we get more now on all this from stephen hadley, national security adviser under president george w. bush. he's now with the united states institute of peace and is an international business consultant. and jane harman, former democratic u.s. representative from california. she stepped down earlier this year to take over as president of the woodrow wilson international center for scholars. thank you both for being with us. stephen hadley, to you first what are the prospects for peace in the middle east after the president's speech yesterday and this meeting today at the white house which on the surface looked contentious? >> well, it may on the surface. i actually think there's more there to work with than you-- than meets the eye. i think prime minister netanyahu gave the speech to the knesset before he came to the united states. i think there are actually a number of positive elements in that speech that have largely been overlooked. i think president obama made a contribution toward moving the process forward. and if you look at the three things that prime minister netanyahu said

i would just want to disagree once with my friend stephen hadley. he used the word "balance." he said that the president's speech on thursday was perhaps too far in the palestinian direction and it needed to be rebalanced today for aipac. i thought that the president's speech on thursday was a very good speech and the word "balance" kind of makes me break out in hives. he addressed both sides of this, and he also addressed the broader context. and he said very clearly that the u.s. will be on the right side of history as these governments change, and i applaud him for doing that and sticking to his guns. >> i think it is a good speech. i think it is a balanced approach. i think the real problem is going forward. one, can we avoid violence from breaking out in the west bank. and that means having a prospect for negotiations and also continuing the progress on the ground that prime minister ayad has been doing to show the palestinians that a peaceful, democratic, secure state can emerge. then we've got to see of the politics in the palestinian/israeli side, because the problem i

is that the rest of us that one in every seven hundred healthcare dollars is going to one guy stephen hadley his predecessor dollars argue it's a health care exact make a ton of money if their life nationalized health care yes i don't think that's a really good argument i think that's and i think it's a brilliant are you married you got you've got leeches they're taking twenty to thirty percent of all health care dollars and they're bankers they don't give a single kid a shot they don't look at anybody's throat they're banks you're probably have it all of corporate and so you know i say that about any c.e.o. i would not there's a lot of companies that are very well run into it very moderately did. i'm not one to try this experiment i say let them try it you know states are laboratories of democracy but i don't see that as an argument for saying you know six hundred fifty thousand you know every month on health care i mean arizona passed a immigration law last summer to be passed that went to you because there is evidence well alex. there's there's groups pushing that state i just don't. like

i was almost always invited so i knew there with the admiral mcconnell literally president or stephen hadley would say okay the to mike schogol first and he would talk and then if i had anything to add i would add. we were both of there. the admiral was really disadvantaged and i'm sitting atop the nation's premier analytical service. we are going down with the problem to ensure. at mcconnell is up the road reading books and i'm putting somebody in the back of the car with me explain the details are running down because it got the analytical staffs. so there is a bit of attention, a bit of an anomaly. you have to work through would remember that transparency and freedom of action between the two the bci and the cia have to be friends and the dni doesn't get to to do the job which is smooth functioning into the community. unless everyone believes he's the responsible one for job one. he gains power for the second task from his performance on the first. >> i agree. we wanted the dni to be the principal intelligence adviser to the president because the gathering of intelligence goes beyond the

i was almost always invited so i knew there with the admiral mcconnell literally president or stephen hadley would say okay the to mike schogol first and he would talk and then if i had anything to add i would add. we were both of there. the admiral was really disadvantaged and i'm sitting atop the nation's premier analytical service. we are going down with the problem to ensure. at mcconnell is up the road reading books and i'm putting somebody in the back of the car with me explain the details are running down because it got the analytical staffs. so there is a bit of attention, a bit of an anomaly. you have to work through would remember that transparency and freedom of action between the two the bci and the cia have to be friends and the dni doesn't get to to do the job which is smooth functioning into the community. unless everyone believes he's the responsible one for job one. heains power for the second task from his performance on the first. >> i agree. we wanted the dni to be the principal intelligence adviser to the president because the gathering of intelligence goes beyond the ce

i was almost always invited so i knew there with the admiral mcconnell literally president or stephen hadleywould say okay the to mike schogol first and he would talk and then if i had anything to add i would add. we were both of there. the admiral was really disadvantaged and i'm sitting atop the nation's premier analytical service. we are going down with the problem to ensure. at mcconnell is up the road reading books and i'm putting somebody in the back of the car with me explain the details are running down because it got the analytical staffs. so there is a bit of attention, a bit of an anomaly. you have to work through would remember that transparency and freedom of action between the two the bci and the cia have to be friends and the dni doesn't get to to do the job which is smooth functioning into the community. unless everyone believes he's the responsible one for job one. he gains power for the second task from his performance on the first. >> i agree. we wanted the dni to be the principal intelligence adviser to the president because the gathering of intelligence goes beyond the c

interview with stephen schoolmate on wednesday we got some enthusiastic responses and i'm really excited to be able to use the show to promote and encourage new activists this e-mail comes from dan hadley as a libertarian and resident of indiana i was ashamed of quote our supremes court decision the young mr school next who has to organize a protest was heartening. then i think i think you meant coho nice there this old vet wouldn't mind making the journey to join him next wednesday but not enough information righted please advise then i emailed you the link to the event page on facebook so you got that and i posted it on my page so whenever we cover topics like this that necessitate main points and more information to get involved those links will always be there on our facebook page finally from you tube one more intellectual property comment neo plasma x. wrote adam used food as an example but genetic food is as it also and there are some companies using it to their advantage just read up on the monsanto soybean patents and all bull surrounding that exactly and that's why we're planning on covering that next week and now this one time at boot camp. was. and so you remember this one