steve bing gave nearly $14 million in 2004. democrats in terms of rich democratic donors in 2004, way outpace the republicans. but this time they are sitting on the sidelines, george soros has given $2 million. peter lewis, $200,000 and steve bing, $425,000 compared with $14 million before. why aren't big campaign donors who can make a difference in terms of personal decisions on what to do on campaign related spending as individuals, why are they sitting on their hands on the democratic side so far? are they waiting for something and they get in later? do they think it's hopeless because yeah, maybe they are rich guys but not the koch brothers and will be outspent no matter what they do? is the post citizens united thunderdome created by the supreme court so inherently distasteful with democratic politics they don't want to play in that dirty game anymore? those of us thinking bg what it means for our country, the likely outcome of the election, it seems like an important question, an important part of the procs. but for the p

steve bing, $425,000 compared to $14 million before. so why aren't big dollar democratic campaign donors the people who can really make a difference in terms of their personal decisions of what to do on campaign spending as individuals or campaign related spending as individuals, why are they sitting on their hands on the democratic side so far? are they waiting for something and they're going to get it later? do they want attention they're not getting from the president? do they think it's hopeless because yeah, maybe they're rich guys but they're not the koch brothers and they never will be? is the post citizens united political zillionaire thunderdome so inherently distasteful that people don't want to play in that dirty game anymore? for those of us who are watching this from the outside, reporting on it, observing on it, thinking abouwhat it means for the country, the likely outcome of the election, it seems like an important question. an important part of the process. but for the people who are inside making these decisions, how d

binge. pregnant women between the ages of 35 and 44 were the biggest drinkers. >>> when we come back, our first look at ashton kutcher as steve jobs cht ♪ [ male announcer ] for our families... our neighbors... and our communities... america's beverage companies have created a wide range of new choices. developing smaller portion sizes and more low- & no-calorie beverages... adding clear calorie labels so you know exactly what you're choosing... and in schools, replacing full-calorie soft drinks with lower-calorie options. with more choices and fewer calories, america's beverage companies are delivering. . >>> okay, you going to' the movie? ashton kutcher channelling steve jobs. >> these are photos tmz got. most is being shot at loyola. shooting began in los altos last month. >> we'll see you at 6:00. >> good night. >>> on our broadcast tonight, outbreak. out of nowhere a warning from doctors about whooping cough, the worst they've seen in more than 50 years. highly contagious, potentially dangerous, and tonight what is behind the surge. >>> spending scandal. another black eye tonight for the agency that is supposed to keep g

steve bought on behalf of microsoft a faw percent of the company. but the key thing more strategic than that is that as we are making binge innovative we work with facebook and we're able to share information so they, they see google as a competitor. we see google as a competitor and are doing a lot of innovation that brings together the strength of the two companies. >> rose: so if you look at apple and you look at google and you look at amazon and you look at facebook, these are-- and you look at microsoft, these are the giants that are going to decide the future. and what's the goal. what will be the golden ring for these companies? >> well, in the end it's always about the applications, you know, can kids learn in a fun way. can you track your health and keep yourself healthier. can you stay in touch with your relatives and the people you care about in a neat way. at the end of the day it's that application. we're seeing an education now, another wave of people trying to take horses and make them interactive and get lots of people to try and use those things. making the device more natural, having it work with your tv set, your phone, that's all to g

. >> steve: he's trying to reduce the am of liquor people can drink? >> brian: something to avoid bingen on it in some type of way. >> gretchen: i just feel like this -- >> brian: this is why you don't give a mayor a third term. >> gretchen: dads can relate. when off newborn at home and they're screaming at the top of their lungs, you might want to be able to get your hands on a little bit of formula. it's already going to add to the stress of being a new mom in the hospital or a new dad who is trying to console the child. i think it should be up to the person to decide what they want to feed their own kid. >> steve: suitly. this time i think he's -- i think he crossed the line before. he crossed the line this time easily. there are as gretch mentioned, some women who can't do it. some women who don't get the time off to do it and others don't want to do it. he's essentially mandating you got to do it or you'll get lectured. >> brian: am i the only one not feeling comfortable with this conversation? >> gretchen: you're the only one admitting it. >> brian: i am totally uncomfortable with