. >> steven warfield and i am not familiar with the details of the case nor am i a party to it. but i must say that i was taken aback by mr. ginsberg the dog ate it defense. first of all what parks policy was he following? if indeed he claims that he was following it i think that you should certainly ask under what policy was he destroying these documents? and i should back up and say that i support mr. wooding's request and position as many of you other folks previously have said. i would like to read to you section 67.29-7, correspondence and records shall be maintained, section a. the mayor and all department heads shall maintain and preserve in a professional and business-like manner, all documents, and correspondence, including but not limited to letters, e-mails, drafts, memos, invoices, reports and proposals and shall disclose all such records in accordance with this ordinance. >> that does not allow for the dog ate it or it was not important enough document or some such reasoning. i will read it again in fun, it is one sentence. 67.29-7, correspondence and records shall