i wonder if you would like to respond to steve probst's otherwise favorable review where he asked why you hadn't put the financial crisis in the context of global trade imbalance? >> could you hear the question? okay. steve probst finished his review, as i recall, hiding me for not basically blaming the global trade imbalance for the crisis. the answer is, because that's not what caused it. we have had trade imbalances for decades. it's not years. it's decade, and we didn't have anything like what happened over the mortgage blowup and the derivatives and all of that stuff. it is -- the world is interconnected and causation is always running in both or many directions at once. but this is very clearly a case where shenanigans in the united states -- and also from other countries, ireland, ice lean, england, et cetera -- and the rest of the world. it wasn't the rest of the world doing it to us. it was us doing it to the rest of the world, and that's my answer. if steve was here to why i didn't blame these international trade imbalances for the crisis. >> my name is can be and i'm -- my