which stultz is the senior staff attorney at the electronic frontier foundation, a non profit group, defending digital rights. he joins us via skype now from san francisco. thanks very much for being with us. now this is a 2nd attempt, as we said to, to go off to facebook, which alleged anti trust violations off to the judge dismissed the, the 1st case, what's different this time around? what's, what's the basis of their argument now? so their basis is the same, but they are showing more of their cards. they have to say is put more quotations and what appeared to be internal emails but weren't made public. but worse given to the court that show in different ways how facebook has acquired and has and maintains monopoly power. so what if facebook is saying that their accusations, a key, acu, sorry, acquisitions, rather of what's happened. instagram cleared all of the, the regulatory, illegal hurdles years ago, and that they shouldn't be a case to, to answer here. what do you make of that? so the court already said that it's all right, and it is permissible for the f t. c to challenge t