steve bannon sat down in london. i was in the room with john nichols weight. here is what he had to say. -- john micklethwait. here is what he had to say. steve: i think the timing of it is very suspect. i have been out with these congressional house races. if president trump -- i've called this for many months for this to be his first reelect. if he loses the house of representatives, he will be impeached. they will bring impeachment hearings immediately. it is imperative that we keep

that is how steve bannon described it. he is going all in with the rhetoric. the birthright citizenship issue is another thing that he can throw out there in the final week of the election to steer the debate back to immigration and he fears even if legal scholars say he can't do this, that is where the focus is and thinks it will motivate his core supporters to turn out. >> you have a hell of a senate race out there, john. nevadans know a thing or two about immigration. how is it likely to go over there? >> immigration is the number one issue for republicans in the senate race making it counter intuitive to a lot of people. we are not a boarder state but there are a lot of undocumented workers here. when he ran in 2012, and remember when he ran in 2012 he has been appointed only winning by 12,000 and lost the hispanic vote 4-1. before he saw the results he was against anchor babies. he used that term. considered offensive. he was against the dream act and said birthright citizenship made less sense today than when the 14th amendment was passed. saw the changi

steve bannon, reince priebus. and rex tillerson from the administration, all of them -- gone. >> from the beginning, kushner was determined to position himself with trump. >> he said every big decision was going to come through him. asserting his primacy as main adviser to the president. >> the idea that a 36-year-old real estate executive who had never worked in government would hold such a role was sharply criticized. >> then president trump handed kushner a full plate of high-level assignments, stunning official washington. >> he was assigned to find peace in the middle east. to handle relations with china. with mexico. he put on a flack vest over his blue blazer and went to iraq. >> he set up the office of american innovation, he was going to solve the veterans affairs crisis. he was going to do an infrastructure plan. it became a joke that there was no problem in america that jared kushner was in the going to fix. >> many in the white house weren't laughing. in the early months of the administration, some sen

steve bannon, reince priebus. sean spicer and rex tillerson from the administration, all of them -- gone. >> from the beginning, kushner was determined to position himself with trump. >> he said every big decision was going to come through him. asserting his primacy as main adviser to the president. he was going to be the person at his side. >> the idea that a 36-year-old real estate executive who had never worked in government would hold such a role was sharply criticized. >> then president trump handed kushner a full plate of high-level assignments, stunning official washington. >> he was assigned to find peace in the middle east. to handle relations with china. with mexico. he put on a flack vest over his blue blazer and went to iraq. >> he set up the office of american innovation, he was going to solve the veterans affairs crisis. he was going to do an infrastructure plan. it became a joke that there was no problem in america that jared kushner was in the going to fix. >> many in the white house weren't laughi

it was also about different ideologies between jared kushner's and steve bannon's camp. >> kushner thought that bannon's populism he was pushing on the president was dangerous. and bannon thought that kushner was basely a new york democrat. in fact he referred to kushner and ivanka trump as the democrats. >> there was a real battle over the soul of what this white house was going to stand for. >> that battle became more urgent after the violent protests in charlottesville in aug2017. >> when donald trump defended the neo-nazis. >> very fine people on both sides. >> i think jared and ivanka felt that steve bannon was a toxic influence both on donald trump but also on the country. >> bannon meanwhile blamed kushner for supporting the president's decision to fire fbi director james comey. it was a controversial choice, but kushner's attorney confirms he supported it. >> he wasn't the one who drafted it or conceived of the concept. but it did come about, he definitely supported it. >> the firing led to the appointment of robert mueller as special counsel in part to investigate whether trump an

progressing, mueller's team is hearing things from other witnesses about let's say roger stone and steve bannono make sure that you're getting all the details right, it makes sense to go back, see the witness again, bring in bannon to meet with the investigators another time, a third time, however many times you need to find out what actually happened and to hear the account from as many different witnesses as possible and so i think what must have happened here is that some witness made reference to their being communications with bannon and then mueller's team said, let's get bannon back in and hear what happened. >> khan, it was two months ago that roger stone sent out a fund-raising email where he wrote, i'm next on the crooked special prosecutor's hit list because i have advised donald trump for the past 39 years. discounting that crazy claim that he's crooked, that mueller is crooked and, you hear this latest reporting. does it sound like stone's right that he might be next on the list? >> yeah, i think roger's instincts are right on that count. and -- >> what's the crime? what's the pote

>> reporter: as you pointed out, steve bannon went in.third day of interviews with the special counsel team, but this time "the washington post" reported that the questions the special counsel's team were regarding roger stone, of course the long-time political adviser to president donald trump. what this tells you is there is still an active investigation in mueller's team into whether roger stone may have communicated with wikileaks. we have learned another roger stone associate, jason sullivan, roger stone's social media he told "the wall street journal" even though we know he previously talked to the special counsel and previously gone before the grand jury he told "the wall street journal" that they're circling back again and has even more questions. again, this all gets back to roger stone's claims he was in touch with wikileaks. part of the stuff that jason sullivan has been asked about are conference calls that roger stone did for his paid subscribers in 2016. i want to read one thing he said. we know there are going to be many, m

steve bannon positioned himself as a hero of the alt-right, right? he did that. we didn't do that.hat was at a time when we thought the president didn't have really deep kind of grounded principles and policies. we thought that he was just kind of winging it and steve bannon was a man with a policy argument, that he had a sense of principles that he wanted to advance and he was grafting those on to the president. >> but, i mean, he's gone. >> he's gone. one thing about trump, once he says there's something i want, i've said it, no, he has to make it real and true regardless of whether or not that is something that is special to him or the nation or whomever, and once he says i believe in this he believes he must make it come true and be right. >> david you can draw a direct line from the vitriol and the caravan and the gunman in pittsburgh that referenced that and turned it into an attack on jews. >> i just want to say we have to be careful about having a discussion that is going to blame the president or another political leader for these acts of violence. in that way, tone does m

was it steve bannon who put this idea of nationalism in trump's head? >> i think that bannon was the one who distilled a set of policies into this idea of nationalism that trump took up during the 2016 campaign. it obviously proved very effective for him. although bannon has left the white house and is no longer as close to trump as he once was, if you look at the idea that trump is talking about in the stretch run of the campaign, they're being tough on china, being aggressive on trade and opposing tariffs and most prominently of all, demonizing immigrants like the caravan coming up through central america and using that as a motivator to inspire fear and terror and anger in a lot of voters. that's a recipe that worked well for trump in 2016 and i think it's one he's trying to replicate ahead of the november 6th elections. >> there's the fear that president trump is using and then there's the fear that the word nationalism brings up in a lot of other people. leah, it is a loaded word to put it mildly for a number of americans. put that into context for

another steve bannon-created fiction. why do i know it was steve bannon?here were only three people in the room, me, the president, steve bannon. i know michael lewis didn't interview the president and he didn't interview me, so who did he interview? that's it. it never happened. the present read a story on labor day weekend 2016 that we were having fund-raising problems with the transition. he calls from air force one and said, what are you raising, how much money? i said donald, remain calm, it is $1 million. $1 million. that's it. it's not a lot of money, and most of it is coming from my fundraising list, not even yours. i went to the apartment the next and and steve bannon was there for half the meeting. he walked in in the middle of it. all the president said to me was are you going to raise any? i said no. we had 140 people on staff. we had office space in washington, d.c. we did have some expenses. he did say to me he would like to shut down the transition. days from the60 election and we cannot shut down the transition. itnon jumped in and said wou

how much water does someone like steve bannon still hold in this argument?steve bannon's comments are really reflective of where the republican base and the republican leadership is at this moment. they know that the base is looking for a supreme court nominee to be put into the high court as soon as possible but behind the scenes, they say this whole process has actually stoked grievance among republican voters and the rage and outrage about the process on the right could be there regardless of how this actually plays out this week. >> interesting. pete, let's talk about the court itself. you have an argue talking about where the court is going and you interviewed a gentleman of georgetown law of how far right the kavanaugh nomination if he is confirmed will take the courts. lay that out for me. this is one of the more partisan supreme court nominees we've seen and it was certainly under scored last week when he started off his opening statement by pointing to the democrats and calling it clinton's revenge, et cetera. >> if brett kavanaugh is confirmed, the

but it now appears former trump adviser steve bannon played a role and so did ross lie?ing raising serious questions about wilbur ross's testimony before two house committees earlier this year when wilbur ross said it was not him or the white house that was involved with initiativing discussions about his citizenship question on the 2020 census. it was the justice department instead. now, this new filing suggests otherwise. it said that actually it was the former white house adviser, steve bannon, who had called wilbur ross and urged him to talk to the secretary of state about adding a citizenship question to the census. this early year when he was asked and a congressional hearing by a democratic congresswoman about whether or not the white house was involved, he said he didn't know and said the justice department began discussions over this topic. >> has the president or anyone in the white house discussed with you or anyone on your team about adding this citizenship question? >> i'm not aware of any such. we had a request as everyone is aware from the department of ju

they're lining up to praise you for ramming through the cavanaugh nomination and even the likes of steve bannon has prays what he called, your strong leadership. are you happy to have his approval serve? >> it's almost an out of body experience. [laughter] >>chris: but how do you take this criticism, the tea party, the far right of the republican party has had a view over the years. as you've been trying to do your business on capitol hill? >> it's pretty hard to be a majority leader without getting criticism. i'd rather be judged by my record. i think this has been and is ordinarily accomplished congress. the most productive to your. right of center whether it's taxes, regulations, we've gone the economy booming. and were making long-term systemic changes in the courts that will serve future generations of americans in a very good way. >>chris: i know there have been bipartisan accomplishments as well.you voted on in faa bill. you also did a big bill to fight the opioid crisis. but there's no question that this brett kavanaugh confirmation battle has come at a cost, the relations between repub

so call now. >>> president trump's former chief strategist, steve bannon, met once again with robert and his team on friday. this is at least the third time he has met him. the washington post reporting that bannon was asked about private comments that long-time trump associate roger stone has made about wikileaks, specifically if he had advanced warning about the hillary clinton e-mails. >> and whether there was a coordination in terms of the timing of the leaking of these e-mails. so for roger stone in part he denies any coordination with the gro group. stone is beefing up his own legal team. he has hired a prominent attorney who recently worked for the trump organization. an expert is here to discuss. we'll get to the legal team that roger stone is building up in a moment. but first to your point about the washington post reporting that bannon was specifically asked about private claims by stone regarding wikileaks ahead of the release of the hacked remar e-mails. bannon said don't believe everything you need. >> yes, yes. but i'm not surprised. mueller is now focussing on the wiki

another steve bannon-created fiction. why do i know it was steve bannon? because there were only three people in the room. it was me, the president and steve bannon. and i know that michael lewis didn't interview the president, and he didn't interview me, so who'd he interview, you know? let's see, one, two -- yeah, that's it. never happened. the president read a story labor day weekend 2016 that we were having a fund raiser for the transition. he called me from trump force one and said how much money are you raising? i said, donald, it's a million dollars. it's a million dollars, that's it. it's not a lot of money. and most of it is coming from my fundraising list. not even yours. so just remain calm, it's okay. he goes, all right, well, come to the apartment tomorrow, let's talk about it so i know what's going on. so i did go to the apartment the next day, and steve bannon was there for half the meeting. he walked in in the middle of it. all the prime minister said to me was -- president said to me was are you going to raise any more? i said, no, we've g

i saw the interview between john micklethwait and steve bannon. sit down with the head of global level management for deutsche bank, fabrizio campelli. i asked him about this greatest wealth transfer in history we are undergoing. do you know who is at the heart of it?pesky millennials like you. i learned you like to be catered to a little bit differently. fabrizio: regulation is causing us to become more of a channel, as opposed to having the likely overlapping role as a chairman, distributor. it is causing us to be more product neutral than we were. this means we need to reinvent ourselves for new clients as a competitive channel in the face of many competing channels. we become a lot more product neutral. essentially, if you apply this to all wealth managers, it is a challenge to the suppliers who need to decide how to correct distribution methods. jason: does that change the way you structure teams? does it change the way that people are deploying into various parts of the world? fabrizio: very much. they are fundamentally different clients. ev

. >>> and as steve bannon appears for a second time before the special counsel. >> when you see mueller with the conflicts, he's so conflicted. >> congressman adam schiff on the foiled far right plot to undermine the mueller probe when "all in" starts right now. >>> good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. one week before the crucial mid term elections from the president down is growing ever more desperate. donald trump and the gop have controlled the government for almost two years but with apparently little to show for it, they are engaging in an increasingly reckless, indeed dangerous gamut. they are throwing red meat to their most rabid supporters instead of running on their record. something donald trump almost certainly cannot legally do. yesterday the administration announced plans to send 5200 u.s. troops to the border potentially stationing up to 14,000 there because of migrant mothers and children, almost 900 miles away, coming on foot to ask for asylum. before that it was donald trump's promise to pass a fictitious tax cut for the middle class even though congress won't b

steve bannon was behind this. also in embrace of steve bannon''s idea of nationonalism.egardless of he may say this is not ethnic nationalism, , white nationalism, it is sending a very distincnct message and drawing a very distitinct messae at a p point in time where nationalalism is on the rise in the country, but so is violence around nationalism, ethnic nationalism, white nationalism. so in a way, this is drawn back which wasrategy, quite effective for him, which is a rallying cry to all of these people around the country, this base, that put them in office, that elected him at a time when in the midterms where he is really pushing a cultural , because there's so much else to go on. it has worked for him in the past. it is a calling card. here he is reviving it. the other interesting point, he is doing so at a time when steve bannon is no longer officially associated with t the white hou, with the t trump admdministrati. ties does tell y you those are still there, but so is the ideology that is pulling through. it is s a message to o e base, i am here for you, i stand

we know they are scrutinizing every comment roger stone made in that time, so steve bannon coming in is significant not just because we know they're focused on roger stone, but because he was actually running trump's campaign and that's the big question here, was there collusion between the trump campaign and russia? vis-a-vis wikileaks. >> and david, before i let you go, your final thought on this bizarre effort that's clearly of interest in washington to try to frame bob mueller? >> you know, i think we still need to figure this out. it could be that the original letter was some sort of hoax to hook in reporter, to report in something that wasn't true, but your guest coming on and saying she too was approached and there's a surefire outfit that really seems to be a bogus intelligence gathering outfit run by people who are completely unprofessional, there's a lot more here. reminds me of the peter smith effort. remember that during the campaign? >> which rachel covered a lot. >> to try to get the hillary clinton e-mails from russian hackers. there are all these players out there. we

one, is he's got steve bannon on his shoulder whispering in his ear and breitbart and steve bannon have been longtime tribunes for white nationalism. and trump has never hesitated to separate himself from those. remember, he was questioned probably three years ago about david duke. and whether or not he would disavow duke and the kkk and sort of backed away from that. the other thing to remember is he has a long history of race baiting. going back to the 1980s. during the central park jogger case. he jumped into the middle of that. he took out big page ads in "the new york times," sensationalizing race to insert himself in a high-profile moment and make hay off it by sensationalizing race and being a racist. i think now he's going into the midterms. he understands that the base that got him elected in 2016 is still the base he needs now. and that is precodominantly whi, predominantly male and non-college educated and doing racist dog whistles to it appeal to them. >> it's not a coincidence this comes as he doubles down on the hard-line immigration rhetoric. the embracing of the word nat

they are also listening to people like steve bannon. they're trying to figure out when stone said publicly. this is a way of testing what he said in confidence. that also tells us about what knowledge -- possibly what knowledge people had wherein these e-mails released when they were released by roger stone, and it could also be people in the pain that he created. i need you to talk about it. if americans are willing to take about what russia has done to the united states and what their role is in our politics. >> the heart of this question and the heart of the special counsel investigation is the degree to which the campaign colluded with a former aide and did so with an effective campaign staff. when you talk about roger stone, they thought they were doing things to help. greatly appreciated. >>> coming up from all of us with one week to go aimed directly at an audience about sending the u.s. military to our southern border. "the 11th hour" just starting on a sunday night. place, the xfinity xfi gateway. and it's strengthened by xfi p

ameritrade. ♪ >>> new developments in the russia investigation, former white house strategist, steve bannonterviewed for the third time. joining us now is federal prosecutor and cnn's chief legal analyst, jeffrey toobin. based on our own reporting, what bannon has been asked about is roger stone, and he's a political figure who was an adviser, and he has been involved in republican politics all the way up to the trump campaign and very close at times to the president. what might robert mueller's team want to know about roger stone? >> i think we know what they want to know, and the question is are they going to build an actual case around it. roger stone in the peak period of the campaign was bragging about what wikileaks or somebody was going to disclose about the clinton campaign, that he apparently knew or claimed to know that the hacked e-mails from the dnc, from john podesta, clinton's former campaign chair, were going to be released and the question is was he an actual intermediary between the trump campaign and the russians. >> what if he did talk to wikileaks, and what if he did kno

on friday mueller's team questioned steve bannon, trump's former chief kpcampaign strategt about theked by russian operatives. this phil rucker, seems to be the story that a lot of people were expecting that would confirm, robert mueller, who's already charged 13 russians with a conspiracy to effect and impact the 2016 election is simply looking for one more dot to connect the trump campaign or trump's associates would that conspiracy, this would seem to be it. the stolen e-mails and timing of their release and their knowledge of that. >> potentially. and mueller has really zeroed in on roger stone, the president's former political adviser who had actually boasted about his interactions and knowledge of wikileaks, honed in on that. he's not only interviewed steve bannon, by the way, he's interviewed other -- special counsel team interviewed other stone associates including gentleman roam corsi, a known conspiracy theorist, according to bob cafosta and others at th post. it shows how much mueller is doing. we think he's gone dark because there have not been public announcements or big

and now it appears steve bannon played a role.pondent has more from capitol hill. >> new filing raising serious questions about wilbur ross pfsz testimony. before two house committees earlier this year when he it was not -- raising questions on the 2020 census. it was the justice department instead. now this new department filing suggests that actually the former white house advisor, steve bannon who called wilbur ross and speak about adding a citizenship question to that census. now earlier this year when he was asked by a a democratic congressman about whether or not he was involvedpub he said he didn't know andess it was the justice department that began discussion can over this topic. >> has anyone discussed you or with anyone on the team add a thing citizenship question? >> i'm not aware oas search. we have had a suggestion to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. >> now in the aftermath of this rev larksz democrats jumping all over this. including the top democrat who issued a statement going after will ross and the

steve bannon in pella iowa he was there before sarah palin running for president and she did not. and the middle class has been destroyed by the local economy from 2008. and charles lindbergh. and the republican party will reach did not even know trump was on the horizon. because the global economy got its people the ideology and connection to the republican virtue 2013 in both long - - beverly hills and bernie sanders he sounded so much like bernie sanders. and the future of american politics will be nationalism idea on the left. and then to got the middle class. so bannon in 2011 and then bernie sanders and then in a thematic way it was all driven by this anger of what had happened in 2008. and then to step back as hearing from the historians or even in control as reporters perk - . but to dominate too much. and with that advantage of what was changing the country or the world is moving in a new direction. and then to say in a bigger ship. it with a wide range of sources the youtube channels that dwarfed those additional outlets so they are going to war but this is a little simp

among them, former white house strategist steve bannon, who was interviewed by mueller's team last friday, for at least the third time. the "washington post" reporting bannon was asked about comments stone made privately in 2016 about wikileaks. it was just before wikileaks released emails prosecutors say were hacked by russian operatives. this past january, bannon called the infamous meeting between trump campaign officials and russians, quote, treasonous. >>> stocks rebound tuesday big time. the dow rose 432. the nasdaq and broader s&p 500 up 1.6%. investors relieved to hear president trump comment tuesday that he is willing to negotiate with china on a trade pact. markets had tumbled monday on fears that the trump administration would impose a new round of tariffs on china. but the month of october, overall folks closed it out, truly ugly. the dow down 6%. the nasdaq down 11, the s&p 500 down 8%. worst month since 2008. we all remember how horrible that was. end-of-the-world horrible. the problems with the market, the idea of peak earnings here, tax brackets the fade, interest rates ar

steve bannon sat down in london. i was in the room what john micklethwait. re is what he had to say. steve: i think the timing of it is very suspect. i have been out with these congressional house races. if president trump -- i've called this for many months for this to be his first relaxed. if you loses the house of representatives, he will be impeached. they will bring impeachment hearings immediately. it is imperative that we keep the house. we finally start -- reporter: john: virtually every pollster would tell you that looks highly unlikely. steve: we went from 60 seats down to 30. now i think it is wrong 25 to 30, which means we have a narrow gate. to get to that 23, there is a very narrow gate you have to go through, but it is doable. the kavanaugh hearings give us traction for the first time to try to, against all odds, just like in 2016, to close strong and say that. nikki haley's timing was horrific. it reinforced i think with republican women that donald trump is someone you don't want to back. john: do you think nikki haley is aiming herself to be

we will turn attention to steve bannon and stoking populist sentiments in europe. reporter: he is trying to bring the populace to power in the european elections, even creating his own club in britain. he is not hiding his intentions in an interview where he says he break up europe. and you have a big world cup star -- what is up with him? reporter: he continues to throw football fans with his club. 5-0 in the league match thanks to quadruple goals, four and 13 minutes to be precise. it's a personal best for him. frenchlso time for the sports page. and just to wrap up now, i happy ending for devastated star wars lego fan? reporter: he is a huge fan, his passions spanning 14 years. man's last collection took 10 months to build. they broke into his home and the parisian suburbs. and they left all the valuables. and then he posted a cheery video online. they set up a video. not bringat this will back his collection, but he can build a new one. genie: thanks for helping us with what these papers of and saying. you can get a closer look, of course, at this on her websit

those posters exist and a lot of people have them and not every single person in a steve bannon mobile is going to end up sending bombs. that's what i meant by we need to sit back and look at the larger cultural issue and look at what is going on. >> i agree. but communicating a threat is a crime. and i question whether putting hillary clinton's face on the side of your van with a big bull's eye over it is not communicating a crime or something darn close. >> we'll come back in a moment. sean, henry, thank you for joining me. the rest of the panel will stick around. >>> coming up, persistent conspiracy theories and how to tie him to the fringe. theorieso tie him to the fringe. >>> though we're stinl analyzing the devices in our laboratory, these are not hoax devices. >> fbi director christopher wray trying to put an end to the conspiracy theory that has been raised, quote, fake news, fake bombs, who could possibly benefit from so much fakery? rush limbaugh is not backing down after the arrest of the suspect, rush limbaugh is casting doubt on the suspect's van. >> none of the stuff on t

post" reporting that on friday robert mueller's team questioned trump's former chief strategist steve bannoning bannon's third sitdown with the special counsel's team. he was reportedly asked about comments that long-time trump associate roger stone is said to have made privately about wikileaks in 2016. prior to their release of hacked democratic e-mails. joining me with more is nbc news intelligence and national security reporter ken dilanian. >> this is about roger stone, stephanie, in this case. as you said, bannon has said he was asked about comments stone made in private in which he appeared to have advanced knowledge of moves wikileaks was making to leak democratic e-mails. the special counsel over the last few weeks has been zeroing in on stone and associates. examining evidence that stone act acted as a conduit with the trump campaign. it's opened the door with a question of conspiracy to interfere in the election. it seems to be about roger stone. >> i must ask you about this. a new report that robert mueller has asked the fbi to investigate a possible scheme against him, false sex

it is a grass roots movement, but given the sebastian gorka's, steve bannons, what's his name, steven white, who is on, you know, family, disowns him, this is a bottom-up and a top-down movement simultaneously. it is mass and elite and there are very few phenomenons in political science that catch on in that way. we need to evaluate what this means for citizenship. because they're making a claim about authentic citizens. and again, this is the nationalistic claim, and simultaneously making a claim about the state as anethma to the goals of their movement, so trying to reconcile those two. the cultural logics may be the same or similar or at least have the same effect as some of those movements that we consider less fringe, like the tea party, but maybe we should consider them more fringe. what does this mean for the media and voter theory? what is the average politician now then trying to appeal to? if we have these far right extremist movements, politicians tend to, you know, appeal to the median voter. how does this move right, left? and what does this mean for the party system in t

then i keep going back to this conversation i had with steve bannon last night -- not last night, lastwe talked about the fact that i am not part of the resistance. he said, because of my race and my gender, i cannot go to a trump rally in a red state because i am perceived as the enemy. >> bannon said that? >> bannon told me that last week. we had a -- i talked to him for two hours. i hear all of this higher thinking and how we should be, the ideal of what we should be. the reality is that i am perceived as not the base. i am perceived at the enemy. the exchanges come at me. we can play this game of how it should be. what it really is is what it really is. >> brian, your thoughts? >> how it really is -- they don't like me at those rallies. i went to west virginia where they came up to me and said, fake media, i hate cnn, i hate jim acosta. they said, can i have an autograph? will he take a picture with me? >> it's complicated. >> your perception cannot drive the coverage. we have to be there no matter whether we are black, white, brown, male, female. we're going to be there. >> that's

steve bannon spoke about so openly and promoted inside the white house.the president is veering towards that when you look at his trade policy and a whole bunch of other stuff. so i think that here, you know, when jim acosta rightly asked him about the question of white, you know, white nationalists. the president seems a little confused and put off by it and i do think you know what he is thinking about, is economic nationalism. >> how do you see it? >> i think there is the nationalism definition. when he talks about globalism. i think there is an anti-semitic tinge to that, washington, maybe not coming from the president, himself, it goes back to the 20th concept of ruthless cosmopolitan. the president overhears, i think, discussions in the white house among his aids and tries to boil it down in front of a crowd and winds up with this sort of incomplete definition as you described it, misquoting nationalism and globalism. i think in the end, it's all designed to frame things as an us versus a them. he wants to be the jack nicholson character in that mov

you had steve bannon on in august. he talked about how he wanted to communicate a message that the house is about impeachment. this is donald trump's first re-elect. the president has started to say he has to walk a fine line on this. he can't say if i lose the line i'm impeached because he will be impeached. >> he brought up the supreme court and said they will try to impeach kavanaugh and then me next. >> liz, i'm going to get you back in. you ever notice how these consultants walk a line because they talk credit. i sort of wrote the tweet. if you say that was your idea. they no, donald trump all hail is great. these are his ideas. >> seems like it's a win win. >> it is, i guess. one quick thing, for us a red wave for us the president had the stop communicating this because it was hurting us in focus groups. we can't say we're going to win house seats. we have to hold theese seats. >> hold what you have. >> let me bring in swellenore. >> i don't think hannity/republican party shift is as significant as the shifts wit

stephen bannon is accused of step a time she democratic regimes -- steve bannon is .ccused of bolsonaro has been the last 30 years doing this in brazil. amy: haddad and bolsonaro are set to face off in the final round of elections on october 28. in afghanistan, the taliban is claiming an attack thahat killed top afghan general abdbdul raziq along with a top intelligencnce chief, in the southern p provine of kandahar. top u.s. general scott miller was also a target of the attack but survived uninjured. general raziq was seen by u.s. forces as essential in maintaining a level of stability in kandahar. raziq has also been accused of corruption, drug smuggling, and major human rights abuses including killings and torture. the killings have prompted the delay of an upcoming parliamentary vote in kandahar. israel's supreme coururhas overturned u.s. student lara alqasem's deportation order, granting her the right to stay and study in israel. alqasem, who is of palestinian descent, was held at israel's ben gurion airport for over two weeks after arriving in the country toto start a master's pro

man, it is not easy to be the craziest person in a meeting with steve bannon and steven miller. [ lightalthough in fairness to dobbs, when the meeting started it was just supposed to be bannon, but then miller burst out of his chest. [ laughter ] so dobbs -- [ applause ] so dobbs is one of many prominent conservatives on tv and social media spreading baseless conspiracy theories. and even before the suspect was identified, he was on tv blaming democrats for violence against republicans. although watch as he tries to get through this segment, has trouble reading, and just gives up. >> be sure to vote in our poll tonight. do you believe it's time for democratic leaders to denounce acts of violence against republicans as president trump -- targeted prominent -- targeted democrats -- cast your vote on twitter @loudobbs. >> seth: oh my goodness. [ laughter ] sounds like grandpa took too much lunesta. [ laughter ] "grandpa! the bottle's empty!" so this is what the president is consuming all day, and then turning around, and spewing to his audience. in fact, just hours before an arrest was mad

." >> narrator: even s abrasive adviser steve bannon was stunned. >> of all people, steve bannon is the one in the room who's saying, "you can't get rid of this guy jim comey. this would be a terrible, terrible mistake. it's going to cause a firestorm." >> narrator: although trump had the executive power to fire comey, bannon foresaw dire political consequences. o bannon has more of a sense of history than a lthe people who are in that white house. and so, he knows the history of watergate. and he alsknows about obstruction of justice, and what it could look like if trump fires come >> there's no way mcgahn saysnt that this docuan be used as the basis for firing jim comey-- "no way, no how, give me the document." >> narrator: the white house counsel had an alter. >> mcgahn had separately learned that rod rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, also had concerns with jim comey. and he brokers this deal. so he bacally says to the president, you know, "mr. president, you don't need to send that. you should really talk to rod rosenstein." narrator: they set up a meeting between rosenstein,

but steve bannon basically said that this is about the presidency. it's not about brett kavanaugh.is like the referendum on the president before the midterms or before even the next election, presidential election. so much is riding on this. he says that if, indeed, they do not get brett kavanaugh, this could spell impeachment for the president because they would definitely lose the house and the senate. so this is bigger than the issue of brett kavanaugh, and mitch mcconnell understands that. he's trying to rush it through to make sure that he can get it done or try to get it done. so it's not necessarily about brett kavanaugh. it's about a strategy to make sure that they win. >> got it. alice, i think i told you this last night, that this was too big a thing that they needed a campaign promise that this president wants to keep, and that would probably end up with a justice kavanaugh. and that's what april is saying right now. do you think he has the votes, though -- mitch mcconnell? >> i think he does. and, look, it's not just president trump that campaigned on scalia-like justic

he wrote -- "it was a pleasure to meet steve bannon, strategist in donald trump's presidential campaign. we had a great conversation and we share the same worldview and we are certainly in touch to join forces, especially against cultural marxism." the significance of whahat eduao said? important think it is that the meeting in brazil was -- media in brazil was for trying them as a progressive candidate as far left. but when he was the mayor of sao paulo, actually what he did was he built several day cares and more than 30 hospitals and he tried to make traffic in the city better. for example, having infrastructure for bikes when he was ministry of education under the lula administration. he created more than 18 new universities, more than 300 new campuses, and there was much , fellowships for education at all levels. so, you know, he comes from an education background. ofdoesn't come from any type extreme left background. so what we have now is a very extreme fascist candidate running against a moderate candidate. our hope now is three other progressive candidates have said they would