continues to commit every month, the levers for negotiations are different from those in february, stefanyshina said. she believes that the russians are now proposing negotiations to stop the advance of the armed forces. are negotiations between russia and ukraine needed today? general, and if so , what should be the subject of such negotiations and theoretical agreements? today, negotiations are needed not only with putin, together with our partners regarding the complete liberation of the territory of our state, such negotiations are needed, compensation of ukraine for causing damages, return accordingly all and the damage of our prisoners and people whom they actually captured and especially children in ukraine . this is the working out of international low legal mechanisms for ensuring global security, including ukraine and preventing the future aggressive positions of the russian federation, such negotiations are necessary, but then on it will not work because in fact this is the end of this regime and he does not recognize himself as guilty, accordingly, he lost here and that is why in th

vice-prime minister for european integration stefanyshina says that during the week, russians, officiallyunofficially, various persons came to e-official kyiv and said that well, we are in in principle, i am not against sitting down at the negotiating table, but we have demands, we will not give up on these demands, zelensky said that kyiv will not tolerate any ultimatums, ukraine will never speak to russia in the language of an ultimatum. did you hear someone say in washington that well, sooner or later you will still have to agree on something with russia sooner or later the topic of negotiations will still be on the agenda of your policy from the president's rhetoric i hear that he really says that there will be no negotiations and i believe that this is correct especially after those uh successes we had when we didn't sit down at the negotiating table, if we didn't sit down for negotiations when we had a difficult situation and we retreated on all fronts and uh stabilized the front now and even launched a counterattack here, well, that's gone now it makes no sense. we are in order to

deputy prime minister for european integration stefanyshina says that, well, during the week, russianscially and unofficially, various people went to e official kyiv and they said that well, in principle, we are not against sitting down at the negotiating table, but we have demands and we will not give up on these demands. zelenskyi said that kyiv will not tolerate any ultimatums, ukraine never will talk to russia in the language of an ultimatum. did you hear someone in washington say that well, sooner or later , anyway, you will have to agree on something with russia, sooner or later, the topic of the talks will still be on the agenda of your policy, from the president's rhetoric, i hear what he really says about the fact that there will be no victories and i think that this is right , especially after the success we had when we did not sit down at the negotiating table if we did not all negotiate when we had a difficult situation and we retreated in all directions and stabilized front now they even launched a counterattack here, well, it doesn't make any sense now. we are in order to

stefanyshina, for example, who stated that, in principle, ukraine already does not need the pdch. she can already ask questions about membership in nato, and in principle, i see nothing so extraordinary here, although you know that now it may seem to us something so incredible, something so beyond our understanding. but i do not see anything extraordinary here, moreover, i think that after ukraine's victory, integration into nato can happen even faster than in the european union , because de facto, everything is already ready for this, that is, the ukrainian army is rapidly moving to the relevant aspects related to nato standards in all understandings of this word. relevant legal aspects, material and technical, where to go from them well, of course, this russian langlist under the raisin, let’s say so, will add soviet-style equipment to us , but we will still refuse it, we will switch to the corresponding nato ones standards and the most important thing is that ukraine demonstrates to the whole world that it has an army really suitable for a real war, and for the military-politic

stefanyshina, who stated that ukraine no longer needs a military alliance . so extraordinary, although incredible, something that goes beyond our understanding. but i do not see anything extraordinary here, moreover, i believe that after the victory of ukraine, integration into nato may even take place faster than the european union because, well, de facto , everything is already ready for this, that is, the ukrainian army is rapidly moving to the relevant e-e aspects related to nato standards in all understandings of the word, these are also the relevant legal aspects, well