down at women's rights advocacy and stephanie hayden, lawyer on media commentary. thank you. thank you. that takes us right to the break . not a long wait though, until more grad programs get going. they start moment me ah, join me every thursday and the alex summon show and i'll be speaking to guess in the world, the politics sport. business. i'm show business. i'll see you then. me . when i would show the wrong. why don't i just don't the world. yes, to see out the thing because the after an engagement equals the trail, when so many find themselves well, the part we choose to look for common ground in the, in the moon. prieto american paper in the afternoon event, saturday, december 12 were homeless. and when march of the capital 3 percenters and other races, fascist militia groups, are there his truck and one other truck pulled up right there for the hill got out as soon as his feet hit the ground. that's all the other doors opened. and everybody was on this side of the road, pulled their log out and had us in their scope. so whole time, everybody from the 1st 2 trucks got

and she's not the only one lawyer and trance woman stephanie hayden says the seas decision is well rooted in science. you've got sport, you've got opening body, they have access to sign their access to data, go, you know what work for them. now, where a, lots of people go wrong, if they just assume that somebody in this case who was male borns, now transgender female doesn't change. and i think, why did he, they forget to take into account hormone levels reduction in muscle mass over many years. now, what do we do here? do we make evidence based decisions, or do we make prejudice based decisions? that is the simple question. oh well probably there's never going to be an easy solution to this and do expect more debate. the closer we get to the metal run off . and if you want to share your opinion on the story, you can let us know what you think that r t dot com the friendship president has received another slap in the face this time to his reputation after a shocking performance and regional elections, a manual microns party only got around 10 percent of the vote in the 1st round. as our c

the debated the pros and cons of the law with paula diana, who's a women's rights activist and stephanie hayden, lawyer, a media commentator in spain. the idea is to involve the court. below the age of 16, the court in conjunction with the parents, the child concerned, takes into account of all the evidence of that particular individual case and reaches an informed not prejudicial decision. i think that system which has been proposed in spain is ideal. the focus of the deal in spain, but in any other country should be to protect these, you know, keep everyone from discrimination, abuse, homophobia, try to forget because these are the worst things. can you really say that a 14 year old is mature enough to make such a life altering decision? why been need to rush forward with this? surely the completely sensible thing to do is wait just a few more years until you're of a more auto frame of mind. and you're sure my understanding is that there will be a traditional mechanism below set. an age setting able 16 i understand will be the decision of the young adult concerned is a young adult. let's be c

and she's not the only one lawyer and trans woman, stephanie hayden says the, you'll see decision as well rooted in science. you've got support, you got governing body. they have access to science, they have access to data. they know what work for them. now, where a lot of people go wrong, if they just to shoot him that somebody in this case who was male born now transgender female doesn't change doesn't. why did he, they forget to take into account hormone levels reduction in muscle mass over many years. now, what do we do here? do we make evidence based decisions, or do we make prejudiced based decisions? but it's the simple question. oh, well, probably there's never going to be an easy solution to this and do expect more debate. the closer we get to the metal run off, you know, trying to that will if you do want to share your opinion on this story, you can let us know what you think at r t dot com. the french president has received another slap in the face this time to his reputation off for a shocking performance and regional elections monument, crohn's party, and he got around 1

and she's not the only one lawyer and trance woman stephanie hayden says the c decision is well rooted in science. you've got a sport, you got opening body, they have access to science there of access to data. they know what work for them now, where a lot of people go wrong if they just assume that somebody in this case who was male borns, now transgender female doesn't change. and i think, why do they forget to take into account hormone levels reduction in muscle mass over many years. now, what do we do here? do we make evidence based decisions, or do we make prejudice based decisions? that is the simple question. oh, well probably there's never going to be an easy solution to this and do expect more debate, the closer we get to the metal run off. we had so can, which we'd love to know what you think in case you want to share your opinion on this. why don't do it on our site. t dot com a such a sports pushing for more so called a quality u. k. school. did she traditional title for students more inclusive ones these days more or something? this dividing society more and more to full st

neil debated the pros and cons of the law with power, diana, a women's rights activist, and stephanie hayden, lawyer and media commentator in spain. the idea is to involve the court below the age of 16. the court in conjunction with the parents, the child concerned, takes into account all the evidence of that particular individual case and reaches uninformed not prejudicial decision. i think that the system which has been proposed in spain is ideal, the focus of the, the beale in spain. but in any other country, it should be to protect these, you know, people and everyone from discrimination, abuse, homophobia, trunk before. yeah. because these are the worst things. can you really say that a 14 year old is mature enough to make such a life altering decision? why the need to rush forward with this? surely the completely sensible thing to do is wait just a few more years until you're of a more auto frame of mind. and you're sure my understanding is that there will be a traditional mechanism below set. an age setting able 16, i understand will be the decision of the young adult consent is a you

all has met all of the required criteria, and she's not the only one lawyer and trance woman stephanie hayden says the seas decision is well rooted in science. you've got a sport, you got opening body, they have access to science there of access to data. they know what work for them. now, where a lot of people go wrong. if they just assume that somebody in this case who was male borns, now transgender female doesn't change. and i think, why did he, they forget to take into account hormone levels reduction in muscle mass over many years. now, what do we do here? do we make evidence based decisions, or do we make prejudice based decisions? that is the simple question. oh well probably there's never going to be an easy solution to this and do expect more debate. the closer we get to the metal run off . you know, these are the kind of stories we do these every day and try and take more debts, get your opinions to, if you've got an opinion on this, if you want to get involved, go to our site r t dot com as a comments section that tell us what you think, so it's good to hear from you. and it's not

and she's not the only one lawyer and trance woman stephanie hayden says the sees decision is well rooted in science. you've got support, you got governing body. they have access to science, they have access to data, they know what works for them. now where lots of people go wrong, if they just assume that somebody in this case it was male born. now transgender female doesn't change. and i think, why did he, they forget to take into account hormone levels reduction in muscle mass over many years. now, what do we do here? do we make evidence based decisions, or do we make prejudice based decisions? that is the simple question. oh well probably there's never going to be an easy solution to this and do expect more debate. the closer we get to the metal run off . and if you want to share your opinion on this, you can do so online right now had to r t dot com. and if not, get sports. pushing football at quality, british schools ditching traditional title for students. for more inclusive ones, something that's dividing society right now. we've got more on that for you later in this program. the

and she's not the only one lawyer and trans woman, stephanie hayden says the seas decision is well rooted in science. you've got support, you got a governing body. they have access to science, they have access to data, they know what works for them. now where lots of people go wrong, if they just assume that somebody in this case it was male born. now transgender female doesn't change. and i think, why did he, they forget to take into account hormone levels reduction in muscle mass over many years. now, what do we do here? do we make evidence based decisions, or do we make prejudice based decisions? that is the simple question. oh well probably there's never going to be an easy solution to this and do expect more debate. the closer we get to the metal run off . ok if you want to weigh in on this during the discussion with us on line, you can go right now to our feed dot com. tell us what you think. next, the french presidents received another slap in the face. this time though, it's to his reputation after shocking showing and regional elections. emmanuel, crohn's party only got around 10

i'm happy to say we can go live now to call it diana women's rights activists with her and stephanie hayden, lawyer and media commentator. it's a pleasure to have you both in the program. thank you. stephanie, can we kick off with you? can you really say that a 14 year old is mature enough to make such a life altering decision why they need to rush forward with this? surely the completely sensible thing to do is wait just a few more years until you're of a more auto frame of mind. and you're sure. well, this is why in spain, the idea is to involve the court. below the age of 16, the court in conjunction with the parents, the child concerned, takes into account all the evidence of that particular individual case and reaches and informed not prejudicial decision. i think that system which is being proposed in spain is ideal. i mean, i have some issues with what's being proposed. we may come from in a few moments. the basic premise that a court with the parents on the child concerned will make the decision, i only think is progressive and on a really good idea. what just on the point again, st

neil debated the pros and cons of this law with the powder deanna, women's rights activist and stephanie hayden, lawyer, immediate commentator in spain. the idea is to involve the court. below the age of 16, the court in conjunction with the parents, the child concerned, takes into account of all the evidence of that particular individual case and reaches an informed not prejudicial decision. i think that the system which is being proposed in spain is ideal, the focus of the, the beale in spain, but in any other country should be to protect these, you know, people and everyone from discrimination, abuse, homophobia, trunk before. yeah. because these are the worst things. can you really say that a 14 year old is mature enough to make such a life altering decision why they need to rush forward with this? surely the completely sensible thing to do is wait just a few more years until you're of a more out of frame of mind. and you're sure my understanding is that there will be a traditional mechanism below set. an age setting able 16, i understand will be the decision of the young adult consent. it'