but stephen asked don king, arguably unanswerable questions like what is it that brief fire into the equations and makes the universe for them to describe? why is there something rather than nothing? why does the universe go to the bottom of existing? these stray into philosophy and religion. something that science seldom asks. they're irrelevant to the everyday perception of most science. the cover of the book the grand design promised that this book would tell us the ultimate answers, it doesn't actually and stephen goes on asking the questions. everson fbn he keeps saying i long to know these answers. also in that same book he writes with the answers he proposed or anyone else proposes at that level really represent reality. all of which causes his more dogmatic reductionist statement that he often makes to the media seem not quite stephen hawking. would you agree with him it seems too earthbound big remorse over and he usually is. it wouldn't be correct to stop with his science in trying to explain his appeal. he would probably wish it otherwise. but his disability and even more