stephen allen's engineer discovered tom had received funding from the european union. when we have ensured got a response over a year later the commission's reply was that this is not our responsibility this is the responsibility of hungary now we say that is incorrect both legally but also morally doesn't mean to say that we would let hungary off the hook either they both need to answer for this but it's unacceptable and unsustainable frankly for the commission simply to say it's not it's not up to us go. we asked a hunger in government for a response to allegations about human rights violations which top house but received no reply so i'm ready it's not i'm writing to be. so proud and it beats it being here and all circuits to really stand with those who are not with us you're a liar they're 6 all. 6 back in brussels a key demand from demonstrating is the end to institutional state. and 2 i. i was. a. navy offices if you european commission a symbolic protest about european union money to institution. that you might. then a development the european commission directo

stephen allen's engineer discovered tom had received funding from the european union. when we have ensured got a response over a year later the commission's reply was that this is not our responsibility this is the responsibility of hungary now we say that is incorrect both legally but also morally doesn't mean to say that we would let hungary off the hook either they both need to answer for this but it's unacceptable and unsustainable frankly for the commission simply to say it's not it's not up to us go. we asked a hunger in government for a response to allegations about human rights violations which top house but received no reply so i'm ready it's not i'm writing to be. so proud and it beats it being here and all circuits to really search for those who are not with us you're a liar they're all. 6 back in brussels a key demand from demonstrating is the end to institutional state. and . 2 i. was a. good. idea the office is if you european commission a symbolic protest about european union money to institution. that you might. then a development the european commissio

stephen allen from the ngo validity told me what they found when they visited top us in 2017 this is a young woman who we were told was placed in this cage for her own safety she has epilepsy it was really horrible a shocking thing to see in and keeping people in cages of course absolutely contravenes every human rights stand that there is this is a young man actually with down's syndrome is legs. very skinny this all suggests that he doesn't move very large. and this is someone tied reading tied to a pipe this is a completely unlawful form of restraint where this young man was known to be particularly active able to move around and so what we understand stuff would tie his leg to the radiator and then finally this image you found i thinking found. behind a knocking door didn't behind a locked door that had had the handle removed and which we were told there was no one inside to buy stuff he was standing in the middle of the room rocking making really distressed sounds it was extremely extremely distressing sight. steven allen's engineer discovered tom had received funding from the e

>> stephen: i watched steve allen, you know, the guy who started all this. >> jon: yes, yes. >> stephenlen started the original "tonight show" at the hudson theater down the street. after that, there was "the steve allen show." he was playing piano while jack kerouak read "selections from on the road." that's what these shows used to be. >> jon: wow... >> stephen: and can be again ( laughter ) thanks to coronavirus. ( applause ) well, if all that news wasn't unsettling enough, last night, we also learned that tom hanks has the coronavirus. hey! coronavirus! okay, yeah! you can shut down italy, you can shut down south korea, you can destroy our economy, but keep your filthy nucleocapsid proteins off tom hanks! the man is an american treasure! this is like learning the liberty bell has herpes! ( laughter ) it ends now! it ends now! ( laughter ) i'm being told it is not ending now. i have to keep doing the show okay, moving on...e. >> jon: forrest, come on, forrest. >> stephen: i think this is going pretty well. ( laughter ) do you guys think it's going pretty well? ( cheers and applause )

the author stephen king has tweeted, i'm going to read into quoted, "the decision to drop the woody allens me stop" is that a fair point? it is, it is a bad thing to stop censoring. in this situation it was a sneaky move, apparently it was secret from ronan farrow when he was finalising his book. i think it's a bit of a publicity stunt to do both though i don't want to do both though i don't want to see this book not published, andi to see this book not published, and i think it's awkward to habitat the same company. could it be either financial decision by the publisher if they have to choose between ronan farrow, a young up—and—coming author with decades ahead of him, and woody allen, the choice is simple, to keep ronan farrow, is that right? absolutely, and i think last year there were no new york times reported four publishing companies rejected woody allen's potential bug, so it's not like his book is necessarily going to sell the ronan farrow‘s does and they already have a winner in farrow, so financial motives are certainly a part of this. many authors have had questionable and eve

the author stephen king has tweeted — i'm just going to read it to quote it — "the hachette decision to drop the woody allenorries me." is that a fair point? it is, i absolutely agree. i think it is a very bad thing to stop censoring. —— i think it is a very sketchy thing to start censoring. i do think in this situation it was a sneaky move, a p pa re ntly it was secret from ronan farrow as he was finalising his book. i think it's a bit of a publicity stunt to do both, so i don't want to see this book not published, ijust i think it's a little awkward to have it at the same company. could it be a financial decision by the publisher if they have to choose between ronan farrow, a young up—and—coming author with decades ahead of him, and woody allen? the choice is simple — to keep ronan farrow, maybe, is that right? absolutely, and i think it was about last year the new york times reported that four different media — sorry, publishing companies, rejected woody allen's potential book, so it's not like he was, you know, able to find someone real easily, it's not like his book is necessarily going to sell the ron