here. in particular, jens stoltenberg’s statement that it is necessary to lift the ban on strikes onn weapons, what do you think? at the same time, yes, it should be noted that many european union countries, including those that are members of the north atlantic alliance, have already opposed at the level of foreign ministers, at the level of leaders these states. do you think this is a real split, or is this again an overton window, yes, that is , information is being thrown in, then... here, i don’t know exactly for what reasons, mr. stoltenberg, at the final stage of his tenure as nato secretary general, aleksandrelevich , we hear you with some pauses, i don’t really understand if this is a problem with the sound or if we have some kind of technical glitch. i don't know, here we go, yes, that means, but in any case, yes, in any case, it's hard to say why stoltenberg, at the end of his tenure in this position, which ended ... in the coming fall, decided to try to play along with the most aggressive, rabid forces in the north atlantic alliance, which continue to push towards the esc

in addition, a number of eu leaders also did not support stoltenberg’s initiative to allow kiev to usepons to strike russian territory. report by our european correspondent regina sevastyanova. italy and germany oppose jens stoltenberg’s proposal to lift restrictions on the use of western weapons by ukraine, including for attacking russian targets in internationally recognized territory community of the territory of russia. at the same time , poland and sweden actually supported this idea. over the past few days. the general secretary of the alliance has repeatedly voiced this idea, speaking out in interviews and speeches dedicated, in particular, to what is to come. the allies must decide for themselves on what conditions to supply weapons to ukraine. as i said earlier, the time has come to consider lifting a number of restrictions: ukraine is under attack from russian territory with missiles and artillery, and it is difficult to respond to them. kiev has the right to defend itself in accordance with the charter un, international law, including attacking legitimate military targets on

stoltenberg he says, yes of course, he talks about stoltenberg, and he says, they are all taian and salvini talking, this is by the way, an indicator that italians, albeit not in the same way as conventionally germans, but nevertheless, in general, in the life of the living generation, remember in general approximately what it is like to fall under a strong distribution, although of course italy is not like that got, but nevertheless, but in general some kind of approximate idea of ​​reality. well, let’s also listen to the italian defense minister crosetto, please, i believe that at the moment it is a mistake to escalate the already significant tension. aid to ukraine is intended to prevent the outbreak of war, but this aid must be provided in such a way as to leave open the possibility of concluding an immediate truce and starting peace negotiations. there is no nato secretary or one country that sets the line for everyone else. and now, after listening to krase. we’ll talk now, and well, with your help, i’ll look for the answer to my question, because i don’t have this answer, along these

he was asked to comment on the statements of the head of the north atlantic alliance, jens stoltenbergkraine to launch strikes on russian territory. dmitry peskov believes that in this way nato is increasing the degree of escalation and flirting with military rhetoric. at the same time , the president’s press secretary noted that stoltenberg’s words were not may be a reflection of his personal point of view. he is the secretary general of nato. peskov assured that the russian military will continue the military special operation to stop all threats. this cannot be his personal opinion. he is an official. he is the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance. this is how we perceive it. nato is increasing the degree of escalation, nato is flirting with military rhetoric, falling into military ecstasy, this is the reality that we need to continue to deal with. our military also knows what to do. they they are continuing a special military... operation to stop all this, well, in turn, russian foreign minister sergei lavrov noted that the nato secretary general has exceeded his author

this week stoltenberg brought a whole bag of selected promises to kiev. arrived in ukraine by train. looking out the window of the car, stoltenberg carefully counted how many ukrainians were left? stoltenberg in kyiv held a joint press conference with president of ukraine vladimir zelensky. in press conferences stoltenberg. knows a lot, he always has thousands of variations on how to send ukraine to hell. stoltenberg said that nato countries had not fulfilled their obligations to ukraine and recalled the agreement on new military assistance from the united states. he said it straight out: we didn’t fulfill our old obligations, now we won’t fulfill our new ones. the secretary general of nato in kiev promised zelensky that ukraine will definitely someday join... i apologize, but what were they creating before that? funeral team? judging by the current situation , the ukrainian armed forces will consist exclusively of foreign mercenaries. and gasterbeiter.

so, according to stoltenberg. ukraine to defend itself if it does not attack russian targets in the border area. end of quote. therefore, according to the secretary general of the alliance, restrictions on the right to fire western missiles western countries could remove it for russian regions. that is, in fact, a direct call for attacks using nato weapons. the topic was discussed today at a meeting of eu defense ministers, and europeans were divided into two camps. of those who approve of blows from. western weapons against russia, or at least traditional russophobes openly declare this: lithuania and latvia, as well as the czech republic and the netherlands, they openly support stoltenberg. if we are talking about statements by jens stoltenberg or someone else, about that ukraine could use weapons supplied to it from abroad, i think this is completely logical. ukraine is a country that defends itself, just like a country that has been attacked, it absolutely has. all rights to use all possibilities for your defe

jen stoltenberg said, and so did i i will also remind you that the main delegation, including volodymyr zelenskyi, who literally shortly after the attack on the construction hypermarket in kharkiv visited it, literally against the background of these riots, recorded a video message, it is obvious that his main delegation is to washington, because if washington allows , will give permission to use its weapons to launch strikes on the territory of russia, then this will probably become such a signal, including for other european countries. for a similar permission, i will remind you that there was actually a statement at the beginning of may the head of the foreign ministry of great britain, he stated that great britain is not opposed to ukraine using its weapons to target targets on the territory of russia, but it now seems that the main permission, which ukraine is waiting for, this is washington, and that's really a big question, why is that, because...we were hoping that today maybe we'll have an expert join us, we'll join, and we'll raise this question, why is that, why is there a la

stoltenberg’s fool agreed to the point that putin said well today that well, when he probably didn’tsting, yes, that is, i thought that we had one old man with dementia, now it turns out that there are two of them, that is, stoltenberg too. they are fighting in hysterics, they suddenly say that zelensky is not in control of the situation, his fighting spirit is low, but at the same time i repeat once again, the fighting is fierce, the ukrainians are trying to hold the front, yes, we are now pressing almost everywhere, it is relatively quiet in zaporozhye, the losses are such, that it only seems to zelensky that now these terrible videos have come out of the markets, where... we still have a thousand people a day signing a contract voluntarily, to vasyl, how cool everything is with them, there is no one, there is no ukraine, despite assurance in due course no one, they keep the men because it’s scary, they teach poorly, the westerners say, the russians now dictate where, when and how, they give away, well, if we talk about global things, then we see how... this is a funny statement by

i don't know why stoltenberg says something like that. for the supply of weapons and, which were agreed upon with ukraine, at the moment these rules are working, this is olaf scholz’s position, and sweden, in an appropriate response to a request from journalists, actually supported jans stoltenberg’s idea. according to international law, ukraine has the right to defend itself by introducing military operations directed against the territory enemy, as long as military actions comply with the laws and customs of war. constantly proclaiming what our own red line is only encourages moscow to adapt its christmas actions to our constantly changing voluntary restrictions. earlier, let me remind you, the head of the british foreign ministry said that ukraine can decide for itself how to use british weapons; in his opinion, kiev has the right to strike targets on russian territory. this announcement was made on may 3, at the end of february finland made a similar statement at the chapter level. ministry of defense of the country, let me remind you

some eu leaders also did not support stoltenberg’s initiative. from our european correspondent regina sevastyanova. italy and germany oppose jens stoltenberg’s proposal to lift restrictions on the use of western weapons by ukraine, including for attacking russian targets on internationally recognized russian territory. at the same time , poland and sweden actually supported this idea. in interviews and speeches, he said earlier, dedicated, in particular, to the upcoming nato summit. the allies must decide for themselves on what conditions to supply weapons to ukraine. as i am it is time to consider removing the row restrictions: ukraine is subject to attacks from russian territory with missiles, and it is difficult for them to respond with artillery. kiev has the right to defend itself in accordance with the un charter and international law. including attacking legitimate military targets on russian territory. some allies have lifted such restrictions, allowing ukrainians to better defend themselves. i believe that the time has come to lift other

stoltenberg said something like that. we should remain prudent.d not send signals of concessions. however, in recent months there have been many statements that i would call dubious, such as the words of emmanuel macron. i advise everyone to be more careful. i want to point out that approximately 2 weeks, 10 days in the west. is happening, but still voices, voices, voices that we need to hit further, we need to hit more, and in general against everyone indiscriminately on russian territory, deep into russian territory. lately it was not entirely clear, this is such a orchestrated move, and a chorus of voices that now the american government will say, the rest will say, well, they’re calling us, how can that be, we may not have wanted it, but that means that’s it are we being called to this, or is this really a serious discussion that is going on there, they wo n’t understand what to do, stoltenberg’s statement apparently indicates that this is... an orchestrated chorus of voices, because stoltenberg is voicing the american point of view, in this i

stoltenberg knows a lot about press conferences; he always has a thousand variations ready to send ukraine to hell. stoltenberg said that nato countries had not fulfilled their obligations to ukraine and recalled the agreement on new military assistance from the united states. he said it straight out: we didn’t fulfill our old obligations, now we won’t fulfill our new ones. nato in kiev promised zelensky that ukraine would definitely someday join the alliance and announced its intention to create ukrainian armed forces. nato decided to compensate ukraine for the shortage of ammunition with a surplus assurances of oaths. create ukrainian armed forces. i'm sorry, but what were they creating before that? funeral team? judging by the situation today, ukrainian. i am sincerely trying to understand what amuses me more, the fact that stoltenberg has been continuing to promise something to kiev for so long, or the fact that vova zelensky continues to believe in all this? at the same time, stoltenberg clarified that ukraine will not receive an invitation to the nato summit in july. there is a feeli

regarding stoltenberg and the desire to attack the historical territories of the russian federation,presents in europe. well, since he is the secretary general of nato, yes, of course, whoever, as they say, dines a girl, dances her, the americans pay, controls nato, he works for them without any doubt, and it would seem, but if you want to attack historical territories russian federation, well, let the americans give their long-range missiles for this attack, but they don’t, the idea is this: stoltenberg’s task is to carry out attacks on the historical territories of the russian federation. these are our leopards, leopards, these are our european weapons, now stoldeng’s task is to do the same, to do the same, to convince european politicians that they and, above all, mr. scholz, that they give, these are long-range weapons, and why is this needed at all, it would seem yes, well, if you want to develop success in some direction, you need these missiles to achieve some military goal, no, zelensky’s task is to... for a long time there has been no existence for them, in some moment, well

nato secretary general jen stoltenberg, i will remind you, has repeatedly stated that the alliance willnd troops to ukraine, but if this condition or guarantee will be spelled out literally in the final statement of the nato summit, then this is actually something new, such a thing has never happened before the summit, i remind you, will take place in july in washington, oleksandr kraev, director of the north america program of the ukrainian prizma foreign policy council, joins our broadcast. good evening, i congratulate you, good evening to you oleksandr, we haven't seen you for a long time, let's start from the beginning, there will be a nato summit in july, some kind of final communique should be adopted there. declaration, and here the italian press writes that already in this declaration there will be a refusal to send troops to participate in the war in ukraine, please tell me, it looks like it looks realistic, to be honest, not yet, and it looks unrealistic in some respects, well, first of all, it must be said that such a concession, and it is indeed a concession on the part of n

yes, stoltenberg made it clear to us that we will not receive an invitation to nato at the anniversaryashington, despite our expectations. i... did not dramatize it, i would still be inclined to the fact that ukraine should eventually start to back up its loud statements by demonstrating adequate positions within the state itself, i.e. by strengthening the government as closely as possible to the government of national unity. thank you, mr. yevgeny. magda was in touch with us, we will now take a break for just a few minutes, but you stay with us, there are discounts represented by coco discounts of may on fenstyl 15% in pharmacies plantain, bam and oshchad. there are discounts, representing coco discounts in may on voltaren forte, 20% in the pharmacies psyllanyk, bam and oskad. the football format changes the time of airing. from now on, you can immerse yourself in the football atmosphere every monday at 10:00 p.m. professional analysis of matches, exclusive interviews, goals, goals, emotions. the project is for experienced fans as well as for people who appreciate a non-committed view

but at the same time we must admit that unity regarding the measures proposed by stoltenberg is stilluntries themselves. a striking example of this was another discussion between the militant macron and the slightly more cautious scholz. the president of france made an official visit to germany for the first time in almost a quarter of a century, and ukraine was discussed there primarily. germany, macron has demonstrated a good ability to quickly switch from ship to ball. even more impressive is that this is the first state visit of a french president to germany in almost quarter of century. berlin and paris are so accustomed to solving problems in a working manner. however, the default format of the state visit does not imply a strong emphasis on the conflict agenda. the table football match between macron and federal president steinmeier ended with a score of 1:1. as expected, friendship won. we walked through the background area set up at the brandenburg gate; the square and the adjacent streets were already covered with synthetic turf imitating a football field. european champions

members of nato, none of us could have hoped for a greater champion for this alliance than jens stoltenberg. no one could have done a better holding us together when others were trying to divide us. no one could have done a better job really carrying the alliance forward. and jens, we've all said it in different ways at times, but it always bears. we're so grateful for your leadership. thank. i also want thank all of the permanent representatives from the alliance countries for the work that you're doing every single day with your teams to really move forward with the work of the alliance. none of this happens by itself. none of this is automatic. it's because of the day in, day

stoltenberg called on the countries of the alliance to remove all restrictions on strikes by western on the territory of our country. we are not talking about new territories, we are talking about our borders, the borders of russia as of 1991. and suddenly, you know, it's very interesting that against this background it became clear that what they hired for the last 10 years... somehow it is not the territory of russia at all, because, well, what would there be to talk about, if in fact all this is happening and there are blows in a circle, and they seem to have written something in the constitution, no, that's all turned out to be a complete lie, which is not important even for propagandists, because now they say that this is the real russia, which means that it is not really russia and that is not considered, well , then who is all this talk about that... some exemption of historic areas, if a historic area is found - this is what in 1991, within the borders of 1991, everything else is not russia, not a non-russian territory, and it is not important at all, the only thing that is i

no, they bear the burden, and not only in the fact that jen stoltenberg apologized for the inefficiencyromised that it will be better in the future, well, he will continue, literally from the fall he will no longer have to be responsible for it, because he is finally dying, forgive the title . the post of secretary general of nato, and accordingly, will move further on his personal path, and mark rutt will most likely become the obvious secretary general. i think that this shows that the west is giving russia a fairly clear political signal that ukraine is in the sphere of constant attention, that the west is not leaving ukraine alone with russia, no matter how much the latter would like, this is an absolutely clear awareness , a clear signal, and i don't think we should... doubt that. yes, stoltenberg made us understand that we are at the jubilee summit in washington despite ours waiting, we will not receive an invitation to nato. i wouldn't dramatize it. i would still be inclined to the fact that ukraine should eventually start to back up its loud statements with a demonstration of an

yes, stoltenberg made us understand that we are at the anniversary summit in washington, despite ourectation. we will not receive an invitation to nato. i would n't dramatize it. i would still be inclined to the fact that ukraine should eventually start its loud statements to support the demonstration of an adequate position within the state itself. that is, by strengthening the personnel of the government, as close as possible to the government. to national unity, thank you, mr. yevhen, yevhen magda was at our place communication, we will now break literally for a few minutes, but you stay with us. when you sleep on an uneven surface, the spine takes the wrong position, because you cannot feel energetic in the morning and productive during the day, and with the matrik topper you will forget that you are sleeping on an imperfect surface, for... for a comfortable sleep at an affordable price. more and more ukrainian families choose topper matryk, which comes in a convenient package that is easy enough to remove. within a day after removing the factory film, it can be used. a unique co

and i will recall the words of jens stoltenberg.he time has come to allow ukraine to strike the territory of the russian federation with western weapons. but we will tell about which countries are still trying to prevent escalation, and why this strategy is wrong, in our material. the 25th february 2022, the second day of the full-scale invasion, the millerovo military airbase in the rostov region burns. and who did it? - asked sarcastically on the page of the air force command of the armed forces of ukraine. this was almost the first attack by the armed forces of ukraine on enemy territory. according to the information of journalist yuriy butusov, it was hit by a tactical missile complex point u. then the aggressor lost several sides, planes and helicopters. with in the first days of the great war, the defense forces did not hesitate to strike on the territory of russia, and the enemy, who planned to capture kyiv in three days, suffered losses, but the means of destruction were running out, the enemy adapted, and the western partne

well, as for stoltenberg, so here are his quotes. confirm that he said that western weapons deliveredo ukraine become ukrainian, that is, it turns out that the kiev regime can do whatever it wants with them. we will find out all the details from our european correspondent regina sevastyanov. regina, greetings, well, what kind of help can the kiev regime ultimately receive? well, as the children’s saying goes, i twist and turn, i want to deceive, and i also want to inject myself. hello, belgium, for example, will send f-16s that have already retired from service, so the question is how quickly belgium will receive a replacement with this jet, in addition, spare parts are needed, which belgium does not currently have, the f-16 aircraft intended for ukraine need repairs, but the minister of foreign affairs, who announced this agreement, and the minister defense, being of the opinion that by the end of this year, belgium, the kingdom, may be able to transfer from two to four f-16 aircraft to kiev. repeatedly throughout this week called on the alliance countries to lift restrictions on the

of course, if stoltenberg says where to hit ukraine, we should also say where? a hypothetically possible exchange of nuclear strikes, what targets will we attack? well, for example, the new nato headquarters, and preferably on a day when everyone will be there. well, seriously, i would like to see what happens after that. this, i think that the russians would not like it very much, what will happen after that, well, and in the background of all this, what is actually at issue, it is only about intimidation, and what exactly intimidation, as the russians see it, seems to me to be very clearly explained in this evening club by solov'ov's madmen.

stoltenberg has nothing to do with these weapons. of nato forces on the territory or airspace of ukraine, because otherwise - quote, it will be difficult to keep nato out of the conflict. they seem to want ukraine to win, but they themselves clearly say that they will not interfere, they want nato, excuse me, i’ll interfere a little, but i have the feeling that they want nato to be out of the equation, as it were, but... they don’t understand one thing, that for us these brackets are wide enough, they are all there for us inside, well, for us this is what these all mean, they can quarrel among themselves, argue as much as they want, pass weapons, do not transfer, allow use, do not whether to allow it, declare it to each other or not, we will sit and wait until they decide there, maybe it’s time to take some first steps, if they stopped supplying nato weapons to ukraine, the war would end with our victory, i think, within. .. several weeks, everything that is now happening at the front, all this is happening thanks to nato weapons, en

this statement was made by nato secretary general en stoltenberg.called on the allies to lift the restriction on... the use of weapons that western countries supply to kiev. by according to the gene secalliance, prohibiting the armed forces of ukraine from hitting military targets on the territory of our country means complicating their defense. the states are in no hurry to support stoltenberg’s initiative, but at the same time they continue to pump up the kiev regime with weapons. washington has agreed on a new aid package for kiev worth $275 million. it will include ammunition for the hymers multiple launch rocket system, artillery. the united states announced arms supplies to kiev when russia confirmed its readiness for negotiations. our ambassador in washington stated this, anatoly antonov. according to the diplomat, washington does not want peace in europe; the united states is doing everything to prolong the conflict and increase the number of casualties on both sides. sending to the front lines in the streets of ukrainian cities was complete

i'm talking about nato and stoltenberg and scholz.trying to understand, this is connected with taurus, that is, they give everything, but they don’t give missiles, this is also a strange position, and i can’t understand why, as they say, everyone gives everything that is possible, and he kept his head down and that’s it, stoltenberg not only spoke, he also said that germany owes 2%. spend on the defense industry, and this is a direct demand , this is a transfer of the demand actually from the usa, this is not stoltenberg saying, this is his the head says, about the transfer of taurus , the next point is directly the german military personnel who will take part and scholz is actually resisting, not because he is such a big fan there, he fell in love with russia somehow over the last six months or is afraid that the banner of victory over dristag will installed there again, no, he understands that when he gives up the taurus, he will work out clearly. you can’t move the plant in 24 hours, you’ll get all the people out, for example, scho

you know what russia's reaction was to stoltenberg's calls, threats again. putin said, i quote: small countries with a small densely populated area should take this into account before talking about strikes deep into the russian territory, this is putin's rhetoric, but more and more european countries are in favor of allowing ukraine to use western weapons on russian territory. if a plane with missiles is flying, it is better to shoot down the plane, and not to try to shoot down the launched missiles, this is the position of the czech republic to journalists, the minister of foreign affairs of the country voiced, the bbc correspondent told about this, in addition to the czech republic, france, sweden, lithuania, latvia, estonia, the netherlands , representatives of these countries declare that ukraine has the right to defend itself, if necessary, strikes on enemy territory. but still, britain was the first to break the taboo on strikes against russia, which, among other things, provides ukraine with stormshed missiles. remember, the british foreign minister,

let's listen to what stoltenberg said.kraine continues to fight bravely, but the challenges facing it are getting bigger and bigger. ukraine can still win, but only under the condition of constant, strong support from on the part of nato allies. therefore, at the nato summit in july, we ... plan to put our support on a stronger footing, including a greater role for nato in coordinating security assistance and training, as well as in multi-year financial commitments. mr. oleksiy, how do you assess ukraine's prospects at the july nato summit, and these statements by stoltenberg that ukraine can win, if ukraine can win, then they assume that ukraine may not win. mr. sergey, all options in the world are possible, and they are definitely considering all of them options, no matter how much we like it, but the world will definitely consider it, moreover, i will remind you that only the heroic resistance of the ukrainians in the first weeks of the invasion changed the world's vision about this, the world expected that ukraine woul

nato secretary general jens stoltenberg said this the day before during his visit to italy.the allies, in particular, were unable to send the promised million shells to ukraine. they were sent much later and much less than planned. the head of the north atlantic alliance mentioned the delay of congress in passing the law about... the allocation of additional funding to ukraine in the amount of 61 million billion dollars, but now the situation is changing, says the nato secretary general. in addition, jens stoltenberg emphasized in kokotre that not a single serviceman of the alliance will be in ukraine. well, that's what jen stoltenberg says, but representatives of other member countries of the north atlantic alliance say yes, they won't. to definitely take part in the military operations on the territory of ukraine, but whether there will be any at all, well, but about that later, and now about that. in the near future, the united states of america will return to the same pace of providing aid to ukraine, which was before the interruption in receiving funding. this was state

words about the fact that stoltenberg is the secretary general of nato, leaving, we understand thatll leave, and we also spoiled kalas’s entire biography, they said that the russians did not let me into nato, they did not let me in, they said that i am a passionate russophobe, but i am a beautiful russophobe, i still don’t care they let you in, the word is you yourself, at the choice of the secretary general of nato, she will write it down in her resume. he should be surprised now, the league, you know, is now sagging, and the choice is coming to the european parliament, so they all suddenly became pacifists there in italy, in any case, but in britain now it’s exactly the opposite, there is a company of fear, it has become in general, the main one, they are now inflating... this question that russia will definitely attack someone, and note how the world trivialization of this term is taking place war. last week the daily telegraph writes, well, this is probably the last election in britain before the third world war, today the british defense minister grand chaps writes an article w

yes stoltenberg's statement, when america had not decided whether there would be aid or not , that natohoulder the entire burden of aid to ukraine, and not in the ramstein format, which the americans immediately denied, we are the leaders here, but let's not... but this only meant that the role of europe and the european members of nato, which in principle are the mouthpieces of macron and donald, is growing tusk, it must be said, and jens stoltenberg to a certain extent, they stated that there is, there may be a situation in the future where the european members of nato are responsible for all assistance to ukraine, which cannot but be happy in the context of this. what we have seen for six months in america, yes, but in any case we understand that ensuring our defense is not only about money, it is anti-missile defense systems, it is the patriot systems, and we also understand what is happening now, that is, the russians have shown his criminal tactics, that is , well, on the example of kharkiv, the same, that is to completely de-energize the city and then try to turn it into a wastel

stoltenberg called on the allies to allow ukraine to attack russian territory with western weapons. lifting some restrictions, since we see today that, for example, in the kharkov region, the front line and the border are almost the same thing, if the ukrainians cannot attack military targets on russian territory, this makes it very difficult for them defense i am sure that if we transferred weapons to ukraine, they are no longer our weapons, they are their weapons, which means they can strike them at legitimate military targets, including in russia, for example, at air bases that they use. but to fight according to stoltenberg, it is necessary to use the wrong hands and risk other people’s lives, those that are of no value to europeans, that is, ukrainian ones. if nato forces become directly involved in the conflict, if they attack russian targets in the sky or on the ground in ukraine, then we will find ourselves in a situation in which it will be very difficult to keep nato out of the conflict, so we should not have nato troops in on the ground or technology in the skies of ukrai

than vin stoltenberg. no one could have done a better job of holding us together when others were trying to divide us. no one could have done a better job really carrying the alliance forward. and we've all said it in different ways at different times but it always bears repeating, we're so grateful for your leadership. thank you. i also want to thank all of the permanent representatives from the alliance countries and the work that you're doing every single day with your teams to really move forward the work of the alliance. none of this happens by itself. none of it's automatic. it's because of the day-in, day-out work that you're doing to lead our alliance forward. now, i am really pleased that we're here when we're renaming the conference room of the u.s. mission to nato for secretary albright. she was, for so many of us, a real mentor as well as a friend, a supporter, an incredible counselor. i think we all miss her every single day, but we're also animated by her spirit, her determination, and in man

conflicting position of the alliance's secretary general stoltenberg said that the bloc does not intend to send troops to the square. the great victory is the main key moment in the history of revival and formation. all together in the center of minsk at the victory monument, we are proud to remember for eight decades now. the war taught belarusians to sacredly cherish their native land, defend it at the cost of their own lives and preserve the memory of the feat winners. this is nothing less than an unforgettable lesson for all subsequent generations. a lesson in courage, patriotism, love of freedom and fortitude. for valor, courage and faithful service to the fatherland. from year to year we bow our heads to the heroes, our memory is truly a reliable shield for all times, and alexander lukashenko, speaking at the victory monument, called on belarusians to never forget the road to the abelisk, so that terrible events never happen again, belarus does not need war. belarus needs peace. tomorrow, in a year, always. it is important for us to stand and not give in draw into conflict. time c

i don't know why stoltenberg says this, we have to be very careful.'s remarks and advise that we all act more carefully. it is possible that mr. stoltenberg is trying to add another item to the agenda of the upcoming nato summit in july. he has been seeing himself for a long time. it is also called insurance against trump, which, it seems to some, could completely cut off kiev’s funding. the political publication writes that the initiative, at a minimum, requires clarification. even some behind the scenes. of ukraine's closest eastern european allies have recently become more reserved approach this plan, wondering where and how such a huge amount of money can be obtained, with only a few weeks left before the nato leaders meet in washington in july. there is no great desire to dump into another fund among key nato allies. germany, for example, announced long ago that it intends to continue to remain within the framework of bilateral agreements on money. 7 billion were allocated to kiev at the beginning of the year, now there are... almost four additio

then jens stoltenberg. no one could've done a better job holding us together when others were trying to divide us. no one could've done a better job caring the alliance forward and we have all said it in different ways and times, but it always bears repeating, we are so grateful for your leadership. >> [ applause ] >> i also want to thank all of the permanent representatives from the alliance countries for the work you are doing every single day. with your teams, to really move forward with the work of the alliance. none of this happens by itself. none of this is automatic. is because of the day in and day out work you are doing to lead our lives forward. now, i am really pleased we are here renaming the conference room for secretary albright. she was, as for so many of us, a real mentor as well as a friend, a supporter, and incredible counselor. i think we all miss her every single day. but we are also animated by her spirit, her determination. and, in many ways, animated by her vision of what the united s

president dmitry peskov, commenting on the statement of jens stoltenberg, the latter in particular calledainian armed forces to give permission to strike with weapons of the north atlantic alliance on russian territory, and peskov, in turn, emphasized that our armed forces in any case will continue to carry out the tasks of the special operation and are ready to stop all threats. cancellation of restrictions for kyiv to beat with weapons nato on the territory of our country, the heads of the eu foreign ministry discussed it in brussels. and according to the fan zone, equipped at the brandenburg gate, the streets adjacent to it are already covered with synthetic turf, simulating a football field, the european championship in germany, then immediately the olympics in france, all this is excitingly important, but what is more important is what the score will be on the scoreboard after elections to the european parliament? we have never had so many enemies, both within the country and abroad. as i said a few weeks ago, i believe this is an existential moment for our europe, because i sincerel

stoltenberg laughed sharply in his tone. changing the agreed position of the alliance. no, the secretary general only suggested that each of the western governments think about the feasibility of giving the green light to attacks on russia with their weapons. this is the decision of national governments, not nato. there are various restrictions on the use of different types of weapons. i'm not saying that there should be absolutely no restrictions in the future, but i believe that these national restrictions should be reconsidered, especially in connection with the fighting now going on in kharkov. british missiles, for example, are already being used to attack russian military vessels, including outside the waters that ukraine considers its territorial. there is reason to believe that american missiles are being used against targets on russian soil. at the same time, formally, ukraine is obliged to follow the prohibitions of its western partners. however, these prohibitions are very mild; their violation does not entail any

i don’t know why stoltenberg says something like that.s to be very careful with statements like that. i agree that nato must take a tough stance and not give in. but there are many, let’s say, dubious and controversial statements. suffice it to recall the statement by french president emmanuel macron about sending nato troops to ukraine. i advise you to be more careful. federal chancellor of germany olaf scholz also stated that he does not currently see prerequisites for expanding the scope of use of western weapons supplied by the allies. to ukraine, he noted: there are clear rules for the supply of weapons that have been agreed upon with ukraine, and at the moment these rules are working. this is olaf scholz's position. but sweden, in an appropriate response to a request from journalists, actually supported jans stoltenberg’s idea. according to international law, ukraine has the right to defend itself by introducing military operations directed against enemy territory until as long as military actions comply with the laws and customs of

the country's deputy prime minister said that stoltenberg should apologize or resign after his statementstician, the secretary general has no right to make such statements on behalf of, including the italian people. in turn, the italian prime minister recommends the head of nato to be careful. careful in his statements. violation without borders. the us state department is again teaching minsk democracy, but itself is mired in arbitrariness. how the guardians of world values ​​have become the standard of double standards, inhuman repression and unjustified murder, resolutions instead of legality, politicization of the truth, what human rights have been trampled by washington. democracy labeled as life-threatening, let us break it down point by point into an understandable policy. watch today. after the panorama. two pedophiles were detained in minsk, one of them. thirty-nine-year-old residents of the capital met with a thirteen-year-old girl in a thematic group of the messenger, knowing the age of the schoolgirl and the defendant conducted intimate correspondence with her and sent his can

he was asked to comment on the statement of the head of the north atlantic alliance. with stoltenbergwho called for allowing ukraine to launch strikes on russian territory. dmitry peskov believes that in this way nato is increasing the degree of escalation and flirting with military rhetoric. at the same time , the president’s press secretary noted that stoltenberg’s words cannot be a reflection of his personal point of view, since he is nato secretary general. peskov assured that the russian military will continue the special military operation to stop all threats. but french president macron, who... promoted the idea of ​​sending a european contingent to ukraine, said in drezdan that europe is not at war with russia with a reservation, but wants the peace that ukraine will choose. so far, macron spoke a lot in french and as much as he could in german, since he had a large-scale visit to germany. his defense minister, lecarniu, acted. he discussed with his ukrainian colleague the supply of missiles and self-propelled artillery to kiev. in addition, paris and kiev are working on sendi

nato secretary general jen stoltenberg called on allies to lift restrictions on ukraine's use of westerneapons. let's listen to what the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance said. it must be remembered that this is an aggressive war. russia attacked another country. this is a senseless violation of international law, according to which ukraine has the right to self-defense, which also includes the right to attack targets outside ukraine, including legitimate military targets in russia. mr. viktor, what could be the reasons why our western partners are so reluctant to give permission to use their weapons in strikes on the territory of the russian federation, they still... keep illusions for themselves that it is possible to come to an agreement with putin, and that too, but the main thing , that it is still a fear, especially as for germany, their establishment's fear of putin's bluff, including putin's nuclear blackmail. if we talk about germany and the states, then there are two different positions, if for the germans, the germans are... a pacifist society, after two wars, w

stoltenberg’s words are repeated by the french president.l macron said in an interview with cnn: ukraine can strike those targets in russia from where the shelling is coming. macron is convinced that western supplies of long-range weapons to kiev will not lead to escalation. justify endless military tranches internationally. right new trend in european politics, german chancellor olaf scholz insists these measures help strengthen defense, the question only whose. we want to provide ukraine with billions of euros in funding so that it can guarantee its defense and thus improve the security of the whole of europe. and yet, most eu countries speak cautiously about the legitimacy of strikes against russia. after the meeting of defense ministers, the head of european diplomacy, josep barel, noted that this policy is shared. weapons for attacks on russia have not changed, the state department does not encourage justifying strikes, the white house noted that they do not want the situation to escalate. i will say that the changes in our no approach,

some allies mentioned by stoltenberg are, of course, the us, britain and france.kes on russia for now only london, but the targets chosen by kiev for missile attacks by american attacks and french scalps speak for themselves. but the task is to convince. the only way to respond to russia's actions in ukraine, as well as in our countries, is to support ukraine, to allow ukraine to use weapons as it needs. that's how you deal with escalation, not by descalating and allowing ukraine to fight back. the baltic tigers are increasingly demonstrating that... breaking off their claws in ukraine, the president of estonia recently stated that he wants to bring russia to its knees, and the german magazine spiegel writes today about the threats of the baltic parliamentarians. in the event of a breakthrough by russian troops, they, in company with poland, are going to send troops to ukraine. their argument is that if the russians manage to make a strategic breakthrough in eastern ukraine because the west is only half helping kiev, the situation could escalate dramatically. in t

t strike russian troop concentrations on the other side side of the border, even nato head jens stoltenbergme allies do. with weapons outside its territory, i think this is quite logical: ukraine is a country that defends itself, that defends its territory, its civilian population. ukraine has every right to use all possibilities for its defense. the next step is whether the west will give a positive signal on long-range weapons range? one of the changes happened today. the swedish defense minister talks about this in legal terms, but it is still clear to us. according to international law, ukraine has the right to defend itself with military actions directed against enemy territory, if military actions comply with the laws of war, this means go ahead, you have the right. this is a map from the lesois newspaper, it shows that ukrainian soil is being attacked from russian territory. we need to protect these territories, for example, kharkov. how are we let's explain to the ukrainians that... it is not allowed to attack points from which missiles are launched. in fact, we tell them that we su