do you have any idea, other than steve miller, who might have helped him with his speech. >> i guarantee reince priebus, chief of staff, will be heavily involved. he has tremendous relationships on capitol hill, knows steve scalise personally. i have to believe mike pence the vice president would be weighing in on this. he also has deep representatives with the house of representatives. so does kellyanne conway. lots of people will want to involve themselves in this and try to strike exactly the right note of empathy, sympathy, national sense of grief, also a sense democracy is larger than any moment like this. i suspect, i don't know, interpreting based on my history covering presidents int traumatc moments like this. then there's always room for who the president is, who he wants to be in moments like this. that's sometimes the most important historical variable in a moment like this. >> we underline this the first challenge of this kind for the president since he's been in august january 0th, 2017. >> definitely had to deal with the who are itchihorrific videod all the world, the gas

i bet ceo steve miller will have some great perspective, he always does. then we get some results from fedex, and i think it's going to be a good quarter. i'm looking for the company to guide numbers up and talk about it's role in the privatization of airports, because if there was ever a company that knows how to run an airport, it's fedex. and we have to talk about the food industry because of that amazon-whole foods merger. maybe do the merger bot. >> merger. merger >> it's friday, come on. adobe's stock often confusings people and other times the stock gets hammered because the stock runs too far too fast if you haven't bought adobe yet, you have to wait until this company reports. we have been putting out bulletins like mad at action.com it was a fantastic quarter, keep the pattern in mind, you might get another opportunity. we're always fretting these days about anything auto, we worry about peak auto sales, we worry about subprime loans to auto buyers and we worry about auto parts. and we're concerned about how the big car dealers are doing. we're g

april this decision was from the steve miller, steve bannon part of the white house, america first national ideology. there was we are led to believe a lot of lob yg from ieskt trump and jared kushner to stay in. this seems more victory in ternls of internal white house policy of steve bannon. >> steve ban be had a victory lap you could see him in the rose garden standing tall and letting people see him as this was his -- informs one of his babies. the president definitely talked about the fact that this is about detroit. this is about young s town. not about the world about us was as steve bannon is taking the victory lap you're hearing from president obama and form vice president al gore who won a noble prize about his comments on climate change. you heard from joe biden. as we're talking about the economics of it all and some people saying donald trump is trying to make coal great again at the expense of clean energy, you know, there is another piece that people aren't thinking about. ka treena remember the debate during the bush years about the rising sea levels and droughts and things

and merry we ing john legend tuesday, still steve miller band on wednesday.at the verizon center featuring boys to men and paula abdul all in one spot. a special mention for our producer jamie who best i can teles obsessed with yoga. it will be held at yards park. you can sign up yoga and pi leat's at ten to $15 each. it is open up to the public. there's even kid 's yoga as well. move on, pork ribs, beef brings brisket. the 25th anniversary next weaned . it is being held on pennsylvania avenue, tickets start at 12 bucks. the tony a ward winning play rent is on its coming to the district. struggles to follow their dreams . tickets are still available which lasts tuesday through sunday. speaking of thee at tricks, the universe soul circus kicks off thursday at the fedex field. is is a celebration of global cultures and ethnicities. tickets start ing at $17 for thursday's performance, but you have have july 23. we were talking about rent there. i'm very excited marina, for fox having -- rent is going to be one of those new live musicals that they do on tv . we'r

we get steve miller, queen, a bunch of different songs from over the years, golden eerie, the reallyool thing edgar wright and the way it's edited ties all of these songs with the action we're seeing. each car wreck ties with a beat in the music. it's stylized. if you don't like violence, i will caution you it does get pretty violence. it's done in a stylized way and great cast in terms of kevin spacey and a couple of the bank robbers that the kid drives around are john ham, you know, don draper from mad man and also jamie fox. one of my favorite action movies in year. >> it's here to stay, obviously. it keeps coming up week this and week out. you're saying now, also, that's not the only good option you're talking about the, you think it's the funniest movie of the about this one, yet. >> it's been going under the radar. it's called the big 6. we won't exactly give it away. i think it's the funniest movie of the year. >> i've been dating a girl. she's white. >> she's a white girl. >> white girl. >> we hate carrots. >> so it's actually written by a real life husband and wife. they've

we saw yesterday the importance of the steve miller and steve bannon faction of the white house and i can see them wanting to rewrite this and get it done. >> you mentioned a family photo with neil gorsuch. is his rule going to give us any indication on what he is going to be like in the court moving forward? >> i think he'll probably be among the four justices who would say they would grant this request for putting the lower court rulings on hold and letting the government enforce it. but it takes five. so, who is the fifth vote going to be? if there was a fifth vote, it would probably be justice kennedy. i think we can assume what gorsuch's vote would be here. >> pete williams, thank you very much. >>> on this friday, jobs number day. we've got them. wall street flat at this hour, but we're checking in on how main street feels. ♪ sorry about the holdup, folks. we have some congestion on the runway and i'm being told it'll be another 15, maybe 20 minutes, and we will have you on your way. ♪ runway models on the runway? surprising. what's not surprising? how much money evan saved by s

. >> steve miller? >> i don't recall him having such a conversation. >> cory lewandowski? >> i do not recall any of those individuals having any meeting with russian officials. >> carter page? >> i don't know. >> have you ever in any of these fantastical situations heard of a plot line so ridiculous that a sitting united states senator and ambassador colluded at an open setting with hundreds of other people to pull off the greatest caper in the history of espionage. >> thank you for saying that, senator cotton. it's just like through the looking glass. i mean what is this? >> stone dstz walling of any kind is unacceptable and general sessions has acknowledged there is no legal basis for this stonewalling. >> senator widen, i am not stonewalling. >> i want to ask you point blank why did you sign the letter recommending the firing of director comey when it violated your recusal? >> it did not violate my recusal. it did not violate my recusal. that would be the answer to that. and the letter that i signed represented my views that had been formulated for some time. >> chairma

. >> steve miller? >> i don't recall him ever having such a conversation. >> corey lewandowski? >> i do not recall any of those individuals having any meeting with russian officials. >> carter page? >> i don't know. >> i would finally ask this question because i always think we try to get -- you have innate knowledge -- >> there may have been some published accounts of mr. page talking with russians. i'm not sure. i don't recall. >> as a former senator you bring a unique perspective to this investigation because you've been on both sides. >> i have indeed. all in all, it's better on that side. >> if you were sitting on this side -- >> nobody gets to ask you about your private conversations with your staff. >> here we go. get your chance to give us some advice. if you were sitting on this side of the dais, what question would you be asking? >> i would be asking whether or not -- i would be asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on this election. >> what part of the story do you think we're missing? >> by a foreign power, particularly the russians, since th

at the same time, even just as recently as february, the president's aides, steve miller went on the shows and said the president's powers and national security are very considerable and will not be questioned. that's not the kind of thing that makes us calm. >> lastly, there's been a lot of talk about reince priebus and his lack of influence. typically to chiefs of staff are they drawn from a people who are dependent on the president or that independents to be able to tell the president hard truths? is he unusual? >> he is. you want a chief of staff with the stature to be able to say to the president here's something you're not going to want to hear, if you're anger at me and fire me, that's fine. jim baker had that under ronald reagan. if you go by this incident with article 5 and they flurry to give that speech, it's hard to see this staff is doing that with donald trump. >> not good news. michael beschloss, presidential historian. >> i wish i could have been a little bit more kauj tonight, joy. >> it's okay. we like you to keep it real. thank you very much. >> doing my best. >> i

going to need his nato allies and he's going to be looking around the table and steve bannon or steve miller or maybe 25, 30% of the country is not going to be an issue then. it's going to be his allies and that need. one thing i did see the other day around the paris accord, which gave me confidence is, people are stepping up to fill that gab. they're moving past theth president, they're moving past the administration. they're looking around to mayors, governors, and businesses of both parties around an issue that matters. and i think that has to happen. that gave me some encouragement. i do think there will be people stepping up to fill the gap where presidential leadership is missing or completely awol. >> do you think that jim comey will go up to congress on thursday with any of this sense that the world is watching and the world -- there are other victims -- i mean, we sort of take for granted that america can protect itself in most instances from vladimir putin, but the most sort of vulnerable nato laeallies were the ones th needed to hear that we will protect them. do you think jim co

. >> steve miller? >> i don't recall him ever having such a conversation. >> corey lewandowski? >> i do not recall any of those individuals having any meeting with russian officials. >> carter page? >> i don't know. >> and i would finally ask this quechlt i always think we try to get -- you have innate knowledge -- >> there was -- there may have been some published accounts of mr. page talking with russians. i'm not sure. >> okay. >> i don't recall. >> you bring unique wholistic perspective to this investigation because you've been on both sides. >> i have, indeed. all in all, it's better on that side. >> if you were sitting on this side, okay -- >> nobody gets to ask you about your private conversations with your staff. >> here we go. get your chance to give us some advice. if your sitting on this side, what question would you be asking? >> i would be asking whether or not -- i would asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on this election. >> and what part of the story do you think there? >> by foreign power, particularly the russians since intelligence

." >> nothing like steve miller i'm going to speak about fedex right now. a note t president has met with the people who run fedex this is happening over the next couple of days i think you're going to hear -- this is my own reporting that fedex is involved with the privatization of airports. >> interesting. >> yes that's a very good reason to own fedex beyond the numbers they report june 20th. i think it will be a good quarter. so you've got -- let's not be surprised if i wouldn't hear that the privatization of airports could be an opportunity for fedex. >> wow this is an all-time high going back to the ipo in 1978. >> in you go not in the stock i like the fact they're very close to the president doesn't mean that anyone is going to throw it to them, but they have better plans about privatization than any other public company. >> yeah. how about tonight? >> i have the hottest -- the hottest retailer no one has ever heard of but i love the company. ollie's bargains you're making a strong case for even, thank you, matthew boss for introducing me to ollie's a

clearly, this was a victory for the economic nationalists, steve bannon, miller, and others.r was it simply the president listening to his own head and you cannot attribute it to anyone other than the president listening to what he believed? >> have to believe it is the latter and not the former. you can make the argument legitimately that this was a victory for steve bannon because he argued vociferously to get out of this. you can argue this is a victory for economic nationalists. but i think in the end, this was donald trump acting as donald trump. i am not sure and this is me projecting a thought, that he came down or you wanted to be where he thought he always was and was willing to hear various sides but that this reflected core values he has carried with him into the white house and he's going to operate on, not just on this but other matters as well. charlie: it had the additional tot of quality of it seems be what his base want to come to do. >> is no question about that -- there is no question about that. we talked in the inaugural address about the forgotten americ

steve miller who had no experience in the executive branch.spent time with trump figuring out how to get around election laws. that's what he knows. it's donald trump's fault if he has got a bunch of amateurs around him who don't know how to warn him away from the possibility of committing obstruction. it's his fault even if he is a rookie. >> right. >> as we -- peter, as they say in court, snap, howard fineman making the case. take a look at someone else really going strong on the president here, unusually for him, tom brokaw says, basically, speaker ryan's excuse for trump "this is new for him." excuse me. trump ran as a big-time exec, not as an apprentice. peter. >> exactly. howard is absolutely right. but this is a long pattern with donald trump. this didn't just start. i did have a moment when i thought maybe the presidency, the honor to be president, the responsibility of being president, would in some way moderate his behavior. this behavior has gone on for decades. he is a warlord. warlords never ask for help and never say i don't know

. >> steve miller. >> i don't recall him ever having such a conversation. >> corley lieu within dousean officials. >> carter page. >> i don't know. >> and i'll finally ask this question because i always think we try to get -- you have an innate knowledge -- >> there may have been some public accounts of mr. page talking with russians, i'm not sure. >> okay. >> i don't recall that. >> as a former senator you bring a unique perspective to this investigation because you've been on both sides. >> i have indeed. all in all it's better on that side. >> if you're sitting on this side -- >> nobody gets to ask you about your private conversations with your staff. >> here you go. if you were sitting on this side, what question would you be asking? >> i would be asking whether or not -- i would be asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on this election. >> and what part of the story do you think -- >> by a foreign power, particularly the russians since it's intelligence community has suggested and stated that they believe they did, and but i do think members of this gover

. >> steve miller? >> i don't recall him ever having such a conversation. >> not cor recall any of those individuals having any meeting with russian officials. >> carter page? >> i don't know. >> i would finally ask this question because i always think we get -- you have innate nowledge -- >> published accounts of mr. page talking with russians. i'm not sure. i don't recall. >> as a former senator you bring a unique perspective to this investigation because you've been on both sides. >> i have indeed. all i o that side. >> if you were sitting on this side -- >> nobody gets to ask you a boyour private conversations wi your staff. >> here we go. get your chance to give us some advice. if you were sitting onshi t daid you be asking? >> i would be asking whether or not -- i would be asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on this election. >> what part of the story do you think we're missing? >> by a foreign power, particularly the russians, since the intelligence community has sugges

. >> steve miller. >> i don't recall. >> cory. >> i do not recall any of the individuals having any meeting with the russian officials >> paige >> i don't know. >> finally, i ask this question because we try to get -- you have innate knowledge -- >> there may have been some public accounts of mr. paige talking with russians. i'm not sure i don't recall >> as a former senator, you bring unique perspective to the investigation because you've been on both sides >> i have, indeed. all in all, it's better on that side >> if you were on this side -- >> nobody gets to ask you about your private conversations with your staff >> here you go, get us in the vice if you were on this side, what question would you be asking >> i would be asking whether or not -- i would be asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on this election >> what part of the story -- >> foreign power, particularly the russians, the intelligence community as suggested and stated they believe they did, but i do think that members of the government have offices to run. the questions should be focused on that. >

steve miller. i'm not sure. as a former senator you bring a holistic perspective to this investigation. you have been on both sides. all in all it's better on that side! if you were sitting on this side, what question would you be asking?” would be asking whether or not... i would be asking whether or not... i would be asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on this election, by a foreign power particularly the russians as the intelligence community has stated they believe they did. but i do think members of this government have offices to run, departments to manage, and the questions should be focused on that. is there a part of the story we are missing?” focused on that. is there a part of the story we are missing? i don't know, because i'm not involved in the campaign and had no information concerning it, i had no idea at what stage it is. you members of this committee know a lot more than i. general sessions, we are very much focused on russia's involvement. our hope is t

. >> steve miller. >> att gen sessions: i don't recall him ever having such a conversation. >> coreyandowski. >> att gen sessions: i don't recall any of those individuals having any meetings with russian officials. >> carter page. >> att gen sessions: i don't know. >> finally, -- >> att gen sessions: there may have been published conversations with mr. page. >> if you are sitting on this side -- >> att gen sessions: nobody gets to ask you about your private conversations. >> if you are sitting on this side, what questions would you be asking? >> att gen sessions: i would be asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on the selection. particularly by the russians because this community has suggested they did. i do think that members of this government have offices to run. the questions should be focused on that. >> regarding missing part of the story? >> att gen sessions: i don't know because i'm not involved in the campaign and had no information concerning it. >> i will assure you we are very much focused on russia's involvement. >> att gen sessions: doesn't seem

clearly, this decision was from the steve bannon, stephen miller part of the white house, america first nationalist ideology. there was a lot of lobbying from ivana trump and jared kushner to stay in. this seems more victory of the internal policy of the white house of steve bannon, no? >> steve bannon had a victory in the rose garden standing tall letting people see him as this was one of his babies. the president definitely talked about the fact this is about detroit, this is about youngstown, about pittsburgh, not about the world, about us. as steve bannon is taking this victory lap, you're hearing from former president barack obama and former vice president gore who won a nobel prize on climate change. and people saying donald trump is trying to make coal great again at the expense of clean energy. there's another piece people aren't thinking about. i remember katrina, remember how that debate happened during the bush years about the rising sea levels and also drought and things of that nature. i looked at the world health organizations website today and they were talking about how

. >> steve miller?n't recall him ever having such a session. >> corey lewandowski. >> i do not recall any of those individuals having any meeting with russian officials. >> carter page. >> i don't know. >> and would i finally ask this question, because i always think -- we try to -- you have an innate knowledge. >> there -- there may have been some published accounts of mr. page talking with russians, i'm not sure. i don't recall though. >> as a former senator you bring a unique holistic perspective to this investigation because you've been on both sides. >> i have indeed. all in all it's better on this side. >> okay. >> nobody gets to ask you about your private conversations or your staff. >> here you go. give us a chance to give us some vice. if you were sitting on this side of the d. ais, what question would you be asking? >> i would be asking whether or not -- i would be asking questions related to whether or not there was an impact on this election. >> and what part of the story do you think you're

you look at people like steve bannon, stephen miller, who are definitely still, at least still as far as we know still in sessions' court. so, he still has some support here in the west wing, but the optics of the meeting of those two men at that cabinet meeting is going to be something to behold. kate? >> something to behold. let's see what he hear coming out of that. great to see you, jason. thank you so much. >>> now to a big decision that just suddenly fell into the senate's lap. will he or won't he? whether they will allow the attorney general to testify behind closed doors, or will they require and demand that it be before cameras and the public? cnn's suzanne malveaux is joining me from capitol hill with much more on this. suzanne, word is that sessions caught folks off guard with his offer to testify, so what exactly do we know about this? >> reporter: he did, kate. and you would think that, of course, they want to see him before the committee. it would be a no-brainer, right? but there is a lot of debate that's taking place behind the scenes. the reason why here is that the h

according to the source that he shifted back into that combative place, you know, surrounded by steve bannon, steven miller and now if you look at media today, it is sort of like the campaign all-stars. hr mcmaster, mattis, are there concerns? we talk so much about the palace intrigue that we're going back to campaign trump? >> reporter: there are concerns. think about it this way, steph. yesterday the president's schedule packed. he started with a meeting in the oval office with the secretary of state, hr mcmaster, other top advisers and we're told he popped in and out of the dining roomhere theal counsel was watching the testimony and he met with governors about infrtructure yesterday. what happens over the weekend when he really has time to process some of these headlines, to process cable news? will he, in fact, lash out even more? this morning's tweet may be an indication of things to come, steph. >> i got to bring my panel in here. mid win charles, an attorney from the firm mid win charles. ned ryan, ceo of american majority and former presidential writer for george w. bush. eddie gloud from princeto

steven miller knows he works for the president of the united states. steves he's president of the united states. steven miller does what he is asked to do in terms of speeches, in terms of all of these other things. he may have got out of the lane the first week with the executive order but steven miller works for the president of the united states. steve bannon thinks he's president of the united states. >> and when trump reads his speeches word for word like that -- >> it's true. >> well, after the break, alex -- >> poor bob costa. >> president alex. >>> epa administrator scott pruitt celebrated exiting the paris agreement by dining last night at le diplomat, one of the nicest french restaurants in town. nice little piece of irony there. andrea mitchell, kasie hunt and glenn thrush join the conversation. you're watching "morning joe." we'll be right back. (avo) come with us... ...to a new world. deeper than the ocean. as unfathomable as the universe. a world that doesn't exist outside you... ...but within you. where breakthrough science is replacing chemot

if you're steve bannon and steven miller, it's towards a nationalist agenda. >> but they are not asking him to stop or slow down. >> you can't make him stop. he's the president and he's a 70-year-old man that doesn't take advice. >> they have encouraged him to stop tweeting. we saw this during the campaign. they tried to keep him busy. there was a story about keeping him busy because he doesn't have time to tweet. we're talking about the president of the united states. >> look at how he reacted to manchester and london. he's on his foreign trip. he's not tweeting. he's busy. he has a very trumpy, but eloquent statement about evil losers in life. totally focused on what happened and not himself. london, all about himself. >> there's a lot of discussion about the mcmaster, mattis and tillerson and those are the grown ups who are supposed to be -- the axis of adults and he's not listening to them. they try to look at his speeches and he doesn't what he wants any way. are these two factions? and the president just does what he wants? >> there's the nationalist wing, they are trying to help

steve bannon. it is stephen miller. gorka, peter navarro on trade.t is people who have this america first mentality, people who want to restrict trade, people who want to restrict immigration, people who want to drop out of the climate change agreement, people who want to go backwards on the environment because they want to save jobs in west virginia, etc. they are very narrowly focused. narrowminded, in my view. the second group or what the media is now calling globalists. i call them the traditional republican national security camp. general mcmaster, the national security advisor. jim mattis, defense secretary. rich ellerson -- rex tillerson, secretary of state. dan coats, nikki haley, ambassador to the human -- the u.n. gary cohn, economic advisor. that group sees the world the way i do, which is the u.s. has to lead. when the u.s. does not lead, that vacuum is filled by adversaries and we pay a price. that group believes in free trade. that group believes in climate change -- in sticking to our commitments on climate change and the risks posed b

it's steve bannon, it's steven miller, it's this sebastian corker guy, peter and a half aro on trade, right? it's people who have this america first mentality. people who want to restrict trade. people who want to restrict immigration, people who want to drop out of the climate change agreements, people without want to go backwards on the environment, because they want to save jobs in west virginia, et cetera, et cetera, right. and very-- they're very narrowly focused. narrow minded, in my view. the second group are what the media is now calling globalists. i call them the traditional republican national security camp. general mcmaster, the national security advisor, jim patties,-- mattis, the defense secretary, rex tillerson, mike pompeo, the cia director. >> rose: you conclude pompeo. >> i would include him, dan coates, the dni, nikki haley the u.s. ambassador to the u.n., gary cohen, the president's economic advisor, right. that group, that group sees the world the way i do. which is the u.s. has to lead. and when the u.s. doesn't lead, that vacuum is filled by our adversaries and

those people were walled-off in the writing of this speech and clearly written by the steve bannon and steven millers of the world. and there wasn't really anything that i heard that was even remotely aside from the idea he might try to redo this deal and renegotiate this deal if he can. >> but there wasn't -- it wasn't serious if we renegotiate, fine if we don't, great. let's go to cnn senior white house correspondent jim acosta at the white house. jim, this was full nationalist, america first, damn the rest of the world president trump i'm putting the interests of tforgo man and women woman first according to how i see them. >> that's right, jake it steefd to come out of of the sfeef bannon play book it's a little early for a rose garden campaign to begin. but when you heard the president use words like i represent the represent are people of pittsburgh not paris. . obviously he is representing the citizens of pittsburgh but he is the leader of the free world. and that's why you're is he seeing statements from president obama and others condemning the decision because they are saying that he is rea

and similar to his inauguration speech, the type of writing and tone comes from stephen miller and what is steveannon's goal? decimate things. disrupt things and have a complete wipeout. and that's what he's heading toward. we will take a break and remind you nbc's megyn kelly will be sitting down later today for an exclusive interview with vladimir putin. it will air sunday evening during the premier of her show "sunday night with megyn kelly" at 7:00 p.m. eastern on nbc. up next, more on the president's decision to pull out of the paris climate accord. the president's first choice for labor secretary joins me next. will it really create more jobs by leaving? >>> it's time for the "your business" entrepreneur of the week. niela brown has a tea business. local customers love her product but she wants to go national. she asked for "your business" make-over and now she's about to break through with the disruptive strategy and big time distribution. for more watch "your business" weekends at 7:30 on msnbc. >> brought to you by american express open. visit openforum.com for ideas to help you grow yo

obviously, we know that typically steven miller, some of his top advisers, steve bannon, gary cohn, typicallythis. so we'll wait for final confirmation about who helped him with this speech. says. >> that's exactly right. one point whether or not he's going to stay on topic. a couple things i'll be listening for, does he mention the terror attack from over the weekend again. he commented on it last night. i asked a white house official if we expected to hear from him about this again today. and there wasn't a resense of whether or not that was going to haen. also, will he bring up the travel ban. remember, he's going to be talkinabout the faa, about national security. as it relates to our airline system. will this be an opportunity for him to raise the issue of the travel ban. he's been tweeting about it as you know throughout this morning saying look, this is a travel ban and we need it in order to make our country safer. those are some of the issues we'll be listening closely to see if he raises when he gets to the podium here in a few moments from now. >> it could also be a positive for th

abby lee miller's blowup and behind the scenes of steve harvey's new show with talented senior. >> we had a 91-year-old gymnast that did the parallel bars. >> now this is "entertainment tonight." >> hello, everyone. thanks for joining us. >> let's get right to the latest hollywood news. >> new details on the clooney twins. george's long time pal rande gerber talked to gefn frazier on friday about the newborns, ella and alexander. >> he's so happy right now. >> is he? >> in life in general, and having those kids is such an incredible feeling for him and amal. >> the twins were born june 6th in london, and rande and his wife, cindy kcrawford were spotted shortly afterwards. >> the kids are the perfect mix of both george and amal. they really are so cute. >> how is amal doing as a mother? >> she's amazing. she's a natural. she looks beautiful. i mean they're doing great. >> of course rande and george both have reason to celebrate. their billion dollar sale of their premium tequila brand casa mee go. >> how did you and george celebrate? >> with lots of casa mee go. >> did that mess up a f

the white house is full of california refugees, people like steve bannon who spent time in hollywood as a film producer. stephen millerorks closely with him at the white house. breitbartt of the tendency in the white house seems to have grown up within white, california that did not particularly like the way that and hasanged racially taken the fight nationally. alison: we are talking on a day when the president of the united states tweeted something very personal about a member of the news media. is there anything president trump can do? does he have any achilles heel with his base? is there anything he could do or say that would shake their support? people i talked to about the tweet often say that we don't really like it, we wish he was more presidential but then qualified that as -- the news media is out to get him. it is a way for him to get his message of ross. we don't really like it but it is part of who he is. he is an unconventional politician. we like that. have made a decision to support a regular candidate, then bend how they view the world to fit. on the left and the right. i was right -- writing mainly