amendments to some legislative acts of ukraine on minimizing the potential oligarchic influence on political parties, improving mechanisms of state financing and state controlpolitical parties , registration number 9419 dash 1 i ask the people's deputies to vote for 309, the decision has been made to accept the draft law , show it by factions, please next dear colleagues, the following draft law 96.10 is a draft law on making changes to the law of ukraine on national minorities of the community of ukraine regarding some issues of exercising the rights and freedoms of persons belonging to national minorities of the communities of ukraine. to come i put a proposal to define the bill as an urgent alternative bill before the start of consideration of the issue and to consider it today at the meeting, i ask the people's deputies to vote for 306 decisions have been made dear colleagues, we are at first without discussion, but i understand that colleagues will insist or maybe they will then write it down two for two against dear colleagues, i am sorry that we have not entered yet, i am asking, uh, let's vote for a shortened procedure, please vote for that to resol

colleagues , let's move on. potential oligarchic influence on political parties, improvement of mechanisms of state financing and state controlver the activities of political parties, we agreed to see you at the council without e-e of amendments i understand that there will be amendments of my understanding, how many amendments please do not confirm the amendment, you will have amendments to confirm, yes dear colleagues, someone will take into account the amendments, it will not be so, i ask once again, then we will move on to the amendments for confirmation, please dmytro oleksandrovich how many seconds will you have 5-6 five-six i apologize to goncharenko, what amendments do you have, yes, then let's first goncharenko speak because he will use the amendments that are taken into account, and then i will send you this one for confirmation goncharenko, how many minutes up to 5 minutes, please, thank you, thank you, dear mr. chairman, dear colleagues, an important issue that we will now consider is indeed to it, i brought the relevant colleagues up to 5 minutes, said the chairman of the verkhovna rada, i ask to change, please ,

of political power. and the idea ology that i almost just leave us is that a job with the communist party mailed it with the state. the job. we opened this one party system controlled every sphere of public, expressed political fortitude, just cultural and every other aspect of life you've all arg, was not excluded from these processes that are fed nail style of 3 people. 30 nikolai, who stop at least he has been director of the museum since 2011 and has followed the debate over the soviet army monument and sophia, with interest with the monument fits in the museums, football, pitch sized park. the museum director has another suggestion. you might not be a, uh, fine with me cuz there's the idea of dismantling the monument and removing it to the city of the truck route to get up about 200 or 250 kilometers from sophia. it all should be the interesting aspect. there is that this city was founded in the early years of socialism, which finding it was built out of nothing. the material ground became a symbol for the construction of a new socialist society in bulgaria uh to come to moving the monument. there really isn't an outlanders idea because the mutual ground itsel

be a political process today we will clearly ask the question of all its political parties deputies at different levels, learning from the verkhovna rada, who controlled the activities of the staterious ways , ideological, political, informational, economic, secret, operative. these are the people who are against the state and today, in order not to vote , in addition to what we tell them, they were banned, but ended up in the parliament, each must go the investigation was carried out concretely clearly and effectively quickly i think that there are a lot of signs for some reason and the security services i see other law enforcement agencies did not react and are looking there are some pro-russian agents there, there are individual innovators, that’s all correct. and here there are strategic people who are oriented towards pro-russian priorities, supported russia and in fact today they are trying to show themselves in a political way in a residential format to show that they are already tall, patriots , that they are fighting the enemy there and the like, let's create a precedent to bring to justice those persons who worked outside of russia and have russian citizenship unequivo

of political power. and the idea ology that i almost just leave us is that a job with the communist party melted with the state. the job. we happened to this one party system controlled every sphere of public expense, political for the just cultural and every other aspect of life you've all arg, was not excluded from these processes. the national style of 3 people. 30 nikolai, who stop at least he has been director of the museum since 2011 and has followed the debate over the soviet army monument and sophia, with interest with the monument fits in the museums, football, pitch sized park. the museum director has another suggestion. he might not pay a promise me because there's the idea of dismantling the monument and removing it to the city of the truck route to get up about $200.00 or 250 kilometers from sophia. it all should be the interesting aspect. there is that this city was found that in the early years of socialism, which finding it was built out of nothing. the drug crowd became a symbol for the construction of a new socialist society in bulgaria. uh, to come with cheese, moving the monument. there really isn't an outlanders idea because the mutual grot itsel

states have actually ded in nonpartisan ways. can think of four states, new york, florida, californi control of one political party where presumablyhe incentives would have beed up to maximize partisan advantage through the redistricting process, but in all four of those states they amended their constitutions through the work of the people to restrict partisan gerrymandering and those provisions have been enforced. i mean, the provision was enfon new york, of course, just earlier this year. so, i do think it is more than whose ox is being gored. s a really important issue in this country, and i think would be an extraordinary thing to say, as my friends on the other side are saying here, that the elections clause requires that all oe provisions and countless others be disabled with respecongressional elections. that would be an extraordinary thing to do, and, before doing that, i would hope that the court would see a case much, much clearer than the one that the petitioners have presented. thank you. chf justice roberts: thank you, counsel. general prelogar. general prelogar: mr. justice, and may please the court, throughout our

politics like you for a couple of decades, served a variety of presidents from different parties. the attitude of the united states is obviously to keep taxes low and public spend under controlthe word control is interesting, but that stops forward thinking in terms of planning. the short-termism around fiscal policies has hurt us. in essence infrastructure is a long-term return. to get a long-term return, putting into private hands is one way of doing it, but the public side of life has to be willing to be the forward spend. the spend on roads, ev charging stations has to come from the public domain. raising taxes to spend money on infrastructure means you have to trust people doing the spending, and i think the public-private is the way to go, it is create an infrastructure bank. u.s. public company owned or public sector owned that has a private sector matching funds. that sort of breakthroughs yet to occur in the united states. where do we go? tax and spend. unfortunately one side of the aisle disagrees with. david: manufacturing is something that never stays thought not to be as good at 40 or 50 years ago, is that fair? andrew: there is a perception that manufactoring i

politics like you for decades. i have served a variety of presidents from different parties. the attitude in the united states is to keep taxes low and keep the public spend under controle word control is interesting. but that stops forward thinking in terms of planning, and therefore, short-term around fiscal policy has hit us. in essence, infrastructure is a long time return. putting that into private hands is one way to do it it, but the public side of life has to be willing to move the forward spend. airports, roads, ev charging stations has to come from the public domain. raising taxes to spend money on infrastructure means you have got to trust the people doing the spending. i think the public-private model is the way to go. create an infrastructure bank that the u.s. public company owned with private-sector matching funds. i think that breakthrough has yet to occur in the u.s. the way we go is tax and spend, which one side of the aisle disagrees on. david: manufacturing is something the united states, by many people, is thought not to be as good at. is that true? andrew: there is the perception that manufacturing is last decade's problem. but that is erroneous.

remote control existed after the war and was gradually approved. with meaning in a week here i see that, in fact, the consensus among all political parties. the president assessed the work of the state duma and other details of the meeting in our program. this has been repeatedly said in the most difficult times, we have worked hard in the regions. we have a unique experience. i don't just want to congratulate, of course i remember we think that we need all the details in the review of the regional week. the results of international meetings, where we ourselves went and whom we met in russia, and about plans for the fall, our new concept of foreign policy is no isolation in our rubric parliamentary control today. the touching story of a girl from astrakhan about how one deputy's receptions changed her life became crucial in our program, told the chapters today in our program. vladimir putin met with the head of state to discuss joint work. here i see that, in fact, there is a consensus among all political parties. despite the fact that many colleagues have different approaches to solving social economic issues, and some domestic political issues, it is natural, but on key fateful mo

another lobbying for support for 260 decisions in the mechanism of state financing and state control over the activities of political parties, i put the temporary investigator of the commission on public procurement during martial law number 91 by vote no we will put no changes well, then we will do it tomorrow for the next time .