the court went out of its way to find that unlike crawford, justice stevenson crawford, the state did not have the an interest in protecting the integrity of the roll sufficient to establish that requirement. and i think went on to legislate its own standards. you know, it surprised me in reading that opinion, professor because we've had photo i.d. in florida for quite a long time. i don't believe it to have been an impediment to anyone's right to vote nor do i believe it to have been discriminatory as to any particular subgroup including hispanics which i'm in that category. i think that effort in wisconsin, maybe it's unique to milwaukee and wisconsin. if this is part of a movement to stir up the votes among certain groups, perhaps that's the intent behind it, but as far as being a law that is unconstitutional or contrary to the voting rights act, i think that was a reach by the district court judge. >> let me do a historian's job and put this in a little bit of context of why people can come to very different conclusions on the same topic. republicans generally have a view of the p