steve forbes, always good to have you, thank you, sir? >> thank you. lou: breaking news now, a dangerous escalation of tensions in the middle east. a senior official confirms to fox news thatcon components of a surface-to-air missile have been sighted in syria. russia is sending advanced antiaircraft missiles to syria. this now confirms that that fear has taken effect. >>> the united states says russia's intentions are not clear, they certainly should be clear to anyone at least when it comes to surface-to-air missiles. don't you think? >>> be sure to vote in our poll tonight. do you believe a low energy candidate has a chance of winning the republican nomination for president? we'd like to hear from you on that issue. cast your vote at loudobbs.com. >>> an italian man taking a hands-on approach to solving his parking problems. surveillance video, you got to have surveillance video, and this one shows the man returning to find his car boxed into a tight spot on the street, so he did what any man would do. he lifted it. he moved it, away from the curb a

governor who wants to let cities raise the minimum wage as a way to get rid of that income disparity, steve forbesa ceo and jack barons senior editor. so, steve, i think these minimum wage hikes could be very bad for the people that they're supposed to help by putting a lot of folks out of work, which they've done in other places that have been tried. however, shouldn't cities be allowed if they want to experiment with the idea of raising minimum wage >> no. because they're part of a stoot. and if the state determines this is going to hurt the business climate, they shouldn't do it. especially the kind of minimum wage increases they're talking about, that hurts those who have the least. people who have the least need to get the job skills, they need to learn to show up on time, work with other people, and then they move up. research shows that one year after you get a job at minimum wage, you're getting -- paid above the minimum wage. so what this is a reaction to is the fact that real wages in this country are going down, so they're trying to do by legislation what free markets could do if allowe

let's go in focus to find out what steve forbes, rich, sabrina, carrie, john, and mark. sabrina, is this a way to force sanctuary cities to obey the law? >>. >> i think it might be. it's a way to remind people that the state law might not like to admit that, but that's the case. what's really interesting is that a new -- your survey research out of uc befshgly shts not the home of conservatism show that there is widespread opposition to these saipg wear cities that crosses political lindz, it crosses ethnic lines. >> her brother makes a powerful point. >> this is a tragic situation, but this is another example of what is happening in court and also what's happening in congress to essentially criminalize immigration. this is a civil matter. we need to tighten up on some of the holes in immigration, but we should not basically fall into the trap that all immigrants are criminals. there is an element in congress that would like us to believe that because somebody is in the country illegally, they are criminal. >> the politicians are diterring on kate's law. politicians are

for 6 plus years, what does that tell us about the state we're in anded the word, and weigh in steve forbes and raia, steve, i am starting with you. how important is the economy in in election right now? is that going to be the decider? >> it is the big issue. even in debate last night, you had more substantive discussion, the economy is still not forefront in the way it should be with proposal they have on the table did not get dealt into. the economy is critical. in 2014, median incomes fell again, the question is what do we do about it. the fed is part of the problem. trish: let's talk about what the fed did, what was nothing. i have been warning of this, you heard me, saying they are not going to do a darn thing. they don't move at all. probably are not going to move in december either. why is that? >> or october. >> or october. >> right. >> they have october and december to do this year. i think we learned today surprise today is that we learned that fed is unlikely to move for the rest of the year. the external conditions are weak, with china, and the emerging markets, europe and japa

joining us for an exclusive, steve forbes, chairman and editor and chief of "forbes." >> welcome backe. >> good to be with you, thank you. >> only worth $4.5 billion. where does that are come from and exaggeration comes from besides his, of course, personality and ego? >> well, i think the biggest difference is in terms of how he values his brand. we don't use brand value in terms of our valuations because we figure if you have some brand value, you're going to find a way to monetize it. until you do we don't count it. he -- i thinks -- he brand values over $3 billion in his estimation. we have a piece in the issue where we consult brand experts about what they think his brand is worth and they range anywhere from 0 to $1.1 billion. so in terms of the real estate side we're lower than what he values it as but the big difference is the brand. he counts it, we don't until you monetize it. >> so you're literally marking him to market, which he's not doing, and what do you -- >> good way to put it. >> what do you think of his empire right now? is it mostly real estate or, you know, where

steve forbes is with us today. >> very exciting. first back to stocks. the dow down over 200 points. look at that, 272, as the closing bells sound on wall street. david: okay, well, as wall street ends the day, here's where everything else is ending up as we look down. nasdaq had been leading us down in the markets over the past couple of weeks, not so today, but meanwhile, let's get an overview what happened today. it was a very interesting one, starting at 8:30 when we got the jobs report. again the unemployment rate came down a couple of ticks but the expectations were for a much stronger growth of jobs. we were off about 45,000 jobs from where we thought we'd be. gary kozlowski watching the pits from chicago. adam shapiro's today's biggest winners and losers and lori rothman. tell us what happened? it looked like we were going to recover. the market down 350. they began to recover, we were in the 100 range at about half hour ago, but traded down towards the end of the day? >> let me just set the scene by reminding everybody chinmarkets were closed. s

maybe smaller less complicated but still very much the same. >> well, i'm glad steve forbes wouldn't present because if he's president, he wouldn't be able to do forbes on fox. >> thanks, steve. >> and now al-qaeda targeting some of america's most successful business leaders. details on who is included on the hit list. and hillary clinton finally apologizing. the interview and she said something that wasn't exactly true . . . . . . we live in a world of mobile technology, but it is not the device that is mobile, it is you. david: al qaeda's new hit list. notorious magazine for the terrorist organization calling for lone wolf attacks on u.s. economic leaders including buff but and bill gates. here is peters brooks from the hair tan foundation. former deputy assistant secretary of defense. peter, we're just two days away from 9/11. we remember benghazi, 2012. is that what they're planning for, some kind of anniversary terrorist act? >> i'm sure that would suit them in their own twisted sort of way, david. the fact of the matter al qaeda is also competing with the islamic state which is

steve forbes joining me there. chairman and editor in chief of "forbes" magazine. you are now looking at the airplane landing here. jfk international airport. he is going to be arriving in new york city. he addressed a joint session of congress earlier. >> the challenges facing us today call for a renewal of that speed of cooperation. >> congressmen key is with me now that pennsylvania. he was in the joint session. congressman, you are a devout catholic. what do jamaica the pope's comments? >> is a very historic day for us in congress. the first pope in history to address congress. but all that back to st. peter and to be there when he walked into the chamber, the mood, the atmosphere was electric. his speech covered and i lost track of how many topics with a very broad agenda he wanted to talk about. >> we are seeing shots here live at jfk. the pope is arriving here in new york. i mentioned you are a devout catholic, congressmen, but also a career politician. he lost track of the different subjects he was covering. why did you make of this town and how we addresse

trish: steve forbes talks about the gold standard. you talk about some kind of basket of commodities you can peg all of this too. is deflation the real worry right now? ashley webster as we confront a environment where there is no inflation whatsoever? >> certainly is an argument for that. what do we have right now? 1.2%. all money has not pushed it up higher. loyer oil prices not helping. with the global economy clearly slowing down that is a consideration for the fed. that is a big one. >> i want to continue the conversation. i know you have to run. jonathan, art, steve, stick with me as we talk about commodities. china fears basically weighing on oil here. three days of hefty gains you're saying sayonara too. 46.46 a barrel. what do we expect going forward? dan stesich from cme and steve moore, art hogan with us. dan, as you watch traders in the pits sell all this stuff and as we approach final minutes of trading for oil, is this something that you anticipate will continue despite the upside earlier in the week in the last few trad

steve forbes is with us right now. the pope is doing a mass at cathedral of saint matthew, that was the cathedral i might recall and for a lot of you recall are of a certain age the funeral mass for john kennedy after his assassination in november 1963. but back to steve forbes and the significance and the controversy over these papal remarks at the white house. what did you make of it? >> well, first of all, weather's been changing for four billion years on the earth, where do you apply resources that most help people? climate change, so-called man made climate change, the dollars you have to spend are hundreds and hundreds of billions. wouldn't that money be used for malaria vaccinations, clean up water in africa and elsewhere where millions of kids die each year. neil: we might not have human beings if we don't address that right now. >> there's no evidence of that at all. in terms of of the science behind it, it is still undetermined. and so when you don't have real science backing it up, are you going to spend all

steve forbes, alan keys got 52,000 -- it's only increase period. the media covers trump because the american public are looking for somebody who's big and bold. they don't want small. the problem with all of the other republicans is that they seem small compared to donald trump. >> to pick up on matt's point, bill, donald trump will start to fall only if he gets warning -- >> look, we did a poll of weekly standard readers, only 15% are for trump. our readers aren't that pro-trump. we also asked them, are you happy or unhappy that trump is in the race? 64% are happy in the race. people happy he's shaking things up. i think the one -- there are three outsiders are running. trump, ben carson, carly fiorina is one of the three of the outsiders who's a plausible nominee. >> what matt said, what is big in american politics? a billionaire bully beating on big politics. i predict that trump will never become boring. but i think he's reached his limit. with all due respect to donna, ben carson is quiet. he's a certified extremists. he wants to bar immigrant

alexander was the flavor at that moment, in 1999 at nine at this point time we're talking about steve forbes and all the money he was bringing to the race. 2003 a was three was howard dean, you get my point. are we over analyzing trump and sanders? >> let me start with trump and then i'll go to sanders. for trump there is something he is doing, i agree with what people are saying, he it's different than what we have seen before. it's not that he's just able to set the agenda by playing by a different set up rule, it is fascinating to watch the candidates around him. it's like watching kids on the playground when one kid comes in and starts doing something differently and winning whatever game it is, kickball, whatever, all the kids who had been playing for a long time say, it's not fair. you're not playing by the rules. we had rules and you not play by them. >> that was july. >> i think jeb bush that that in july. >> so he has been a master of that, there's there's also things i've never seen before. i see the reason why cabinets are on the show is we have a feeling we can't go any further,

steve forbes. please state your occupation and qualifications for the testimony today. we've been following the federal reserve since its inception. my grandfather wrote about the federal reserve in 1912, 19 of the senate was created in 1913 but the mechanism is put in place before that so we've been following for a number of years and the we co-authored a book called money on how the federal reserve is made worse not better >> the economic crisis like the great depression in the 1970s and the recent debacle is caused by government mistakes they printed the terrible inflation and wreaked havoc around the world. in the early 1980s they stopped it. people say that he's the head of the fed didn't he stop the inflation tax us and then he put it out. but why set the fire in the first place? and do you have it as john ellison pointed out in the early part of the last decade would when he created excess money that led to the commodity bubble into the housing bust and then the other thing that is recognized as since the crisis of 2008, 2009 if the principal reason why we have t

whether it's steve forbes who didn't hold public office, or a ronald reagan who was a california governord been outside of washington. in fact, even in 1968, when we had a consummate insider nominated by the republicans, richard nixon, he made his argue. that the insiders were nelson rockefeller and the eastern republicans. so, what makes this one different is that we have got three people who have never held office before. >> karl, i went if you went out there and asked whether governors are insiders or outsiders, i bet most american people would call them insiders. i bet they would call president bush 43. his family had a very deep political history. i think they would call him an insider and governor romney an insiders a well. maybe they are not as far out as the current ones. >> i disagree, greta. i mean, that's one of the ways that they won the nomination was not by not being the insider, look, people are angry today, i get that let's also put this in perspective. today, 72% of the american people are dissatisfied with the direction of the government. 77% were that in june of 2012. a

but also to echo david chalian's point, ross perot, steve forbes, john mccain, they ran for president and didn't go so well. >> ross perot went out for different reasons. when he dropped out, he was number one. bill clinton was number three. after ross dropped, bill clinton chose al gore and his fortunes changed. i think david has a really interesting point, not just the business dealings, not just the companies themselves. they have to reveal a lot of financial records and they can often be used against rich candidates and business candidates. it's one of the reason that you don't see them step up and say i'm willing to be dominated of this or that. they don't want to put all of it out. >> mitt romney's return in 2012, the low tax rate, cayman islands. >> there's going to be a lot of questions before this is over. >> chris christie went after trump and fiorina together for talking about their business careers so much. listen to how he put it. >> i'm as entertained as anyone by this personal back and forth about the history of donald and carly's career for the 55 construction worker o

steve forbes spent $150 million, a very wealthy man. i don't think donald trump will spend a billion dollars and would be hard for him to raise a billion dollars to do so. this is more of the trump exaggerations. >> thank you. have a great weekend. >> good to be with you. thanks. >> you bet. >>> we have seen historic changes to u.s. policy towards cuba this year. moments ago the white house releasing this photo showing president obama on the phone with cuban president raul castro discussing more policy changes. the obama administration is lifting restrictions on business and travel to that country. the changes go into effect on monday and during pope francis's visit to the island. >> chris jansing has more on this for us. good afternoon to you. how significant are the changes you have been reporting and the phone call today between president obama and president castro? >> reporter: i think there is no doubt about it that since the president said he was going to move towards normalizing relations back in december these are significant mo

a gold standard is mentioned by steve forbes and others. currency board. is it possible to live without the fed. >> absolutely. the only reason we had recovery since 2008 and nine because of quantitative easing, which not expanded economy or lending. it only expanded financial asset bubbles. they're trying to cure a debt problem with more debt and it can not happen. there is this illusion that the fed can taper off here and start to raise interest rates and economy will go into escape velocity. there is not a chance that will happen because the fundamentals demographically and debtwise are the worst in history. david: my brother, ted peters, representing the federal reserve board. are we being too harsh here? is it bad to look for alternative to the fed? >> i respectfully disagree. i think the fed did a great job. they did a great job in 2008-nine when the crisis hit. remember the fed members, testimony omc and janet yellen they have no personal agenda. they want to do what is right for the united states. david: even the old expression the road to hell is

alexander was the flavor at that moment, in 1999 at nine at this point time we're talking about steve forbes and all the money he was bringing to the race. 2003 a was three was howard dean, you get my point. are we over analyzing trump and sanders? >> let me start with trump and then i'll go to sanders. for trump there is something he is doing, i agree with what people are saying, he it's different than what we have seen before. it's not that he's just able to set the agenda by playing by a different set up rule, it is fascinating to watch the candidates around him. it's like watching kids on the playground when one kid comes in and starts doing something differently and winning whatever game it is, kickball, whatever, all the kids who had been playing for a long time say, it's not fair. you're not playing by the rules. we had rules and you not play by them. >> that was july. >> i think jeb bush that that in july. >> so he has been a master of that, there's there's also things i've never seen before. i see the reason why cabinets are on the show is we have a feeling we can't go any further,

steve forbes was very critical of it. he wants to get rid of the fed all together. hear him here. >> maybe only game in town but it has been a destructive one. no one asked a question, why after seven years of zero interest rates we still have this punk economy? why do we have a small businesses still have a hard time getting credit? the skewed credit market? what the fed has done is bleeding an a peoplic patient. it is part of the problem, not the solution. trish: i got to say, he has a very good point. how is it we can be in environment of six plus years zero interest rates and jim, no inflation? barely any inflation? i point this out, in the real economy? >> well, key words there was the real economy. i think what we're all talking about is inflation has been in financial assets. that is what has been popped up. that is what everybody has been worried about. and i think that's why the fed has come down. we had four 10% corrections since 2009, since they started qe. what has happened in all of those instances when the stock market corrected 10% like it did last mo

steve forbes is with us today. >> very exciting. first back to stocks. down over 200 points. look at that, 272, as the closing bells sound on wall street. david: okay, well, a

two time presidential candidate steve forbes goes "on the record." i want to ask you about the impact the economy is going to have tonight. first this idea of whether they are going to talk ill of each other in violation of president reagan's rule. do you expect that? >> well, we will see. i think some of them may go after donald trump. i think most of them realize, especially after that first debate that if they don't break out and have a real strong per sownna, like reagan, in terms of principles in what they stand for, good criticism of president obama. then they are going to be be also rands pretty soon. don't worry about the donald. worry about getting your message out there. your principles out there and donald will take care of himself as he always does. >> okay. you are the expert on the economy. what question do you want asked tonight of these candidates? >> well, on their tax plans, some of them have put proposals out there. questioned them on that. those who haven't, why haven't you? and when can we expect to see it? what are you going to

i mean we're going to hear from steve forbes.ing to look at oil and gold in this market as well. i mean gold's supposed to be a flight to safety. nothing really behaving in the way you would expect >> no. meanwhile trump firing another one. fiorina is a terrible manager. he said it five times. but is she really that bad? charlie gasparino is here. he's been doing reporting on that >> and that is really the battle i mean it was so funny to watch them during the debate sort of fight with each other who was the worst ceo >> i know >> a lot of people in america don't know that much about both of their records and we're going to dive a little bit deeper on that one >> but we are looking at the stocks. this is, again, a very, very bad day, and it doesn't hurt to remind folks that usually when the fed has soft accommodating policies, the markets go crazy about it, have just the opposite reaction from what we're seeing today. the idea is that the fed has run out of bullets, it is sticking to a policy that doesn't seem to be helping overa

and bill clinton had not announced. 1995, alexander lamar was the fliefsh. 1999 i think it was steve forbes and all of the money he was bringing to the race. 20, a guy named howard dean. are we overanalyzing donald trump and sanders? >> let me start with trump and then he will move to sanders. for trump there is something what he is doing and i agree with what everybody is saying it is different than what we have seen before. he is able to set the agenda by playing by a set of different rules. it is fascinating to watch the other candidates. it is like watching the kid on the playground when one kid comes in and does something differently and winning whatever the game is. kick ball or whatever. and all of the kid that have been playing for a long time say that is not fair. you are not playing by the rules. we had rules and you are not playing by them. >> that was july. >> i think jeb bush said that in july. >> it looks like that! guys, stop! he has been a master of that. there is something i have never seen before and the reason people went on tv saying harry reid -- he had a feeling he cou

, lamar alexander was the flavor at that moment. 1999 was appointed time we were talking about steve forbesand all of the money he was bringing to the race. 2003 was a guy named howard dean. anyway, you get my point. are we over analyzing trump and sanders? >> will let me start with trump and then we will move to sanders. for trump, there is something he is doing. i agree with what everybody said that it's different. it's not just that he's able to set the agenda by playing by different set of rules. it is fascinating to watch the other candidates around him. it's like watching little kids on a playground in the kit comes in and starts doing something differently and winning. kate ball, whenever and all the kids that have been playing for a long time say it's not fair, you are not playing by the rules. we had rules and you are not playing on. >> it was july. jeb bush said that in july. so he has been a master of that. there's also something i've never seen before and people like me that he had a feeling he can't get any further. i don't remember, maybe you guys do come a time when a candida

yesterday, at the closing bell, steve forbes said donald trump wasn't worth $10 billion.ow trump is firing back. cnbc's john harwood will get you the details on that. first, though, it's been 30 years since delorean unveiled car doors that opened like a falcon wings. that story is next. you're watching cnbc, first in business worldwide. my name is rene guerrero. i'm a senior field technician for pg&e here in san jose. pg&e is using new technology to improve our system, replacing pipelines throughout the city of san jose, to provide safe and reliable services. raising a family here in the city of san jose has been a wonderful experience. my oldest son now works for pg&e. when i do get a chance, an opportunity to work with him, it's always a pleasure. i love my job and i care about the work i do. i know how hard our crews work for our customers. i want them to know that they do have a safe and reliable system. together, we're building a better california. >>> welcome back. tesla's long awaited model x finally being delivered. phil lebeau joins us with those details. >> last

steve forbes was on cnbc yesterday to defend that estimate. he says the reason for this discrepancy may be the terms in how donald values his brand. the publication doesn't use brand value in their estimate. he said if a person has a brand value, that brand value has to be monetized before they count it into this estimate. so what does that all mean as you boil it down? if it is accurate and all these numbers line up, donald trump believes his name alone, the trump name by itself, is worth $5.5 billion. i tried to use that logic when i was negotiating my salary here. they didn't buy it. >> it didn't work? >> no. the barrett name, come on. >> i've heard of it. i think it's quite value potential. >> thank you. >> seven figures. >> at least. >> kerry, thank you so much. >>> edward snowden is now speaking out on twitter. the surveillance whistle-blower posted his first tweet tuesday. it said, can you hear me now? snowden also revealed the only twitter account he follows is the nsa. that's the agency he exposed by releasing secret documents. snowde

steve portion the editor in chief of forbes media.ential candidate. the media has been looking inwards and out wards for two months now trying to figure out why this trump thing has happened, what has contributed to the rise of donald trump. you say to a certain extent it is the other candidate's impetus. you said they have only themselves to blame for trump's steadily increasing lead. why? because these veterans of the public square violated the first law of politics. they let trump set the agenda. >> and you can see knit teit in of immigration, in terms of blaming china for problems here at home. and if you asked what the candidates stand for, what are their signature issues, you'd be hard put to do it. you're going to see them much more aggressive than they were in that first debate, coming out with specific proposals, what are you going to do on taxes, what exactly are you going to do on healthcare. sharper criticism of president obama. hit the president for his mistakes, have your own proposals like reagan did in 191 1980. reagan

welcome to forbes on fox. steve, isn't north korea exactly what you get when you reward bad behavior just like we are doing with the iranians. >> it's a terrible example. that's why the iranians stuck it out. if you continuously violate agreements, go ahead with the nuclear program. you periodically shake down the west including the united states for tens of billions of dollars. that's why a regime with a dysfunctional economy, starve 3 million people to death in the 1990s survive. every other country is looking at this saying if i get nukes, i survive. i get power even if my people starve. >> bruce, you believe that rewarding the iranians is going to stop them from building nukes? >>. >> i don't see it that way. i see we are trying to prevent them from getting nuclear weapons. that's as simple as i can make it. what we are doing is trying to ensure they don't. there were as he people on the republicanle stage who said they wouldn't necessarily rip up the deal if they violate the terms of the deal. then everything g

want to bring in steve forbes on the subject. good to see you. >> good to see you, maria.rump and putin? -- trump and putin? >> that's very interesting. what are they going to talk about? maybe selling him something in trump tower if he gets overthrown from power in russia. but the meeting will get plenty of press coverage. maria: you're saying there's no substance there. you're saying it half facetiously, obviously. >> putin may say, yeah, he'd be a great negotiating partner, but in terms of what's going to be done about syria, russia putting in military forces, we got them out of the middle east back in 1946, now we're letting them back in, what's the implication of that? trump said in the debate that he wants to meet with putin. again, that begs the question, what policy are you going to pursue to get him out of ukraine, stop going against your neighbors, stay out of the arctic and syria, what's he going to do about that? maria: it's interesting, sandra, you don't think he lost any shine, he didn't do any -- >> his supporters are so diehard that i don't know that one de

steve forbes is with us right now.thew, that was the cathedral i might recall and for a lot of you recall are of a certain age the funeral mass for john kennedy after his assassination in november 1963.

her andt to agree with i want to disagree with steve forbes. i had called about a month ago. it all starts with having less affluent young people coming to affluent immunities to get education. that is based on a property tax. teachers get paid well. said no, we cannot have affordable health care in these affluent communities and that is where the breakdown is. and you did aral fair housing question and almost not wante people did those people in their communities and that is the last straw for us liberals. want asbe any color you long as you are wealthy. but if you are poor, that is the last prejudice that we have not been able to overcome. that's where it starts. host: that if kathleen in massachusetts. kimbrough? caller: i think that starting teachers ought to be given i alsosalaries, but think that because there is such a disparity on the different school district property tax money that they have to supplement the federal and state that one way we could help teachers is to give them an actual tax credit for the money they are spending out of their pocket for additional s

steve forbes. into your computer you tell me when i am going to die with 95% accuracy. >> that is correct. the purpose of the project is to harness the power of big data. and all possible information on the computer, your past, previous medical visits, laboratory results, vital signs every few seconds. you and is a by predicting probability of dying within the next 30 days. stuart: people come to the hospital, some serious condition, you apply this computer program to those people in the condition, not to be like myself to feel pretty good at the moment. >> this out the rhythm is applied in the emergency department and is on every patient that comes in and this is requiring a huge amount of work and we have been doing collaboration with the institute for the last five years. ashley: "cavuto coast to coast" when do you tell patients when he or she is going to die? >> we do not. these algorithms are so tightly integrated into our load most of our doctors don't even know it is there and we do more tha

steve: vassar. >> when did you study? >> economics. >> you think you were going to end up on wall street? i were to the law firm, didn' really enjoy it. i ordered the forbes stock market course over the mail, -- >> $450. steve: i had to trade stocks with bar mitzvah money. that was my spending money. >> and bar mitzvah envy. [laughter] steve: that' got enough money trading. >> how are you managing your bar mitzvah money? steve: the first talk i lost money in was robotics vision. a friend of my brother suggested it. the story didn' t make a lot of sense. and then i membered thinking i could lose money on my own, i don' t need someone else' s advice. anthony: now you go from kidder. acquisition and high-yield finances. from there, i the by; it was hard. i was with pension and i sent a 100 letters to the top 100 firms. high-yield. joined. it was a two-person group. after two years, the manager leaves and they gave me the opportunity to take over the fund. i wanted to be an owner. that wasn' t available where i was. between having a business plan and a piece of paper that i carried around why was recruiting people that said it' s one piece of paper, here' s w

steve is no longer there. that's it for "forbes on fox. thank you for watching, everybody. have a great holiday weekend. keep it right here. the income one business block continues with eric and cashin in. >> sure looks like a war on cops is eripting in america. another officer murdered on the job this week. this time in illinois. in pennsylvania a female officer assaulted and then thrown over an embankment, and if it's not violence, it's violent rhetoric, and social media messages suggesting cops might deserve it. this in ferguson, missouri, a picture of a roasted pig wearing a top hat and officer darren wilson's name on it. how can the brave men and women we pray to protect us do their job if they're under attack? hi, everyone. i'm eric. welcome to "cashin in. our crew this week wayne rogers, swron than, militia fields. also joining us juan williams and jessica. welcome, everybody. surprise, surprise, a new report this week says police recruitment numbers are down big in some big cities. now, michelle, are we starting to see the affect of the war on cops? >> we have a war