stephanie bach is a professor of international criminal law at marburg university here in germany. i asked her why the i c, c was going after putin on the charge of illegally deporting children. when you go to the head of state and want to accuse out of state, it's always a problem of lincoln. the crimes committed on the ground to the person in very high position. if you see, we see the crime committed in which are for example, it's rather have to prove that protein was very away from the crime scene. is individual responsible scraps of the protection of children a close to link to the overall state policy. so it's easier to connect them to protein. hey, so proximity playing a key role there. and this warrant by the i c. c. does it have more than just a symbolic meaning? and is it realistic that we will see prudent on trial in the heck? yes, more than a symbolic meaning restrict putting freedom of travel. he can't travel to other states who are members of the international criminal court. because he must fear that he will be arrested as soon as you arrive there. and we're seeing so