stillwell deserves some criticism. he cannot do the job and he is not dedicating all his time to the chiang kai shek account. that is why they call him the squad leader. he wants to be on the ground fighting down in burma as that is not where he is supposed to be. he is the senior chinese military officer in the china-burma-india theater. he should be spending most of his time working with chiangai shek. that is not what -- what he does. he gets relieved by a man from the obama national guard, silver star in world war i. he was a politician in an army uniform, had served in very powerful positions. the story of him getting off the plane to meet with mao and doing an unlawful war -- an oklahoma war whoop. he will recommend to roosevelt that stillwell should be relieved and he will be relieved. this guy, with a -- whittimyer, he will become the guy. he is a strategist. he is going to do what stillwell should have done. sit down with chiang kai shek and get the job done. we have at cdsc a cheer named for wedemeyer as the

that is where stillwell sets up. we will train the division army in india, the brits will supply the uniforms and the money. the first group of americans, about 65 american soldiers who will lead savanna georgia 65 to pakistan and move through india up to rein ramgarh and build this training school. we will be helped by what is now , which then was the office of strategic services. it had two kind of parts. one of it was this office of war information. this is john king fairbanks, who, with his wife, was in china collecting information and writing studies. the intel piece of the central intelligence agency of today was born here. the operational part of the cia is also born here. the american cooperation organization, milton miles is the front for the office of strategic services in china and they will work for chiang kai shek's chief of gestapo. dai-li, who will later die in an airplane crash, essentially is out there making sure there is no opposition to chiang kai shek. it does not matter who that opposition is. i