how about chris stevens? did chris stevens come over from benghazi to see you when you went for the big trip in october of '11? >> i don't recall. i don't recall if he did or not. this was -- this -- this was about ambassador cretz and he was the person that we were meeting with at that time. >> what was your purpose for meeting with ambassador cretz if chris stevens was your expert in libya? >> the ambassador was an expert as well. ambassador cretz was our ambassador. you remember as i mentioned to you before, he had been our ambassad ambassador, and then because he reported very accurately about what he observed regarding gadhafi and gadhafi's hen ofmen when wikileaks disclosed internal u.s. government cables and gene cretz's cables were publicized talking very critically about gadhafi he was then subjected to threats and we took him out. we did not close the embassy at that time. so, he had returned to finish out his time and we were in the process of moving him to another assignment and nominating chris s

how about chris stevens? did chris stevens come over from benghazi to see you when you went for the big trip in october of '11? >> i don't recall. i don't recall if he did or not. this was -- this -- this was about ambassador cretz and he was the person that we were meeting with at that time. >> what was your purpose for meeting with ambassador cretz if chris stevens was your expert in libya? >> the ambassador was an expert as well. ambassador cretz was our ambassador. you remember as i mentioned to you before, he had been our ambassad ambassador, and then because he reported very accurately about what he observed regarding gadhafi and gadhafi's hen ofmen when wikileaks disclosed internal u.s. government cables and gene cretz's cables were publicized talking very critically about gadhafi he was then subjected to threats and we took him out. we did not close the embassy at that time. so, he had returned to finish out his time and we were in the process of moving him to another assignment and nominating chris s

how about chris stevens? did chris stevens come over from benghazi to see you when you went for that big trip in october '11? >> i don't recall. i don't recall if he did or not. this was about ambassador kretz and ambassador kretz was the person that we were meeting with at the time. >> what was your purpose for meeting with ambassador kretz if chris stevens wa your ambassador in libya? >> ambassador kretz was our ambassador. as i mentioned to you before, he'd been our ambassador and then, because he reported very accurately about what he observed regarding gadhafi and gadhafi's henchmen, when wikileaks disclosed internal u.s. government cables and gene kretz's cables were publicized talking very critically about gadhafi, he was then subjected to threats and then we took him out. we did not close the ambassador at that ti -- embassy at that time. he finished out his time. and we were in the process of moving him to another assignment and nominating chris stevens to replace him. >> but you diplomat during that

how about chris stevens? did he come over from benghazi to see you when you went for that big trip in october '11? >> i don't recall if he did or not. this was about ambassador krets and he was the person we were meeting with at that time. >> what was your purpose with meeting if chris stevens was your expart in libya? >> he was an expert as well. ambassador krets was our ambassador. you remember as i mentioned to you before he had been our ambassador and then because he reported very accurately about what he observed regarding gadhafi and gadhafi's henchmen, when wikileaks disclosed internal u.s. government cables and the cables were publicized talking very critically about gadhafi, he was then subjected to threats and then we took him out. we did not close the embassy at that time. so he had returned to finish out his time and we were in the process of moving him to another indictment and fom nating chris stevens to replace him. >> you didn't talk to chris stevens? >> while i was in libya, i don't recall. o

he could not find chris stevens.ne of the horrors after the attack was our failure to be able to find where the ambassador was. we hoped against hope that he had somehow gotten himself out of the compound and he was alive somewhere maybe in the back. and additional efforts by the diplomate security officers and by the cia enforcements that arrived find his body or to find him hopefully were unsuccessful and they had to withdraw because of the continuing attack back to the cia and annex before we knew what happened to the ambassador and we were desperate and we were trying to call everybody we knew in benghazi and libya get additional help. what appears to have happened at some point later is that libyans found ambassador stevens and they carried him to the hospital in benghazi and libyan doctors labored nearly two hours to try to resuscitate him. i mentioned all of this because i want not just the committee members but any viewers in the public to understand that this was the fog of war, that the diplomatic security

you never saw chris stevens emails. there is an email from jim jordan as a joke saying i should contact the qataris and ask for security because no one will listen to me. how could she not know about the security environment in 2012. bill: much more to come on this. lyndsey graham, thank you for your time. thank you, sir. >> much of the questioning centered on calls for more security in libya that went unanswered. peter roskam make anne a gesture to make his point. >> of course i took responsibility. >> what does that mean when you say you took responsibility. >> i was telling you many of the issue ofs i was work on to help the libyan people. >> wham your responsibility to benghazi, that's my question. >> my responsibility was to be briefed and discuss with the security experts and the policy experts whether we would have a post in benghazi, whether we would tint, whether we would make it permanent. >> no one represented closing but you have two ambassadors who made self requests. here is what happened to their requests

stevens into benghazi? >> i was personally told by the officials who were in the state department who were immediately above chris, who were making the plans for him to go in, that it was going to be expeditionary diplomacy. it was going to require him to make a lot of judgments on the ground. about what he could accomplish and including where it would be safe for him to be and how long for him to stay. and i think the initial decision was, you know, up to 30 days and reassess. but it could have been 10 days. it could have been 60 days depending upon what he found and what he reported back to us. >> is and possibly what was determined about the danger of benghazi. who were those officials? >> there were a number of officials -- >> advising you on the security specifically? >> with respect to the security, this was a particular concern of the assistant secretary for the bureau in which chris worked. >> i'm sorry. what was that person's name? >> assistant secretary jeff feldman. and the security for diplomati

steven scully: i want to go back to 1975. the war had just ended, one of the most divisive wars in u.s. history. thousands of young men have died. the draft was in place. and yet, as the war came to an end, these vietnamese americans came to the u.s. many were fleeing because of the communist threat. take us back to what these families, these vietnamese were thinking, and why they wanted to come here. amanda demmer: this is a part of the most interesting part of my research, looking at compelling human stories. in the case of 1975, you have a moment where a country, south vietnam, the republic of vietnam, no longer exists on the map. this group of people who are to some extent stateless in a way. and so the group that i look at, the families of vietnamese political prisoners association, i will call them the association, the association is founded in 1977 by vietnamese americans, mostly women who have husbands, brothers, sons, incarcerated in political prisons in vietnam. and so they are able to enjoy the benefits of living i

schmidt. >> first of all, ambassador stevens had access to you.ct -- trish: i would like to thank our entire all-star panel here that we have had with us. stephen yates, thank you. kt mcfarland with me throughout the hour. wonderful analysis from all of you. thank you so much. we will continue monitoring these hearings as republican lawmakers grill hillary clinton there on capitol hill over just exactly what happened that day, september 11, 2012 when four americans were killed in libya. we will continue watching it as this market climbs higher. of 307 points. near highs of the session. liz claman taking it away. . liz: the dow up 312 points, the s&p up better than 33. both seeing best levels in two months. does it prove wall street needs less grilling on the secretary of state and more on the grilling of mcdonald's hamburgers? the fast food giant thrilling investors, and we can show you the stock. mcdonald's, ticker symbol mcd is jumping 7 nearly 8%, a major

because chris stevens knows how to pull the levers? is that your testimony? >> ambassadors are the ones who pass on security recommendations and requests. that's true throughout the world. they too rely on security professionals. >> what's his remedy if they're not responded to? what's his remedy if it's no? >> as i testified earlier, he was in regular email contact with some of my closest advisers. he was in regular email contact, and cable contact with -- >> cables didn't get through. you created an environment, madam secretary where the cables didn't get through. they didn't get through to you, didn't break into your inner circle. that was your testimony earlier. you can't have it both ways. you can't say all of this information came into me and i was able to process it, and it all stops at the security professionals. >> congressman, that's not what i was saying. i think that we tried to clarify that millions of cables come in, and they're processed and sent to the appropriate offices and personnel, with respect to the specifics. >> they didn't get through

stevens reported it? mr. hicks response, absolutely. for demonstration on chris stevens front door and not reported it is is unbelievable, mr. hicks said. secondly if had been reported he would have been out the back door within minutes and there was a back gate. everything points to a terrorist attack. we just heard from mr. pompeo about the long history of terrorist incidents, terrorist violence in the country. and yet five days later, susan rice goes on five tv shows, and she says this. benghazi was a spontaneous reaction as a consequence of a video. statement we all know is false. but don't take my word for it. here is what others have said. rice was off the reservation. off the reservation on five networks, white house worried about the politics. republicans didn't make those statements. they were made by the people who worked for you, in near eastern affairs bureau, the actual experts on libya in the state department. so, if there is no evidence for a video-inspired protest, where did the false narrative start? started with you, m

or whether she talked to chris stevens. there is nothing big, no major bombshell, and for hillary clinton that's a great thing. she's coming off, you know, a couple of highs here, a great democratic debate and joe biden deciding not to get in the race, and this was the third of three big challenges this month, and for her to emerge from it without any news or bombshell, new piece of information emerging is tremendous. this will be a really helpful sort of injection of energy into her campaign. so -- so, no, this hearing went about as clinton would have wanted it to. she got a little snippy perhaps naturally towards the end of those 11 hours, both trey gowdy and hillary clinton and elijah cummings, the ranking democrat who were sort of sniping at each other, but there were no bad moments, no the new pieces of information that are going to damage her politically that appeared to be revealed yesterday >> she mostly kept her cool and the democrats lined up around her and were able to attack republicans on her behalf, as her pro

stevens did not know in december whether or not the compound was going to remain open? are you -- >> or do you think that was 0 joke? >> i think if it about not an example of his sense of humor, as part of the ongoing discussion about benghazi's future, which he went to lengths to describe what he thought should be done, a lot of it was trying to decide, could we afford it? maintain it? what did we need to have there? so, yes there was an ongoing discussion, and i think he knew he was going to be in line to go to tripoli and he wanted to know exactly what the decision was going to be about the compound. he had weighed in, not only in that e-mail but numerous discussions with his colleagues back at the state department. >> finally, secretary clinton, we know that compound, the benghazi mission, was extended for yet another year because that same month your benghazi point person here in washington, jeffgszxh feldman, sent a memo wanting to extend benghazi through 2012 and sent it to undersecretary patrick kennedy who approved it. another high level official, state departm

from your staff about benghazi and chris stevens. when i look at this pile in 2012, i only see a handful of emails to you from your senior staff about benghazi. >> clinton acknowledged stevens didn't have her personal email address. but lawmakers have her friend sidney blumenthal's electronic messages. that led to sparks flying between the chairman and the panel's top democrat. >> why is it you only want mr. blumenthal's transcript released. >> i would like to have them all released. >> the survivors, their names? you want those released. >> it is noteworthy that blumenthal's emails got her attention, yet security requests from her ambassador in libya, she says did not reach her desk. brett? >> mike emmanuel live on the hill. let's get more details from hillary clinton's testimony before the house select committee on benghazi and some apparent contradictions, chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge is here. mrs. clinton said today will was never a recommendation to leave benghazi. >> well that's right, brett, mrs. clinton

we know ambassador stevens was worried. he wanted security ramped up and those pleas went unanswered. why did the state department just turn over 1,300 pages of his emails that have been asked for for years? bill: what should we expect from leading in the republicans in that hearing? reporter: definitely a buzz of nerves. gowdy would prefer this be a closed session, but he says hillary clinton wanted it to be open. he says hillary clinton will be treated fairly and professionally. expect detailed questions about stevens' emails and hillary clinton's emails. her top aid huma abedin was up here friday testifying. she has not complained about her treatment at the hearing. she is expected to testify as they try to get to specific details about hillary clinton's emails and chris stevens' emails as well. bill: what are their expectations. reporter: the democrat say it has turned into a circus. they believe hillary clinton will be very disciplined and represent herself very well. they say there is a chance of republican overreach

you say chris stevens was a friend of yours. he asked numerous times for extra protection. now, if i had been mr. stevens and i think anybody out there, anybody watching this, would agree if i had been mr. stevens, and i had had a relationship with you, and i had requested 20 or more times for additional security to protect not only my life but the people that were there with me, i would have gotten in touch with you some way. i would have let you know that i was in danger and the situation had deteriorated to a point i needed you to do something. did he have your personal e-mail? >> congressman, i do not believe that he had my personal e-mail. he had the e-mail and he had the direct line to everybody that he had worked with for years. he had been posted with officials in the state department. they had gone through difficult challenging dangerous assignments together. he was in constant contact with people. yes, he and the people working for him asked for more security. some of those requests were approved. others were not. we are obviously looking to learn what more we cou

and buster stevens was a particular type of ambassador. i will stay this in the best way possible. -- ambassador stevens was a particular type of ambassador. i would say this in the best way possible, he was a cowboy. he would jog around benghazi without security protection. he was trying to let the local people know that he did not when you take risks like that, terrible things can happen and that is what happened here. there -- hillary clinton does not want to raise that issue because it sounds like you were blaming him for what happened. >> if you are the assistant director getting me up -- getting the briefing, somebody really did screw up. i agree. let's agree. the one thing that came out, which hopefully will agree on [ indiscernible - multiple eight -- >> there were seven or eight stood role. it is difficult to do in and whatever. unless you change the civil service rules. that has all happened. that is the point. this so-called investigation by the committee is just a rehash of everything.>> a few heads rolling is not the problem.

stevens into benghazi? >> i was personally told by the officials who were in the state department, who were immediately above chris, who were making the plans for him to go in, that it was going to be expeditionary diplomacy. it was going to require him to make a lot of judgments on the ground about what he could accomplish and, including, where it would be safe for him to be and how long for him to stay. and i think the initial decision was, you know, up to 30 days and reassess, but it could have been ten days, it could have been 60 days, depend upon what he found and what he reported back to us. >> and possibly what was determined about the danger of benghazi. who were those officials, secretary? >> there were a number of officials who were -- >> that were advising you on the security specifically. >> well, with respect to the security, this was a particular concern of the assistant secretary for the bureau in which chris worked. >> i'm sorry. what was that person's name? >> assistant secretary jeff feldm

stevens into benghazi? >> i was personally told by the officials who were in the state department who were immediately above chris who were making the plans for him to go in that it was going to be expeditionary diplomacy. it was going to require him to make a lot of judgments on the ground about what he could accomplish and including where it would be safe for him to be and how long for him to stay. and i think the initial decision was, you know, up to 30 days and reassess, but it could have been ten days, it could have been sixty days depending upon what he found and what he reported back to us. >> and possibly what was determined about the danger of benghazi. who were those officials, secretary -- >> well, there were a number of officials -- >> that were advising you on the security specifically. >> well, with respect to the security, this was a particular concern of the assistant secretary for the bureau in which chris worked. >> i'm sorry, what was that person's name? >> assistant secretary jeff feldma

and they did have that on the day chris stevens was in benghazi. unfortunately, that proved insufficient in the face of the kind of attack they were facing. >> yes, ma'am. put the next poster up please. madam secretary, you're not likely to know who these two folks are, do you? >> i do not. >> one on the left is mohammad al zawahiri, the head of a terrorist group. the man on the left. were you aware they met with those men? >> i'm unaware of any meeting with him. >> the day he was killed, stevens sent a cable to the state department talking about his meeting with mr. bihn ham mid. are you aware of that cable? >> no, i am not. >> he said, they, referring to mr. hamid, they wanted an introductory meeting. they were here. they asked us what we needed to bring security to benghazi. your officials were meeting with this man on the ground in benghazi, libya, discussing security two days before that. but in august of that same year, the united states government had said this very man was, quote, a young rebel leader who allegedly fought in iraq under the

stevens in to benghazi? secretary clinton: i was personally told by the officials who were in the state department who were immediately above chris who were making the plans for him to go in that it was going to be expeditiously -- expeditionary diplomacy. it was going to require him to make a lot of judgments on the ground about what he could where sh and including it would be safe for him to be and how long for him to say. i think the initial decision was up to 30 days and reassess, but it could have been 10 days, it could have been 60 days depending upon what he found and reported back to us. mrs. brooks: and possibly what was determined about the dange every of benghazi. who were those officials? secretary clinton: there were a number of officials -- mrs. brooks: that were advising you on the security specifically. secretary clinton: with respect to the security, this was a particular concern of the assistant secretary for the bureau in which chris worked. mrs. brooks: what was that person's name? secret

chris stevens was a gutsy guy. good guy, a peace corps guy turned foreign service officer andity took risks. i don't want to get into him, and what blame he had, but you take risks in the world. really almost a mile from the nearest cia station, there was no real troops around him. but, see, he knew all that. i think he said my vibes are good, i got a good sense of the situation. things happen, horrible things happen, especially in a country without a real government. i think we have to put all that in perspective. it not like fort apache and we're fighting indians. it's not a fort. it's a little building with people there trying to get certainly done in terms of building a country and keeping peace. i thisnk we have to keep that i mind, not as some military installation being defended improperly. >> back to the panel of this and the backdrop for today, how much damage did mccarthy do in talking about the creation of this panel and how it has brought hillary clinton's polling numbers down? >> look, politics surroun

stevens into benghazi? ms.: i was personally told by the officials who were in the state department who were chris, who above were making the plans for him to go in, that it was going to the expeditionary diplomacy. it was going to require him to make a lot of judgments on the ground about what he could accomplish and including where it would be safer him to be, and how long for him to say. i think the initial decision was up to 30 days and reassess, but it could have been 10 days or 60 days, depending on what he found and reported back to us. >> who were those officials? ms. clinton: there were a number of officials. >> that were advising you on the security specifically. ms. clinton: this was a particular concern of the assistant secretary for the bureau in which chris ware. >> i'm sorry, what was that person's name? ms. clinton: assistant secretary the assistantand secretary for a diplomatic security and other officials within the state department. i think it is fair to say, this was a risky undertaking and

stevens into benghazi? >> i was personally told by the officials who were in the state department who were immediately above chris who were making the plans for him to go in that it was going to be expeditionary diplomacy. it was going to require him to make a lot of judgments on the ground about what he could accomplish and including where it would be safe for him to be and how long for him to stay, and i think the initial decision was, you know, up to 30 days and reassess, but it could have been ten days. it could have been 60 days fe s depending upon what he found and what he reported back to us. >> and possibly what was determined about the danger of benghazi. who were those officials, secretary clinton? >> well, there were a number of officials that were working -- >> that were advising you on the security specifically. >> well, with respect to the security, this was a particular concern of the assistant secretary for the bureau in which chris worked. >> i'm sorry, what was that person's name? >> assis

and steven spielberg, a match made in hollywood heaven, right? as i found out when i sat down with them, they're also just really good buddies. tonight the two pals unguarded at their most clever and playful. a far cry from the high-brow drama of their new movie" bridge of spies." when you sit down to a tom hanks movie, you can count on a riveting adventure with the fascinating hero. >> you're asking me to violate the constitution. >> reporter: and "bridge of hanks plays a relatively ordinary man plopped into extraordinary circumstances as a high-stakes negotiator. >> i'm an insurance lawyer. i haven't done criminal work in years. >> he was a bad ass. he was a brawler when it came down to the finer points of the law. >> reporter: it's the kind of meaty role built his now legendary hollywood career with, earning two oscars along the way as the loveable underdog in "forest gump." >> can you believe it? i got to go to college, too. >> reporter: in all his roles he plays the ever likable every man, as in "a league of their own." >> there's no crying

ambassador to libya chris stevens. 24 minutes later, o10:04 p.m.on cia rescue squad assembles at the cia annex one mile from the consulate. before leaving and heading to the consulate. the cia rescue squad conducts local militias and libyan intelligence service. they see they needs vehicles with 50 caliber machine guns. no one responds. at the same time the alert goes out at the state department announcing an attack, the cia security team taking heavy fire heads to the consulate. 10:30 p.m. libya time, ambassador stevens and diplomat sean smith take refuge in the consulate compound. the militants set fire to the consulate. the smoke killing ambassador smith in minutes. meanwhile back in washington, d.c. at 5:00 p.m. eastern time. defense secretary leon panetta, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff martin dempsey attending a previously scheduled meeting with president obama. at 5:11 washington time. 11:11 p.m. in libya. american surveillance drone arrives overhead. on the ground in benghazi, the cia team at the consulate puts a group of state depar

chris stevens was there to serve hillary clinton's idea. he is dead because he went over there in service of hillary clinton's idea and hillary clinton did not provide him with enough security after he went over there. but they didn't actually lay it out that way because it is impossible to prove the connecting tissue in that argument. >> they were working their way in the early part of the session when they seem to be a bit more concentrated when they were building those circles. first she wrote the policy and then put chris stevens in there as the person to carry on the work and then later got in as ambassador and the time she was aware of security problems. steve kornacki, you are thinking about this because i think it is a hard time to write the main piece except hillary wrote over and over again responds well to the charges. i don't see a coherence except that somehow she let those people die. >> i was surprised by jim jordan like all of the members of this committee had two shots at hillary clinton on this. he decided to concentrate b

stevens into bern ghazi? >> i was personally told by the officials who were in the state department who were immediately above chris who were making the plans for him to go in, that it was going to be expeditionary diploma as where i. he was going to be required to make judgments on the ground about what he could accomplish and including where it would be safe for him to be and how long to stay. i think the initial decision was, you know, up to 30 days and reassess, but it could have been ten days. it could have been 60 days, depending upon what he found and what he reported bab. >> what what was determined about the danger of benghazi. who were those officials? >> well, there were a number of officials who were advising. >> that were -- well, with respect to the security, this was a particular concern -- >> i'm sorry. what was that person's name? >> assistant secretary jeff feldman. >> thank you. >> and it was also a concern of the assistant secretary for diplomatic security as well as other officials within

did they keep faith with chris stevens?evens was someone who had a commitment to our presence in libya -- >> there is no question. >> and we want to honor that by continuing to -- >> there is no question -- >> continuing to do what we can to support the transition. it is very much in my view in america's interest to continue to try to do so. >> i yield back. >> the chair will recognize the general lady from illinois ms. duckworth. >> i understand there were securiity improvements made. can you talk about those prior to the attacks and perhaps some of the things you sort of eluded to with more ventilation in the safe rooms and some of those things? >> yeah, there were a number of security improvements that were made to the facility. again, there was an emphasis on the outer walls, to try to create a more effective guard entrance. there was an effort to try to make sure that the facility itself was hardened so it could with stand attacks if that came to pass. it was in a series of decisions made by the security professionals

>> steven fincher. >> jimmy: oh yeah, of course. >> steven scorsese. >> jimmy: steven scorsese, he's a great guy. yeah, yeah, he's martin's brother. yeah, he's really fun. >> incredibly talented guy. >> jimmy: yeah. but the thing about soderbergh as well, i heard that you charmed your way into seeing an early cut of "magic mike xxl." >> well, i did. >> jimmy: yeah, and he produced it? >> he produced it. he didn't direct it this time, but he shot it. >> you really wanted to see the sequel. >> i mean, "magic mike" is his finest work. >> jimmy: yeah, arguably. but yeah. >> forget "erin brockovich." forget "traffic." it's "magic mike." >> jimmy: "magic mike", everyone knows it. >> so, i begged him for a long time if i could see the movie. and he showed it to us. and i was so overcome with emotion. i had such a cathartic experience as they were playing deangelo that i started crying. [ light laughter ] >> jimmy: wait, you cried during "magic mike xxl"? >> i cried. and steven looked at me and he goes, are you crying? because that's how he talks. >> jimmy: that's a good impression, by the w

tom hanks and steven spielberg teaming up again in the new cold war thriller "bridge of spies." >> the next mistake our country makes could be the last one. >> 16 oscar nominations between them, but you will never guess what spielberg has his eye on next. >> yeah, yeah. >>> and breaking tonight. lamar odom found unconscious. the former l.a. lakers basketball star and ex-husband of reality star khloe kardashian rushed to the hospital from a nevada brothel. but first, the "nightline 5." >> it takes a lot of work to run this business, but i really love it. i'm on the move all day long. and sometimes i just don't eat the way i should so i drink boost to get the nutrition that i'm missing. >> boost complete nutritional drink has 26 vitamins and minerals including calcium and vitamin d to support strong bones and 10 grams of protein to help maintain muscle. all with a great taste. >> i don't plan on slowing down anytime soon. >> stay strong. stay active, with boost. >>> number one in just 60 seconds. >>> good evening. thanks for joining us. what does a presidential debate look like without d

come on. >> they arrest steven harris. as they are taking him to the police car, i approach him and i ask him if he wants to talk. i am chris hanson. >> once he figures out who it is he wants to tell the story. >> we are doing the story on pimps in las vegas. >> co-incidence. >> lucky for me. >> do you ever see our show "to catch a predator." >> what, is she 17 or something? >> no. >> good. >> but the word on the street, steven, is that you're a pimp. >> no. >> she just made this up? >> she made a lot of stuff up. >> was you following us around at the restaurant? >> were you following us around to the restaurant? >> i will get to that. you tell her to go up to a group of men. >> no. that never happened. >> so she is making this up. >> if i was a so-called pimp, i would never let someone of my girls go solicit somebody while they were with me, that is just dumb. if i was a pimp i wouldn't do that. so that story is a lie. made up. >> the picture that starts to come together here is one of you grooming her like so many other

you say chris stevens was a personal friend of yours. he asked numerous times for personal protection. i think anybody out there watching this would agree. if i had been mr. stevens and i had had a relationship with you, and i had requested 20 or more times for additional security to protect not only my life but the people that were there with me, i would have gotten in touch with you some way. i would have let you know that i was in danger, and that the situation had deteriorated to a point, i needed you to do something. he didn't have your personal e-mail? >> congressman, i do tnot beliee that he had my personal e-mail. he had the e-mail and he had the direct line to everybody that he had worked with for years. he had been posted with officials in the state department. they had gone through difficult, challenging, dangerous assignments together. he was in constant contact with people. yes, he and the people working for him asked for more security. some of those requests were approved. others were not. we're obviously looking to learn w

chris stevens communicated with the members of my staff. not raise security with the members of my staff. communicated with him about certain issues. he did not raise security with me. raised security with the security professionals. i know that's not the answer you hear because it's being asked in many different ways by committee members. facts,se are the mr. chairman. john: hillary clinton, 2016runner for the democratic presidential nomination, was on capitol hill this week. testimony ongave her four-year service as between 2009state specifically, in relation to the september 2012 terrorist attack on the u.s. consulate in benghazi, libya, in which four americans, including ambassador chris stevens, were murdered. republicans believe mrs. clinton had the opportunity to tell the whole story, especially leading up tood the benghazi attack. democrats say republicans are playing politics to discredit mrs. clinton's presidential campaign. the exchanges were sometimes heated. here's g.o.p. committee chairman gowdy. trey gowdy: i want to draw you

the movies that i've made with steven are very different one from the other. "saving private ryan" was this emotional piece of historical documentation along with this other kind of like heartbeat to it. "the terminal" was this, you know, one off set piece that was looking at a very specific almost american behavior at this time kind of story. "catch me if you can" i jumped on, , called them up, and d saidid"hey, i know it's leo's movie, but if anybody is playing this fbi guy and they drop out let me know." you know this takes a man who is , willing to go deep, deep, deep, deep into the nuts and bolts of the law, and that requires a aery special kind off tention and energy, but also faith in the nuts and bolts of the law that he had. and my job was to make that evident in every opportunity that i had. as for abel, if he dies in an american prison, the next russian operative who gets caught mighththink twice about keeping his mouth shut, and you never know. again and decide to trade russian secrets for small american favors. >> one of thththings i loved about t

steven! steven! steven!

steven saywell is good to stay with us.continue the conversation on central banks. ♪ jonathan: good morning. welcome back to bloomberg tv. this is "on the move." i am jonathan ferro live from the city of london. 30 minutes into the equity session here in london. the dax also higher this morning. volkswagen stock actually trading higher. despite a series of negative headlines. let's get straight to it with caroline hyde. riksbank has no change. ofare seeing a record low minus. we are seeing weakening a little bit. up about .1%. spiking that much higher. we are seeing continued weakening in the cronin there. no move, still negative. look at it first test look at it versus the euro. -- look at it versus the euro. inflationll seeing going. the target is 2%. but when you get consumer prices , there is still a challenge. the swedish central bank is trying to fight the ecb. the ecb promising further stimulus. what can be seen with the spout. the repo rate can be cut further. they see inflation rate at 1.9% for 2015. they see it co

stevens entering the night at 4-0, hosting the 3-1 lakers, / stevens in red, 7-0 lakers, . malik carter 39 yard touchdown catch, made it the lakers 14-0. weren' t done, nick brothers rips off a 30 yard touchdown run, . they would miss the point after. 20-0. stevens couldn' t do much on offense. 42-0, the final. winnisquam and somersworth in the bears improve to 5-0 with a the graveyard. 26-0 win. christain serrano ran for 125 yards and two touchdowns. he also through two touchdown passes. the newport tigers are undefeated in division three, at falmouth tonight. 3rd quarter, already 42-7 newport, tyler shannon with a big run, 32 yard gain, taken down inside the 10. a few plays later, jake dows takes it in from two yards out, . that right there made it 49-7. the wildcats still fighting, jacob shoemaker hits koal simonds for a short gain, but the tigers are looking good at 5-0. they win big, 56-7. bishop brady at raymond the giants were tested, but they win 27-22. >> come on, let' s go. jason: merrimack valley home with kingswood. 14-0 home team in the second quarter when ian

jake sullivan is e-mailing ambassador stevens asking the ambassador to look at a memo sidney blumenthal sent you. and in fact, mr. sullivan writes to the ambassador, chris, checking in with you on this report. any reactions? all right. that's on exactly the same day that, i believe, our ambassador's papers were accepted in libya. the day after an ied attack on our compound, and chris stevens is being asked to read and react to an e-mail by sid me blumenthal from your deputy chief of staff. this is what he's writing on the 7th. this is after he's been turned down on a request for more security. this is our ambassador. appreciate you giving this proposal consideration even if the conclusion was not favorable

steven: my rambunctious son, steven jr. that's why i got to put on roller skates to keep up with him sometimes. come on, junior. go ahead, this way! brooke does have motor dyspraxia, which means is she's a little bit uncoordinated, but she has come a long way as far as her learning. steven: the important thing for me is my daughter knows that she's loved, and we support and we help her as much as we can. robin: even though she does have a disability, we don't treat her like she has a disability. where you going? look! brooke's crazy, carefree, annoying. you're cheating! we're sometimes fighting and on each other's backs and everything, but she's the best. i'm not giving you a head start. tag, you're it. i remember when i was growing up and having pets in the home and how that felt to me, how special that was to me. less than a year ago, we adopted two beautiful dogs, ruby and marley from adoptapet.com. to me, i think any animal deserves a home. i love my dogs. brooke loves playing with ruby, especially at the park, because