gerri: saving people from themselves, that's what obama's former car czar, steve ratner, says he wantsaving the government, the federal government force young people to save for retirement. got a young person here tonight to see what he thinks of this idea, charlie kirk, founder and executive director of turning point usa. charlie, do you think the government should force young people to save? >> no, this is totally ridiculous. and if you look at ratner's article, he wants to get young people to save for the future, but what he doesn't analyze is why young people aren't saving. the metrics are correct, they're not saving, it's because they're too worried about surviving in this economy. they don't have the disposable income to save a 401(k)-type platform, and to say that we should pass a bill that 9% of the income of millennials should now go towards some oligarchic type of 401(k) system is ridiculous, and to say he could save us from ourselves is totally preposterous. gerri: okay. so let's look at the metrics, you mentioned them. workers under 25, 43% are saying they contribute 4.3% o

here is some of your emails on steve ratner proposing to have the government forced young people to savear from you. go to gerriwillis.com believe it or not the one defers anniversary of the federal income-tax. the pain just keeps getting deeper it was just 400 pages when it launched now 73,000 pages. the standard deduction is 1,400 but in today's dollars it would be worth $93,000 the top tax bracket is 39.6% it was 7%. doesn't that sound so much better? that is my $0.2. thank you for joining us. we will see you tomorrow. >> finished paying your taxes is get ready to pay for more because you will not believe this but liberals are seriously talking about a wealth tax and guess where they got that idea? the french. the french. the dice a more? our top story tonight. welcome everybody i am neil cavuto. something that will get you fried. a scheme hatched by a french economist that the rich pay more. >> they will not change by magic

ron bloom and steve ratner before him were there representing treasury as the majority shareholder. what are your thoughts on the government's involvement with the company it owns, failing to recall cars. anthis goes back to important point. are the people who are involved understanding about automobiles? the answer is i do not think so. they just looking at finances? i am sure there were a lot of dresses at the time, but the people on the board, do they know how to make a car? to review that is well. question will make the case to review it this year. when you say gm has to take responsibility going forward. there is talk about a $3 million fund. >> gm has to find out where it failed. it is not just the airbags that failed. it was people and engineers looking at it. selling a switch to did not expect and they spend their time saying, can you just accept this instead of fixing the situation? that is the responsibility on want to see. goes, gmee where it establishes a fund for that. probably a good idea to take care of those things. overall, someone standing in front of the american