we just heard analysis from stephen dreyfus. in miami the case is taking place. donald trump's first public appearance after proceedings this tuesday was at the cuban bakery we were talking about earlier. let's take a listen to what trump was saying there. >> it's a rigged deal. corrupt with no borders and nothing but problems. a nation in decline and then they do this stuff. you see where the people are. we love the people. >> his first public pronouncement since his not guilty plea. charges were put against him under the espionage act. reaction coming from the other side of the atlantic this evening. next, russian missiles raining down on 11 people were killed. at least more than two dozen were wounded as a warehouse and an apartment building were struck. the attack fell on a city that is the hometown of volodymyr zelenskyy as ukrainian verses are in the early stages of a counteroffensive to try to drive the russian occupiers through 1/5 of the territory they now occupy after 50 months of launching their invasion since february of last year. >> carting away the

former prosecutor stephen dreyfus joins us now.iden saying this is rolling back years of progress. what is your opinion? >> well, certainly, it rolls back at least 20 years of judicial opinions endorsing the idea that ensuring diversity is a compelling state interest that justifies discrimination based on race, but i think it is important to note that the court's opinion left an escape clause. at the end, the court said that we are not saying you cannot consider race at all -- for example, you can consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise." what they are basically saying is it has to be an individualized determination, and they recognize for the first time that admissions to these highly selective universities is really a zero-sum game. if somebody is selected for admission simply because of his or her race, it necessarily means that somebody else is denied admission simply because of his or her race, and that is what the court is finding improp