third, after i left office, the state department asked former secretary of state for our assistance in providing copies of work-related e-mails from our personal accounts. i responded right away and provided all my e-mails that could possibly be work related which told roughly 55,000 printed pages even though i knew that the state department had the vast majority of them. we went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related e-mails and deliver them to the state department. at the end, i chose not to keep my private personal e-mails. e-mails about planning chelsea's wedding or my mother's funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends, family vacations, the other things you typically find in inboxes. no one wants their personal e-mails made public, and i think most people understand that and respect that privacy. fourth, i took the unprecedented step of asking that the state department make all my work-related e-mails public for everyone to see. again, looking back, it would have been better for me to use two separate phones and two e-mail accounts. i thought using o

this is part of why the state department has asked all of the previous secretaries of state who have used any e-mail as they were conducting official u.s. business to send their e-mails to the state department so they could be properly preserved and maintained. secretary clinton's team in response to that request, reviewed her e-mails and complied with that request by sending all of the e-mails on her personal account that pertain to her official responsibilities as secretary of state. they did that even though many of the records were already maintained on the state system because those records were e-mails between the secretary of state and state department employees using their official government e-mail address. >> so are you saying that her use of her personal e-mail solely was appropriate, or was it a violation of this policy? >> well what you should do is you should check with the state department who is responsible for administering this policy. but the policy as a general matter allows individuals to use their personal e-mail address as long as those e-mails are maintained a

third, after i left office the state department asked former secretaries of state for our assistance in providing copies of work-related e-mails from our personal accounts. i responded right away and provided all my e-mails that could possibly be work related, which totalled roughly 55,000 printed pages, even though i knew that the state department already had the vast majority of them. we went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related e-mails and deliver them to the state department. at the end, i chose not to keep my private personal e-mails. e-mails about planning chelsea's wedding or my mother's funeral arrangements condolence notes to friends, as well as yoga routines family vacations, the other things you typically find in inboxes. no one wants their personal e-mails made public and i think most people understand that and respect that privacy. fourth i took the unprecedented step of asking that the state department make all my work-related e-mails public for everyone to see. i am very proud of the work that i and my colleagues and our public servants at the

between her and state department employees with state department.gov e-mail addresses. >> somebody in the white house had an e-mail to send to the secretary of state, did they just use her private e-mail account? how did they get in contact with her? did that never raise a red flag? >> during her four years as secretary of sdat, shetate, she and i did not trade e-mails. if there were e-mails between secretary clinton and white house officials, i'm pretty confident there were they weren't just protected by or maintained by the white house e-mails system. those e-mails were reviewed by secretary clinton's team and they were sent to the state department so they can be properly maintained on their system as well. again, that's consistent with the requirement of the federal records act. >> the domain that the secretary used to send the e-mails was registered a week before the president took off, the same day her confirmation hearings began. it seemed it was set up for the express purpose of being a vehicle to use while serving as secretary of the state. the president has said the most tran

third, after i left office, the state department asked former secretaries of state for our assistance in providing copies of work-related e-mails from our personal accounts. i responded right away and provided all my e-mails that could possibly be work related, which totaled roughly 55,000 printed pages even though i knew that the state department already had the vast majority of them. we went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related e-mails and deliver them to the state department. at the end, i chose not to keep my private personal e-mails. e-mails about planning chelsea's wedding or my mother's funeral arrangements, condolence notes to friends, as well as yoga routines, family vacations, the other things you typically find in inboxes. no one wants their personal e-mails made public, and i think most people understand that and respect that privacy. fourth, i took the unprecedented step of asking that the state department make all my work-related e-mails public for everyone to see. i am very proud of the work that i and my colleagues and our public servants at th

this little piece of paper when they leave the state department. and it says i certify basically under penalty of perjury that i have returned all official records that were in my possession while i was an officer of the department of state. so where is that document, megyn? and if there isn't -- if she didn't sign that, why not? there are a lot of questions to be answered. >> if she signed it, as you read the law and the manual itself which refers to the criminal code, if she signed that saying she had given them everything back, everything federal record she had in her possession, when in fact she had thousands of documents, thousands of e-mails sitting on her home server did she violate the law. did she commit a crime? >> if that is the -- if that's the case, there's no question. the form itself says hey before you sign this understand that you are certifying something that we can prosecute you for. making a false statement in this context knowingly and willfully which i can't imagine anything more knowing and willful than knowing you have 55000

we don't do that at the state department. d on these documents. >> as a former secretary of state has hillary clinton met all of her responsibilities to the federal government. >> she said she turned over everything. that's her responsibility. she says she has. i think she can speak best to that. we're looking at the documents and get them ready for release. >> i know that's what she says. does the state department accept what she says? >> i have no reason to doubt anything she says. she's the one who can speak to that. she had the records. she and her team said they gave everything they possibly could. this covers the breadth of her time in the state department. >> marie harf thanks very much for coming in. just ahead oklahoma university expells two students over this racist chant. and the scandal grows as another shocking video emerges as the fraternity's house mother. ncer researchers. it used to take two weeks to sequence and analyze a genome; with the microsoft cloud we can analyze 100 per day. whatever i can do to help c

$500,000 from the country of algeria that was in contra vengs of the agreement she had with the state department not to raise foreign money in the clinton foundation. and then we know that since she left the department of state that they raised almost a quarter of a billion dollars, a third of the million-dollar donors to the foundation are foreign sources. and this raises a lot of concerns as to whether that money or any of it was solicited by her or anyone on her staff while she was secretary of state. >> well, the thing is that this staff that surrounded her while she was at state, they're also very relevant. because if they were not on the state.gov servers, we also don't have their e-mails. we have reason to believe there's been reporting this week that her top staffers were also on the clinton's e-mail server including a guy by the last name of cheng potentially. tell us about this guy. >> well dennis cheng and we have a pending foia request with the state department to get some e-mails he may be involved in. but he was with the clinton foundation before he went to the state department as

and she was unable to answer the question just put to her by the reporter, which was did the state department have access to your e-mails while you were secretary of state. the answer to that is a big flat no they did not have it. she makes a sort of slap-dash circular argument. it's this. okay i used my husband's server. and okay, the state department didn't have it. but every e-mail i got, i answered. and if i answered to a government person they had the copy of my e-mail. that does not cut it under the statute. under the statute which regulates high-ranking and low-level government people using government documents and records, the government must have possession of those records at all times. >> but she doesn't get to keep them. >> correct. what she is talking about she is intentionally conflating what is purely personal with what is obviously governmental. and she has decided what's personal and what's governmental. the statute says the government decides what's personal and what's governmental. >> she points out in her talking points that she submitted in addition to her press conferenc

just this fall the state department requested those records but it went years. so who was running the state department during the period that regulation was supposed to be in place? hillary clinton. it was her job to get in compliance. >> governor granholm, we're going to take a break, come back and let you respond to what we just said here in new york. we'll be right back. (boy) i'm here! i'm here! (cop) too late. i was gone for five minutes! ugh! move it. you're killing me. you know what, dad? i'm good. (dad) it may be quite a while before he's ready, but our subaru legacy will be waiting for him. (vo) the longest-lasting midsize sedan in its class. the twenty-fifteen subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. [ hoof beats ] i wish... please, please, please, please, please. [ male announcer ] the wish we wish above all...is health. so we quit selling cigarettes in our cvs pharmacies. expanded minuteclinic for walk-in medical care. and created programs that encourage people to take their medications regularly. introducing cvs health. a new purpose. a

third, after i left office, the state department asked former secretaries of state for our assistance in providing copies of work-related e-mails from our personal accounts. i responded right away and provided all my e-mails that could simply be work-related which totaled roughly 55,000 printed pages even though i knew that the state department already had the vast majority of them. we went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related e-mails and delivered them to the state department. at the end, i chose not to keep my private, personal e-mails e-mails about planning chelsea's wedding, or my mother's funeral arrangements, keep my condolence notes to friends, as well as yoga routines, family vacations, the other things you would typically find in inboxes. no one wants their personal e-mails made public, and i think most people understand and respect that privacy. fourth, i took the unprecedented step of asking that the state department make all of my work related e-mails public for everyone to see. i am very proud of the work that i come and my colleagues in our publi

third, after i left office the state department asked former secretaries of state for our assistance in providing copies of work-related e-mails from our personal accounts. i responded right away and provided all my e-mails that could possibly be work-related which totaled roughly 55,000 printed pages, even though i knew that the state department already had the vast majority of them. we went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related e-mails and deliver them to the state department. at the end, i chose not to keep my private personal e-mails, e-mails about planning chelsea's wedding or my mother's funeral arrangements condolence notices to friends and yoga routines and family vacations the other things you typically find in in-boxes. no one wants their personal e-mails made public and i think most people understand that and respect that privacy. fourth, i took the unprecedented step of asking that state department make all my work-related e-mails public for everyone to see. i am very proud of the work that and my colleagues and our public serve abouts at the depar

has been waiting for the state department to disclose. >> what is the state's department excuse? five years is so unbelievable. >> the state department is slow at responding to foia qu s not just a.p. but citizen requests. >> five years. >> five years one of the requests. others go back two years. the state department says it receives 19,000 foia requests a year. that is a lot to process five years is too long for the citizens of the united states to wait for information how their government functions. >> let's set aside the two year request. let's go back to the five year. what was the a.p. asking for? >> the requests fall into several categories. the oldest of them deal with a government contractor called bae systems. which was accused of violating federal technology transfer export laws. and the a.p. journalist's request on that subject focused on the state department's role, mrs. clinton's potential role and other state department official's role in settling those charges. >> well five years, search probably dead and buried by this point. to me, it's like, you know what are t

y ofemployee of a state department how you can have a state deputy where they don't retain e-mails how can you have a separate government operating within the government. >> okay this is the way that e-mail situation works for the average state department official. you're issued a statement department e-mail that is the e-mail you use at your desk. if you want to transfer to your private e-mail to you know book a reservation, for a restaurant, or something, you have to get out of that computer, and into another field that is you have to go through -- it antieasy it ain't easy to get back in the private e-mail people are using state department e-mail for all private things that is the problem. lou: well, one thing about it problem don't last long they get rid of the e-mails. >> interesting respect today it was -- report today it was. lou: interestingly timed. >> yes. >> ambassador good to have you. >> thank you. lou: thank you so much. vote in tonight's poll. do you believe that president obama fully understands disasterous consequences of foreign policy choices he made. cast your vote

she felt the need to go against the state department's own rules, rules that the state department under her watch criticized individuals in the department for not abiding by but also there are questions about cyber security. as you know in 2013 one of hillary clinton's top advisers a guy named sidney blumenthal was hacked by a hacker and some of hillary clinton's e-mails were released into the public. gawker printed them. they didn't get a lot of attention at the time but they seem to be about detailed information having to do with the middle east and other items. and that was information that wouldn't fall under the purview of what secretary clinton's supporters have said in the last week which is hey, any time she e-mailed anyone at the state department, that would be preserved because those individuals were using official e-mail addresses. a lot of unanswered questions. this is really the first big test for hillary clinton, presidential candidate. >> how she handled this. so far, the only thing she's done is issue a short little tweet, saying she's handed over documents to the state

they leave the state department. i certify basically under penalty of perjury that i have returned all official records that were in my possession while i -- while i was an officer of the department of state. lou: ominous, don't you think? he has no doubt that hillary committed a felony if she signed the exit form. but you and i know better. clintons and bright bold lines just can't co-exist. that's just a fact of clintonian exertion in the political universe. clintons create their own centers of gravity. and secretary clinton is beginning to draw to her. even more attention. more attention itself. three house committees have launched or are thinking about launching investigations into her email practices. including the benghazi select committee and house oversight committee. if clinton refuses any of those requests lawmakers could begin contempt proceedings against her. we've seen how that works with the attorney general. but because secretary clinton is who she is, that may just be her plan. her rightful place in i

after secretary clinton gave her big press conference at the state department yesterday, her office put out a nine-page statement about her e-mails, and her e-mailing as secretary of state. and we did learn a couple of news things. for instance when secretary clinton handed over more than 30,000 e-mails to the state department, here's a reasonable question, why was the state department given printed copies? that is a fair question right? you've got all these tens of thousands of e-mails, why not just put them on a flash drive, or forward them. hillary clinton's office says that is not allowed. so maybe you're thinking oh okay, that must be for security reasons. the printed e-mails are handed over in person to prevent hacking or leaks or something? no, that is not the reason. quote, the instructions regarding electronic mail in the foreign affairs manual that says until technology allowing archival capabilities for long-term retrieval of e-mail messages is available and installed, those messages warranting preservation as records must be printed out and filed. they can't handle it if you

a routine request to her and to all of the secretaries of state. >> after i left office the state department asked former secretaries of state for our assistance in providing copies of work-related mails from our personal accounts. i responded right away. >> nbc chairman, what role did your committee play in bringing about the state department asking her to turn over mails she did not turn over for the two years since she left office? >> well, i will not be able to answer that question definitive only the state department knows the impetus behind the letter i fine the timing curious and i think the state department has what to correct the testimony on multiple occasions. we asked for those e-mails as early as august of 2014 and we got eight of them. we ratcheted up the conversations and we got 300 in february. why they decided to try four former secretaries of state under a routine records machine program does not pass the smile test but you have to ask the state department that question. >> only way to say she said in her news conference that she turned over 30,000 mails and she deleted 30,

also tonight there are new questions over past requests for information from the state department. and not just requests i'm talking about legal demands. that appear to have not been appropriately handled. because none of then-secretary of state clinton's e-mails were being reviewed never mind produced. according to the state department, none of that matters. let's just let bygones be bygones. who cares if we were hit with subpoenas we didn't respond to appropriately? last week deputy spokesperson marie harf said any past requests are not going to be revisited. >> will there be an issue depending on what kind of records searches were being done somebody asked for a search of the office of secretary e-mails, wouldn't it be the case that those other e-mails wouldn't have been produce snd and is the department doing anything retrospectively to look at forward requests or litigation or congressional about whether it provided complete production of documents? >> it's my understanding that will not be happening. >> joining me now congressman trey gowdy. good to see you tonight sir. they s

the state department estimates that up to 17,500 individuals are trafficked to the united states every year. the majority of these are women and children. some of them are forced into a life of unpaid servitude many others into sex work. worldwide rktworldwide, it is estimated that 4.5 million people will currently enslaved through sex trafficking. these numbers are stag ring but illustrate the scope of the problem. the surveg of each individual -- the suffering of each individual victim should not be lost in a sea of statistics. for victims of human trafficking, the surreal horror of their lives bears testimony to the gravity of the crime. consider the case of holly smith. when holly was just 14 years of age, she met a man at the local shopping mall in new jersey. with all the innocence of youth holly confided in this man the fears and anxieties of her adolescence, telling him how nervous she was to begin high school. holly could never have guessed that the man she had just met the man she had just trusted with her deepest feelings were a human trafficker trained to emotionally lure y

>> well i am very happy that the state department after miss clinton's time in office did reach out to her and others to ask for e-mail records to be returned into government custody and the secretary of state has complied. and so as a technical matter the 2009 national archives regulations have been respected because now, 55,000 e-mail records are in the government's custody and are available under the freedom of information act or otherwise. the legitimate question to ask for anyone inside the government is how that transfer of records should take place in the normal course. so if you're using a private e-mail network, one would expect that you rather contemper rainously transfer records, so that there can be appropriately stored in a record keeping system. there is now -- >> what i think i'm hearing you say is that this is very unusual, but doesn't represent a violation of law. and if i misunderstood, by all means correct me. i want to ask this. don't the government rules that apply to a circumstance like this mandate a time period in which the e-mails would have had to have been pr

>> no they say. >> i'm serious. >> the state department said there was no state account.hn kerry is the first secretary of state in the history of the united states to have a government e-mail account. that is what the state department said. colin powell used personal e-mail. and that is part of the argument that hillary clinton's side made they said well, colin powell did this. it was sort of common practice. we did it. and you know a lot of our e-mails that she was sending were being sent to state department people so we thought they were getting caught in the state department web. >> wait a minute. wait a minute. it's not like she broke protocol. there are other department secretaries who had personal e-mail? >> well, condoleezza rice didn't do e-mail, according to my reporting. colin powell did. and -- but the rationale that hillary said, well, we didn't have to have a state account because the e-mail she was sending to the state department and those people's accounts were catching me. >> hold on a second. talk about the difference between colin powell and hillary cli

any employee including the secretary is not required to receive a state department issued blackberry. >> why not? why wouldn't you want to control the security of devices being used for official business? >> i'm just stating what our policy is. i'm answering your question. there's no reason to take the tone. obviously she had a personal device. i can't speak to what was done on that and what was not. >> john cook of gawker, what did you hear in the comments by the state department spokeswoman. >> i heard defensiveness. it's astonishing that the security of the communeications of a key government official were just completely privatized, out sourced so whatever steps hillary clinton decided she was going to take or not take. we have no idea how vulnerable she was or her communications were to interception. what steps she took. it's shocking. >> washington, d.c., doug, good morning. democrat's line. >> good morning. thank you for taking my call. mr. cook, you've used words like scheme, plot. i think you have a bit of a bias here. i have two questions. one, can you tell me why it's impor

home. >> we're going to have to send a request to her directly and personally. >> reporter: the state department says employees can use private e-mail. >> it's not prohibited. >> reporter: clinton was required to turn over her e-mails to state but there's no rule on then. >> it's important that the e-mails are properly preserved. >> even the government e-mails are potentially vulnerable. >> reporter: the rules have now changed. there is a deadline for work related e-mails having to turn the e-mails over to the state department. >> thank you tracy. to ferguson missouri. residents are seeing the first response to the justice department's disturbing report on the police department. one police official and two others have been put on administrative leave. the mayor says it is the first of many steps in fixing the city's policing problems. >> these actions taken by these individuals are in no way representative of the employees of the city of ferguson. we can identify the problems in her police department but in the entire splus region. >> later today the parents of michael brown will hold a press co

the fact sha she turned them over before all this came public i think in october the state department asked all secretaries of state to send their e-mails over and she's the only one who has done it. >> schieffer: doesn't this sort of reinforce what some of the critics have said about the clinton family over the years that they will cut a corner when they can and we have this now we have disclosures about foreign governments giving to the clinton foundation. just seems to raise a whole lot of issues that people used to have and it looks like they're back in the news. >> well, look, i mean, bottom line she's a national figure, potential presidential candidate. people are going to shoot at her. i know her. we were the two senators for new york for eight years she's is one of the most finest, most upstanding, most hone rabble people. always trying to do the right things. cares deeply about the country and the middle class. this is politics. this is how it is. i don't think the public is going to pay much attention to this. they care much more about middle class people, who is going to ge

state department on this issue. there was a plan to do some carving up where britain would get this chunk where there was a a's and a communications facility. france would get this chunk. italy we get this piece. they were carving as if there were not people there anymore p is if this were 1884 all over again. and wlatalter white went, no, no no, to the point where chester williams and the state department said, you know, that document you wrote you're going to have to destroy and burn it because you have violated confidential information. that briefing was off the record. and walter pushed back. i'm not destroying anything. what you are doing is wrong. you are leading the u.s. down the road to perdition. colonialism is dead. you need to get a new horse. i'm going to help you do that. and so, there is this moment where there's this, it is called the -- agreement were finally the british and the italians have worked out an agreement because they had been at loggerheads with each other to carve up north africa and the

judge for themselves. >> madam--madam secretary madam secretary, excuse me, madam secretary, state department rules the time you were state secretary were perfectly clear if a state employee were going to be using private e-mails that employee needed to turn those e-mails over to public computers. why did you not go along until nearly two years after you left office. and the president of the united states said he was unaware that you had this unusual e-mail arrangement. the u.n. council office said that you never approved this arrangement through them. why did you apparently camp the white house by surprise, and one more question, does all of this effect your decision in any way whether or not to run for president. >> let me try to unpack your multiple questions. first, the laws and regulations in effect when i was secretary of state allowed me to use my e-mail for work. that is undisputed. secondly under the federal records act records are defined as recorded information regardless of its form or characteristics, and in meeting the record keeping obligation it was my practice to e-mail gover

every as i say, every employee of the state department must sign it before they leave. i have surrendered all unclassified documents and papers to responsible officials, relating to the official business of the government acquired by me while in the employ of the department. two questions chairman, do you know if secretary clinton signed that form before she left the state department. and secondly, whether she met that pledge, which is to be enforced as a felony by either prison time or a disqualification from public office? >> no, i do not know if she signed that. and it would be irresponsible to -- for me to guess. the responsible thing to do is to ask her and ask the state department to produce a copy of it. and if she did not sign it, ask her why she did not sign it. and if she did sign it we'll go over the document with her. but when you don't have evidence one way or another, i'm not in the business of speculating. i would have to ask her and the state department that. >> finally, we're about to talk to congressman adam schiff, a democrat on your committee. he says

just this fall, the state department requested those records but it went years. so who was running the state department during the period that regulation was supposed to be in place? hillary clinton. it was her job to get in compliance. >> governor granholm, we're going to take a break, come back and let you respond to what we just said here in new york. we'll be right back. why do i take metamucil everyday? because it helps me skip the bad stuff. i'm good. that's what i like to call, the meta effect. 4-in-1 multi-health metamucil is clinically proven to help you feel less hungry between meals. experience the meta effect with our multi-health wellness line. i take prilosec otc each morning for my frequent heartburn. because it gives me... zero heartburn! prilosec otc. the number 1 doctor-recommended frequent heartburn medicine for 9 straight years. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. >>> we're back with my panel. governor granholm, i'm having trouble believing if we were talking about a republican secretary of state hiding e-mail like this that you w

clintons are entitled. >> a.b., she did hand over 22 months after she left secretary of state, state departmenther and says do you have any emails? she says yes i have 55,000. she gives these emails that she says are dealing with state. but, her long-time aide sydney blumenthal it was discovered years ago had many exchanges over this private email system and it was a hacker that actually got those emails. and they run the gamut, global flash points, nigeria turkey libya european central bank. germany and one of them says the following information comes from extremely sensitive sources and should be handled with care. we don't know whether those emails are part are part of the stuff that she gave over. >> apart from what she was asked for and then she released it's all supposed to be in the system. it's all supposed to be captured in the system on your official state department email account. so forget that she runs the clinton foundation. and all -- that she is under investigation by the benghazi select committee and everything else. when she took that office she knew better than anybody when y

state department were not properly archived.he report says a computer upgrade in 2009 when clinton took office failed to preserve thousands of key policy e-mails. for example, in 2011, employees archived only 61,156 e-mails out of more than 1 billion sent. why? inspectors found employees did not receive adequate training. the computer system kept breaking down. and some employees deliberately avoided creating computerized records that could be searched later. >> the state department just wasn't saving its e-mails. not mrs. clinton's, not all the people responsible for our foreign policy. >> reporter: clinton is also being challenged for her claim she never sent a classified e-mail. >> i did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. there is no classified material. >> reporter: republicans were skeptical. and even the white house didn't rush to her defense. >> ultimately i think it will be up to all of you to make your own determinations about sort of how secretary clinton has resolved this matter. >> reporter: c

when you talk about jay carney saying don't do it hillary clinton sent out her own memo to the state departmentshe let her secretary of state, as president of the united states have a private e-mail, server -- >> she didn't even let people in the state department use private e-mail. >> and there were a dozen other people, more than that in the obama cabinet, did it occur to anyone to do this? no, they showed up at work met with the people who run the orpgss, the i.t. people, the lawyers, and said secretary sebelius or secretary kerry, here's how it works. you have a government account, a private account for your stuff. there may be some overlap. make sure to forward stuff. that's not what she did. what she did is so beyond the bounds of normal behavior, it's shocking. but it's convenient if you don't want other people to have access to your e-mails, including, let's not forget other people in the state department and in the white house. if you're on a government e-mail server and there's a request, the office of legal counsel or state says we've got to look at your e-mail account. suddenly, any

this is part of why the state department has asked all of the previous secretaries of state who have used any e-mail as they were conducting official u.s. business to send their e-mails to the state department so they could be properly preserved and maintained. secretary clinton came in response to that request reviewed her e-mails and complied with that request by sending all of the e-mails on her personal account that pertains to her official responsibilities as secretary of state. they did that even though many of the records were all ready maintained on the state system because those records were e-mails between the secretary of state in state department employees using their official government e-mail address. >> so are you saying her use of her personal e-mail saleh was appropriate or was it in violation? >> you should check with the state department who was responsible for managing this policy but the policy as a general matter allows individuals to use their personal e-mail address as long as those e-mails are maintained and sent to the state department which if you ask secre

state department business. said she was within the law, complied by the rules and didn't send any classified material out. >>> how about some weather? roberta? >> good afternoon, we are shrouded in a deck of fog. the fog is lifting. it will dissipate and then we rehave more clouds. currently we are in the mid- 60s. this is the scene from lick observatory. you can a layer of fog there as well and mid- and high-level clouds atop. we are socked in at the coast where we will not see any clearing there and this is mount vaca. these are the clouds of the approaching area of low pressure promising to bring a smattering of light rain on wednesday. we have fog at the coast, increasing cloud cover i understand. we have mild temperatures in the mid-60s. we have a gentle breeze under 10. and we will have some spotty rain showers with warmer weather this weekend. high pressure is giving way to this amazing area of low pressure very impressive but the bulk of the activity riding into the pacific northwest as well as british

it's just a violation of procedure at the state department. >> procedure at the state department.t will raise more questions for trey gowdy and other republicans did she deliberately not sign that document because her lawyers might have known that if you sign the document saying i'm accounting for all of these public records and then you leave with tens of thousands of emails, you are essentially committing perjury. if you don't line document did, she know, look, i'm leaving with these emails. >> he bet she didn't sign it if she signed it she would say hey, it's good to see you, i like the pocket hankie, i signed it. why would she -- if she signed it, why wouldn't she tell you? >> right. >> she was going to an irish thing today right? >> irish american hall of fame. i heard from a source there that you were inducted last year. >> i think i was, yes, i was. i'm in the hall of fame. but irish people have a tendency to talk straight. you know, and it was a little blarney, i know that. >> it was revealed today she is not irish. >> then why is she in the irish hall of fame. >> england

suing the state department.the congressional committees are going to force ultimately revelations. >> i have got to go. down the road political problem for her? >> ongoing for a long time. >> yes, i agree with that. >> and substantive. >> that's it for the panel. stay tuned for some surprising moments from yesterday's press conference you may have missed. do you want to know how hard it can be to breathe with copd? it can feel like this. copd includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. spiriva is a once-daily inhaled copd maintenance treatment that helps open my airways for a full 24 hours. spiriva helps me breathe easier. spiriva respimat does not replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms. tell your doctor if you have kidney problems, glaucoma, trouble urinating, or an enlarged prostate. these may worsen with spiriva respimat. discuss all medicines you take even eye drops. if your breathing suddenly worsens, your throat or tongue swells you get hives, vision changes or eye pain or problems passing urine stop t

the convenient thing would be the state department.he built a separate thing for i am not sure what reason. she has turned over 55,000 pages but not all of them. why should she be in the position of determining which she should retain when she currently has all control and no one has any idea. why should she be the one to make that determination? >> you said a few things i would like to take issue with. why should she be the only one? like anybody else whether it is: powell or any other secretary of state they will be asked what was private, was official. the state department system in their own private system. everyone is in the same boat. as to whether or not she will be second-guessed 90% she said when to state department people. everyone who received it not only knew that she was using it but has it on their servers. she should say i have done nothing wrong. definitely nothing illegal according to the archives administration. >> if you were advising her what would you have said to her? would you have advised her? >> with the wisdom

they leave the state department. d it says, i certify basically under penalty of perjury that i have returned all official records that were in my possession while i -- while i was an officer of the department of state. lou: ominous, don't you think? he has no doubt that hillary committed a felony if she signed the exit form. but you and i know better. clintons and bright bold lines just can't co-exist. that's just a fact of clintonian exertion in the political universe. clintons create their own centers of gravity. and secretary clinton is beginning to draw to her. even more attention. more attention itself. three house committees have launched or are thinking about launching investigations into her email practices. including the benghazi select committee and house oversight committee. if clinton refuses any of those requests lawmakers could begin contempt proceedings against her. we've seen how that works with the attorney general. but because secretary clinton is who she is, that may just be her plan. her rightful