from the economy i think that's when the real damage could be again so that economics expert dr steve mccabe doesn't believe the chancellor's rescue package is enough to protect british workers from the worst. there's a few bits in it they're good but by and large i don't think it's it's going to do the job that's required which of course is to stem the flow of what increased the same who had the sort of the nuts would say from john lewis and amongst others a tsunami of job losses we're going to face unemployment is probably going to be sort of 10 percent by christmas easily. and possibly even 15 percent but we are seeing the job retention bonus i mean that surely is good news and many people in that jobs i don't not i'm not particular convinced i think as you sort of sort of think the pace of this is made clear those people are going to come back anyway the employers that they pocket this is of the 1000 pounds which is perfect on one wouldn't pay and those that are going to go there's no work for them to do yet they're not going to be kept on for an extra 3 months just for the sort of bonus

for that sound joined by economics expert dr steve mccabe staved good to see. you all right thank you very much what do you make of the government spending plan. well it's the classical curate's egg there's a few bits in it they're good but by and large i don't think it's going to do the job that's required which of course is to stem the flow of what increased the same who had the sort of the nuts would say from john lewis and most others a tsunami of job losses we're going to face unemployment is probably going to be sort of 10 percent by christmas usually that and possibly even 50 percent but we are seeing the job protection bonus i mean that surely is good news and i think many people in that jobs i don't not i'm not particular convinced i think as you saw him sort of the pace of this is made clear those people are going to come back anyway the employees that they pocket this is of the 1000 pounds which is perfect for one wouldn't they and those that are going to go if there's no work for people to do you know they're not going to be kept on for an extra 3 m

mccabe, strzok, page, they're sick of that. they want the same standard of treatment under the law. stevee're seeing documents suggest happened where an outgoing administration, democratic administration, essentially spied on the republican candidate for president and continued it even though there was no realistic basis on or predicate to base the investigation upon. >> yeah. and look what they did between election day 2016 and inauguration day, january 2017. in that two month time period, look what they did to michael flynn. and why'd they do it? because a they knew the former head of the defense intelligence agency would figure out what they did, so they had to go get michael flynn. that was the real thing. get michael flynn because he's going to figure it out, he's going to be national security adviser to president trump. so in that two month time period, 38 people, 49 separate times unmasked michael flynn's name. they set him up. we know that because bill bill said they needed to cover up the fact there was never a proper predicate. and if you want to know why people are mad, why the