the interaction of the government of the parliament , for example, how you the sour question in the stiza parliament is to submit the budget, is it all one-sided or the time, for example, to submit the budget is a matter for the government. it is good that the government's opinion is also taken in these cases. otherwise, i will tell you one thing unofficially. see, for example, in the vote of confidence in the ministers in stiza, in all cases, the person who opposes speaks, in the end, the time of the relevant minister is over. he comes and explains. after explaining, if it is a vote of confidence, they will vote . if it is a vote of impeachment, they will vote. but see , for example, the process that exists in the current question. i even talked to some members of the guardian council, and this is really there is room for tolerance, now first the commission will give a short report, then the minister should come answer the question, then the questioner will start again. asking questions is now in two parts . to sum up, the minister speaks in two parts . the last person who asks questions

, the parliament in the discussion of the vote of confidence in the same questions that i said in stizase things, there was a good interaction. we had a case of some representatives who sometimes made comments that undermined this consensus and empathy a little. lately, we have been forced to reply in writing . it is possible that these are undocumented, not accurate, and works and classes it has a negative effect on the system and the country. you can see one. for example, let someone make an opinion, now an official or a representative, then the persian language media will make a plan based on the false statistics that, for example, in that conversation, for example, this number of people want to be executed, or for example, an opinion like this that is not accurate, they themselves will find out later, but when to say something else , well, if the way is that it is within the same assembly, the imam also stressed that an opportunity should be given in the assembly itself to explain that someone has come against, for example, a minister. a group has spoken against a governor , they sh