to state. you also have the physical address. if you have a warehouse. if you have an amazon warehouse, it is not clear, sometimes they move product from one warehouse to another warehouse with no information or no notice and that is all taken into consideration. it varies from state to state and it is difficult to navigate all of that. chair wyden: next question would be for you, ms. yetter. obviously states that have the autonomy to administer on their own taxes generally at the more complicated systems. this strikes me that it makes for even more challenges for america small businesses. we talked a lot today about sales taxes. there are thousands of local jurisdictions across the country. businesses have to figure out how to comply with 45 state sales tax systems. with some states sellers have to deal with local tax compliance separately. you touched on this. can you elaborate on how these additional significant burdens affect remote sellers? >> colorado, alaska and alabama are troublesome s

states army, retired. yenen bedru. petty officer second class chris bisendoff, united states navy. kerry r. blackburn. colonel d. boone, united states army. mary jane moos. donna m. bowen. allen p. boyle. bernard c. brown ii. petty officer third class christopher l.burford, united states navy. captain charles f. bulgergame iii, united states navy reserve, retired. petty officer third class daniel m.colliero, united states navy. sergeant first class jose o. caldron omedo, united states army. sue n.m.cally. androminec. carter. karen a. carter. william e.caswell. sergeant first class john j.chada, united states army, retired. rosa maria chava. david m.chalyboyd. sarah m. clark. julian t. cooper. ajas.cottom. lieutenant commander eric a.cranford, united states navy. adam. davis. james d.debonier. captain gerald f.deconto, united states navy. rodney dickens. lieutenant colonel jerry d. dickerson, united states army. eddie a. dillard. petty officer first class johnny doctor jr., united states navy. captain rober

>> state and federal was about 4200. >> why do you combine state and federal and not a state and local? >> it's not a trick question. it's just a question. it's curiosity. we normally separate federal and now you've got state and local. why? >> local jails is a different type of facility than federal andan state prison. >> that isn't a state prison different than federal prison? >> correct. okay, so you probably got a couple thousand, two or 3,000 prisoners dallying inn custody and state and local prisons. i just assumed this was going to be state and local but he kept ansaying local. it's only local. why did you issue this, chock full of information and statistics on only local? why didn't you combine it with istates? >> i'm sorry, senator. what report are you referring to? >> the whole purpose is to determine the deaths in custody and state and local jails, correct? >> correct. >> so when you publish a paper deaths, mortality 2000, 2019 why did you only do local, why didn't you do state and local of that was the whole purpose? >> there was published state ant federal deaths. >> a wei

party state. arguably the most brutal in the entire south. which is saying something. and today, at the state and federal level, the state government is dominated exclusively by white republicans. with the party holding massive majorities of in both the state health set, senate governorship, both the state senators roger recurs cindy, hyde-smith are conservative republicans. the state is consistently elected republican governors for nearly two decades. most recently the current republican dave reeves. and under her new unified republican control. there is just no earthly way that mississippi can plausibly describe it as quote, promoting and supporting life. the state has the highest covid death rate per capita in the country. and in turn, it has the lowest life expectancy in the country at just about 72 years. mississippi also has the highest infant mortality rate in the entire country. mississippi has the most gun deaths per capita of any state in the entire country. mississippi is also the poore

and state's justification for denying it is the state blaine amendment. it prohibits aid to sectarian institutions. and so the state says, sorry, trinity lutheran, you can't get it. trinity lutheran challenges the exclusion. the case goes up to the u.s. supreme court. and thankfully, the supreme court concludes that violates the free exercise clause of the united states of the constitution because it singlings out -- singles out and excludes an entity for -- from this public benefit program simply because of its religious status, simply because of its identity as a church. but then the court or more accurately four justices in the majority drop a footnote in the opinion. it's a 27-word footnote and it says this. this case involves expressed discrimination based on religious identity with respect to playground resurfacing. we do not address religious uses of funding or other forms of discrimination. now, again, this was four justices signing onto this footnote. not a majority of the court. and the footnote doesn't say there is a status use distinction. it

the united states and other member states are trying to enforce on sovereign states international orders under the signposts of safeguarding democracy and protecting human rights. these interventionist attempts are a blanket breach of the u.n. charter, a procedure to the softening of a quality with partial attacks and double standards favoring the unfair positions of individual countries and specific versus should be thoroughly eliminated with the core principles of the charter being equal rights and the domination of the people as strictly observed. texting that opportunity for the people of cuba in their struggle to safeguard their sovereignty and the development of the country in the face of the high handedness of the united states in their internal affairs and we strongly demand economic and financial embargo on cuba by the united states be lifted in its entirety immediately as required by the revlimid resolution to the assembly. the understanding support of the solidarity with the people in the republic struggles to repair the interference of those forces to safeguard the independen

we do not ask any nation to choose between the united states or any other partner but the united states will be unabashed in promoting our vision of a free, open, secure and prosperous world and what we have to offer communities of nations investments that are designed not to foster dependency but to alleviate burdens and help nations become self-sufficient partnerships not to create political obligation but because we know our own success, each of our successes increased when other nations succeed as well. when individuals have the chance to live in dignity and develop their talents, everyone benefits critical of that is living up to the highest goals of this institution. increasing peace and security for everyone, everywhere the united states will not waiver in our unrelenting determination to counter and thwart continuing theorist threats to our world and we will lead with our diplomacy to strive for peaceful resolution of conflict we seek to hold peace and stability in the taiwan straits, remain committed to our one china policy, and we continue to pose unilateral changes in the sta

well , we will talk about state property and privatization with the head of the state property fund ,. olga batova. are you with us yet? congratulations, let's go. let's remind the audience what the state property fund does, what are the powers of this structure, is it famous, well, in general, the fund has four such main functions, first of all, of course, privatization, this is also associated with something, in general, the fund here has tasks on the most transparent terms for the largest number of participants and in of competition , to implement the state property that is not strategic for the state, the second function is uh, it's a lease, and here we are also uh, the central body of the executive power, which implements the state new we also have a policy in the field of rent for rent. now it is already running for the second year, the gov.ua site is running, there are transparent auctions on prozorro for rent. of money to the budget, the third such function, which is a derivative of privatization, is corporate management, these enterprises that are given to us for privatizatio

i say we go from state to state organizing our state how we choose to live.tiful thing. they do work that gentleman said, they hold people down so they cannot keep running over and over so that we have the policy's -- nancy pelosi's of the world and in the mitch mcconnell's. go to conventionofstates.com and we can get this done. god bless everybody. have a beautiful day. host: happy constitution day. guest: here is one thing michelle said -- i am not sure i agree with everything she said. i am skeptical about the idea of a convention of states. we have not had that since philadelphia 235 years ago. it would open up a can of worms about how they would be selected, how they would vote, would they be limited to certain issues, would they attempt a new constitution. i am not sure i share her enthusiasm about that, at least at the present moment where we are deeply divided. i think amendments should reflect broad consensus rather than a narrow majority. here's one thing michelle said that is interesting. she is in ohio now, she has been in michigan, she talked abo

attempted to erase the sovereign state from the map. russia hasegawa shamelessly violated the core tenets of the united nations charter. no more important than the clear prohibition against countries taking the territory of their neighbor by force. again, just today, president putin has made overt nuclear threats against europe, and a reckless disregard for the responsibilities of a nonproliferation regime. now, russia's calling up more soldiers to join the fight and the kremlin is organizing a sham referenda to try to annex parts of ukraine and extremely -- an extremely significant violation of the u.n. charter. this world should see these outrageous acts for what they are. putin claims he had to act because russia was threatened. but no one threatened russia. and no one other than russia sought conflict. in fact, we warned it was coming. when many of you worked to try to avert t putin's own words make his true purpose unmistakable. just before he invaded, putin asserted, i quote, ukraine was created by russia and never had, quote, rea

language on a state-by-state basis and to find that common ground.ain. at this point i think the states are in better shape to explore and to find the right direction on a state-by-state basis. >> you're on the senate foreign relations committee. the top republican on the house intelligence committee, congressman mike turner of ohio, told me he does not think the u.s. should swap convicted russian arms dealer in exchanged for jailed americans in russia, paul whelan and brittney griner. he thinks viktor bout is too dangerous. do you agree or do you think the u.s. should be willing to make the swap? >> i'm on the armed services committee and also on the foreign relations committee. we have not had a classified discussion about what the impact would be. i know this is up to the president to make up his mind and we probably won't have a say in it. i'm going to withhold judgment at this point. i don't mind being critical of the administration, but i don't want to be critical of the administration on their decision-making process without having all the fac

state constitutional law or state other law. but a few years ago, the supreme court in a case called the arizona republican legislature against the arizona independent districting commission sort of came across the same text and basically said it's okay for arizona to give the redistricting authority. take it away from the state legislature and give it to an independent commission and that was a 5-4 decision and the chief justice was in dissent, along with justice scalia and justice thomas and justice alito. so i think in some respects, the court is going to be revisiting this request he, in the context of a redistricting case where it's the state legislature that did the congressional districting and a state court has essentially countermanded it and i think it's going to be considerations to start, considerations of textulism. and to wax into being a law geek for a second, i think what's interesting about this issue, a lot of these in these electioneering cases and redistricting including the one that jeff was talking about, t

in the state. the pennsylvania court -- you consent. once you register to do business in pennsylvania you consent to jurisdiction and all kinds of case is whether or not they happened in pennsylvania. the question is whether the due process clause prohibits the state from requiring a corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction. the pennsylvania supreme court said yes, the clause does prohibit states from doing that. the supreme court has taken a very narrow view of general jurisdiction for corporations in recent years. if they were to roll for the plaintiff in this case at what essentially undo all those recent cases and allow states a fairly easy mechanism and hold companies on any claim whether or not it has any connection to the state. in the wake of recent supreme court cases, this issue really came to the forefront because a bunch of states had this kind of consent principal. at that time i think it was quite obvious to me that supreme court whenever allow states to do this. it is less obv

state actors. so, they would be empowered. and the other it would empower is the united states supreme court. because it would turn every dispute about what an election law means in the state, as applied to the federal election, into a federal constitutional question. and the ultimate arbiter of that is, of course, the u.s. supreme court. it is kind of feedback loop where the court is kind of not only giving more power to state legislatures. it would be giving more power to itself. >> yes. we should note here -- often their arguments about states rights or difference of the states and there are conservative attacks on the over use of the commerce clause in the u.s. constitution for the federal government to overly regulated states. here they are doing something very scalpel very fine edge. it's like, well, leads effusions we think here have the power of the state legislatures but not the state supreme court. we like the legislators because they are our people and not the supreme court's. but then a

the united states in a war with russia could force the united states into serious dialogue.ly teaches the lesson of the caribbean crisis according to these and dmitry, i agree. i even tell you that only last friday. i spoke at a conference at the diplomatic academy, where mr. coach spoke, and according to him , both he and i had, in general, quite similar positions, and he, as i understood it, how can i speak, how i understood him. i know exactly what i think myself uh, we thought that u russia would hold you back as much as possible. here are the applications any nuclear weapons on any targets, but on the other hand, that nothing can be ruled out if the united states takes some kind of action on russian territory, whether it be the territory of the old or the territory that will become russian in a few days as a result of a referendum. i think we all agree on one thing what? uh, mr. sallin's statement has, of course, uh different audiences, and one of those audiences is the american allies, who have begun to worry about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in europe and

there is a good level of effort in coordination between the department of state, state justice, and treasury. i would like to highlight that of an example as a recent success that was accomplished across those three departments. at the same time i do think and believe that there is an opportunity for more in that arena and area. i think as we continue to focus on new opportunities to include inter agency collaboration at the center that we can present opportunities that could be successful in this theater as well. >> thank you mr. watson. mr. rosenbaum, anything to add? >> i would echo what assistant director watson has said. there is excellent coordination among the persian agencies as a result of which, i think it is fair to say the united states is among the leaders in the world in calling out, identifying, and sanctioning human rights violators. as always, more can be done. >> thank you, mr. rosenbaum, i'm not sure i confess to what extent you had to dig in on the specific texts that senator durbin has put forward. are you familiar with the precise outlines on what he's suggesting in ter

continue to be largely unaffected, while 19 states have protect a low. >> the other states almost like a fall someone there in between. myth three, overturning roe means healthcare professionals and hospitals cannot treat women with miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies or when the mom's life is endangered. these are all scare tactics preying on the emotions of people. listen, every state abortion law triggered by overturning roe includes an exception to save the life of the mother. treating miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies are not the same as performing abortions. in fact, no abortion law in any state in america prevents treatment for women with ectopic pregnancies and/or other life-threatening conditions. i remember my first year in residency when we were learning about ectopic pregnancy and our model was to never let the sun set on an ectopic pregnancy. that model will be continued throughout america. every pro-life position i know of, every physician that i know of including myself has always and will always care for these clinical conditions and there are no laws that prevent such

united states constitution. the theory is not grounded in history or logic but it has gained increasing following in some sectors of america over the last 20 years. it may include some current supreme court justices. the north carolina supreme court struck down the supreme -- gerrymandering of the state congressional district. relied on provisions of the state constitution as the basis for its decision. apply to all federal elections. here today to examine the legal theory to discuss the evidence or lack thereof supporting of it and perhaps more importantly to explore the consequences to american democracy that would ensue if the court endorses it, this topic may seem dry at times. all 50 states have administrators. some are elected, some are appointed. none are the state's actual legislature. professional, nonpartisan administration is a cornerstone of the modern american right to vote. depending on how the court resolves this upcoming case the entire apparatus could vanish overnight. at least for federal elect

while the united states is prepared for a mutual return to plan of action the united states is clear, we will not allow ukraine -- we believe diplomacy is the best for this outcome. one of the greatest successes of this institution, we cannot let the world slide backwards. perhaps, singular stands the universal declaration of human rights by which our forebears challenge us to measure ourselves. they made it clear in 1948 that human rights are the basis for all we seek to achieve. fundamental freedoms are a risk in every part of our world. detailed reports by the u.s. commissioner to horrible abuses and the increased oppression of women and girls in afghanistan. today, we stand with the brave women of iran who are demonstrating to secure their basic rights. the future will be one where women and girls can exercise equal rights and committing to building stronger economies and a more resilient society. living their lives without harassment in lbgtq plus communities. where citizens can question and criticize their leaders without fear. united states will always promote human rights in o

. , ,., , catastrophic storm surge to the state. , �*, ., state.e is, it's a mandatory evacuation, - state. the message is, it's a mandatory evacuation, you i state. the message is, it's a i mandatory evacuation, you got to get out. are you confident people will, given their past experiences? it’s people will, given their past experiences?— people will, given their past experiences? it's a tale of two states. those _ experiences? it's a tale of two states. those that _ experiences? it's a tale of two states. those that have - experiences? it's a tale of two states. those that have been l states. those that have been here for a long time usually do not heed the warnings. we do have people evacuating. we would love to see everyone evacuate. but we don't think we will get 100% compliance. what will get 100% compliance. what are ou will get 100% compliance. what are you expecting _ will get 100% compliance. what are you expecting or— will get 100% compliance. what are you expecting or concerned about in terms of damage? still about in terms of damage?

my state, idaho, is an advisory state, i understand. why are those states that are not members resistant to joining? >> let me say this. first, i can't speak for the states that are not participating with us. i can tell you that we have reached out to all of the states. we have tried to encourage them to participate with us, to join the organization. we feel there is great benefit to having all of the states involved in it. some of the things that mr. hennessey and miss huie have mentioned is far of simplifications of uniform definitions, that something that we have. we continue to work with the business community on those types of uniform definitions, when the uterus when the business community brings it to us it's important to us to get input from the business community and realize what causes those burdens. central registration system, we have that in miss huie's situation, if she's registered through streamline and she needs to add additional states, any remember state, that the member of log matter of logging back, and checking a b

state. it clearly identifies a single state official who is responsible for certifying a state's elector. it ensures a state's elector is certified and appointed pursuant to state law that was in effect prior to election day. third, it provides presidential candidates with an expedited judicial review of several claims related to a state's certificate of electors. this does not create a new cause of action. instead it will ensure a and efficient adjudication of disputes. fourth, it would require congress -- submitted by a state pursuant to the judgment of state or federal court. finally, our bill strikes a prevention of another outdated law enacted in 1845 that could be used by state legislatures to override their popular vote by declaring a failed election. that is the term that is undefined in that 1845 law. our bill permits a state to modify the period of this election only in extraordinary and catastrophic circumstances. and also, only as provided under that state's law enacted prior to

i am currently in the united states in the city of washington.every day i meet with a business trip. every day i meet with congressmen who are directly responsible for allocating funds in ukraine and for the allocation of economic aid for arms in ukraine, and i tell you honestly every day, meeting with someone there or just uh, around the capitol somewhere, meeting a senator or a congressman, the first thing we hear, ukrainians, we are with you, uh, the counteroffensive near kharkov is a historical moment for which you are very we are grateful that you have done something that no country in the world has done in the last 70 or 80 years, that's why the whole world knows about us, they want to help us and want to be with us. spend a speech asking about our successes at the front well, of course, mr. roman, it is interesting how in this situation, when they try to interpret these events in moscow, the kremlin constantly says that it was all planned, that we did everything here as we wanted that's why we see that they left hundreds of pieces of equip

president and his children from doing state -- from doing business in the state of new york. >> good morning. following a comprehensive three-year investigation by my office, including witnesses, interviews with more than 65 witnesses and a review of millions of documents submitted by mr. trump and others, i am announcing that today we are filing a lawsuit against donald trump for violating the law as part of his efforts to generate profits for himself, his family, and his company. the complaint demonstrates that donald trump falsely inflated is net worth by billions of dollars due unjustly enriched himself and to cheat the system, thereby cheating all of us. he did this with the help of the other defendants, is children -- his children, donald trump, jr., if ivanka trump, and eric trump, and the former trump cfo. mr. trump and the trump organization repeatedly and insistently inflated the value of assets to induce banks to lend money to the trump organization on more favorable terms than would have otherwise been available to the company, to pay lower taxes, to satisfy continuing lo

the great state of new york.e could reconstruct, it reorganized a number of these corporations, but the relief that we are seeking from this judge is again for him to perform his practices in the state of new york and prohibit him from engaging in any real estate commercial transactions in the state of new york going forward. >> these allegations are at least three years old. dear jay has access to the same starting points with these referrals, do you hope to force their hand in direction? >> it is not a question of forcing their hand. it is a question of presenting evidence, which we believe suggests illegality and suggest he was engaging in a number of schemes to benefit himself, his corporation, and his family. we will prevent this information to the district attorney to new york as well as the irs based upon the allegations to be uncovered. based upon the evidence we uncovered. >> [indiscernible] >> i will not negotiate in public. we have rejected settlement offer as they submitted, and our doors are always o

our state in the u.s. capitol. someone recognized for her historic renown as an aviator, but also someone who broke barriers, created opportunities for others, and captivated the attention of the world with her adventuresome spirit. kansas amelia earhart. with dwight eisenhower and now amelia earhart. kansas officially has two of the most iconic and recognizable american and heroes representing any state in the united states capitol. i thank just a few people in the room who made this happen. jackie pridgen and karen sieberg and reid berger with the atchison and amelia earhart foundation. thank you for never giving up. thank you for never giving up. perhaps amelia was your role model. amelia's ambition and spirit of adventure that took her around the world was built on a foundational upbringing in atchison. it is fitting today that the foundation on which she stands is from limestone, from the flint hills of kansas, between two and 3 million people from around the world will visit the u.s. capital every ye

the son of a bitch stated.hat, the obama administration canceled a meeting with the puffy ex-president himself, to whom the us journalists quoted the words of the philippine leader with a grin called him a bright guy. shut kalinu it was in this year that relations were severed duterta allowed the united states to hold the last military teaching and leave now he is surprisingly healthy and lives in his native country. another fight for the ages. after all, it was during the korean war that one country was divided by the thirty-eighth parallel into the republic of korea and the korean people's democratic republic, historians call this conflict the bloody fratricidal war itself, according to various sources, it died. about a million people , tens of millions, were injured , it is noteworthy that in the usa, who actively helped the south, this is not called a war, but a police operation at the heart of the war. again it’s not the desire of the united states to accept the independence of others. the fact is that kor

the members states have to sign off on that. they requested the european commission and or the la funder lion to put forward those proposals. and we are certainly going to hear more detail later today details later today on that. but member states all 27 of them still have to approve those measures. and that might be a reason, a bid for also underlying not to be very specific, very concrete in her speech, for instance, on the topic on a price caps. because of course, she's aware of the fact that it is up to the member states to decide, and that this one measure could be very controversial among the member states. and how effective has a commission been so far in addressing energy concerns of the 27 member countries? well, i think we can say that they have been doing quite a good job so far. even though, as i said, the latest measures were not as concrete as some member states would like them to be. however, they have come forward. for instance, with this proposal for joint procurement of an energy for all member states, that is

i say we go from state to state organizing our state how we choose to live.autiful thing. they do work that gentleman said, they hold people down so they cannot keep running over and over so that we have the policy's -- nancy pelosi's of the world and in the mitch mcconnell's. go to conventionofstates.com and we can get this done. god bless everybody. have a beautiful day. host: happy constitution day. guest: here is one thing michelle said -- i am not sure i agree with everything she said. i am skeptical about the idea of a convention of states. we have not had that since philadelphia 235 years ago. it would open up a can of worms about how they would be selected, how they would vote, would they be limited to certain issues, would they attempt a new constitution. i am not sure i share her enthusiasm about that, at least at the present moment where we are deeply divided. i think amendments should reflect broad consensus rather than a narrow majority. here's one thing michelle said that is interesting. she is in ohio now, she has been in michigan, she talked a

so, oregon is one of 39 states that has a state housing trust fund. these funds typically though not always have a designated revenue source and can be particularly helpful in providing additional housing resources for state needs. in the state of oregon, our trust fund is funded by state general fund. and lottery funds. and certainly, as you continue to pursue and work on this build, were eager to work on you -- with you in this area. >> i appreciate that very much. my bill would also support the construction of new workforce housing, creating a new competitive grant program at hud. mr. konter can you explain -- and how federal support can help build more houses? >> absolutely. the crux of the problem is very simple. we're just not building enough houses. the more houses we build, the less pressure we have from our rising costs. because we are supplying the market. i appreciate that very. much >> i'd also note that the more housing we have in the more people who are housed, the more other issues that we all work on together we can address. mr. robert

now the latest report about the united states thinking all into sanctions. now this is really out of the ordinary because beijing as not comparing and needed information. there was no indication while the e u is bringing in a raft of new media laws and a bit to protect journalists from state interference. apparently, the actor would require outlets to make public the names and contact details of their owners and state and affiliate companies. want to publish how much money this spending on media advertising this as well as similar dangerously prohibiting governments when trying to influence editorial policies or spying on journalists. well, it sounds great, but i spoke with economist and analysts talk to i got hammer, but earlier in the program and he outlined what he thing. so the real goals of this new media legislation, but they use the new port and this law is only something that is meant against russia or other country countries. they are in fight with all and so on. it is, it has nothing really nothing to do with live right, realisation of the journali

member states. however, l n g originally came from russia, a british broadcaster action returns, he gives us his take on brussels. and edgy woes while they may be canceling, lisa plan is because of the austerity. they've enforced on themselves after sanctioning russia. we have information that under 20 dutch counsels may not hit the deadline of 10th of october, and we'll have to we sanction sanctions are a terrible, terrible thing that kills so many tens of thousands of people. what was it? 40000 in venezuela by us sanctions. the fact that the german foreign minister believes that it doesn't matter what german voters think, shows that in the washing of both must head motto, democracy dies in darkness. well, democracy died in europe a long time ago. it dies with the sanctions, it dies with the lack of breast freedom and as a cancel, these multi 1000000 euro deals for air conditioning, gardens and bars. the people of europe are suffering boy caught bollywood. that's a trending hash tag among indian so

in the state of oregon, trust fund is funded by a state general fund, and lottery funds. and certainly, as you continue to pursue and work on the, bill we are eager to work with you in the area. >> i appreciate that very much. my bill would also support the construction of new workforce housing and creating a new competitive grant program. mr. canter, can you expand on how building more housing will lower costs for home buyers, and how federal support can help build more houses? >> absolutely, the crux of the problem is very simple. we're just not building enough houses. the more houses we build, the less pressure we have from home rising costs because we are supplying the market. >> i appreciate every. much i'd also note that the more housing we have, the more people who are housed, the more other issues that we all work on together we can address. mr. roberts, as also previously introduced bipartisan legislation with senator blunt, to provide tax cuts for middle -- how does morgan sharon's make ownership more accessible, and how can we continue to cut costs for families

you have to look at this state by state. this is how it's played out in the mid-terms.don't have a huge swoop like in 2018. everybody was rallied around healthcare as the issue. we have a split here. is it about the pocketbook or about women's rights? the democrats are trying to make it about womens rights. republicans are trying to make it about the economy but trying to make it about more than that. they have a four prong policy. we'll see how much that plays out. is it going to get enough play and is it enough. we're getting close now. we're in the home stretch here. just a few weeks to go until those mid-terms happen. so the republicans should have had this message months ago, not in the last five weeks. so we'll see if it's enough. >> neil: we'll see who resonates last. that's what matters. lee carter, thanks very much. want to take you back to the sunshine state, which will not be sunny for long if it is now. a lot of people trying to get out of town on i-4 near tampa where evacuation orders are in effect this could spread to other parts of the state. they're rele

fraud in any state. so that's what's happened here. they went down the street, they're going down the street at the manhattan d.a.'s office and took the same charges and the same people who are being alleged to have been defrauded by the same people, it's the same case. >> because people in new york paid money. >> yes. >> so anyone, any state could do that as long as somebody in the state gave money, they can do it. some of bannon's collaborators have pleaded guilty already in the federal case, which would seem to, again, i'm no lawyer, i don't knowknow, but that doesn' seem to bode well for mr. bannon. >> i suspect the state prosecutors have been in touch with federal prosecutors about getting these people who pled guilty to testify in the state case because they could -- that could be used to lighten their sentences in the federal court. so they have every incentive to testify as to what they did. they have already been convicted and they actually could get some leniency. i don't know that for a fact,

what you are talking about is not a question of state intervention, state intervention, the economy,leaning up part of the state. energy security than increasing the role of the state in the strategic course of the liberal economy, reducing the role of the state in the economy, that's why i didn't perceive it that way. i understand that if it weren't for the war, i would have had to change my mind several times. before speaking, discuss like this, but in this case, if we are talking about genetic independence, then this is, in principle, an understandable step in relation to a-and in relation to the bank, it is possible

he said this war is about extinguish and ukraine's right to exist as a state planing simple -- as a state, plain and simple. wherever you live, whatever you believe, that should make your blood run cold. trying to make sure those who've yet to join this alliance, the blockade and accept -- in a sense, making russia a pariah, he is seeking others at the assembly to join. alix: we talked about how he will have a bilateral neck with the secretary-general and liz truss, i'm wondering what are we expecting. annmarie: really this whole u.n. general assembly has been about is ukraine. when he speaks to the secretary-general and the uk prime minister, russia's invasion of ukraine, that will be top of the list. there will be other issues. notably energy security, food security. 2.9 billion for food security and made it clear u.s. sanctions on russia does not mean they cannot exist further. especially for the likes of countries like latin america and the caribbean they've increased so much of their fertilizer. with the united kingdom typically there will likely be a conversation with regards super

and state convention after state convention after state convention after state convention. that said, yes, we do. if the document was truly anti-democratic, why did people vote for it? why did tens of thousands of ordinary working men enthusiastically join massive pro constitutional rallies in philadelphia and manhattan? why did america's electoral college vote unanimous? mostly twice, to make the constitution's father, george washington. the renewed unions first president. why did voters overwhelming early vote for federalists in the first set of national elections? if you're just right about all these things, here is why. because contrary aired, the document was remarkably democratic for its time. if we bracket a moment, the slavery issue and i promise i'll return to that at the end. but that was an issue that beard and interestingly, all but ignored unlike so i'll talk about 1619 just a bit unlike the articles of confederation, the constitution featured a new institution. the house of representatives, elected directly by the people. the 1787 plan. rejected property quali

if the scale is substantial but still manageable, even united states does not collapse as a state and the country, then the course of course this will be dangerous or worse. do more political upheaval exists in american domestic politics. the less responsible is therefore in the, in the more pro, are they for some sort of escalation and irresponsible behavior by the united states classes? well then we will also have to think about that consequences for the world about their nuclear weapons, you know about the milligram basis all over the world i so on and so forth. so i will, brother, as you know, as a restriction, i would rather think about the negative security consequences of their political. yeah, well we will definitely not rejoice that somebody else a damage and harm need to. we have to leave it there. thank you very much for your time today. as usual, it's great pleasure talking to you. my pleasure. thank you very much. thank you for watching hope to see you again on the world. ah with mm ah ah ah. well, oh oh oh. oh i ah ah, in with business and you will clean them a b e r w t

the drug problem in the state combined with a cannabis field in the southern part of the state has made us a very attractive place for people who abuse or use drugs. if the legislature would not we affirm the ballot measure i would lead the charge to get sufficient signatures to put it to the voters again. the whole drug addiction problem is accelerating and exacerbating the mental health problems in that bill needs to be referred. >> the harsh reality is there is a lot of people dying today from addiction in our state and we have to do a better job in with voters said they support measure 110 figure out a better way than throwing people in jail get them treatment and healthcare to get well. i will not throw in the towel. we have a slow start in an agency under the oregon health authority that has been incompetent as your governor i will work harder and more effectively to make sure we see the new source of revenue going to treatment in our communities people are dying will measure 110 may be in perfect that doesn't mean we throw it out luscious focus on solving the problem in helping p

this is a state capital in the united states of america. a city of more than 150,000 people. without running water for nearly a week, and now as you're saying, not only are they without safe drinking water, you don't have a timeline for when they're going to have that restored. americans are lining up for hours in the heat just to get the bottles of water you're talking about. who's to blame for this? >> yeah, i think that there is a lot of information that we need to dig into to find out, you know, what is the actual cause of how we got to this point that we find ourselves in today. but i think that we need to focus on what it's going to take to fix this. i mean, this is not okay for the residents of jackson, mississippi. so, our focus needs to be on what is it that we need to do today and in the coming days to make sure that, one, we get safe drinking water back, but that we make sure this does not happen again. >> i understand what you're saying, but when you -- you don't want to look back, but it's not even looking back, right? it's current. there is no timeline that you

or prison deaths, state prison deaths in 11 states, jail deaths in 12 states, from october to december of that first period when bja was undertaking this collection and missed 592 deaths, was that concerning? surely that was concerning. you were transitioning from one agency to another. the prior agency was telling you, it's not working. was that concerning? >> it's very concerning that there is the underreporting, and it's widespread across all of the states. it's not just in certain areas. >> okay, thank you, ms. henneberg, it was concerning. so, in response to those findings by bjs. what did the department of justice do to improve the collection methodology so those problems wouldn't persist. the current administration, the current department we're focusing on fixing the problems that we have-- and the obstacles that we have observed with reporting under dcr 2013. we're presenting proposals to amend dcra so we can amend issues that we believe are contributing to the underreporting, having states serve as the central repository and the central reporter is certainly-- >> ms. henneberg

my father went to school in the united states. i went to school in the united states. all of my siblings went to school in the united states. and what we do see, which is bizarre, and you and i have spoken about the u.s.-saudi relationship, and we have spoken about this, i think it is a foolish idea to think that the united states deal with china, trunk, 10 years ago, 15 years ago, that is when the conversation was had. today, there is no longer a conversation, right? you can have event like this and actually discuss it passionately. it will tell you the extent to which the chinese have changed, the technologies, etc. now, people in saudi arabia do seem frustrated with the way they are being portrayed in the united states, especially young people in saudi arabia, young women, like in "united states," -- "the new york times," the rating the outfits, the concert. hundreds of thousands of people go to school in america. dr. doran: sorry, just to make sure your point was clear to our listeners, you are seeing articles berating the artist for performing in saudi arabia? mr.

states in your mind. okay, like what it looks like today the lower 48 so you're gonna take essentially the entire state of florida. okay, you're going to extend the panhandle of florida and then think about how it begins to make this curve to the northwest. okay, so that curve is gonna follow the south and southwestern boundaries of the louisiana territory, right? so it's going to look like what you know, it's gonna look like you're starting sort of the texas state line and then it's gonna go a little further north perhaps up into colorado, wyoming and then it's gonna hit a straight line almost all the way to california right to almost all the way to oregon territory, okay? so if you're following that line. florida eventually picks up a nickname. all right. it is referred to and it's referred to by. jackson what's by one of jackson's biographers who uses this expression and it's wonderful. it's he said he describes florida as a pistol aimed at the heart of the united states. that if we can't settle this t

about the state of alabama. he is heavily involved and forcing land session for the chickasaw, choctaw, cherokee. this seminoles are the end of the process. when you map it out, they become the last piece of the southern -- what today is the southern united states. it is dominated by native peoples and claimed by the united states. clearly fitting into this established example of the south as an agricultural region. florida, for jackson, many ways is representing the end of a process. all of these land acquisitions and land sessions are happening concurrently with the seminal war while jackson himself is in florida. yet, he is still very much involved in all the nations that it takes to get this land ceded to the united states. when you add up all the land sanctions that jackson is responsible for during this period you are talking about tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of acres of land in what today is the southern united states. often, again, when i do this with children, one of most natural questi