. >> he explained he had been involved in a dating relationship with stefani. >> stefani, that was thether name still on the short list of suspects. he pressed rutton for more on their relationship which had started when they were both students at ucla. they dated on and off until john got engaged to sherry. >> you're convinced that the relationship with john had overlapped with the relationship he had with his wife. >> we know from john that there was at least on one occasion that he was intimate with sketchny has rhus. there was a love triangle and stefani has rhus had deep feelings for john rut top aton y have had a motive to hurt sherry. >> we had two women on the list who in our opinion had a motive to harm her. >> debra the nurse and stefani has rhus. >> correct. >> a few weeks later cops in northern california tracked down debra and recreditly scooped up a sample of her crash that contained her dna. it was sent to the crime lab and 72 hours later came an answer. >> she was not the donor of the dna profile from the bite. >> that left one possible suspect. number five on the list.

, supervisor stefani, mar, and walton. i just wanted to give a couple of facts about this particular sb-23. san francisco has the highest rate of property crime in the state, and in 2017 there were over 32,000 auto burglaries in san francisco. the city's property crime rate is over double the statewide average. i receive calls every week from my constituents asking what is city hall doing about the car break-in epidemic and i imagine other supervisors are getting the same kind of calls. my constituents are frustrated and want us to do something to help them get relief. what sb-23 does, it clarifies the definition of auto burglary, defines auto burglary as entering a vehicle unlawfully with the intent to commit theft. it also removes a wide loophole currently when a suspect auto burglar is arrested, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the vehicle was locked. problematic, often victims are unable to attend a hearing to testify. they may be tourists who have returned home, or they may be residents who cannot

yes, supervisor stefani? >> supervisor stefani: yes. thank you, chair fewer. i just have a question, what is the 7 million going to? >> just quickly to say utilization review involves visiting clients in treatment during the course of treatment toy assure ourselves that they're in the appropriate treatment, that they're making reasonable progress, that there's a coherniate plan for their -- coherent plan for their future in there. all of our services are also indeed contracted out, so this is sort of a standard routine measurable way of keeping track of the efficiency of our system and the fairness and many of those other items. quality management is a little bit more open-ended in some ways, but i mean, it involves standardized reporting on compliant measures and quality measures. the program is shifting to be more and more a medicaid -- state optional medicaid fund, and the bulk of the funding now comes from the feds, so it is a little bit upping the standards to be a little bit more consistent across the boards. if you step back one step further, this is a

supervisor stefani, would you looic to share your remarks. >> supervisor stefani: yes. thank you, president yee. with regard to eights eight through ten, the ceqa -- items eight through ten, the ceqa appeal, i believe the planning department properly reviewed the project and that a class 31 exemption was appropriate in this case. therefore, i'd like to move to affirm the determination made by the planning department that the proposed project at 3637 and 3657 sacramento street is categorically exempt from further environmental review and deny the motion in item nine. >> president yee: okay. >> supervisor peskin: i'll second. >> president yee: so we have a motion to approve items eight, and to table nine and ten. we have a second by supervisor safai. colleagues, can we take this same house, same call? okay. items are approved. >> clerk: mr. president, items eight were approved, and items nine and ten were tabled. 11 and 13 are before the board. >> president yee: okay. >> supervisor stefani: president yee, can we rerefer itemed 11, 12, and -- items 11, 12, and 13? i have a

the rest i submit. >> clerk: supervisor stefani. >> thank you, madame clerk.olleagues, i'm calling for a hearing on the gary parker gas line explosion with my colleagues supervisor fewer to conduct a full review of the incident including actions an event leading up to

supervisor stefani? >> supervisor stefani: thank you, chair fewer. i just have one question for clarity's sake. who -- is it the office of cannabis that is enforcing on-site regulations and permit rules? >> supervisor mandelman: i'm going to welcome yeugene to coe back up. as this, say, on park property, it might involve some combination of rangers or police that get hired, but if you want to address enforcement. >> sure, thank you supervisor. particularly around enforcement with regard to cannabis sales, so we have the ability to revoke permits, the process of making sure that there's a process for stopping sales of product. for example, that's a place in which the office of cannabis will be able to essentially exert its regulatory authority. for general enforcement, we wouldn't be in a situation where we would usurp the authority for other regulations. specifically, if your question is around sales, then, the office of cannabis will be responsible for that enforcement. >> supervisor mandelman: and then permitting a particular event, the office of c

supervisor stefani? >> thank you. i have a few questions as well. the b.l.a. report indicates that westside has not consistently met their budgeted level of deliverables, and you are telling us you've dropped the expectation of 139 people served to a tee. is that what you are saying? >> they probably should have been another sentence on that sentence. the westside meeting does not meeting their deliverables applies to the one program, the mission program, and the mission act program is intensive case management, so they have a set caseload, and it was 139, and we have dropped that down to 80. they are only expected to have 80 clients. that is how much staff they have to carry that number in the caseload. >> okay. so i just find a disconnect unit we are dropping our expectations of deliverables of people served from 139 to 80, yet we are increasing the contracts from 70 million to 23 million. i feel like there is a huge disconnect here, and i also don't understand, why are we giving awards to service prov

the rest i submit. >> clerk: supervisor stefani. >> thank you, madame clerk.olleagues, i'm calling for a hearing on the gary parker gas line explosion with my colleagues supervisor fewer to conduct a full review of the incident including actions an event leading up to the event of the situation on site and coordination of the response and the role of each entity and requesting pg&e and verizon and others to report. we were in a budget and finance committee and were alerted to a fire on the border of our districts, and my district. we then learned a gas line exploded resulting in a three-alarm fire at gary and parker in district 2. the incident spanned three hours from the time the gas line broke and the area was declared a safe site to begin recovery efforts. videos of the incident are harrowing at the height of the flames reaching three stories putting a lot of people in fear and danger. four structures were impacted. many residents were displaced and we're working to help them now. the beloved hong kong lounge on the corner of park and gary was very damaged.

before public comment, supervisor stefani has a comment. >> supervisor stefani: yes. just a question on the eraf fund and why weren't any of the funds allocated to the understood lying infrastructure and improving that of the light rail system and the subway. basically i read the transit riders letter and had a concern on that. >> we also have a major project underway to modernize the train control system for the light rail system. that is a critical need and something we were intent on the moving forward with. >> supervisor stefani: will that deliver service better around faster? >> i believe we are working as quickly as we can to make that a reality. there is not a funding restraint, but a lot of complex planning going into it. >> supervisor stefani: thank you very much. >> superviser fewer: thank you very much for being patient for public comment. christopher peterson, you have two minutes. >> thank you very much. i would like to thank supervisor mandelman for his comments. unimetro right now is facing a crisis in reliability. and i really do think that these extra

vice chair stefani? >> supervisor stefani: yes. once they accept that seven-day bed? what happens during that seven days? are there people that come and assess what they may need? i think this is where supervisor haney was talking about outcomes, during those seven days, are we able to get them somewhere else? are they successful? what are the success stories? we need to know those, so i want to know. because i do understand supervisor ronen's point, but during that seven days that we are able to make a difference, that people are getting the help they need, i think that's a good thing that we need to know, as well. >> i think our colleague in the fire department is going to address that. >> the definition of the nav center is it is a navigation center with shelter on-site. seven days may not be enough, but seven days is a chance to reboot, to get a -- to get some sleep, get food. three meals, and a case manager who's willing to take them to the d.m.v. and get their i.d., the first step to getting permanent supportive housing. we'll take them to the g.a. office. that'

supervisor stefani. >> supervisor stefani: first of all, thank you so much for that presentation and your involvement. it's great to see you up here. i'm impressed with your work and the priorities you laid out here. on the transformative justice committee slide you talked about mandatory instruction for law enforcement officers for youth cognitive development and interactions with youth. i think that sounds really important and promising, and i'm wondering if you know of any programs out there that other departments are using, or if there's a sample program that you're thinking of, or if you know of anything. >> well, there was already a program implemented in the last year, but it only trained 25 officers, as opposed to the 2,000-plus officers in the sfpd. we wanted an expansion of the program to create a program that can be taught to all sfpd officers that works with both community organizations and the city to create, like, a baseline instruction, because we think it's really important that all officers are trained in this and not just a few. >> supervisor stefani: perfect, great

>> that is correct. >> supervisor stefani?>> one more question, what is the makeup of the 18 units in terms of studio, one bedroom, two bedroom? >> it is six one-bedroom, and 12 two-bedrooms. >> are you done? okay, any other questions? i see none. is there any motion that you would like to make, supervisors? >> thank you. so my office has convenes discussions between the project sponsor and the neighborhood, i've been out to the neighborhood, i've listened to everyone's concerns. thank you for coming out. at this time, we received from the project sponsor a list of 11 additional conditions that would be part of the conditional use permit. late last night i want to thank the project sponsor for putting those forwards. i think that the neighborhood would like some additional time to review those, and therefore, and i have discussed this with the appellants and with the project sponsor, i'm requesting one week to continue the remaining item. i understand the hearings have been filed, but if we can continue the matter for one week

supervisor stefani. >> supervisor stefani: thank you, i want to thank everybody for coming out. city here is listening to everybody. supervisor mandelman said it's really difficult because we want to please all of you. we want to fix all your problems. that's really tough. it's hard responsibility for us. as you're sitting out there, i got to thinking about me. i've been out there on the other side in red shirt with something i care deeply about. i thought about times where the subject matter who i cared about didn't even matter to people. after sandy hook, when april of 2015 congress said, we don't need universal background check on gun sales. that was devastating to our gun violence movement. today, because speaker pelosi whipped everyone in shape and we took back the house, they're having a hearing on universal background check. it takes that work. why i'm saying that is because it made me realize that here in san francisco, we care about every single thing that you talked about today. it's not an issue of subject matter. it's not an issue of go away we're not going to listen

>> supervisor stefani: thank you, president yee. colleagues, before you today of course is the conditional use, we have heard the hearing and thank the neighbors for coming out and expressing your concerns about this project. i do find this process somewhat exasperating, to be honest, that we have projects that goes to the planning department to a different reiteration what can or cannot be done, lacking predictability what can be done and then going to the planning commission where it's reviewed at a 4-2 vote and a level of parking was taken away, i think everyone is fine with. and now before us is the appeal of the conditional use for this building, for the various reasons that have been laid out. and i take this appeal seriously. we sit in a quasi judicial manner and it's important to me i consider everything that has been said, everything i know, desired. the mayor spoke of housing. 18 units of housing at this site, maximum number allowed. i think it's very important that this property, this project fit in the neighborhood. i th

seconded by supervisor stefani. without objection, this closed session will be continued to the meeting of march 19th, 2019. madame clerk, please call, no. okay. madame clerk, please call the for adoption without committee reference calendar. >> items 44347 introduce for adoption without reference to committee. these items are resolution. unanimous vote is required. alternatively, any supervisor may require a resolution to go to committee. >> okay. for item -- colleagues, are there any items you want to sever? >> i would like to sever an item >> as if you. >> my apologies. yes, i have worked, i would like to sever number 45. >> forty-five, okay. any other items? seeing then, could we take items 44, 46, and did you call 47? >> yes. >> i 47, same house same call, without objection, these resolutions are adopted unanimously madame clerk, please call eight and 45. >> item 45 is a resolution to urge the san francisco public utilities commission to include in their preliminary report to the mayor regarding pg and he a pla

thank you. >> supervisor mandelman: that's it, vice chair stefani? >> supervisor stefani: yes. >> supervisor mandelman: supervisor haney? >> supervisor haney: thank you, director kozinski, i know you have to go. and thank you to all the folks who presented every day, and both the folks that are here and out here in the field. this is both the most urgent and devastating crisis that we face here in the city. in many ways, it's a human rights crisis, and i want to appreciate all of my colleagues who spoke so eloquently about the need for urgency as a city, and the willingness to step up in your own neighborhoods, your own districts, to do what we possibly can. i hope you heard that this department is wants to be -- board is wanting to be a partner, whether that's opening new points, allocating new money. i think we really feel the urgency from our constituents and make sure that all of us are stepping up and making sure we're building housing and shelter in our city. i have some questions about the presentations and about hsac. i do want to say because

vice chair stefani. >> thank you, chair mandelman.the other day, when it was the first week we had of the really bad rains, i was going to my home, and i was putting my key in the door, and all of a sudden i heard someone say, supervisor! and it startled me, and i turned around, and he said to me, and he said, do you know the police are taking away tents from all of the homeless people in the rain, and they don't have anywhere to stay? and i said, you know, i have not heard that. i don't know that to be true or not. i said, it breaks my heart. my daughter, who is nine, and i were just talking about where do people go when it is raining like this? and it actually -- i mean, i know all my colleagues well. i know their hearts. all of us here have empathy. all of us here have compassion. all of us here do not want people out there suffering. i certainly do not. and i want to be careful on how we frame issues and how we all treat each other. and there is a lot of demonization of people who are trying things that might not be exactly what y

supervisor stefani glass glass. >> thank you, president he. first to mr lewis on the ceqa to appeal, i just want to provide more context to what you heard from the public that came out in terms of the noise, and it was -- i thank you need to explain a little bit more as to why it's exempt from environmental review with regard to the noise. they complained about the demolition or refute removal of the concrete. if you could just explain a little bit more why you have determined it is exempt from further environmental review. >> sure. through the chair, the sponsor provided a list of the pieces of equipment that they anticipate to use in construction. we looked at that and determined we are able to figure out the characteristics of the project in terms of construction. we looked at the noise ordinance and determined which pieces of equipment could exceed the standard of the noise ordinance, which is 8 decibels, 100 feet away, and then we determined, of those equipments that could exceed the nordic -- noise ordinance, with a resultant substantial

. >> chair fewer: supervisor stefani? >> supervisor stefani: thank you, chair fewer. through the chair, miss dawson, is there a map where all of these bathrooms for? can you send one? >> of course. >> supervisor stefani: is there an established criteria for where these bathrooms go? >> so this was cited when the original agreement was put in place? they were determined on the following basis, where most tourists were and there were not readily available public facilities, so you'll see a lot of them in the fisherman's wharf area. there are some on the top of twin peaks where a lot of tour buses go. there's one in u.n. plaza, civic center plaza where there just weren't access ibibility areas to go? there was, a long time ago, a sense that the toilet program could expand, and there was this ratio between the number of kiosks and the number of toilets. but later on, the voters passed an initiative that limited the number of kiosks, and so that is why we have 25 toilets today. we might have had more had we had a different policy decision? but that's what we have now. we c

yes, supervisor stefani? >> supervisor stefani: yes, i'd like to forward this to the if you mean -- full board with a positive recommendation. >> supervisor fewer: thank you. at this time, i'd like to call . >> supervisor fewer: we'll combacome back into session. we'll start with our last item on the agenda today, which is item 12. madam clerk, can you call item 12. >> clerk: yes. resolution approving a vertical disposition and development agreement between the port and a joint venture between tmg partners and presidio bay ventures for the sale of parcel k north, located at 20th street and illinois street, by the port and adopting various findings. >> supervisor fewer: thank you. i believe we have christine maher from the port of san francisco to present on this item. thank you. >> my name is christine maher, and i'm here representing the port on behalf of director forbes to present on pier 70, which is parcel k north. before getting into the details of the parcel k north transaction, i'll start off with just

yes, thank you, chair stefani. >> supervisor stefani: yes. thank you.i would like to nominate you to continue on this in role the san francisco transportation authority in this role as chair. >> chair peskin: thank you. is that a second from commissioner ronen? is there a second? did anybody else want this job? all right. seeing none, nominations are closed. there is a motion and a second. is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel]. >> chair peskin: and can we take this same house, same call? roll call, stan. roll call, please. >> clerk: on the motion to aelectricity check as the chair of the 2019 transportation authority -- [roll call] >> clerk: we have approval. >> chair peskin: thank you, colleagues. now let's get a t.n.c. text on the ballot and get it passed. now we will nominate vice chair. supervisor brown? >> ms. brown: y >> i would like to nominate my colleague, supervisor mandelman. i think he would be kpleexcell in this position. and thank you. >> chair peskin: is there a motion for this? thank you, commissione