against stonewall jackson. the idea was the main attack of the union army would turn the confederates out of their positions and interject a union for us between richmond and richmond's defenders. unfortunately burnside orders were very badly worded, in which he had told a commander who had 60,000 man in nine divisions of infantry to send a division, at least, to seize the heights in france. and keep the rest of their force ready to make a rapid movement down the old richmond road. it does not go to the confederate lines, it runs parallel to the confederate lines, it was a quiz that franklin was not sure you could possibly obey all of the pieces. but he found himself duty bound to try. and, he stuck to the spirit in the letter of the law. what the second one in support, 57,000 men stationary on a road. they did not have to go down richmond road, they had to be ready to go down richmond road. so, he had checked all the boxes as far as he was concerned and as far as he knew he had been downloaded from being the p

the stonewall and the irish brigade. everybody talks about the stonewall, including confederates who are five miles away fighting for their. they talk about a stonewall for the union. everybody talks about the green flag in, the irish brigade, and how they supported the irish brigade or preceded the irish brigade, including men who were five miles away and never saw the irish brigade. but it was important because they were a symbolic, the stonewall, a symbol of absolute confederate dominion. they dominated this battlefield and nobody could ever that. and for the union that's the irish brigade set an interesting tone where men were complaining that this was just mere slaughter and murder. the irish were the first ones to say it was never about winning or losing. it was about doing one's duty, even in spite of the consequences. and no one could ever look at their casualties and doubt that they had done their duty. duty became the hallmark of the union experience as well as the tragedy of fulfilling it on other fronts. the

in no way interferes departments of justice investigation and until the administration stopped stonewalling congress, there will be pain as a consequence. >> what if you don't get an assessment today. >> congress has an absolute right to review these documents to form our own judgment to make their own assessment of any potential risk to our national security and no one in congress has received these documents and whether it is blocking nominees or withholding budgetary funds, congress will impose pain upon the administration until the provide the document said that is coming from both parties. [inaudible]. >> what i consistently have heard, what they have heard is they cannot provide the dogmas whether special counsel's message about president biden and president trump which is a farce and i was on the intelligence committee when we reviewed russia's interference in our election processes in 2016, we had access to many sensitive documents related to that investigation and at the same time, bob moran is special counsel's office was investigating the russian collision homes and there's no re

the stonewalling has been going on for some time.a suspicion that there is a cover-up going on. the cover up is often the worst part of any scandal. do you see it this way? >> i see two things at play. one thing is ask the question as you did, what are the content and why won't they share this with congress but also boils down to ongoing committal investigation, typically doj has not shared updates or information in an ongoing, investigation. vice president pence controlling classified documents, interesting if special counsel ordered an investigation on him and it points to merrick garland trying to be too cute with the original special counsel, getting himself in a bind. stuart: matthew whitaker, thank you for joining us, hope to see you soon. in november, beto o'rourke returned a donation from sam bankman-fried. was that accurate? lauren: not all of it. i praised him when this story happened. this was before the ftx fiasco and he said i had -- i didn't shake his hand so didn't feel comfortable taking it. then came the ftx fallout

kaylee: i think karine jean-pierre stonewalling on this ironic since this is supposed to be the most transparent administration, yet and yet we've gotten zero answers on anything, there are many questions that need answers, like what was the actual timeline on this? who had access to the documents? and how much of a threat to our national security did this breach of protocol pose. maria: i want to see if we are connecting dots to the money biden family has taken in to this classified document scandal cheryl i want to ask james comer when he joins us 20 minutes. cheryl: why was hunter biden in that house during time documents in the garage talking 2013, 2016, remember that is when the laptop hunter biden was peddling his name father's name to make millions doing a job for burisma had no qualifications to do o other question where is national archive right now? they could not shut up when president trump when it was found he had documents in mar-a-lago all of a sudden president biden classified difficulties not a word from national archives they missed a deadline does it play political

today, stonewalling congress. biden's director of national intelligence says go pound sand to the senators on the intelligence committee for urging access to the classified documents that joe biden took out of the white house and the senate. democrats and republicans agree they need to know biden's gross negligence left america's top secret information exposed in at least five unsecured locations. >> every member of the committee, regardless of democrat or republican, were unanimous many that -- in that this position that we are left in limbo until somehow a special counsel designates thatst okay for us to get briefed is not going to stand. maria: coming up, texas senator ted cruz on his calls for a hearing on what exactly is in those documents amid new questions about the so-called biden records, that's 1,850 boxes of records that joe biden donated to the university of delaware can. why is the university withholding the so-called gift agreement of the mystery funder of maintaining those documents? and did the mon

the white house can stonewall all they want.es the house can use to get the details they need to get to the bottom of what was going on for 20-some years it looks like pay-to-play for his brother and son. liz: bp energy is expected to report a profit. and this is basically how the biden family immediate money overseas. >> i guess it's okay for hunter biden to make money off big oil. but anything else joe biden will take an aim at. it's the hypocrisy there. but they have to shift what the focus is because inflation is hitting average americans. they have to turn someone else into the bad guy. liz: the house oversight chair james cop cope -- -- james comb, what is the white house hiding? activity reports of the biden family's overseas deals. >> you have to take a look at all of the moving parts here. the treasury department withheld these when the republicans were not in control. now that they are in control, the republicans in the house had the right to this information. as the chair said, it's going to take a lot to go through a

the white house is stonewalling on president biden classified document scandal. >> after special counselresident biden went to his house in wilmington, what would he do in there? >> i would refer you to the white house counsel's office. >> the president admits to having information that wasn't his, why did he smuggle it out? >> i will let the statement of the president stand for itself. >> brooke: fourth batch of classified materials were found at biden's home on friday. republican lawmakers are demanding access on who had access to the documents. >> todd: such a default answer, it is a bad joke at this point, but not a joke, we need answers. the white house is not only one deflecting questions, also trashing the media. >> there are many people out there in the media who try to stir up controversy to get attention or time on camera, underlying issue we're talking abouter hoo, as soon as the president's personal team noticed something, they immediately and promptly disclosed it to the proper authorities beverly joins us now. what do you think about what he said? are people in the media st

is how valuable is a stonewall tick at the moment? ofsted, they've lost the bbc , they've they've lost the bbc, they've lost quite a few things because of behaviour in stonewall. basically say us lots of basically say give us lots of money if you give money money and if you give us money and our rules, we'll put and follow our rules, we'll put you high up our rankings. you up high up on our rankings. but you want to follow that but do you want to follow that rule? no it's a racket. so rule? no yeah, it's a racket. so anyway, for part anyway, so that's all for part to us after the break. but to join us after the break. but misogynistic influences are taking social media. why people are celibate and are choosing to be celibate and why people are turning to why young people are turning to satanism . so you can imagine . the welcome back to headline is your first look at sunday's newspapers get straight to it began with mail now the authorities have found more classified documents at joe biden's home. that's a bit embarrassing i love joe

is how valuable is a stonewall tick at the moment? ofsted, they've lost the bbc , they've they've lost the bbc, they've lost quite a few things because of behaviour in stonewall. basically say us lots of basically say give us lots of money if you give money money and if you give us money and our rules, we'll put and follow our rules, we'll put you high up our rankings. you up high up on our rankings. but you want to follow that but do you want to follow that rule? no it's a racket. so rule? no yeah, it's a racket. so anyway, for part anyway, so that's all for part to us after the break. but to join us after the break. but misogynistic influences are taking social media. why people are celibate and are choosing to be celibate and why people are turning to why young people are turning to satanism . so you can imagine . the welcome back to headline is your first look at sunday's newspapers get straight to it began with mail now the authorities have found more classified documents at joe biden's home. that's a bit embarrassing i love joe

maria: this is exactly right, unfortunately, congresswoman, you are getting stonewalled again you sawr of national intelligence told the entire committee the kwintelligence committee and senate said we want to know what documents are about, she said, no, go, pound sand. so congresswoman i am asking you, subpoenas or no subpoenas you are going to get stonewalled you know that, just the way you were stonewalled in russia collusion lie will you hold this president and this white house in contempt? will you hold these leaders quote/unquote leaders, in intelligence ho niend 20 that letter calling biden tlaps disinformation will you hold them in contempt? how are you going to fight book from stonewalling. >> everything is on the table maria, certainly these individuals not above the law i have said i believe there were crimes committed here this is i government abuse at work, i serve on house intelligence coour committee formed going back decades because intelligence agencies were running amok no voifrt in congress our roll to sustained up for constitution a and kwints making sure we hold a

. >> we have growing bipartisan outrage in senate over white house stonewalling of mishandles of classified documents. and house launches a new committee on whether china let the leak out of a lab. half the country, filed a lawsuit against the white house to stop its new push to get your retirement accmoment invested in -- money invested in democrat's green agenda. i am elizabeth macdonald, "the evening edit" starts right now. elizabeth: thanks for joining us, welcome. we begin with stocks ending higher today. economic spanninged better than expected 2.9 percent. but still growth was sluggish. look at this, ibuprofen, s.a.p., dell, they are growing list of companies announcing layoffs, now spreading beyond tech. president biden's speech attacking quote maga republicans, it was lot of misleading claims, grady trimble in virginia with more. reporter: president biden did not mention in his speech the tens of thousands of workers laid off this month, no mention that gas prices have been going up, but he spent a good portion of speech on a new line of attack on house republicans, claiming they w

back in washington, the white house stonewalling o multiple inquiries from oversight committee reps failing to commit to information providing info the regarding several batches of classified difficulties found in president biden's possession unsecured locations. "mornings with maria" is live right now. . . >> the white house this morning is suspending economic record as dozens of technology companies announced sweeping job cuts, white house secretary karine jean-pierre responded. >> we have seen inflation has been going down for the past six months, and that is because of the work, that we have that this president has been doing since he walked into the administration we previously said on broader economy, layoffs near record lows unemployment is down is the lowest that we've seen in 50 years this is an economic policy, economic plan that is working. pt and a lot of it is because the president has taken steps. >> yes, so let's talk about what we've seen in the way of policy, joining me right now for the "hot topic buzz" all morning long mark tepper, lee carter joe concha mark we know that

spokesperson ian sims to help and he had a press briefing where he revealed no information and stonewalled us. on a personal level i have been festered because i asked the white house a question and they were for the counsel's office and the counsel's office averse me to the justice department and the justice department refers me to the white house and it is this circle that has created an information blackout. host: we have been covering these white house briefings in recent days and the press secretary is going to hold another one today, this afternoon. go to c-span.org for more details about that. as jeff was just talking about, she's peppered with questions about the classified documents, and her answer is consistently -- guest: i will refer you to the justice department. host: indiana, democratic caller, your question or comment about accountability could caller: this is the thing i'm concerned about. it is going back to the mccarthy days. they say they have a lot of information, that got a lot of things they found, this and that. after what happened at mccarthy hearings, they didn't

stonewalling o congress joe bidn director of national intelligence says go pound sand to the senators on thecrat intelligence committee urging access to the classified documents that joe biden took out of the white house andd the senate. democrats and republicans agree, they need to know ifions biden's gross negligence left america's top-secret information exposed in at least five unsecured locations. >> every member of theat o committee, regardless of democrat or r republican were unanimous in this position that were left in limbo until somehow a special counsel says it's oka for us to get briefed. it's not going to stand. >> texas ataturk ted cruz for his calls on hearing of what exactly is in the documents. amid new questions about the so-called biden records, that is 1850 boxes of records that joe biden donated to the university of delaware.g th why is the university withholding the gift agreement at the mystery funder of maintaining those documents. did the money come from china after the ccp said $50 million plus to the university of pennsylvania and able to get pen to lobby for

we know that they are already stonewalling.t a letter to you and your colleague, jim jordan, saying this is an active investigation, we're not going to answer any of your questions. how will you get to the bottom of it? >> well, fortunately for me with the influence-peddling investigation, we have a lot of people that worked with hunter biden that we've been meeting with for many months now. i don't think that's any secret. and, you know, there are a lot of terms that these people say the bidens use like plausible deniability. that's a term that uncle jim biden uses a lot. and then when you see that there are documents, classified documents just casually left around in different locations, it's very concerning. i mean, you see the complexity of this influence-peddling scheme that the family's been doing for years and years and years. and then we learn joe biden, some of those documents were from his time as a u.s. senator? i mean, when joe biden was a u.s. senator in 1977 he worked with republicans to thwart jimmy carter's nomi

you know, joe, we knew they were going to stonewall.sked devin nunes who s stonewalled for years when he was trying to report the russia hoax. to do we have the sound bite? no, we don't. what we do have is what devin nunes told me and he said, look, if had they stonewall, they need to prosecute and they need to hold them in contempt. i wonder if the republicans will do that. >> i have a feeling they will, maria. if this is going to be as slow walked as it's being done already then kevin mccarthy if he wants to really set a good impression with the american people and those who want equal justice, then they must do this but again, when we go back to the fbi, why haven't they gone to the re beach house owned by e biden that he spent multiple weekends at. there could be multiple documents there as well. we're not seeing the fbi acting with any sense of your p jen sigh. i wonder why they that is. maria: the doj allowed biden's lawyers to look for the documents. when it came to trump, they said no, the lawyers cannot be present and shut off

this is nothing but a stonewall to prevent members of the intelligence committee from doing our oversightdistinct and separate from any criminal investigation. in fact, my colleague on the intelligence committee senator susan collins says this is the worst stonewall she has seen in 26 years in the congress so i really can't answer your questions about the seriousness of it until the administration allows us to conduct our legitimate oversight responsibilities and until they do, there is going to be consequences in the congress for them. >> brian: i know you are the legal guy not supposed to just jump to conclusions. if someone won't let you see the contents of the documents knowing their own party is going to have an aneurysm and blow up on them on the senate floor and it's worth that type of blowback, how bad are those documents? how incriminating and disturbing are they? >> well, i think many senators after this week are now beginning to ask that question. you know, senators who are willing to give these former officials the benefit of the doubt now wonder like what could be in these do

he stonewalled and refused to surrender these documents. so that meant that these jurors were instructed only to decide how much he must pay the sandy hook in damages. so this was a damages trial that happened here in austin in the summer. scarlett in she testified she hadn't finished by lunch so. jones comes rolling up in his motorcade with his bodyguards fleeing in set the journalists on his way into courthouse just over here on guadalupe and comes in sits down at the defense table. he's going to have the floor to himself off. and scarlett hadn't finished yet and so for 90 minutes this grieving mom and i'm i get a little emotional when i about this because to witness was really one of we talked about this one of our great privileges journalists to see this mom address jones directly he sat there literally sweaty threw his shirt at the defense table saying you are responsible for this pain that we have experienced for the last years. for people confronting, us on the street, my jesse was real. i a real mother. you are a how can you do this

and, you know, the predecessors stonewall . yes, stonewall.es, stonewall. and, you know, the predecechange. beaumont pressed for change. beaumont society going back to the 1970s, 19805. society going back to the 1970s, 1980s. yes, absolutely . and your 1980s. yes, absolutely. and your feeling with scotland is that this is a kind of smokescreen that really s&p would to that really s&p would like to continue with this ideological. oh, absolutely . i mean, they oh, absolutely. i mean, they they are totally committed to this ideology . why that is a this ideology. why that is a separate . but they are separate. but they are completely to this ideology. you only have to witness the passing of the gender recognition reform bill through stages to three. yes. and the stage three debates in hollywood on hollyrood. you know , i attended those and i it know, i attended those and i it was chilling what i consider to be an abuse of parliamentary process quite apart from the wholly egregious counter , just wholly egregious counter, just the structure of wha

and, you know, the predecessors stonewall . yes, stonewall.es, stonewall. and, you know, the predecechange. beaumont pressed for change. beaumont society going back to the 1970s, 19805. society going back to the 1970s, 1980s. yes, absolutely . and your 1980s. yes, absolutely. and your feeling with scotland is that this is a kind of smokescreen that really s&p would to that really s&p would like to continue with this ideological. oh, absolutely . i mean, they oh, absolutely. i mean, they they are totally committed to this ideology . why that is a this ideology. why that is a separate . but they are separate. but they are completely to this ideology. you only have to witness the passing of the gender recognition reform bill through stages to three. yes. and the stage three debates in hollywood on hollyrood. you know , i attended those and i it know, i attended those and i it was chilling what i consider to be an abuse of parliamentary process quite apart from the wholly egregious counter , just wholly egregious counter, just the structure of wha

it's been stonewalled since then.ly information that president biden's only couple weeks old and president pence is only a day or two old. [inaudible] >> again is something essential as is i don't think, i personally don't think that the congress should settle for executive branches of assessment, that we should see the underlying, underlying documents to have the evidence to make our own informed judgment. >> can you clarify, all nominees or -- >> i personally don't think, this is such a central matter in such an easy matter. we should not be fast tracking nominees whether they are in the intelligence community for the department of justice or the department of agriculture to with access to these documents. >> and you plan to personally object? >> i don't think i would be the only one. i know plenty of people and i suspect democrats to your question although they may not want to do it publicly will be privately pressuring the administration to relent on stonewalling the congress. >> is it fair to say you're frustrate

but no amount of stonewalling can stop other shoes from dropping on the scam.reportedly prepared to obtain a warrant to search president biden's delaware house, the other one, the president's legal team not giving consent, and asking all presidents and vice presidents to recheck their personal records, except dan quayle, who says he's not received an inquiry, but he's willing to check his stuff. jesse, do you think that senator warner will go as far as senator tom cotton and refuse to confirm ambassadors or nominees until they come clean on what exactly was in joe biden's stuff? >> jesse: the one thing that bring the parties together, not seeing the stuff they're supposed to see. >> brian: are you exercised? >> jesse: no, i'm not, because they're entitled to do oversight. like you said, during the russian investigation, they got briefed. they got briefed all the time. at least they got briefed. the dni comes in, this was a scheduled briefing, and she goes, you know what, i don't even know what the documents say. she's walled herself off from the documents. so i

can the white house keep stonewalling? >> apparently it worked so far.resident trump of the white house he was in the encina children's cancer initiative in the press would try to devour him with questions and he would engage. in fact sometimes do you really want to do that you really want to take them on but he did, this president did not you see his shoulders as he goes through the door that is a terrible image to give the american people when this could go questions that need to be answered. senator warner is right don't just under the rug with the special counsel investigation. we as members of the peoplesoft and they as the greatest deliberative body deserve to be briefed on this. maria: you're not briefed what you doing are you powerless, can they continue to stonewall. yesterday i spoke with james comer who said he will hold him in contempt if he doesn't respond to subpoenas. what can you do. >> that's exactly right ultimately as you know there will be significant fights over funding of all ages and the department of justice is no exception. in th

aka, we will stonewall you.essman and member of the house judiciary committee, lance gooden. congressman, what are your thoughts on what you're hearing from justice here? obviously, you and your colleagues are getting stonewalled and they're not going to get you any answers to your requests. >> this is the same justice department that had no problem publishing photos of inside of mar-a-lago. remember, president biden said this would be the most transparent government ever and what we're seeing is a justice department that is continuing to do his bidding, they're taking up for this president and defending him and the hypocrisy is not flying on capitol hill. we're even seeing anger from senate democrat as recently as yesterday, democrats on the intelligence committee are furious that some of the responses that have come from justice saying we can't show you these documents that were found. we just want to know across the capitol what was the damage to national security from what was found at joe biden's home, the

how long are they going to stonewall a democratic majority senate?ean, that's unbelievable to me. are you going to stonewall in a press conference that's one thing. it's a little bit different when you have an intelligence committee. >> ainsley: they are also trying to paint the republicans and we will hear this today in the speech as very extreme for trying to get rid of the irs and saying there should be a 30% sales tax across the board. those aren't the only companies that are cutting people off. there is 3m that make jury scott tape and post-it notes cutting 2500 manufacturing jobs. temp workers are being cut. we saw that in the fall of last year. the last five months of 2022 there were more than 110,000 jobs that were cut. temp workers. meta cut 13% of their staff. a lot of people across the board are worried about losing their jobs especially in the tech industry. we saw that with this girl on google she does day in the life on tiktok. >> steve: this is what i'm doing today. >> ainsley: let's go to the confetti room and this room. then her box

president handle that or former president trump handle that one cooperated fully and the other stonewalled for over a year. the bottom line is simple prosecutors in both cases should proceed unimpeded without anyone pressuring them. >> can you negotiate with $320 billion? >> i will not negotiate in public. obviously again we want to make sure we negotiate a budget for the average working family with the on the bill and were pleased with the outcome and hopefully it can be done again without brinksmanship but i will not get into specifics. >> is this not incumbent to have some sort of oversight

if that's the excuse that's being used, then the senators are right. >> martha: i mean, the stonewalling argument is strong here. every time the press secretary comes out, she's stonewalls the questions even if they don't relate directly to the information in this case. can they get away with this for much longer? >> that's a political question. i don't know how much longer they can get away with it. the fact is that the existence of an investigation does'prevent the white house from discussing what is being investigated. that just -- there's no connection. >> martha: so what recourse to these senators have to get the hands on the information that they want? >> the recourse of access to your cameras and putting pressure on the administration. i don't think there's anyway for them to force the disclosure. but they with subpoena information and get it that way. those subpoenas would be enforceable. that's a long-term process. >> martha: james comer asked for more information. documentation. they basically shut him down. they said you're not going to get it. what does that tell you as someo

[applause] and spoke out at the stonewall to defendant human rights.applause] in each of these movements, those leaders expanded rights, which advanced the cause of freedom and liberty. 50 years ago today, so did those who won a fight in the united states supreme court to recognize fundamental, constitutional right of a woman to make decisions about her own body. [cheers & applause] not the government. [applause] for nearly 50 years americans relied on the right that row protected. today, however, on what would have been its 50th anniversary, we speak of the roe decision in the past tense. because last june the united states supreme court took away that constitutional right, a fundamental right, a basic freedom, from the people of america, from the women of america. the court's action has meant already that many dedicated doctors and nurses now lose their ability to care for their patients. that providers go to jail just for doing their job. and that patients are denied critical care and even fear that they will be punished simply for seeking care. it

. >> the administration's stonewalling congress on the classified documents for congressional republicansnd democrats say they are in the dark on what exactly was in those classified documents discovered in biden's and trump's homes. "fox news sunday" legal panel will break down the fight between the d.o.j. and capitol hill over what was found and. mcdaniel elected his chairwoman for her fourth consecutive term. we'll ask our sunday panel what it means for the gop's direction head into 2024. plus sent stafford to centaur my sit down with newly sworn in senator katie britt of alabama. all right now on "fox news sunday". hello from foxnews in washington. breaking this weekend there are new calls for justice. americans collectively take video of an appalling police encounter in memphis. it shows the brutal beating of 29-year-old tyre nichols at the hands of police for he later died from this injury spread law enforcement leaders all across the u.s. expressing outrage. and, there are new concerns this morning about the drawn out war and ukraine for the u.s. has agreed to send advanced tanks t

use of investigation to stonewall the public and the press. >> brian: other thing to keep in mind younator tom cotton and senator warner both say unacceptable and will not stand. threatening to grind the whole senate to a halt. totally stop confirmation hearings and everything else that the senate may or may not do. stop all the business until they do this. senator warner brought up too, which is questionable for him to bring up if you are his special life coach we were able to see top secret documents when it came to the russian investigation with president trump. we were both able to see that. his interpretation of what he said publicly is for another time. but why are you stops now? it doesn't make any sense. so they are outraged, very curious with a 51-49 senate and democrats leading the charge if they realize the white house are over their skis. for mark levin who actually understands hear from a legal perspective what they can or can't do. he said this about what we have discovered so far. >> bottom line is. if joe biden can walk out there and scif and the senate documents how d

he had a press briefing with us where he revealed no new information and stonewall us. on a personal level i will have been frustrated because i will ask the white house a question and they refer be to the counsel's office, the counsel's office refers bit of the justice department, the justice department refers me to the white house and it is a circle that creates an information blackout. host: we have been covering these press briefings. the press secretary will hold another one this afternoon. you can go to c-span.org for more details about that. she is peppered with questions about these classified documents and her answer, jeff mordock -- guest: i will refer you to the justice department. host: mack in indiana, democratic caller. your question about oversight and accountability. caller: this is the thing i'm concerned about. it is going back to the mccarthy days. they say they have a lot of information and things they have found. look at what happened at the mccarthy hearings, they did not have anything. they want to make sure they have got something and ask what ha

you know, they know there is a stonewall out there, they have to make sure they get their message outuse investigations, you tell the american people, what we're trying to did do, we're being stonewalled by garland and fbi and joe biden and that p press secretary, important american people deserve the truth. they deserve to be told the facts. the democratic party has got everyone away with lying to american people, you have media protecting those lies it makes it difficult. we do have an a advantage. we have house and leadership and committee assignment. it has to be 24/7 barrage, mark levin on radio and tv, leo 2.0 telling american people the truth with house republicans who are trying to do the right thing, hopefully democrats will get message what they lose to 2024. mark: two things i would do. with the debt ceiling, if i were republicans. they are not getting any really essential information out of the department of justice, i would slash their budget, slash by 20%. some significant amount and move to border patrol and i.c.e. who need money to encto enforce force the lay, or try t

the other stonewalled for over a year. to be able to proceed unimpeded without anyone pressuring them. cox helped negotiate to your question. $20 billion force ending. to be open to negotiating? i said not going to negotiate in public. obviously again we want to make sure we negotiate a budget that's good for an average working family. we did that in the omnibus bill. and hopefully it can be done again without brinksmanship. i'm not going to get into specifics. [inaudible] mike pence having document is it incumbent on some kind of oversight these are being leaked out? consider peters is looking at bipartisan legislation. terms of classified documents i support our efforts. in the meantime on the specific cases the appropriate thing to do is have special prosecutor that's what's happening. [inaudible] [background noises]

so the right wing and left wing, and they're commanded james longstreet and stonewall jackson, superb corps commanders. so he's got this really good command team. but as the campaign progresses, the the problem for quartermaster is like william elder manifests themself selves and grow to immense proportions. if we can only enough for our men to eat up here. i don't. general lee's army can be whipped. he's very competent. but he can't get enough for the men to eat. and that is going to play havoc with this army. when the army gets to leesburg, virginia, they have a shakedown. kind of like what sherman did before he started the the march to the sea. not as elaborate, but they're going to shed about 5000 soldiers. they're either physically unfit or they don't have shoes. those soldiers are excused. they're going to march them to winchester. that leaves a balance of, let's say, 65 to 69000 men in the army. they march into maryland. they will lose thousand 107 men in the battles take place before antietam, sharpsburg that's south mountain, harpers ferry, crampons, gap skirmishes plus sic.

the same type of effort but a new level of stonewalling i am particularring frombining, we'll have toead into it and you hole these people accountable it is about building your case and subpoena our records and bringing correct people before the committee. trey: and only thing i would add, legal letting people know the obstacles that investigators have to clear, when the biden administration controls the federal prosecutors, you are. you can go do civil court, and yo you could use appropriations but you would get blasted by media if you cut government money based on noncompliance. let's switch to your new china select committee, what lead you and others to think that gallagher number one would be right guy to lead it we needed a select committee china as well. >> the voters are tired of the biden administration's soft on china policies. we'll do things that the democrats have failed at for last few years, we'll hold our greatest adversary accountable. that that is what china committee is about. gallagher has been appointed to lead that committee. and hunt down party of china. that is

daniel, clearly investors stonewall to. we're not too happy. and the same is true for analysts are actually a couple of entities from the big bang. so either downgraded the stock or lower the price to target to for that company. it's not only about deliveries at this point. i mean, as you mentioned, they are historically high. and then with the new plants in berlin and also in texas. deliveries could still still be on a pretty good to track, but another concern by now was actually a profit margin. so we did hear from tesla that in certain cases, say, for example, offer some incentives so they could care less per car. and that could put a profit, the profit margins under pressure, and that's what was sweetest, focused on at this point. let me take one example from and that is to, isn't that down beat goldman sachs, for example, that did lower the price target for tesla, but they're saying in the long term it still looks pretty good for a test as they might remain being the leader when it comes to the mobility, but clearly at this point, a lot of

other stonewalled for over a year. the bottom line is simple prosecutors in both cases should proceed unimpeded without anyone pressuring them. >> can you negotiate with $320 billion? >> i will not negotiate in public. obviously again we want to make sure we negotiate a budget for the average working family with the on the bill and were pleased with the outcome and hopefully it can be done again without brinksmanship but i will not get into specifics. >> is this not incumbent to have some sort of oversight. >> senator peters is looking bipartisan legislation for those classified documents for his efforts specifically the appropriate thing to do is have special prosecutor and that is what is happening. [inaudible conversations] >> welcome back everyone the big question on your mind is the notification by the secretary of the treasury for the need to raise the debt ceiling which is the beginning of the discussion that always occurs in leading to those strong decisions. and you are probably wondering what role the senate