this means and how it might impact the fight over funding and immigration on capitol hill are: stephen legomsky, professor of law at washington university in st. louis and alan gomez, immigration reporter for "u.s.a. today" in miami. we welcome you both. professor legomsky, it's our understanding the judge in this case did not rule on the merits of what the president did but rather on a more narrow procedure in how this was carried out. explain that. >> yeah, that's correct, judy. under a statute called "the administrative procedure act," certain federal rules and policies have to go through a notice and comment process, as you were describing. the way it works is that the federal government issues a proposed version of this rule. the public has a chance to submit comments. the government evaluates those comments and then decides how best to proceed in light of those comments. the issue here is that there is an exception to that procedure. it's not required when all the government is doing is offering guidance as to how it proposes to exercise a discretionary power. the plaintiff states for the