assistant general manager steve ritchie said -- >> there's no excuse. it was human error that caused it. that's why we're putting in place mechanisms to make sure it doesn't happen in the future with additional reviews to make sure it doesn't happen. it's as simple as that. they also said that it found -- similar couplings throughout its water delivery system, but those connectors had the proper restraints. in south san francisco, charles clifford, kron4 news. >>> today we saw sunny skies. but tomorrow, clod cover , at least through -- cloud cover, at least through the morning. areas of fog expected, plus the cloud cover. even after the fog clears, you're not going to see sunshine right away. temperatures into the low 40s in the mid and afternoon. and it let's take a look at thing to clearing times. today was really bad. we had fog for the delta, and the north bay, that just didn't want to clear. tomorrow morning it looks like 11:00 in the morning for santa rosa and concord. 10:00 in livermore, redwood city, and san jose. we're still going to have cover

i strongly want to support what steve ritchie said about creating a position -- call it a manager or an ombudsman or a liaison -- that could be a point where the information is received and decisions can be made. that is a great idea. so many of these water issues fall under your jurisdictions. there is storm runoff, recycle water, ground water, wastewater. these are all factors that properly should be under your control. finally, on the question of expenditures for the boat house, i know it is controversial sometimes, but i want to strongly support the expenditures for fixing it up. as a west sideer, that has been an embarrassment and eyesore for way too long. you should go ahead with it. but that should not be the last word in a long-term vision for the like. this is an interim step, and there are better solutions. there is land that at some point we would like to see made available that is across the

then i have to give the concise staff report award to steve ritchie, who managed in the first page to get the three take away messages for his item. thank you for doing that you are an example to all of us. commissioner caen: r.c. going to have that as a public meeting at some point to review that? commissioner vietor: the intent is and know, that if it is a written report, it stands on its own, but we had the opportunity to ask any questions. but it is not an option item. the intent is to take items and have complete report so that we can review it and not take up a commission time. if there is something in it there that you have questions about, you should ask them and we should spend time on it. it really requires our time, then we should schedule a calendar item for that. commissioner caen: i do not have questions on this particular document, but as it progresses, it might be of interest for the public to know what we're doing. commissioner vietor: and those reports are part of the public record. their posted, so that if anybody sees on the agenda that that is something they're in