation on these lists. i'm grateful for your input that helped us to build the best possible retaliatory list. as we take these steps in response to the section 232 tariffs, we are acting in close collaboration with our like-minded partners in the european union and mexico. i was in brussels on tuesday to discuss this issue and i have been in touch with mexican officials, these countries are also subject to the section 232 tariffs which were imposed on june 1st and they are also allies and neighbors of the united states. canada's approaches and will be this. we will not escalate and we will not back down. judging by the feedba

the states and the state of utah knows a lot better how to care for people here, how to make sure that people with preexisting conditions don't get excluded from insurance. we want people to get insurance. the reason is if they don't have insurance and they debt g -- get sick and they go to the emergency room to get covered or treated, guess who pace for it? you do. the people paying or free care are you. the people pay for those that don't. utah knows how to do it. obamacare is the wrong way to go and need to be repealed. >> representative kennedy? >> obamacare definitely needs to be repealed. i'm not interested in more government programs. my opeanut on some level has created more government programs and instilled in his state and instilled that. it was a state that wanted that but in the state of utah, i, along with many others, stood against obamacare and i stand by there. it's best delivered by third-party players working together. when it comes to preexisting conditions, i've had great patients with very minor medical issues that in the past had no access to insurance. it was sha

, these other states? have they had brawls in the polling place? have they had disturbances in the polling place? >> no, there is no evidence of disruption either in minnesota or in these other states caused by simply -- >> states that don't have laws as far as minnesota, what has been the record? >> as far as i know, there hasn't been any instances of a disruption caused by people wearing apparel except for when polling workers confront people wearing apparel, then stop the process to try to police their clothes. this is part of the problem. disruption and intimidation will occur through the policing of someone's shirt, not for the fact they are passively wearing it as they go in and out. >> does the record show how many officials would be making these determinations at a general election in minnesota and how they are selected? >> the polling officials? >> yes. > they are selected from the parties -- various parties. a list is submitted and they are selected. i don't know how many but there's more than on

and the downsides, even within the united states, not just from downsides, even within the united statesa treat tariffs, but also from the tariffs themselves that america imposes. that is correct. in the oil industry in the us, a tremendous amount of production depends on steel imported from mexico and parts from canada and on steel exports to canada against which there may be retaliation. there is a great deal of interdependence in modern production systems and this will have widespread effect in the united states and across the world. and i think one needs to add here that the united states today is 20%, maybe a little bit more than that, of the world economy and we seem to be declaring trade war on the other 80%. that is likely to force the rest of the world to finally unify against us and retaliated. it is a moment that is kind of sad for us in the united states to watch after 70 yea rs of the united states to watch after 70 years of trying to keep the world trading system stable. if it is possible to put this briefly in a nutshell, what we mean by a trade war? well, we mean increase

he treat jewish people differently than others the jewish state different than other states that haso be organized and i appreciate the efforts of the people who support this coalition i encourage encourage you to do even more. [applause] >> i also get to throw out a couple of pitches. >> two days ago i played basketball football and baseball but i am telling you now to also strike so any other sports teams watching. >> has posted the video of those pitches. >> and then that really brings the heat those in israel like to have those odds stacked against them. >> last question as a miami boy what is your prediction of the win loss record this year? >> but this is on c-span. >> that is the difference between ralph and me once to get to the promised land and i learn that this wasn't going to happen so i just went to the real promised land like every miami dolphins fan at the beginning of the season that they will win the super bowl that is my prediction and because we predict that every year here is what i figure just say it's going to happen because there is no one in america but now yo