stephen g. breyer: so why -- i mean, it's possible we will agree with you. i mean, it does say that the clock stops ticking when the alien is served a notice to appear under section 12. then you look at the section, and it says a notice to appear shall specify nine things, including the time and place at which you're supposed to appear. in the government's view, i looked at the notice to appear every one of those things is , included on the document, except not notice to appear -- i mean, where you're supposed to appear. that seems odd, but assume you're right. we then get to step 2 of chevron, and step 2 says that the agency decision has to be reasonable. so i looked for the reason. what's the reason that they don't want to put in a notice to appear? the former chairman of the b.i.a. says there used to be a process called interactive scheduling. it meant that a human being who was over at d.h.s. would go to his computer, find out what dates were available, and fill them in. that wouldn't seem too toug

on the other side, the defenders of the chief justice john , sonja, stephen breyer sotomayor and alayna keegan. a mixture of those thought to be conservative and more liberal justices here. forward, who do you think the winners were? the big winners were in this decision, and who were the losers? guest: the big winners are going to be state and local tax authorities, so politicians who would like to grow their tax coffers. anyone who is aligned for those public funds is a winner here. you will see more and more dates pass these laws -- more more states pass these laws. it would be shocking if you can see almost all the 45 states with sales taxes doing the same thing. i think amazon is a big winner, and i think yesterday's stock price of amazon reflected that. they are already collecting in the 45 states with the sales tax. they don't collect on the market price, but they haven't a legion of accountants to get that done -- but they serving have an legion of accountants to get that done. losers in this of the small businesses, not the big guys who can comply. we are talking about 10,000 t

al-jazeera is correspondent stephen breyer the stories like tell of this. because the letters. were out they were still barraged out for palestinian read older sirrah fluent in world news. behind the. covers foreign minister responds to reports of threats of military action by saudi arabia and. that they will compromise on its position. and welcome to al-jazeera live from my headquarters in doha with me in the qur'an i'm also ahead another twist in the investigation the u.s. president's election campaign chief is accused of trying to influence witnesses. protests continue in jordan despite the prime minister stepping down and the king promising measures to revive the economy. and rescue his face an uphill task in guatemala as more danger from the volcano that's killed more than sixty people. it's been one year since saudi arabia the u.a.e. egypt and bahrain imposed a blockade on accusing it of supporting terrorism as a claim that has strongly refuted well in a special day of programming al-jazeera is looking at the causes and effects of the standoff we spoke to. says want to ma

leaders.h 51 other also a former clerk for stephen breyer who was a dissenting voice.a, given your background, what is your reaction to this today? >> today's decision is a disappointing one for those of us who think this travel ban and all three of its incarnations violates the statute and the constitution. i think you need to look at it in the context of a 17 month saw ga going back to the first ban issued. you see courts scrutinizing what the president did, asking tough his lawyers and forcing the president to revise it. ultimately, even if i disagree, you see the will of law standing up, as manifested by the courts. emily: for the people who oppose this, is there any legal recourse? >>his case may not be over yet. all of the justices acknowledge that this case can continue in the lower court. this was here on something of a preliminary posture. the case can at least conceivably continue in the lower courts. one of the things that challengers might want to pick up on is the acknowledgment by the chief justice in his majority opinion, that the emergency authority rel

neil: to your point, robert, two liberals on the court, stephen breyer, elena kagan went along with fivevatives on this, two justices ruth bader ginsberg and sotomayor did not. what do we make of the two liberals joining in the opinion. >> the happiest person has got to be chief justice roberts. he wants people to view the court as not necessarily a partisan place. i think hopefully 7-2 decision will cause people to look at the decision, maybe there was some actual constitutional basis here, when 5-4 and conservative justice vote one way and liberals vote another they tend think it is politics, which those of us who practice law hope it is not. the strength of phillips' case, demonstrate that breyer and kagan went along with it. they agreed the tribunal in colorado was hostile to his religion. he deserved to have his religion taken seriously. and he has a first amendment righto, to not be compelled to make statements about marriage he doesn't want to make. so i think, you know, it's, it's a good decision for the court. hopefully it will turn the temperature down in the country a little b

that picture of the current supreme court, a reminder, ruth bader ginsburg is 85 years old and stephen breyer turns 80 this year. think of the high court if he gets a second term. areva, thank you. >> and let's bring in political reporter tal kopan. tal, we heard from gillibrand. she said any of the scotus justices would overturn roe v. wade. equal rights is on the line. this is a rallying cry for women and progressives on capitol hill. >> absolutely. this is going to turn into arguably the biggest political narrative for both sides for months until this seat is filled. it is going to be a galvanizing issue for both bases. the immense number of consequential sides. this is for progressives and women, it fits into the narrative that they are spinning about president trump and serves to further that narrative. you can expect republicans are just as loud on the same issues in the other direction. >> nothing galvanizes voters like a supreme court opening. let's look at the democrats' options. 51-49 margin, plus mike pence and ten democrats up. is there anything democrats can do? >> it is not like

. >> and stephen breyer on side, think a little. >> exactly. trump's ideology and it's his political strategy. he was having a lot of bad news and he knows that to pick on we'lly black men and say that they're the one who's don't like the flag, they don't love this country just because they. >> they donuy ts who fight for the country. if you go back to the latest statistics as many minorities fighfor the country ashite people do. >> certainly asd trump, mr. bone spurs who avoided the draft in every single way he could. countrs do this, you play the national anthem for big social occasions whenever you get together. i never thought it was particularly directed at the people that were killed in battle or people who bed. it's about love of country. trump has grabbed it into a social issue where he can get the black players against the men to die ford the country. he's creating a drama that isn't implicit at all what they were doing. >> here's the bigger thing. he created there because he did not like the turnout. this all comes down top crowd size

justice stephen breyer cited the report in his dissent writing -- "another report similarly indicateshat the u.s. embassy in djibouti, which processes visa applications for citizens of yemen, received instructions to grant waivers 'only in rare cases of imminent danger,' with one consular officer reportedly telling an applicant that 'even for infants, we would need to see some evidence of a congenital heart defect or another medical issue of that degree of difficulty that would likely lead to the child's developmental harm or death.'" talk about this report that ccr did with yale. the majority said, in severe cases, people will be taking care of and let and. washat the majority did even worse, actually. unfortunately, what we're seeing is the way the majority handled our report as well as the litany of other evidence that was before it, whether it was evidence of the trump administration's animus, anti-muslim bias leading up to the issuance of ththe proclamation, or the litany of evidence that it had s since the proclamation went into effect in that we were all able to prove, those of

it is a pleasure to welcome you all to the fifth annual justice stephen breyer lecture on international law. and a warm thank you to deborah, who has been the architect of the series from the outset and pulled together today's events. this is a series of transatlantic dialogue that cutting-edge issues at the intersection of security and international law. we want to particularly thank the municipality of the hague at the embassy of the netherlands for their steadfast support to us into this activity. this year's lecture we have chosen one of the most compelling and complicated -- here we go. that interrupted me which is very good. let's see how sensitive this is. shall i just keep talking? we wilwait for a minute. i suspect if that happened during an actual emergency, no one would've noticed and we would've continued anyways, so we have to give some feedback to our emergency management folks about the signaling. that was it i think. if we get interrupted again, we get interrupted again. at that time, you shouldn't ignore it because i don't know if it is a test. to return to the theme of

.> justice stephen breyer and all three women on the court dissented...saying the law only provided women with information; it did not require clinics to encourage abortions. abortion rights groups worry the decision is a step toward outlawing abortion. that's something anti-abortion groups don't deny. in washington, i'm jessica (anchor) taking a live look outside-- overlooking downtown san francisco. (anchor) time now to check on our weather... with chief meteorologist lawrence karnow. lawrence karnow: it became mostly sunny and bay area. high were cooler but still warm inland with 80s. the sea breeze is blowing again and will bring fog and low clouds further inland tonight. we could see some patch drizzle too. fire weather conditions will improve a little more tomorrow and thursday with increaing humidity and decreasing winds. that changes starting on friday with hot temperatures and gusty offshore winds. on the satellite you

you know, when bill clinton nominated ruth bader ginsburg and stephen breyer to be justices of the supremeeived overwhelming support from both sides of the aisle. and that's not because anyone was under any illusion that they would be necessarily centrist, but because they were essentially qualified. unfortunately, in more recent years it's become much more partisan. it's not focused on the qualifications so much of the justice. for if it were, it would be hard to come up with someone better qualified than someone like neil gorsuch. [inaudible conversations] neil: i'm sorry. they have the list, the 25 individuals, so i'd imagine that list has been pick apart, all sorts of details and files have been built on every individual name. so the attack lines and the attacks are already there as soon as that announcement is made, right? >> of course. and, of course, some of the people that are on the list were fairly recently confirmed -- neil: right. >> -- to the federal bench, so they have already gone through judiciary committee hearings. i think we saw some to have, i think, discriminatory ques

on the other side, the defenders of the chief justice john , sonja, stephen breyer sotomayor and alaynagan. a mixture of those thought to be conservative and more liberal justices here. forward, who do you think the winners were? the big winners were in this decision, and who were the losers? guest: the big winners are going to be state and local tax authorities, so politicians who would like to grow their tax coffers. anyone who is aligned for those public funds is a winner here. you will see more and more dates pass these laws -- more more states pass these laws. it would be shocking if you can see almost all the 45 states with sales taxes doing the same thing. i think amazon is a big winner, and i think yesterday's stock price of amazon reflected that. they are already collecting in the 45 states with the sales tax. they don't collect on the market price, but they haven't a legion of accountants to get that done -- but they serving have an legion of accountants to get that done. losers in this of the small businesses, not the big guys who can comply. we are talking about 10,000 to 12