of stoltz then. >> but both sides agree that later on stoltz returned to the scene of the knife withn knife. >> how similar is that knife from the son that killed your son? >> we think it's close from seeing the blade broken off at the trial. >> given the fact stoltz returned to the scene rather than call police, the lusks believe he armed himself not out of fear but revenge. >> i don't think my son did anything wrong that night. i really don't. and i can see when he came back why brian went over here and said, why are you back? i mean, i would have. brian didn't know how to fight against a knife. he was just a kid. and there was no way. and he just slaughtered him. >> i should have called the police. >> why didn't you call the police? >> never crossed my mind. i was so obsessed with getting my things and going. i wanted out of the condominium. i wanted out of that environment. i wanted to go home. i wanted to go back to california where i was comfortable. it was just -- it was like it was just a big mistake to come out to colorado. that's how i felt at the moment. >> along with the

joining us from san francisco is mitch stoltz at the electronic frontier foundation part of the team that supported aereo's position. let's start with you mitch. what are the next steps? >> it is not clear what the next steps are. they have some options. the bigger question is what the impact is going to have on other internet technologies, especially audio visual technologies. >> gordon smith, come in on this decision. tell us what it means. >> if you have a new technology you are not exempt from copyright law. but the supreme court did is stand by the principle of the united states constitution that requires those who would take the intellectual property of others to deal with them, to do business with them. cable was subject to copper then a new technology comes along and they were subject to copyright. aereo comes along and tries to build a model that exempts them from dealing with the creators of this content. the supreme court said you cannot do that. >> come in on the decision. it was 6-3. what does that tell you about the future litigation around streaming of content? >> the