constitutional committee could have been created earlier is it least part of the freshest criticism steffan de mistura justified is it fair i wouldn't personalize it i've worked close to a friend in the story quite closely. his heart was in the right place and i think minister lavrov will say that quite clearly they had a very good relationship and they understood at the end of the day. the special envoy whether it's the mr or or anybody else working on other issues. has to operate within the parameters set by the security council and it's met and particular the 5 permanent members you cannot effectively discharge your mandate if you are unable to balance things between the 5 permanent members at least if not an entire security council so i think personalizing it is a bit too much i think if you as minister lavrov directly you a lot of praise as well i mean on a personal level likes a lot of people but i think you also ignore as if he is right to create. just as them when they're professional or whatever i mean i was in many meetings i mean probably all the meetings de mistura had with a minister love