about the courts and about the supreme court in particular, that is, even history is monitored by stupych. i understand our western colleagues, colleagues and the impossibility, for example, of the central committee in its current composition, when tupytskyi's powers expired to elect a new head , what was the problem? they gathered, they voted already at one meeting, none of the candidates received the appropriate number of votes. i don't know the situation with the constitutional court. that is, in detail, yes, i can only say in general that the situation with the constitutional court is the same as what we have to write about everything else, i.e. what is the problem? the president's office is not ready to appoint independent people there according to a transparent selection procedure who will pass relevant, honest and fair integrity tests and will meet all the criteria really objectively. and there is a constant effort by some toxic people, but their own put it in there, but it is very important for the constitutional court because it is a court that judges laws, that is, it is not a c