in fact, everybodyst and young presented the clause in an e-mail long after this employee -- stephen the morris, is his name -- had been hired and he had to consent as a condition of employment. he was told if you show up to work the next day, going forward you agree to submit your disputes to arbitration. and according to a certain kind of classical economic theory that's very popular among the judiciary but completely discordant with real life, at that point stephen morris had the ability to renegotiate his agreement or press for better terms. but as most of you know, what he really had to do was show up to work the next day because he had to payr a mortgage, elder care and childcare, so on. so things don't have to be this way. a better model would admit that coercion is inevitable in all human affairs, not least in market activity. it would recognize that unchecked private coercion makes a mockery of our democratic ideals, and it would insist that such coercion be ameliorated between more give and take. this is the promise of what i call private -- sorry, what i call political, change capita

in fact, ernst and young presented the arbitration clause in an email long after this employee, stephen morris, as his name, had been hired and he had to consent as a condition of continued employment. in other words, he was told, if you show up to work, the next day going forward, you agree to submit your disputes to arbitration. and according to a certain kind of classical economic theory that's very popular among the judiciary, but completely with real life. at that point, stephen morris had the ability renegotiate his agreement or or press for better. but in reality, as most of you know, what he really had to do was the only choice is to show up to work the next day because he had to pay a mortgage and pay for elder care and child care and so on. so things have to be this way. a better model would admit that coercion is inevitable in all human affairs, least in market activity. it would recognize that unchecked private coercion makes a mockery of our democratic ideals, and it would insist such coercion be ameliorated by more robust political give and take between the asset rich few and the

the admiral told him. you will find nothing but a corporal's guard to oppose you. after morris island was evacuated, sumter commander major stephen elliott anticipo aided an assault and continuously kept one third of his garrison on alert short of boats. dahlgren signal general gilmore asking to borrow some army craft. gilmore was flabbergasted, waited for he was planning his own amphibious assault. elements of the seventh connecticut and 104th pennsylvania manned their own boats to land colonel thomas osborn's assault of the 24th massachusetts and 10th connecticut. gilmore proposed merging both attacks under current law. osborn dahlgren responded. i cannot consent to let the commander be other than a naval officer. ultimately, all they agreed on was using the watchword detroit to prevent friendly fire. a distraught gilmore sent dahlgren one final message. we must trust to chance and hope for the best no matter who gets the fort. if we place our flag over it. unsurprised, teasingly seasick, or as quartermaster, intercepted and all the messages. both groups marshaled their assault boats. the tug dandelion towed dorgan's boats towa

he's holder of the samuel eliot morris award, which is the highest award by the society of military history. the same award that stephen ambrose also was awarded in the 1990s. and he came on board in 2016. i gave him responsibility to pass the to him to help finish the designs that were in the gestation and the creation stage. he did that marvelous job with that, along with our leader in the institute of the study of war democracy, mike bell. so robert citino it's all years. now following nick mueller. that's always easy. but follow me, jacob, is just unfair. i have to do something about the scheduling. you know, like nick, if don't mind, i'll begin on a personal. he said he's been working on this project the liberation project for 33 years. you know, for me, it's only seven. it just felt like it was 33. i arrived here in 2016, i had a full head of luxurious brown hair and that's that's what's happened over the last few years. now, nick mentioned he told me almost the first day i arrived on campus as the senior historian that i was going to be the lead historian for this liberation project. and, you know, that seemed l