if it's 2 states, the quality within both states and between both states. but i think as i said, as an analyst, i don't think it's viable any longer because there is simply no land left or ok. let's stuff us my day job. when i'm not hearing though, which i am at the moment is based at the u. n. in new york for out to 0. and i watch the security council meeting that happens every single month on the middle east. the situation regarding israel and palestine and every single month i listen to all 15 members of the security council. talk a mention a 2 state solution is rather like a mantra, but no one ever talks about the steps to make it happen. do you think the toe now we're hearing, for example, from the, the spanish prime minister in the belgian problem is that, do you think is actually changed or do you think that just saying it because they have nothing else to say? no that has changed and the change is specifically because the hetero isn't just that fast as of the palestinian people, especially in gaza. but all over the palestine have defeated the is it

applies in certain states. the court is not bound by that history but rather the text that was enacted. >>'s north carolina one of those states? were all the people that applied for amnesty under that two thirds provision from those states? >> no and in our opening brief we cited amnesty from states that were not included. tennessee is an example so people were applying from all over the south for amnesty. i want to talk about the timing question. >> before you get to the timing, the question i wanted to come back to and i said this argument is probably better for you, if i understand your petition, your position all along has been secretary of state has the authority to declare someone in eligible and if that is true does seem like that is an awful lot of power in one person, particularly when the disqualification can be made without any type of due process for the candidate being disqualified. there is no mechanism for them to challenge that were put in any evidence showing disagreements. in my reading you co

and this event that the stuff i just talked about different solutions, one state to state. well, you just read a book titled, one state, the only democratic future for palestine, israel, and you have rejected the idea of a 2 state solution as a realistic one. why is a 2 state solution unrealistic in your estimation? well the 2 state solution is impossible for 2 very important reasons. first of all, color, just stickly. if you look at the map, you will see that the area we should form the palestinian state is bookmarked by is randy supplements until and unless the western states or those people who support the 2 state solution come forward and say those settlements will be removed. therefore releasing a viable territory for the pallets and pedestal and state. unless that happens, we cannot talk about a palestinian state because there is no territory on which to place it one to in terms of the justice and defend this resolution like this. what the 2 state solution proposes is that full fits of the land of palestine should remain with this row. and one 5th 20 percent 22 percen

we are the freest state in all of these united states. the free state of florida.e] we have set the standard on so many things that when things go wrong in other states, , in othr cities around this country, the first place people think to escape for refuge is right here in the sunshine state. [applause] and usus because we have lead ad we delivered results, and reducing even seen even within the last month when hamas executor a brutal attack on our friends in israel, i knew instinctively that this would impact the state of florida. we just have too much relationships. we have israeli americans. where people go over with the church groups. i knew there was going to be application for the state. a couple days go by come to find out biden had abandoned these american citizens who are trying to escape the war zone. the embassy wasn't helping. the state department wasn't helping. so i said okay, there's a void. floyd will stand up and leap we did an executive order. we scrambled our resources and were able to rescue over 700 americans and bring them back, mostly from t

what's adult the state?why are they resisting accountability quietly bite administration hiding instead of being transparent but they're trying to do? million-dollar question. >> you've got to ask them. that's what i can say. i am a former prosecutor and i don't know your background if you are a former prosecutor or defense attorney progress mm arranges a simple marine. >> let's use shakespeare he protest too much. i always wonder what motivates people. that is my personal opinion this is not an audit and all of that my personal opinion is the same with yours what are they trying to hide? is it worse than we have already uncovered? i do not know. i think it was joe dunford, and other marine who i remember telling me said jon every time you come here you uncover iraq and something ugly comes out. how do we stop that? he did not try to stop me he said how do we stop it beforehand? i create a program to try to do that. these are the type of questions the types of things we used to deal with the state department

well, another question is how the united states can compete, we we know in what form the united states, so today it’s probably correct to talk about the political centricity of this world, that is, there are states, key centers that unite around themselves the local, specifically human, local, well, if possible so to speak, local human civilizations , that is, there is our common global civilization, and there is a local one, and we...' let's see the same thing, where there are these key states, for example, western civilization or western european civilization or american and american, it is clear that they are american-centric, there is a state that controls activities within its civilization, if we look, for example, east slavic or russian civilization, it was recently adopted, including into the russian federation, very interesting document, called the concept of external security, which says that now the russian... federation should be considered and this is correct, precisely as a state of civilization, i think we later we will return to this definition, also in this very region

great state of nebraska. about threats to election administration. we look forward to hearing your testimony and learning from your experiences. as voters on election day, we are focused on which candidate we will pick for county commissioner, governor or u.s. senate or. but well before voters fill in the single oval, state and local election officials are making sure that every name on the ballot is perfectly spelled , that the ballot paper is the correct way to her scanning and that election equipment is tested and secured. election officials are assigning the election workers to polling locations and making sure that each polling location has the correct equipment and number of ballots. needless to say, state and local election officials worked tirelessly to administer elections often managing multiple elections in a year. in recent years, officials have faced both cyber security threats and physical threats. they have struggled to retain experienced coworkers and to recruit and train new poll workers. the

if it becomes, it comes with up of the state and state recognized by the state in state at the end of the process. so there is an opportunity. now if you wish to terminate a muscle to revive the 2 state policy, it to state solution. that's a big step and i know that that's what the state of aim of the is there any operation in gaza is but what you're basically saying to me is that how most 1st needs to go. and then a monitored ballast and then leadership takes the space in the gaza strip. and then potentially one hasn't. is there any one has about us doing inside that one can talk to, is that what you're essentially saying to me? actually not exactly because what i would like to say is that you cannot terminate from us rule over the gaza strip or anyway, 10 minutes come off for as an organization without as a political solution diplomatic solution. that'd be end of it. you cannot do that. the only way to terminate from us rule over guys i'm and it's and it's frank also in the, in the westbank is by proposing an alternative and the alternative at the end of it at the end of the process

the united states itself is in a difficult position.ars in recent months and is approaching 34 trillion. the government, despite the disputes of the republicans, is not ready to risk financial stability for the sake of other countries, and therefore they adopted a temporary budget without assistance to other countries; ukraine has already been allocated about $100 billion. 100 billion aid, in reality about 113 billion dollars - this is not just money for weapons, it is also money for humanitarian aid to keep the ukrainian government functioning, and this $113 billion did not fall out of the sky for us, it came from the pockets of our citizens, from the pockets of american taxpayers, because regardless of what you think about ukraine, we we must watch these funds like hawks and cannot allow them to be stolen and wasted. since the beginning of the russian special operation, the united states has spent 96% of the funds allocated to support ukraine, remaining a little more than a billion, and this money is intended to replace weapons in arm

states, anytime israel get into any kind of real serious trouble, the united states always come to its rescue with weaponry, with money, with uh uh military intelligence, so the united states, you have here, you have zinonis, central bankers, as you know, in 1948, the the primary force behind the establishment of the zionist state with a roth child banker. the international bankers, they were behind the establishment of of that, today in the united states, these same bankers and others, they are behind the power of the zionist state of israel, so this is used to divide people, they use democracy. now to to more to answer your question more sicinctly is that what what the design state of israel did years and years ago, they saw that the plo was a real real problem for them, so what they did, they did what the united states did, the united states went out there, they established al-qaeda with bin layden and put them against the soviet union, so israelis they went out and they got some palestinians, they funded them, they aided them, and it became known as hamas, okay, so okay, well, i'm

state action or not? >> state action.hat is speech an individual could do in their private capacity the i no objective idence to answer any roues or anything else are being done through control. evytng you just said could happen to my clients backyard put everythi y just said could happen my clients went to church and asked her fellow congregants hey, have a difficult issue coming up next week. what you think i shoul do? >> when you say the control i guess there are some officials there is a kindf a linef command. buachool board memberell they are a school board member. they a tonol. why do they need somebody insisting on the contents? they are the state. >> they are state officials the could be acting in eithe capacity. th rent control matters it's a way of disentanglement too. ifour boss can tell you what to do then we know you're acting as an official. if your boss can't tell you what too when the boss tells you what to that subject to first amendment we know you're acting in the personal capacity it's cleareinhe next

>> department of state. 20 outstanding request for audits of state. four of these date to october of 2022. and one is more than over-- excuse me, more than one year ago. 13 of the outstanding requests for documents from state should have been readily available. just give us reports, but they refuse to give them to us. and their reason is, and this is very interesting, i'm certain the state department will come up and tell you that we are responding to sigar. well, responding is different than being responsive. >> correct. >> for example, state department provided responses to our requests for a description of activities to address gender-based violence, something which i think that congress should be interested in and we're paying money about right now in afghanistan and we'd be interested in. however, state refused to provide us with documents relating to the funding, the contract awards, or the monitoring reports related to those activities, and the outrageous thing is, the explanation for refusing us is those documents related to monitoring and eva

territorial acquisition by the united states the first the united states needed dispossess the indigenous of the continent and extinguish their claims their land. now this manifests federal indian policy and the removal of native peoples to reservations in the pacific northwest. that process starts in the 1850s. that's going to be a subject, a future lecture. the second broad factor, which we will discuss today, is that the united states, the united states needed to interact with other non-native tive powers, particularly the nations of europe, in order to define american to territory. now, most american. came into the nations possession by wars or purchases the revolutionary war, as you see here on this slide, produced most the territory east of the mississippi river. the louisiana purchase in 1803 brought most of the lands between the mississippi river and rocky mountains into the nation and then war with mexico. in 1846 to 1848. in incorporated american southwest and then in 1867 the united states purchased alaska from russia. and so see, with each of those territorial acquisitions, th

san francisco has out-performed many parts of the state. we still have problem s in the state. mindful of that. we put $800 million into the crime program. hire another thousand chp officers and provide grants to help jurisdictions with prosecution and investigations. all of these are component parts of addressing the issues i hear more often then any other issues, quality of life and the need to partner with new vigor and intentionality and i just think we are at a different place now then we have ever been and i say that as a former mayor, worked with governors and currently working with the legislature and partnership with them with cities like san francisco. i'm really encouraged directionally of the progress we are seeing. >> how important is it for the city to look when these leaders get here for apec? >> i have been in the city a lot and seen improvement consistantsly. we are not just waking up and say we should hire someone to clean the streets. this is what you do. this is the [indiscernible] everything has to get dialed up generally just generally and i think obviousl

and what has happened here in the state of indiana is we get more money than any other state in the country. and medicaid funding for these nursing homes, yet we have the worse nursing homes in the country. yeah. at the out. that was a problem for me. that's a big problem. stay with us. susie, we are going to take a break. susie to live ski initiated a case that has help literally hundreds of thousands of americans living in nursing homes, all across the country to protect their human rights and civil liberties. we're going to go to that short break and when we come back, we're going to talk to her about why the mainstream media ignores this important case. say to. 2 2 2 the, the, [000:00:00;00] the, the welcome back to the whistle blowers. i'm john kerry, onto we're speaking with suzy till epsky, who initiated a case that the supreme court of the united states ended up deciding that allowed americans to sue states that receive medicare and medicaid when their rights are being violated. suzy, it's good to have you with us. thanks for staying. thank you very much. before we get to the media

, not 13 states, but nine states give it their approval. now. what exactly is this? what are what do you call it? when people are actively trying to undermine and overthrow the government under which they live? what's the common term for this? well, it's insurrection. if you take up arms, it's sedition. if you merely just undermine the government. it has been called treason in the past. now, it's not called treason under james madison, the constitution, because madison and the other framers of the constitution, they knew that treason was this catch all charge that was leveled against us mere enemies of the government, and they would not allow that. this is why there have been a mere handful of treason convictions in american history. the constitution of 1787 defines treason very specific, actually. it is the carrying on of war against the government of the united states for giving aid and comfort to its enemies and in some of the famous treason trials, when aaron burr was tried for treason, james thomas jefferson accused him of treason. he

the state senate. youngkin and bret mentioned this, too, he was all over the state trying to get republicans elected. trying to get out the vote. this was a real test for his ground game. for his political coattails essentially after winning the governorship a couple of years ago and whether he could get that unified control. that's something not only did he go around the state in early voting, and they did have six weeks of early voting here, something else that republicans were highlighting trying to get reluctant republicans to vote early, he was at six different polling locations across the state. 150 different miles traveled by him. so all of that, trace, as we wait for the results here. he put his face on this one. it was a big part of governor youngkin for the last two years of his governorship, trying to get that unified control. trace? >> covered a lot of ground, spent a lot of money. rich live for us in virginia. thank you, plenty of other important races. the senior national correspondent ke

state officers are governed by state law.ongress and senate are governed by article i, which is why lehman trimble's bill excludes them. each house is the judge of the qualification of its own members. house and senate are governed by that. appointed officials, including judges, is enforced through the advise and consent proceedings of the senate. only the president is bereft of any possible enforcement. it is a serious problem. at the primary level, no matter what the state say, the republican party convention to nominate -- can nominate whoever they want for president. they are not governed by that. electors are running. how are we going to say people running as electors are to be excluded? they are not insurrectionists. i don't see how that is going to work. i think the only way it's going to work is, harris will be standing there with electoral votes coming in. she will have a legal opinion from the 2024 version of john eastman telling her she's entitled not to recognize electoral votes in favor of donald trump. we have s

after state after state and election after election after election. at this point, you'd think republicans would get it. but they don't. i'll tell you another thing, a real footnote from last night, election denier, a loser, in fact, jonathan lemire, if you go into kentucky, a democrat -- a democrat despite "the new york times"/siena polls -- a democrat won the state of kentucky. but the republican that did the best in the state of kentucky, was a secretary of state candidate who strongly and vocally took aim at election deniers and pounded away at them and has never once allowed any election denier in his campaign and he won big in kentucky last night. it's just like georgia, where, you know, you have georgia republicans, who crushed donald trump's hand-selected candidates in '22 and they did it again by being strong against election denying. >> yeah, we saw this in last year's midterms, too. the high-profile election deniers all lost. election denialism is a losing issue for republicans writ large as discussed, abortion, abortion rights wins again,

palestinian state.hey both would have full serenity and -- sovereignity. there would be the green line but they would make a distinction between residency and citizenship. so that people all, say jews who live in a palestinian state, could remain israeli citizens who have rights of residency in a palestinian state but have to than it here to all the lulls, rules, resolutions of that palestinian state. and palestinians would like to live in haifa like a french man from paris would like to live in berlin, could move to haifa and they could have rights of residency but they would have to conform to all the rules and regulations of the israeli state but they would vote to a palestinian parliament. and jerusalem would be the joint capital of both. and above that, there would be institutions that would take care of their mutual affairs of these two states, which are very tightly woven together now by the infrastructure, electricity, water, and so forth. it is really impossible to cut them apart. that is right

jordan meath already. stated that jordan will not bring order to israel in gaza.country? but this is unacceptable, because it is the israelis, along with the americans, who do not want to listen to the voice the security council, the voice of the un, to return everything to the palestinians' homeland. there is resolution 2.42, which requires... considers itself that it has the right on the territory of palestine to self-defense, to self-defense, this is absolutely illogical, only, like hamas, like other liberation movements, the arabs themselves have the right to self-defense, this and thank you, thank you very much for the detailed answers, connections with the fifth studio were hussam alyatum, a journalist, international specialist, specialist on russia from the kingdom of jordan, discussed situation in the middle east, this was the fifth studio, see you. if you have already spent all your energy on training, don’t spend too much, order a selection of profitable shelves for your scooter, free delivery, a scooter without extra expenses, open your first deposit on

perhaps for the first time, it was stated so openly that the united states of america should increaseential to this extent. degree, so that they could not only contain opponents such as russia and china, but please note, i’m putting an exclamation mark here, defeat russia and china, in this phrase, i see a clear departure from the previous formula regen gorbachev, well and of course, from what our presidents said in twenty 2021 in geneva, when they said that there could be no nuclear war, there would be no winner; moreover, the experts who prepared this document, among them, by the way, were very influential people in the past, including the american head of the delegation at the negotiations according to start, so they propose to throw away everything that was achieved within the framework of start. this also applies, in simple terms, if a missile has one warhead, and we believed that only one warhead should really be counted, in in fact, it can be, can be placed 10, then it is essentially like a skewer on which you can string several very quickly nuclear warheads, you have repeatedl

and it's clear that many states, including the united states itself are not only in breach of their obligationto ensure respect vis-à-vis those states over which they have influence in this case, israel but have been actively complicit, actively engaged in arming, in diplomatic cover, in political support, intelligence support and so on. that is a breach of international humanitarian law. we need the opposite of that. we need all states, members of the united nations, to use whatever influence they have to ensure an end to these attacks on civilians in gaza, to ensure as well accountability for the perpetrators, redress for the victims, protection for the vulnerable there. it's interesting, amy. we have a formula at the united nations that is applied to virtually every other conflict situation. but when it comes to the situation in israel and palestine, there's a different set of rules, apparently. and that's, i think, a big source of my frustration. where is the transitional justice process? where is the u.n. protection force to protect all civilians? where is the tribunal for accountability?

into a border state.he free flow of drugs and crime is everything where. we have five virginians a day on average that die from fentanyl overdoses. it's not only hurting virginians and americans, you bit projects weakness around the world virginians are telling me every single day that these issues -- these issues of jobs and inflation and public safety and education for their chirp are so important. that's where we need to be focused and common sense policies do work and i'm looking forward to having virginians come to the polls on tuesday and hopefully hold our house, flip our senate and do even more to drive virginia forward. >> george: thank you for answering the question. thank you for joining us. >>> up next, devin dwyer looks at the growing legal effort to try to block donald trump from the 2024 ballot. stay with us. at the effort to try too block donald trump from the 2024 ballot. stay with us. with certain hpv-related cancers. for most people, hpv block donald trump from the 2024 ballot. stay wit

and when he spoke, he emphasized cooperation with the united states out a strong united states is good for china out, china is not seeking to displace the united states on the global stage. these were the words that we heard from the chinese leader who, who are about to eventually see if we see each other as the primary competitor, the most consequential challenge of geo politics and pressing threats. this will lead to misinformed policies, misguided actions and unwanted results. china never bets against us and never interferes with its internal affairs. china has no intention to challenge or replace the us. instead, we are glad to see it confidence open and prosperous us. likewise, the us should not bet against china or interfere and china is internal affairs. it should instead welcome a peaceful, stable and prosperous china. the main thrust of the meeting and the main agreement that came out of the meeting was that the us military and the chinese military will resume regular communication to avoid any confusion. in addition to that, i didn't, and she's in ping agreed to have dialogue

for one thing, it's notjust about the united states. it's primarily about the united states.ually fundamentally disagree with you. it is not primarily about the united states. this is about european security. we've already had in the united kingdom before the invasion of ukraine, litvinenko of the skripals, you've had all kinds of operating operations going on in the united kingdom, assassinations in the tiergarten in berlin as well. russia has been a bad actor in europe against european security for a very long time here. that really wasn't my point. my point was it was the threat... it's not about where the response sits. yes, but the response doesn'tjust sit in the united states. if europe doesn't care and the united kingdom doesn't care about security, then the response sets the united states and then, yes, putin will prevail because the united states is not going to keep bailing out europe for 100 years. world war one, world war two, that's where the debate is. so if europe doesn't care in the united kingdom doesn't care, then absolutely that is probably going to mean th

in utah it is 64% of our state land -- the land of the state is owned by the federal government. we spend a lot of time engaging with federal land in agyeman agencies and going through that -- federal land management agencies. going through that process. specifically, one of our concerns is as we try to work together on those preferred alternatives and a recommendation is made, sadly we are used to having the preferred alternatives of the state ignored. now we are seeing a trend where even the preferred alternatives recommended by local blm agents on the ground are being ignored. we have seen that recently with the rock springs resource management plan in wyoming. i know you don't personally make those decisions but the oh ira stuff is heavily involved to of course the white house when it comes to policy. what happens when those preferred alternatives are completely ignored, there is a cynicism that enters the process. this thing is being decided by outside entities. by donors, environmental agents, environmentalist groups. is that of the people doing the work on the ground. i'm

socialist state. if you're opposing the big american state and the biggest american state project in the 1950s is the interstate highway. that's just to facilitate the u.s. economy and going for dwight eisenhower and minimal state philosophy and you can't tell the difference between dwight eisenhower and joseph stalin and need better eyeglasses. >> how do we get from frederick hyak to how you have lib libertarianisms and the political philosopher from hyak to the present and leading them to the absolutism that you've seen now. >> it's a common sense cal property story. what's that? >> it's the -- ii had a job, i built a business, here's my pretax income, it's mine. when government takes them, they're taking my property and taxation is robbery and that's the idea that's underlying the libertarianism and going on the line more generally and what's going up with what i earned with the rules included big government and i earned what i earned in a context where there are roads and there are regulatory agen

, you know the united states is 334 million people, it's not a small country, right? as you, it is 3.4 million square miles uh, so what we have to really do here, and i'm saying this as message to to - movements inside the united states as well and and for those movements outside the united states to really put that type of focal pressure on us to be able to organize in a sustained way where we can make a fundamental change to our networking and unity amongst ourselves buse right now you have organizations here and there you know doing this work we organize a protest and then that's over with the emotions are high emotions will low run low one day so how do we sustained incrementally - powerful movement to be able to to uh put real economic and political pressure on the government that exists not only to to to to to demand and make them compel them to change their policy, but believe it or not to really change the fundamental structures in this government, this colonial power called the united states of america to really be able to change it so that not only palestine

of the commonwealth of independent states. in general, our cooperation with the cis countries is developing quite actively. to what extent is our legislation in the notarial sphere unified today, what difficulties are there, what needs to be addressed first of all today? well, you know. such, i’ll just give an example, mm, such an important, important component of notorial activity in our states, this is the procedure for registering inheritance rights, it would seem, yes, we have a model civil code, which, on the basis of which all states, our commonwealths formed their national civil legislation, but at the same time, radically, for example, the opposite foundations... of investigative law in the republic of belarus in uzbekistan and without knowing, without understanding the legislation of uzbekistan, a notary of belarus will not be able, in in the event that a specific inheritance case is complicated by a foreign element, he will not be able to help but consult, prepare a document, or send the appropriate request correctly

do this and for a federal court to overturn a state supreme court interpretation of state law, the statert would have to be doing something pretty lalas. we can argue back and forth how to describe what the standard review will look like and how much difference would be involved, the point i make in the paper is if it is lalas enough to constitute state court asking outside judicial role for purposes of elections clause, could not be used in state as well as federal election. you can't make up new rules to apply in any elections whether these elections are governed by article one or two or garden-variety state elections. spent a lot of time in the piece on it but i want to double back, as celebration of regionalism, what's different between this 6-numtwo or 8-0, versus the 5 to 4 ruling in the arizona state where thomas dissented and both of them are on board, the districting commissions. the big difference between rbd's opinion in the arizona case and majority opinion here is there is a whole section on a regionalism that demonstrates before and after the founding, legislators did not h

red state, ohio, red state, virginia, the bluish purple state.mocrats should be celebrating or should we be looking at the biden poll and democrats should be saying, oh, no. right. and so this is you know, david chalian, you're looking at this poll. is this. yes, it's tonight. it looks like a good night for the democrats. yes. is there a carryover? >> tonight is undoubtedly a good night for the democrat. yes, there's no doubt about it. and it's not just issues. you noted bashir's identity is part of this. his political identity. i think what we are seeing tonight is that and by the way, tonight, guys, builds on a year of successes and special elections. oh, yeah. builds on last year's midterm elections where they overperformed expectations largely on the issues of abortion rights and democracy. so democrats have been on a run here. and i think when you look at the poll, you see that there is a biden problem more than there is a democratic party problem. so we asked in our poll in dealing with the nation's issues, biden is mostly part of the probl

but as far as the united states. and so if it's close allies, the like the united kingdom are concerned. i don't see them wielding the kind of insurance that they did before because they are going to be seen of been completely the good of d as just having the one sided view and completely blind to the humanitarian consequences of their own policy. and as for the future and how this would have been out, i think it's hard to say. but i think the fear also why the reason of the conflict is very real. the longer this goes on, the logo is right, continues with this, but better admitted reactions. the greater the risk that they to begin to suck in and join of united states. i mean, nobody wants a way to war, but they may not be able to avoid one if this guy is on a, for any length of time saving you've covered uh, many conflicts, all the previous conflicts in this region. before do you, do you see a wider regional conflict as a result of what's going on? and as a consequence of what's going on in casa right now, is not, i

one of the greatest governors the state has ever had. a great head on her shoulders. she stands for the conservative values we all believe in she delivers really, really big results she's willing to do that when it is not easy. and ultimately that's a test of a leader it's easy to lead when the wind is at your back. it is a little harder when you're facing turbulence. when i was going through what we are going through with covid i think kim and i were the only governors in america that forced all of our schools to be open for classroom instruction for the kids. [applause] get called a lot of things now but it think it was worse then and she got called a lot of things and we took a lot of flak for that. but everybody looks back now and those those were the right decisions. those decisions have benefited kids in the states that did the other and fauci and all that it was wrong. she has shown an ability to stand and fight for you when it is not easy. that's one of the reasons why iowa is one of the best governed states in america. and i am

the united states is different.t is why our economy has some setbacks and make some progress, but is also part of the global free-trade system. that is why china's economic problems are different in nature and scale than the united states. eventually i think the two sides must figure out one thing that is very important, which is not -- we are not of equal into -- institutional virtues. china and the united states have recognized the competition is not just for economics it is also about political and edl -- ideological differences. that is important for us to realize. host: from robert, north carolina. democrats line. go ahead. caller: yes. in 1951, the korean war we were afraid of going into north korea because the chinese were at war. in vietnam we were afraid to go into cambodia because that might start a war with china. here we are 70 plus years and we talk about china. china is buying property in the united states and you cannot to a store without purchasing something made in china. so somebody is bs saying, t

, which goes by decades to the foundation of these, where the state, if you like, i'm the united states giving over 250 $1000000000.00, rory in a to these really states since that time, most of the military aid you have to ask, you know, how much did the united states know about this punitive biblical operation that was launched after october 7th. and we might have got a glance into that some time a back when we hear a junk for we talk about what was all about and some of this that know this is for, it is combat. it is bloody, it is ugly and it's going to be messy. and innocent civilians are going to be hurt . yeah, and again, the older elements, older specifics. the language is very important when the white house speaks to we're listen. the why does refers to palestinians suffering from horrendous, a humanitarian crisis. apparently the, the policies aren't being killed. they're not being bombed. the missiles are being dropped american planes. american munitions aren't being dropped to killing all these policies. they're suffering from a humanitarian crisis. this is where the, the, the

oleg shamsho, diplomat, ambassador of ukraine to the united states from 5 to 10 years, and ambassador of ukraine to france from 14 to 20 years, i hope now will appear, good health, mr. oleg, thank you for what you found for us, on saturday, thank you for the invitation, well, look, i have such a first question, there is such an edition of aksios, which is translated from greek, worthy, this means they spread decent information, and this information is like this, trump is planning to establish a dictatorship in the united states, the question is for you as a person with experience in international relations, it is even theoretically possible in a country like the united states, with a balance of power with a huge centuries-old history democracy, to establish a dictatorship, this is theoretical, and even if it is possible, it is difficult to say theoretically. maybe impossible, but again theoretically, i think it's impossible, at least in the united states that we know that exist now, it is impossible , because there are safeguards, there are institutions, and i think that it is impossi

i'm for a two-state solution. i think it's important the palestinian people get a state. but rest assured one of those states -- ms. manning: 30 seconds. ms. moskowitz: thank you mr. speaker and the gentlelady from north carolina. i'll conconclude with this. anyone who believes israel doesn't have a right to exist is calling for genocide. we hear that word thrown around. we have a war in the middle east, we don't have genocide. but if you believe a country should not exist, the millions of people in that country should also not exist, which means you're calling for a genocide. i urge everyone to vote yes on this resolution, israel has a right to exist. thank you, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady reserves. the gentleman from new york is recognized. mr. lawler: i currently have no additional speakers and reserve the right to close. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentlewoman from north carolina is recognized. ms. manning: i yield two minutes to the new member from rhode island, mr. amo. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recog

state aviation of ukraine.eded to expand the staff several times, we expanded it, got many training complexes , and at this stage, from the first of may to the present, we have already trained about 750 people, that is, we have a throughput capacity of 45-50 people per month one course a course on training for flying such an aircraft lasts a month. if a serviceman already knows how to operate the stork 100, it will take only one and a half weeks to master the updated complex. compared to the drone on which we used to work, this drone is equipped with better software, it is more convenient, training for this type of bpak is faster, and pilots and operators, well, it is more convenient to use this drone, to use the stork lr can be compatible with artillery and multiple rocket systems of the type hymars to confirm hitting the target. also, communication channels on non-standard frequencies allow working together with other bpps. in the near future , the aircraft is planned to be supplied to nato countries, but now

the state of israel is an apartheid state. it needs to be replaced with a free democratic state of palestine. you know, free palestine free democratic palestine on all historic palestine. one person, one vote elections and we have, you know, we've seen this happen. we have a roadmap, we've seen, you know, stashes dicks of tauriel and, and apartheid regime in south africa fall and be replaced by the by, by democratic governments by democracies. so we've seen it happen many times before and we need to follow the same. the roadmap is there's nothing that needs to be reinvented here. the issue is nobody is willing to stand up and say we, the state of israel is precisely the problem. it's not an occupation, it's not there's, it's not the other. it's the state of israel. it's an apartheid state. it is the obstacle to peace. it is the obstacle to justice. now ask them members of the media as voters, we need to speak up and we need to make it clear to our elected officials. you cannot stand up and support zionism because on. ism is ra

no, this is a counterweight to the united states as a political, financial, industrial complex.cating with these european politicians, society already rejects, not just help, but the conduct of this special operation, help from the european union to ukraine, categorically. this is a political game, today he announced that he would allocate two times more, tomorrow he will say nothing, just like biden’s rhetoric, biden, as always said, we will always be, but for now remember, they started with the dzhevelins, we argued here, they will give, then now they will give f16, that is, with all this this game, they go and keep their word, another point, i generally agree that on the other hand, you know, as the owner of my word, i gave it, i took it, ksediy, viktorovich, look, after all, by and large, ukraine, and what is happening to her now should become such a sobering lesson for everyone, here i am now i’m speaking for everyone, but i will be more specific , i mean armenia, the day before we saw, we heard this information in a telephone conversation that took place between alexander

and essentially, it is a single state, but it's an apartheid state. and it's not, you know, me who says it's an important i states. but again, you know, going back to it said earlier, is that the active list had been calling this applied type for a really long time. post things have been calling it apply side for a long time. and then, you know, human rights watch an amnesty international did their investigations and it's clear that this is an applied side, an apartheid as a crime against humanity. it means it's a crime against all of us, not just against palestinians. that's what a crime against humanity is. and so we need to take that seriously and we need to and, and so, you know, we're either living or one states applied side, or we live a one state inclusive. and i think, you know, obviously this comes in later. so i'm interested in this with this one state idea. obviously maybe this time starts thinking beyond the orthodoxy of the 2 state solution. but at the moment we have a very far right. is there any government? we have a mass that diplomati

our first guest is matthew bryza, former adviser to the united states secretary of state, former director of europe-taurusian affairs at the us national security council. greetings, dear mr. ambassador. glory to ukraine. glory as a hero. well, the key issue is what is happening now in the united states, around money for ukraine, we understand, there were several versions. the latest events are that the democrats blocked the republicans for ukraine and for the state israel. i think that everything is not so bad. it's no secret that in the republic. the number of those who oppose any military aid to ukraine or any other country is growing. and yet they are a minority in the party, the democrats did the right thing tactically in this situation, because they know that far-right republicans, especially evangelical christians, want to help israel, and many of them would rather help israel than ukraine. so the democrats are wisely promoting aid to ukraine. and this aid to ukraine will definitely come, this is just a short-term political struggle, which is currently going on in washington, but wh

that's why i think the state department is not only crucial to this effort, the state department must be a leader in global a.i. governance efforts. the state department has valuable data, that data has not always been well organized or used to its fullest potential. this includes real time information from embasses and diplomats -- embassies and diplomats around the world, it includes economic trends. this is highly valuable information. you know how much we are trying to gather information today and how valuable that is for the private sector. state needs to unlock the insights from this novel data and you have the work force to do just that. the department has concentrated on public servants with advanced degrees that go beyond foreign policy. your data science experts will be vital in this effort. our diplomats also must be involved as we manage our a.i. competition with nations like china and russia. diplomats know how to take on complex and multifaceted problems. they know how to balance competing ideas when making policy. and most importantly, american diplomats know how to dri