all the procedures or set up stephen daubert cumbersome, that require that and they are implemented on a routine basis by the courts. another point that i think is relative to make today, that currently even though this is an historic doctrine, there is insufficient authority, and sufficient clarity and insufficient guidance for the courts to provide an independent review that i believe is important in our system of checks and balances. we have the reynolds case that has been cited, the el-masri site most recently, the eastern district of virginia, the jefferson case i understand luby discussed, the fourth circuit case. all these reflect different approaches in different results. some better, some not so good depending upon your viewpoint. but i believe that congress, being the important third branch of government, should act to provide the guidance and clarity in terms of what is the right approach to provide the independent review of the state's secrets privilege. house resolution 984 is an excellent foundation to consider this. provides for an independent assessment by the courts. i