>> it varies from state to state. i know canada has passed legislation although they have very little in the way of russian state assets. i can tell you for certain that the candidate passed a law similar to the repo act. in other states, depending upon the constitutional system, they may or may not need legislative action. it may be possible for them to do it executive action without further legislation. >> your predecessor was ash? was he not? >> i was the predecessor, yes sir. i knew him well. >> just to add to what was said, i think the u.s. acting alone would not make enough of a difference because we don't hold many of the russian assets. the europeans hold much more. they hold the bulk. passage of repo would be assigned to the european union, which is wrestling with this issue and assigned to keep key governments knowing we are serious. u.s. leadership can help the european union make a decision about this. that is certainly an added benefit of repo. >> thank you, mr. chair. >> thank you. we now proceed to sena

>> think it varies from state to state.nada has passed legislation although they have very little in russia state assets therapy i can say for certain canada has passed a law similar certainly affects to the repo act. in other states depending upon their constitutional system they may or may not need legislative action. it may be possible to get by executive action it would vary from state to state for. >> its ambassador freed your predecessor were you not? >> i was a predecessor yes, sir. i knew him well for. >> another good. >> just to add to what was said i think the u.s. acting alone would not make enough of a difference because we do not hold many of the russia assets. the europeans hold much more they hold the bulk. passage would be assigned to the european union which is wrestling with the issue that we were serious. u.s. leadership could help the european union make a decision about this. that is certainly an added benefit politically. >> thank you, thank you mr. chair for. >> thank you we now proceed to senator ric

states are changing their laws. to say that you open carry guns in polling places, which makes very nervous and people who think elections are stolen are pointing their fingers at the election saying, you must have done it. and if you follow any of this is hard to miss. all these articles being people chased out of office. i was in arizona again. the two top election officials in maricopa county, which is 70% of the population of the state, went into essentially the federal witness protection program. they had to leave their houses with their families and be hidden because of the threats of violence. one of them is retiring from office. as a result. that's the threat we face. so that's why it's so important that we have state laws, federal laws that say it's it clearer than it is now that it is a crime to threaten an election. but the optimism start to end on the optimism party and on is that there is a bill that is moving to find hava and the electoral assistance commission, which i mean, i'll go out on a limb. i t

some required state legislative action, some required action of the state level. acf has the over arcing federal rules and regulations. each state runs the child welfare system and has their definition of what child abuse and neglect are. i want to make sure that is clear. through the review that i spoke about, that's one mechanism for review. we have regional offices. they alter joint planning with agencies, in regards to how they are implementing the requirements that exist federally and technical assistance mechanisms that are available and provided to state agencies regarding workforce training, ability to connect with others that have already made changes in regards to those rules and regulations. and again, through the review process, if the issue gets raised up to us, the process of possibly doing partial reviews, we are going in and we are seeing the case review process, if the federal rules and regulations are being followed and the actual practice on the ground. >> we will dig a little bit more on that in a moment. first, let's talk about children who we

every state is different. underthe process. every state is different. under the united states constitution, elections are held and it different voting rights are different ballot access laws. under main law, if a candidate qualifies for the ballot, any registered main voter may bring a challenge. that is what happened here. i qualified trumpet for the ballot and there were three challenges brought. by citizens of maine floors and a couple cases, to former that it is democratic state senator. that requires me under maine election law to hold an administrative hearing to review the evidence and facts. both parties may be presented by council and mr trump was represented by an attorney as worthy challenges i mentioned. they brought forward witnesses, exhibits. iwas mentioned. they brought forward witnesses, exhibits. i was then required to review the evidence and hearing record, the law and constitution and ultimately thatis constitution and ultimately that is my sacred obligation. my that is my sacred obligation. my duty to uphold the constitution. fix, my

so what is colorado's secretary of state, state jena griswold, do now? let's ask her.olorado secretary of state jena griswold. madam secretary, thank you for joining me. what do you do now? >> well, as long as there is not another case, trump is disqualified from the ballot. the colorado supreme court affirmed the district court's decision that he engaged in insurrection. the fact of the matter is, he incited the insurrection to try to stop the peaceful transfer of the presidency. in the colorado supreme court has decided that those actions are disqualifying. so, again, as of now, he is not a qualified candidate in the state of colorado. of course the u.s. supreme court may choose to review, and i will follow whatever court order or decision that is in place at the time of certification. >> you are deadline of where when you have to decide what names to put on the ballot is january 5th. there is a stay on this until january 4th. can you walk me through the scenarios here if the supreme court does not decide whether it's going to review this or not by january 5th? or, s

is what i want to talk about, who, besides its worst enemies, will strive to dismember russia , our statehas existed for many centuries, is this possible in principle, alas, yes, russia is a multinational and multi-religious country, consisting of many peoples their ancestral lands, on which... without which russia is cut off from the maternal foundation of the earth, what was lost must be returned, but almost bestial. after all, to our country in the west , embodied in bloody wars with a campaign against russia, are they accidental, of course, the desire to profit from the riches of our land lies on the surface, but that’s not the point, here, perhaps, i could be wrong, but wishing well homeland, why be silent about what you think, even if it concerns... this is my personal opinion, which does not claim to be the absolute truth, moreover, i will be glad if everything said turns out to be inaccurate and unfair, but i made conclusions with a sincere desire to understand what was happening, and these conclusions, the proposals that follow them, are aimed at improving the life and prosperity

do you think this is allowed under state law? >> my job as secretary of state is to make sure that only qualifying candidates appear on our ballot. we routinely do that with all types of candidates. and just like i wouldn't allow arnold schwarzenegger on the presidential primary ballot, because he is disqualified for not being a natural born citizen, a person, a candidate who is disqualified under section three of the 14th amendment, similarly, would be barred. so i do disagree with the dissent. but ultimately, it is up to the court systems, and right now, the highest case that we have says that donald trump is disqualified, because he disqualified himself when he tried to steal the presidency from the american people. >> so to be clear, you disagree with the dissent, and you believe he is disqualified, and therefore should not be on the state ballot. you agree with the majority in this opinion? >> no, that's not what i said. i of course will follow whatever court decision is in place. what i disagree with is that it is impossibl

the state makes two arguments.irst is this court's inconsistent cases do not apply because there is a difference between a repuant vdi ended inconsistent verdict. inarticular that with a repugnant verdict, there is no uncertaiy to what the jury did. that is wrong as a factual matter because uncertainty is the same but more imptantly, it does not matter because an acquittal is final regardless. it does nomatter why the jury reached that conclusion. the acquittal is final and conclusive. i welcome the court's questions. >> your client filed motion to vacate the conviction as repugnt? whats the effect when a verdict is determined to be repugnant? >> this court is held -- >> the georgia code. >> in georgia, before this case and the tuer case of the georgia supreme court was the leading emple, the acquittal would stand. the georgia supreme court for the first time held that both the acquittal and t cviction should be vacated. >> if i understand the opinion below correctly, the georgia supreme court says because of the r

on the site of that louisana there are now 15 us states.american war of 1812-1814, when the british captured washington and burned the capitol, mondreau ensured the evacuation of the state department archives, preserving the original declaration of independence and many other documents. during monroe's presidency , eastern florida was annexed to the united states, and the missouri compromise was concluded between the southern, fishing and northern free states. the independence of the new states in central and south america. on december 2, 1823, in his annual message to congress, james monroe issued a declaration of principles for the foreign policy of the united states. the main principle was the division of the world into european and american systems. the idea of ​​us non-interference in the internal affairs of european countries and , accordingly, non-interference of the latter in the internal affairs of the countries of the american continent was proclaimed. the idea itself was proposed by john quincy adams, secretary of state in the ad

that emilio aguinaldo had stated. so we are telling the story of these events that happened 125 years ago through portraiture. why do we make that decision to do it that way? well, that way we can make this history personal. we can understand the agency of different individuals in this history. i think the us public is perhaps more familiar with figures such as theodore roosevelt. you know, who was second in command of the roughriders, for example. and there's a whole mythology around him, right? or president william mckinley. but what we do in this exhibition is that we put those portraits in conversation with portraits of figures from cuba, from puerto rico, from guam, from the philippines, from hawaii. in order to complete that narrative, to complete the history, to present the different perspectives, and really to provide a panoramic outlook into these history. well, we do start with president mckinley. he's right here, 25th, president of the united states. why is he important to this story? well, he was the presi

, what tasks were set by the president, the head of state had a hearing with the state security committeesues of current activities, the basis was the developing situation on the eve of the new year's christmas holidays head of state. reported in detail on the situation developing at the external office within our country , the plan of action of government bodies safety during the holidays. we state in general that the situation remains under control, we are working in an enhanced mode together with our colleagues from the ministry of internal affairs of the border committee of the ministry of defense. i would like to focus on one point, this is to draw the attention of parents to minor teenagers. from 14 to 18 years old, who, as a rule, are at increased risk at such moments. the head of state has set the task of strengthening control over the operational situation, preventing emergency incidents, planned, joint work with the ministry of defense, the state border committee regarding the protection of the state border, maintaining high vigilance, maintaining public order, protecting the in

the majority of state secretary of state until courts have rejected this. but, snow we have to, that have done this. i think the supreme court is going to take the case. they're not going to get into whether he engaged in insurrection, they're going to take on two questions. one, is this solely for congress or can the states do this as we saw in colorado and maine? if the states can do, it did they have fared due process. were the hearings the quasi-trials where they enough to process? and, was it not an advance? part of the process is you have to know the processes in advance or they just sort of make it up after the fact and apply it retroactively. so, i do think this all but ensures the supreme court will take it. and, i think the ruling is going to be based on due process. >> all right, elie honig, mia love, katelyn polantz, and thank you again. again, so many unanswered questions here. big big questions. we'll wait and see what the supreme court does. next, nikki haley's cleanup attempt today and a question she got last night and which was answered fra

,, ., states. or not they enter the us illegally _ that? whether or not they enter the us illegally or _ that? whether or not they enter the us illegally or not, - that? whether or not they enter the us illegally or not, i - the us illegally or not, i think that is something for the united states to decide. however i am sure you have read in the news all this phenomenon of all this new investment coming into mexico, most of it coming into mexico, most of it coming into mexico, most of it coming into monterey, again where i am from. onejust assumes that a sicko has an endless supply of labour, in fact that is not the case. there is high labour turnover, there is need for more labour and a lot of these immigrants, and a lot of these immigrants, and againi and a lot of these immigrants, and again i am mentioning the haitians because if you travel to monterey you will see a big haitian community that has been incorporated into the labour force, working in factories in monterey, you see a lot of central

it shows the politics of the united states. but back to the issue of the zionist regime well, look, cutting off the internet , using all media tools, official officials , i don't know, someone is angry, someone is crying at the camera, isn't it, for example , those 18, 19, 20,000 people who were killed in palestine, these are all bad people. this literature , in fact, all these discourses and efforts are made for the young generation in the united states, which is interesting , they sometimes call this generation the "what over generation", that is , a generation that politically has a lot of ups and downs , at least as much as the country. like iran, they are very busy now, basically, in the field what is happening in politics, they have nothing to do, you can see what borders violence, conflict and injustice have crossed, that the generation in the united states who once did not care much about politics, as they say , do not care now and in one of the issues of foreign policy, now this i would like to add rome's point in pare

he just took it carelessly and implements the programs of the union state.the international work of the parliamentary assembly next year. the deputies plan to further develop integration, bring legislation closer together, strengthen foreign policy coordination of the cis member states. in addition, further development of interparliamentary contacts is planned. observation of elections and referendums within the mission will be important in the work. following how kiev is trying to influence russian children through video games, protecting the health of schoolchildren, what deputies are proposing, and the same age as the constitution, how the state duma has changed over 30 years. investment rating, economics, through specific stories, we can reach people, we often talk about money, serious amounts, there is a clear and clear signal to russia, is russian industry capable of replacing foreign suppliers, it is necessary to mobilize all resources, give me a recipe in general, this is how to achieve what you have achieved, do you think that you are on top of the

entry as a state crime. department is now threatening to sue if texas tries to actually implement that law. saying it violates the constitution because enforcing the international border is a job for the u.s. government. this clash between federal officials and local leaders is no simple partisan issue. democratic mayors from new york, chicago, and denver, are pleading with the biden administration to do more, saying their cities just simply cannot afford to care for this many migrants. many of whom were bussed or flown from states like texas. nbc's antonia hylton joins us from new york city on this. it, tonya new york is trying to go the transportation method. try to make these bus arrivals at the very least more predictable. what can you tell us about that? >> that's right, steve, a new executive order from the mayor is in effect now and here are the new rules. when buses come from places like texas here to new york, they need to get at minimum 32 hours of advanced notice. they can only arrive between 8:38

united states of america and great britain.ing attacks on our territory using unmanned, aircraft and sea vessels has increased significantly. the main targets were military, transport, industrial, energy, nuclear and social infrastructure of the central and southern regions. districts, ukrainian special services do not hide their participation in the preparation and conduct of terrorist attacks against representatives of russian authorities, public figures, journalists and former ukrainian politicians who openly criticize the kiev regime. almost 900 thousand calls and more than 320 sms were received. call center for week results

individual state level secretaries of state. today we're watching maine. and important to note these rulings often are precursors to litigation that follows. if we look at the broader landscape, it has not gone well. we've seen secretaries in these states decline to kick donald trump off. they have said we didn't believe we have the constitutional power do that. that includes democrats. michigan. and also republicans. brad raffensperger. we know he was on the receiving end of one of donald trump's efforts to try to flip an election result. both have said we don't believe that we have the legal power to throw him off the ballot. >> one success going through the courts. explain why. >> so the map doesn't look great in terms of how the cases have come out for people trying to throw trump off the ballot. let's look at the landscape. those legal challenges have been rejected by courts. some bay the state supreme court, some by lower courts. but in these six state, 0 for 6. most recently just yesterday the michigan supreme court said

russia, the american state department stated this, arguing that the innovation does not violate theountry. the day before, the united states released new maps, where arbitrarily extended their shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the coast, in seven sections at once from the atlantic through the arctic to the pacific ocean. the russian federation council previously stated that such self-will... is contrary to international law. the topic will be continued by anastasia ponko. the continental shelf - invisible through the water column - is a continuation of the land territory of the state, and therefore a continuation of the economic interests of the country. this is exactly what the un convention on the law of the sea says, but the united states, declaring the expansion of its territory in the arctic, violates one of the main principles of this document. any application to change boundaries must be supported geologically. through research, the country first needs to prove that it rightfully claims the shelf, and it is a natural continuation of the continental platform, only after tha

do you think the victory you have had in the colorado state supreme court might encourage other states to take similar cases now? absolutely. and i think a lot have in other cases, there is one being heard in maine right now. i think what this helps them to do is to prove their cases. and i think it also it requires the supreme court to step in and say, ok, we need to make a decision for the country as a whole. there's been lots of diplomacy on the israel—gaza war, but no new deals yet. a vote at the united nations on a draft resolution calling for a cessation in fighting has been delayed again, and in the middle east, possible talks on hostage releases are making progress. it's the second time the un has delayed the vote with the language in the resolution standing in the way. in the latest wording, the un would be calling for a "suspension" of hostilities. that's watered down from the stronger language calling for a ceasefire in the original draft. the holdout is the us who has vetoed the previous resolutions. here's white house national security spokesman john kirby earlier. we don'

election earthquake in the united states , the supreme court of the state of colorado, in an unprecedented action , disqualified the republican candidate . we are here because trump claims he can become president again, but our constitution says so he has no such right. this verdict was issued following the complaint of 6 non-governmental organizations and legal institutions. it is unprecedented in american history. and it refers to a section of the constitution that is rarely cited , the ban on the participation of rebels. we have never had a rebel candidate before, that's why we are witnessing the issuance of such a sentence for the first time, but if you read this court decision, you will see that it is accurate and it is true that the judges of the supreme court of colorado believe that donald trump not only incited the january 6 riot during his presidency, but that he voluntarily and openly participated in it. attack on congress in january 6, 2021 was an unprecedented attack on democracy. this happened as a result of election fraud and with the aim of questioning the outcome of the us

however, above all, russia depends on china, the states that together will try to resist russian and russia and china the influence of the united states of america and the european union, only with that, i would say with the difference that, at least for china itself , the idea of ​​a multipolar world, which for many years advanced both in moscow and in beijing, since the time of boris yeltsin and... chinese counterparts, is now being replaced by the idea of ​​a bipolar world, a world in which the main forces are the united states of america and the people's republic of china, and it is precisely about the bipolar the world was spoken by both chinese politicians and chinese experts when the president of the people's republic of china xizen ping visited san francisco and held his summit with the president of the united states of america joseph biden, the only difference is that in this bipolar. of course, beijing wants to represent the interests of moscow and is interested in russia undermining the capabilities of the united states through its relations with the west, its war in ukrai

daniel frith, former coordinator of sanctions policy of the united states department of state, a person who knows about american domestic and foreign policy, if not everything, then almost everything, will be on the air of the tv channel. congratulations. extremely important story, the news came from the state of colorado, the local court gave ukraine and not only ukraine a chance, so donald trump may not get into the american election race. when we read the signals from donald trump, we understand that this can directly affect the containment of russian aggression against ukraine. it's a shame that the world doesn't see the best side of american strategic...thinking these days. donald trump represents the so-called america above school , that is, the school of thought of the 1930s, when the united states had no real interest in european security. it was a disastrous policy. it is not about the policies of the united states government, then headed by franklin roosevelt, but about the mood of congress that prevented roosevelt from doing more in the fight against hitler. the disaster was

the united states on december 8th used its v2 power to turn down a un security council resolution put forward by the uae calling for immediate humanitarian sease fire in gaza. we do not support calls for immediate cease fire. us deputy permanent representative to the un robert a. would said before the vote, this would only plant the seeds for the next war, alleged wood with a war mongering tone. this was the disappointing diplomatic result of the uae draft resolution, which calls for immediate cease fire in gaza for humanitarian reasons while calling for the protection of civilians, the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages and ensuring the access of humanitarian aid. despite srenious diplomatic efforts made by the arab ministerial contact group eminating from the riyad summits in the capital of the most prominent member states of the council, especially washington, it was there where the arab ministeral delegation met with several officials, most notably secretary of state anthony blincan and the chairman of the foreign relations committee in the senate ben carden and n

ukraine must understand that the united states can come to power in the united states... and any of thepresidential candidates, if it is trump, then what policy should we build with his office right now, or do we wait and act according to the circumstances ? it is clear that we are, we, as the state of ukraine must work with both political camps, and this is understandable, because of course both internal and external will depend on who wins the election. us politics, are we doing enough with both camps now, don't you think? i hope that taking into account certain experiences of the past, i think that this is being built up by working with different political forces. with both parties, with different politicians in a specific party, well, of course , for the sake of, if the representative of the republican party still wins, to be able to cooperate effectively in the future to solve the problems that exist, of course we have to concentrate a lot on the fact that we have common challenges, and actually this is the russian federation and china, and by the way, china is now getting closer a

states primary ballot. all this sets up an explosive legal and political drama that will inevitably end up before the justices of the nation's highest court. nbc's ryan nobles has more. >> for the second time in two weeks, a state has ruled that donald trump is ineligible to run for president of the united states. >> it was not a close call on the question of whether january 6th, 2021, was an insurrection. the events of january 6th 2021 were impressive dented and tragic. >> reporter: shenna bellows, the secretary of state in maine, a democrat, determined that trump's actions on january 6th constitute a violation of the 14th amendment. the weight of the evidence makes clear that mr. trump was aware the of the tinder laid by his multi mine effort to delegitimize a democratic election and then chose to light a match, she wrote. the decision in maine is similar to one in colorado. and in both cases, the ruling won't go into effect until the appeals process is exhausted. meaning trump will remain on the ballot f

this is the deep state. to the average republican there in waterloo tonight, it's all confusing, but it's all part of the same argument that trump's been making, which is politically, they don't want me to run again. that's really, really powerful, and i'd argue that's really powerful with voters beyond just his hard core base. and desantis and nikki haley have to second that. >> right. and it feeds into this narrative he's been pushing more aggressively recently saying, i'm not the threat to democracy. it's really the other side. they're trying to take away your will as a voter, right? i mean it will not be surprising if he uses that to try to push that narrative along even though it's all separate. this is a colorado supreme court. there's federal cases. there's state cases. he's trying to lump them all in together. judge gertner, ultimately, though, you look at the supreme court, and gloria touched on this. it's just really incredible. if we take a step back and look at all of these weight are trump-relat

that they cannot encumber these rights to the passage of state laws which we have seen in states across. i talked -- we already talked about the 1849 criminal abortion ban in wisconsin but our legislature has been very busy in recent years in recent years putting further hurdles in the way of women seeking comprehensive -- and we have seen the cases, the statutes in texas, in florida, that are so -- access for women to needed health care, virtually impossible, as we saw in the case in texas of kate cox, and i heard similar stories in wisconsin, abundant similar stories of people who had crises crisis pregnancies and were unable to get services in wisconsin. as you've mentioned, they resumed care into counties, but elsewhere in the state there is still no access. >> let me ask, you because you have had experience of, this this is the anniversary of your respect for marriage act that you passed, then enshrines lgbtq+ equality. i think a lot of people thought it was like abortion, we didn't have to deal with, this but we now realize you actually have congress and state legislatures have to

of the commonwealth of independent states. well, in general, our cooperation with the cis countries is developing quite actively. and to what extent is our legislation in the notarial sphere unified today, what difficulties are there, what is today should be decided first? well , you know, this, i’ll just give an example: such an important, important component of notarial activity in our states is... the procedure for registering inheritance rights, it would seem, yes, we have a model civil code, which, on the basis of which all states , our commonwealths formed their own national civil legislation, but at the same time, radically, for example, the opposite principles of inheritance law in the republic of belarus in uzbekistan, and without knowing, without understanding legislation of uzbekistan. and a notary of belarus will not be able, in the event that a specific inheritance case is complicated by a foreign element, will not be able to not provide advice, not prepare a document, not send the appropriate request, right, and

going and the role of the united states in this? how powerful, how important is the united states?the united states is very important, very powerful, very influential. the only single state that can really change the dynamics between israel and the occupied palestinian territories not only because the united states provides a lot of means and military aid to israel, but also shelters israel from its responsibilities -- political responsibilities. the last resolution, the u.s. managed to water it down to a point that makes no sense. the only thing that is needed now, and it is already late, is a cease-fire. the fact the u.s. is still not considering this as an option because it continues to engage with israel as business as usual, shows profound disrespect toward the palestinian people. again, this is a level of dehumanization i have never seen -- it is not new from israel, but it is new at this level with this magnitude, endorsed also in the u.s. but also in europe. yeah. there is huge responsibilities and the u.s. is laileading. amy: how do you see this ending in this last-minute,

vc of nato ships is the name of the military operation led by the united states. goal, is to protect international shipping and prevent yemen's houthi rebels from attacking merchant ships. according to the pentagon, there have been more than 100 such attacks in recent weeks. and so the americans put together a coalition. it also includes great britain, france, the netherlands, canada and other countries, and is preparing to send ships to the red sea. they say this right away. does not mean that to every tanker or the cargo ship will be assigned an destroyer or a cruiser, but nato wants to provide, rather , so-called umbrella protection, that is , to prevent missile attacks by the houthis, who openly declare that they will attack ships belonging to countries that support israel’s operation in the gas strip. by the way, the united states has also already intercepted several missiles fired directly from yemen at israel, and now they want to expand the scale of action. this morning we launched operation prosperity guardian, which involves international maritime forces

way that israel could do what it is doing without help and approval of the united states? absolutely not. first of all, it is not only the approval. we've seen the americans supporting the israelis by sending 45000 bombs. today the pentagon approved of sending 14 tanks from the strategic warehouse. they are direct participant to the genocide. secondly, the american from the one, to israel and said, i am not here representing this government, i am here as a jew, like if was a religious one which indic theopic level of this narrative, it is a conflict that has been going on for the last 75 years about the right of land of territory, it is not about the religion. thirdly, joe biden, when he arrived to the us, he had a press conference saying, you have the... legitimacy and the right to do what you are going to do, so he gave him the full authority to benjamin netanyahu to do what he's wanting to do, and the last point here i would like to point out is prime minister benjamin netanyahu coming out on television yesterday and saying to the world, threatening the world, if you ta

and our guest today is the secretary of state of the union state, dmitry mezintsev.ting program, thank you for addressing the union state, in the sense that we are assigned to implement the topic that i want today, thanks to your attention, to present to our television viewers, thank you, dmitry fetrovich, thank you very much for coming, you are one of our most long-awaited guests, well, i apologize that the invitation that was previously indicated was only realized today, but i will say again: i am convinced that all those who come to you in this studio, studio so interesting, only original and brightly designed, these are the people who perceive such an invitation as a great honor, thank you, dmitry fedorovich, when you were chairman of the federation council commission on information policy, you defended maximum freedom, the internet, freedom of creativity, now in the era information wars, have you somehow changed your attitude towards censorship? very interesting question, i really didn’t think that you would raise this topic, well , let’s think about it together

centers, how do you generally assess the level of training of operators at state centers, are therences or systemic things that should be improved in order to really achieve maximum efficiency result, and this is a very broad problem, because unfortunately, at present, state educational centers... are not able to provide themselves with the necessary material and technical base, the learning process itself is not for anyone who does not have some kind of secret , it is constantly accompanied by some damage to educational equipment, and to predict in advance how many educational complexes will be damaged during the course, it is not important at all, because it directly depends on... the personality of the personal qualities of certain cadets, so our own the training center has such a great advantage that we are not limited in the number of our training complexes, and we can repair them, literally, if something was damaged there during the training day, then tomorrow or the day after tomorrow it will be restored and will be used again by our instructors, together with the cadets, in

the two—state solution would create an independent state of palestine. of israel's government, benjamin netanyahu, is against palestinian independence and he's opposed two—state solutions. he presented a map of israel to the united nations this year, which included nojurisdiction for palestinians and drew criticism of incitement. in the same speech, he accused palestinians of not recognising thejewish state of israel. for peace to prevail, the palestinians must stop spewing jew hatred, finally reconcile themselves to the jewish state. 0n the other side of the conflict, hamas, seen by some palestinians as a resistance movement and designated a terrorist group by western leaders, rejects israel's right to exist. hamas supports what they describe as armed struggle against israel, as armed struggle against israel. but hamas is not the only palestinian political voice. until 2006, the palestinian authority was in control of both the west bank and gaza. but after the elections that year, hamas ousted the pa by force from gaza, creating a divide in palestinian

and you are usi a state resource. it can't be a limited as your savior got started i would government the employees first amendment right we know government employees havehe right to speak publicly about their jobs. >> the question is on what topics? and the issue becomes,s i think your other side is arguing, are you using this as a chnel of communication with the public for you to be able to do your job? that is how they want to define it. >> tgree that your hon. >> that is whathe are saying but i don't know what's wrong wi that if you work position is the state stops you from usg it as an official page. >> then every time aovnment employee speaks about their job they have the tea of litigation like this and they ve the teat. >> these facebook chaens to are not quite made up but i don't flynderstandhe no one forces a publicmployee to have a comment box. on so i do not know why you're yourperson close down his facebk account whe he could've just blocked public comment to big lecture oner at the time facebook did not h

in 12 of the 13 states had in 12 during the articles of confederation. 12 of 13 states had state constitutions. tions that regulated voting to the committee to the continental congress. and so you had states and state courts participating in the business of federal elections from 1781 to 1787. it's the exact same provision from the articles of that is transplanted over to the united states constitution. and in addition, there's just all this original list evidence that basically the founders believed in checks and balances. they would have never let just state legislatures have carte blanche over something as important as elections and the like. okay. all that is to say, i had my like golden ticket for the supreme court in terms of the original understanding of the document. then the question was and a 30 minute supreme court argument, they actually had me up for more than an hour. but the rules are 30 minutes. how do you actually get out? and in a way that's persuasive to the court. supreme court advocacy has changed a lot just in the last two years because for my first, like 45 arguments bef

one can replace the united states.also know, and mr. president trump knows it, that there are certain logical limits, certain possibilities, beyond which the united states cannot go. therefore , the refusal of aid to ukraine, the withdrawal from europe, this meant the adoption of a decision according to which the united states ceases to be a world hegemon, ceases to be a great state, because it would be a signal not only for us in poland, ukraine or europe, it would be a signal for the whole world, it would be a signal for australia, for new zealand, for mr. trump or someone in his circle, or someone who is a candidate in the election does not want to lose this function, does not want to give up this role, because it is very important for the united states, so we must seriously analyze the discussions that are taking place in the united states, we must draw conclusions and we must know the reality that what is possible and what is not. if to talk about the cooperation of european countries within the framework of nato,

these are things stated by some arabs in the past. we never set this. we don't throw anyone into the seat. does this mean that wrong will support a 2 state solution if the palace sending people agree to it is a good we have or on use of the house is neighbor to be starting and therefore, i'm glad that the, that always for me probably kind of has clarify this issue in terms of twist a solution. that's the only reason i'm leaving that because 1st of all, is that our so it's not supporting this plan. the 2nd, it's not possible. it's not feasible because only the 20 percent over the son in law and using the hands of palestinians right now. and you've been in that 20 percent that a lot of the system. there's been a complaint the person. yeah. so it's not, in fact practical to talk about the twisted solution we believe that's a defined all solution would be establishing one state compose of muslims. christians think it was decided by duration on the pickup while i've been living in this on this, i believe you mentioned leave would be a reasonable client to co

this was stated by the official representative of the us state department, miller, during the briefing. for him words left a little more than 97% of the allocated. the amount and these funds will remain only for a few weeks, - says the spokesman, and without the decision of the congress to allocate additional money, it will be difficult, if at all possible, to help ukraine, well, that is, the situation is serious, but there are encouraging moments that will unlock, until in the new year, we will receive this money, and we are all waiting for joe biden's address to congress, china can still help russia... to wage its aggressive war on the territory of ukraine, and this cannot be alarming, about this during a meeting with by journalists in washington, said the deputy secretary of defense of the united states of america for the affairs of the indian and pacific ocean region eli ratner. he did not reveal the details of how russia and china can help russia, but added that such support is under the sky. can provide in many different ways, and what the state secret of the united states of ame

of the union state and even its role in system of international relations. various initiatives implemented within the framework of the integration project of belarus and russia will be further scaled to the eurasian space. minsk and moscow are united in their desire to ensure peace and stable prosperity. within the framework of the union state. a collective security system is being implemented. belarus is under russia’s nuclear umbrella, and these guarantees have recently been expanded by the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons on our territory. at the same time , the main emphasis is on economic integration and growth in the well-being of citizens of belarus and russia. the driving force of this process today is the implementation of twenty- eight union programs. they tried to bend us down tightly, but nothing happened; on the contrary, they somehow even mobilized. “if there is something left, then we know in which direction we should move. the allies are proving by deeds that with their common forces they are capable of effectively solving any, even the

united states trump?ow need to start preparing for the fact that i have an excellent candidate, but i’m afraid not everyone will like it. inherits his father's business, then the guy knows very well the problems with drugs in the states, the guy knows very well the problems with corrupt girls in the states, has studied the problems of the gambling business well, in my opinion the ideal candidate, supports the entire liberal movement, which is possible, no, he is deeply immersed in problems ukraine, well acquainted with the problems of china, the problem of corruption again, of course, clinton and biden studied corruption. a pretext, then kamala formally becomes, so to speak, replaces him, and after that , in fact, take anyone else to the convention in august, everything, either her or anyone else, she, she is completely, generally tame, and an alternative too what is shining for europeans is that if trump comes, the issue is now being seriously discussed that if trump comes to power for the second time, h

campbell to serve deputy secretary of state. in the words of secretary blinken, he's one of our nation's leading diplomats and strategists, a visionary policymaker and a renowned leader whose leadership comes at a critical inflection point. he's no stranger to public service for the past three years, he served as senior adviser to the president and coordinator for indo-pacific affairs for the national security council as assistant secretary of state for eastern asian affairs it. the region increasingly fight over for our national security and prosperity, i'm here today introducing him because i have full confidence in his ability to steer the department of state through a time of significant global challenges and opportunities with creativity, commitment, and dedication to serving our country and one of its most important of institutions. in his current role, he's had the pleasure and i'm sure he would describe it that way in is most gracious and diplomatic terms of hearing my many opinions and ideas. in numerous conversations,

in the court, state and federal, challenges to secretary of state, a dozen other states said, he's on, we're rejecting this. this is the chaos that people feared when it comes to the 14th amendment. what we're seeing now, and it's not legally wrong, for reasons we can get into. but what we're seeing is different states reaching different conclusions through different procedures for different reasons. that's why we need the supreme court to give us some uniformity to all of this. >> to elle's point. it's not wrong but we're looking at the politics and the patchwork converging into one. it could be dangerous. that's what you hear from some democrats. if there's going to be a way -- there's going to be a bunch of criminal cases that focus on that, not this. >> i was struck by gavin newsom's response to this. this could have been a slam-dunk. you think a democratic governor, this is a democratic-leaning state. and he is saying, we let people make this decision, we don't make this decision for them. it's a slam dunk for the trump team's narrative if you get more democratic led states that

every state has to apply their own state law. the colorado supreme court decision was really about colorado's rules for getting on the ballot. could it affect other judges? they could read the colorado decision and say we think this makes sense, it's between all three or four decisions. i think it was 213 pages so it's a thorough and scholarly analysis, but it would not control anyone else unless the supreme court takes the case and decides it in a way that would affect the entire country. the court could decide on narrow grounds that doesn't impact anyone outside the state of colorado. host: newsweek has an article about neil gorsuch. apparently he made a decision that has some bearing on this case? guest: yeah, it's probably fair to anticipate that justice is thomases and alito would be on board with this decision and maybe justice kagan and justice sotomayor and justice jackson might be -- agreeing with the majority in part because it's a very conservative originalist writing. they use the plain language, they go back to the d

for equipment adopted by the united states in the package., why did it take time, so to speak, today. there are three medical products alternatives, we hope that in the near future they will undergo this procedure, and accordingly, all the money is provided for this. particular attention was paid to this issue during the consideration of the budget for the next three years, then amendments were made to the second reading to allocate additional funds for the purchase of systems for continuous monitoring of sugar levels in children with diabetes, they had to constantly prick these little fingers several times a day, the very fact that we said that this needs to be transferred to the level of state obligations led to the fact that the american company refused to supply these funds to the russian federation, now we ourselves can produce these devices and the children will be provided for, so they will no longer prick children’s fingers. maria burkova, anna melikyan, maxim koul, sergei vergunov, alexey chabburkov, duma tv, parliamentary hour. chai