stephanie woolhandler?>> we did not take a position when the solvent -- with the supreme court deliberations. some of the members did weigh in in an amicus brief. some are more ambivalent and felt there was some good in the bill. what we all agree on, however, is the bill is not a solution. it will leave 27 million americans uninsured when it is fully implemented. it will leave tens of millions of americans woefully under insured with gaps in their coverage like copayments and deductibles, so they will still be bankrupt by illness. it is not going to control cost. we still need single payer national health insurance regardless of what happens at the supreme court. >> do you care of the supreme court were to reject it? say the individual mandate is not constitutional? >> the individual mandate is a very bad idea. the good parts are medicaid expansion, which does not require an individual mandate. some regulations on the insurance industry, which was does not require the mandate. those could have all been don